Archives: Articles

This is the example article

TU Graz conducts research into endangered cultural heritage in the Western Himalayas

Graz University of Technology—In the high-altitude and extremely remote region of Dolpo in north-west Nepal, there are numerous Buddhist temples whose history dates back to the 11th century. The structures are threatened by earthquakes, landslides and planned infrastructure projects such as the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative. There is also a lack of financial resources for long-term maintenance. Researchers from the Institute of Architectural Theory, History of Art and Cultural Studies and the Institute of Engineering Geodesy and Measurement Systems at Graz University of Technology (TU Graz) want to prevent the loss of this cultural heritage, which has hardly been researched up to now. With the support of the Austrian Science Fund FWF, they have documented, analyzed and measured buildings as part of several expeditions and preserved some of the temple complexes as 3D computer models – and could thus also have contributed to the preservation of the real buildings. The results* have now been published in the journal Heritage.

Creating new knowledge

“Written and pictorial sources about the temples in Dolpo are rare, so the buildings themselves usually provide the most reliable information on their history. With our research, we wanted to create new knowledge about the sacred architecture of the region and categorise the existing buildings in their historical and art-historical context,” says Carmen Auer from the Institute of Architectural Theory, History of Art and Cultural Studies. Together with her team, she has been carrying out research on the regions of the western Himalayas since the early 2000s as part of various Austrian Science Fund projects and collaborations. “Our research results are publicly accessible to everyone. They also provide a basis for possible renovations of the temple complexes and raise awareness of the value of this cultural heritage in the region and beyond. This increased attention will hopefully also help to ensure that more funds are made available for the maintenance of the facilities.”

Adapted measurement methods

Due to the remoteness of Dolpo and the high deployment altitudes, intensive preparatory work on suitable surveying methods was necessary. The area is only accessible on foot and with pack animals, so the weight of the instruments had to be kept to a minimum. In addition, there is hardly any electricity or internet in the region, which is why the researchers had to resort to solar panels and batteries and adapt the software used so that it could function without contact to the manufacturer’s server.

Helmut Woschitz and Peter Bauer from the Institute of Engineering Geodesy and Measurement Systems used a 3D surveying technique involving a laser scanner, a surveying total station, a mini-drone and a DSLR camera. Fundamental investigations in the geodetic measurement laboratory at TU Graz contributed significantly to the further development of the instruments and measurement methods. The chosen equipment made it possible to record inscriptions, sculptures and wall and ceiling paintings in addition to the building fabric. Using the data obtained in this way, the research team created 3D models and 2D plans (site plans, floor plans, sections, views) that provide insights into the building structure, for example of the Nesar Temple: https://igms.3dworld.tugraz.at/HomepageBijer.html.

18 Buddhist sites documented so far

During four research visits between 2018 and 2023, the TU Graz research team included a total of 18 Buddhist sites in the documentation, of which 16 assemblies have already been surveyed and analysed. “They are part of a sacred landscape that has developed over centuries. The choice of location, the type of building and the orientation of the buildings are shaped by traditional narratives, geographical conditions and symbolic representations,” explains Carmen Auer. In order to understand these processes, an open dialogue with the local population, comprehensive documentation and interdisciplinary cooperation were necessary.

For the future there are plans to explore the northernmost region of Dolpo around Yangtze Monastery near the border with Tibet, where many buildings have not yet been documented.

_________________________

The Shey Sumdo Monastery was founded in the 17th century and is an important religious centre on Lake Phoksundo in Upper Dolpo. Carmen Auer – TU Graz

_________________________

The Yangtse Monastery, also known as Yang-tsher, is located in the Panzang Valley in Nepal. It covers a total area of 6,600 square metres and consists of three temples and several chortens.  Carmen Auer – TU Graz

_________________________

A model of the Shey ensemble, based on 3D measurements by Graz University of Technology. TU Graz

_________________________

Article Source: Graz University of Technology news release.

Historic Halifax Unearthed: How Metal Roofing Preserves the City’s Oldest Structures

Sujain Thomas is a passionate freelance writer with a deep love for uncovering the past. Fascinated by archaeology, history, and the hidden stories of ancient civilizations, she enjoys bringing timeless knowledge to life through her writing. When she isn’t exploring historical topics, Sujain is often reading, traveling to heritage sites, or researching the cultural roots of modern life. She also contributes to resources like Plomberie 5 Étoiles that highlight expertise in modern plumbing and water systems.

Halifax, one of Canada’s oldest cities, is a living museum of maritime history, colonial architecture, and cultural heritage. Its streets are lined with structures that have weathered centuries—churches, warehouses, homes, and fortifications—each whispering stories of the past. But preserving these treasures requires more than admiration; it demands innovation, craftsmanship, and materials that can endure the test of time and climate.

Enter metal roofing—a modern solution with timeless appeal. Once associated with industrial buildings, metal roofing has now become a preferred choice for protecting and restoring Halifax’s historic architecture. It offers durability, aesthetic compatibility, and environmental benefits that align perfectly with the preservation goals of this storied city.

This article explores how Metal Roofing Halifax contributes to safeguarding the city’s oldest structures, blending historical preservation with contemporary roofing technology.

The Historic Fabric of Halifax

Founded in 1749, Halifax’s roots run deep into the colonial era. Its architectural landscape is a mix of Georgian, Victorian, and Maritime styles—each reflecting different periods of settlement and development. The city’s stone warehouses, wooden churches, and iron-laden facades have survived wars, fires, and the harsh Atlantic weather.

However, time takes a toll. Moisture intrusion, snow accumulation, salt air, and fluctuating temperatures have all challenged the integrity of Halifax’s heritage buildings. Roofs, being the first line of defense, often bear the brunt of this natural wear and tear.

Traditional roofing materials like cedar shingles and slate, while authentic, demand frequent repairs and offer limited resistance to moisture and corrosion. This is where modern metal roofing becomes invaluable—combining durability and historical sensitivity in one solution.

A Meeting Point of Heritage and Modernity

Preserving historical buildings isn’t just about keeping old materials intact—it’s about maintaining the building’s soul while upgrading it to meet modern standards of safety and sustainability. Metal roofing allows exactly that balance.

Architectural preservationists and builders in Halifax have found that metal roofs can replicate the visual appeal of traditional materials while outperforming them functionally. They mimic the texture of shingles or slate but last decades longer and require minimal upkeep.

This harmony between tradition and innovation is what makes metal roofing a game-changer for Halifax’s restoration projects.

The Science of Preservation: Why Metal Roofing Works

Metal roofing’s success in heritage conservation lies in its engineering advantages. Each aspect of its performance contributes directly to the longevity of historic structures.

1. Unparalleled Durability

Unlike asphalt or wood, metal roofs can last 50 years or more. In Halifax’s maritime climate—known for salt-laden air and heavy rain—this resilience is crucial. High-quality coatings and rust-resistant alloys prevent corrosion and ensure that roofs remain intact for decades without losing their appearance.

2. Lightweight Yet Strong

Older structures often have limited load-bearing capacity. Installing heavy materials like concrete tiles can strain their foundations. Metal, on the other hand, is light yet sturdy. It provides excellent protection without adding significant weight to the structure—a critical factor for 18th and 19th-century buildings.

3. Excellent Weather Resistance

Halifax experiences extreme weather patterns—from freezing winters to humid summers. Metal roofing provides superior resistance to wind, snow, and temperature changes. Its interlocking panels prevent leaks and withstand wind gusts of up to 200 km/h, ensuring that heritage buildings stay protected year-round.

4. Fire Resistance and Safety

Many of Halifax’s oldest buildings are made of wood, which poses fire risks. Metal roofs are non-combustible and offer added protection against fire hazards—especially vital for tightly packed heritage districts where one spark could spread quickly.

Architectural Harmony: Metal Roofing and Heritage Design

Preserving a building’s aesthetic integrity is just as important as ensuring its structural stability. One concern among heritage conservators is that modern materials might disrupt the historical look of old neighborhoods. Fortunately, metal roofing offers unmatched versatility in design.

Metal roofs can be crafted to imitate traditional materials such as:

  • Slate roofing – for churches and Victorian homes
  • Wood shingles – for colonial-style residences
  • Copper sheets – for domes, spires, and public buildings

With various finishes, textures, and patinas available, modern metal roofing allows restoration experts to maintain the authentic look of Halifax’s historic architecture—sometimes even improving upon the original design’s performance.

Sustainability: Protecting the Planet While Preserving the Past

Historic preservation and environmental responsibility are now intertwined goals. Halifax’s construction policies increasingly emphasize sustainability, and metal roofing fits perfectly into this vision.

1. Recyclability and Eco-Efficiency

Metal roofs are 100% recyclable, often made from up to 40% recycled material. When they eventually reach the end of their lifespan, they can be repurposed rather than discarded—reducing landfill waste.

2. Energy Efficiency

Metal roofs reflect solar radiation instead of absorbing it, reducing cooling costs in warmer months. When paired with proper insulation, they enhance energy efficiency year-round. For heritage buildings retrofitted with modern HVAC systems, this results in significant energy savings.

3. Reduced Maintenance Impact

Unlike wood or asphalt, metal roofing requires minimal maintenance. This not only reduces costs but also minimizes the environmental impact associated with repeated repairs, replacements, and waste generation.

By adopting metal roofing, Halifax’s restoration projects contribute to a greener, more sustainable future—honoring the past without compromising tomorrow.

Iconic Examples of Heritage Protection in Halifax

Several of Halifax’s most renowned buildings and restoration projects have successfully incorporated metal roofing while maintaining historical fidelity.

  • Citadel Hill’s adjacent structures feature standing seam metal roofs that blend seamlessly with the site’s military aesthetic.
  • Historic homes in Hydrostone and Schmidtville have been restored using metal shingles designed to mirror original cedar patterns.
  • Churches and maritime buildings along the waterfront have embraced copper or zinc roofing for its patina effect—aging beautifully over time while protecting against corrosion.

These examples show how innovation in materials can coexist with cultural reverence, ensuring Halifax’s skyline remains both timeless and resilient.

Archaeology Meets Architecture

Interestingly, metal roofing not only protects the visible portions of Halifax’s heritage buildings but also supports archaeological preservation efforts. Many historic sites in Halifax rest atop ancient foundations, some dating back to early European settlements and Mi’kmaq trade routes.

When a building’s roof fails, water infiltration can erode both the structure and the buried archaeological layers beneath it. By providing superior waterproofing, metal roofing prevents such degradation—essentially preserving history from the top down.

This connection between archaeology and architecture underscores a profound truth: the best preservation practices safeguard not just the visible but also the hidden heritage of Halifax.

Economic and Community Benefits

Preserving Halifax’s architectural legacy also strengthens local identity and economic vitality. Heritage tourism contributes millions to the local economy each year, drawing visitors eager to explore its cobblestone streets and 18th-century buildings.

Metal roofing helps sustain this charm cost-effectively. With fewer repairs, longer lifespans, and greater resilience against harsh weather, building owners save on maintenance while ensuring their properties retain historical authenticity. For homeowners in heritage neighborhoods, this is a practical investment that enhances property value and community pride.

Why Halifax Chooses Metal Roofing

With its proven track record, Metal Roofing Halifax has become synonymous with reliability, craftsmanship, and sustainability. The company’s dedication to preserving the city’s architectural history through innovative roofing solutions has made it a trusted partner in restoration projects across the region.

Whether revitalizing an old church, reinforcing a colonial-era home, or upgrading a civic building, Metal Roofing Halifax ensures that modern performance meets historical precision.

Metal Roofing Halifax continues to play a leading role in protecting the structures that define Halifax’s skyline—ensuring that these treasures stand strong for generations to come.

Looking Toward the Future

As Halifax continues to grow and modernize, preserving its architectural past remains both a challenge and a privilege. With technologies like metal roofing, the city is proving that innovation can coexist with tradition.

Each roof restored with care tells a story of respect—for craftsmanship, history, and sustainability. These metal roofs are more than protective shells; they’re shields for centuries of memories, culture, and heritage.

In the balance between preservation and progress, Halifax has found its stride. Through thoughtful restoration, forward-thinking design, and the enduring strength of metal roofing, the city’s oldest structures continue to inspire awe—standing proudly as timeless testaments to resilience and beauty.

_____________________________

Cover Image, Top Left: Akins’ Cottage 2151 Brunswick Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 2 October 2017. Registered Heritage Property, City of Halifax. Coastal Elite from Halifax, Canada, CC BY-SA 2.0, Wikimedia Commons

New radiocarbon dating of Egyptian artifacts puts Thera (Santorini) volcanic eruption prior to Pharaoh Ahmose

Ben-Gurion University of the Negev—SDE BOKER, Israel, October 22, 2025 – One of the largest volcanic eruptions in the last 10,000 years took place at the Greek island of Thera (Santorini) in the Aegean Sea, but its dating during the late 17th or 16th century BCE remained controversial.  Volcanic ash from the eruption spread over a large area in the eastern Mediterranean region. One of the lingering questions in archaeology was how this huge geological event lined up with royal Egyptian chronologies. Now, a new study* by Ben-Gurion University of the Negev and University of Groningen researchers produced the first radiocarbon dates concerning King Ahmose, the Pharaoh who reunited Upper and Lower Egypt and established the New Kingdom. Their results show that the explosive eruption occurred prior to the New Kingdom during the Second Intermediate Period. The new radiocarbon dates significantly favor a “low” (i.e. younger) chronology for the beginning of the 18th Dynasty, which is of great importance in our understanding of Egyptian relations with neighboring civilizations in the region.

Their findings were published in PLOS One last month.

Prof. Hendrik J. Bruins of the Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research at BGU’s Sylan Adams Sde Boker Campus and Prof. Johannes van der Plicht of the University of Groningen in the Netherlands received rare permission to select samples of Egyptian artifacts at the British Museum and the Petrie Museum in London for radiocarbon dating. Museum staff samples were taken of a mudbrick from the Ahmose Temple at Abydos (British Museum), a linen burial cloth associated with Satdjehuty (British Museum), and six wooden stick shabtis from Thebes (Petrie Museum).

They discovered that, contrary to traditional archaeological understandings, the volcanic eruption did not occur during the Egyptian New Kingdom, but occurred earlier, during the Second Intermediate Period. Radiocarbon dates of the Santorini eruption are significantly older than the first-ever radiocarbon dates concerning Pharaoh Ahmose and the other artifacts investigated of the 17th to early 18th Dynasty.

“Our findings indicate that the Second Intermediate Period lasted considerably longer than traditional assessments, and the New Kingdom started later,” says Prof. Hendrik J. Bruins.

____________________________

The eastern Mediterranean region and Egypt, showing the location of the Thera (Santorini) volcano and other places mentioned in the text. Based on Mapcarta, the open map with CC BY license © OpenStreetMap, Mapbox, and Mapcarta.

____________________________

Mudbrick EA 32689 (British Museum) from the Temple of Ahmose at Abydos, showing the stamped prenomen (throne name) Nebpehtire of Pharaoh Ahmose. Its radiocarbon dates support a low chronology for the beginning of the 18th Dynasty. Photo by H.J. Bruins, 2018 © The Trustees of the British Museum, London. Shared under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

____________________________

Fig 14. Shabti UC 40179 from ancient Thebes, which can be related to the beginning of the 18th Dynasty. Its radiocarbon date supports a low chronology for the reigns of Nebpehtire Ahmose and his son Amenhotep I. Photo by H.J. Bruins (2017), published with permission from the Petrie Museum of Egyptian and Sudanese Archaeology (University College London) under a CC BY license.

____________________________

Article Source: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev news release.

*The Minoan Thera eruption predates Pharaoh Ahmose: Radiocarbon dating of Egyptian 17th to early 18th Dynasty museum objects, PLOS One, 10-Sep-2025, 10.1371/journal.pone.0330702 

Training AI to identify ancient artists

Griffith University—Griffith researchers built and tested a digital archaeology framework to learn more about the ancient humans who created one of the oldest forms of rock art, finger fluting.

Finger flutings are marks drawn by fingers through a soft mineral film called moonmilk on cave walls.

Experiments were conducted – both with adult participants in a tactile setup and using VR headsets in a custom-built program – to explore whether image-recognition methods could learn enough from finger-fluting images made by modern people to identify the sex of the person who created them.

Finger flutings appear in pitch dark caves across Europe and Australia. The oldest known examples in France have been attributed to Neanderthals around 300,000 years ago.

Dr Andrea Jalandoni, a digital archaeologist from the Griffith Centre for Social and Cultural Research, who led the study, said one of the key questions around finger flutings was who made them?

“Whether the marks were made by men or women can have real world implications,” she said.

“This information has been used to decide who can access certain sites for cultural reasons.”

Past attempts to identify who made cave marks often relied on finger measurements and ratios, or hand size measurements.

Those methods turned out to be inconsistent or vulnerable to error; finger pressure varied, surfaces weren’t uniform, pigments distorted outlines, and the same measurements could overlap heavily between males and females.

“The goal of this research was to avoid those assumptions and use digital archaeology instead,” Dr Jalandoni said.

Two controlled experiments with 96 adult participants were conducted with each person creating nine flutings twice: once on a moonmilk clay substitute developed to mimic the look and feel of cave surfaces and once in virtual reality (VR) using Meta Quest 3.

Images were taken of all the flutings, which were then curated and two common image-recognition models were trained on them.

The team evaluated performance using standard metrics and, crucially, looked for signs that models were simply memorizing the training data (overfitting), rather than learning patterns that generalized.

Team member, Dr Gervase Tuxworth from the School of Information and Communication Technology said the results were mixed but revealed some promising insights.

The VR images did not yield reliable sex classification; even when accuracy looked acceptable in places, overall discrimination and balance were weak.

But the tactile images performed much better.

“Under one training condition, models reached about 84 per cent accuracy, and one model achieved a relatively strong discrimination score,” Dr Tuxworth said.

However, the models did learn patterns specific to the dataset; for example, subtle artifacts of the setup, rather than robust features of fluting that would hold elsewhere, which meant there was more work to be done.

The study showed a computational pipeline, from a realistic tactile representation and a VR capture environment to an open machine-learning workflow, could be built, replicated, and improved by others for a more rigorous scientific approach.

“We’ve released the code and materials so others can replicate the experiment, critique it, and scale it,” said Dr Robert Haubt, co-author and Information Scientist from the Australian Research Centre for Human Evolution (ARCHE).

“That’s how a proof of concept becomes a reliable tool.”

The team said this research paved the way for interdisciplinary applications across archaeology, forensics, psychology, and human-computer interaction, while contributing new insights into the cultural and cognitive practices of early humans.

The study ‘Using digital archaeology and machine learning to determine sex in finger flutings’ has been published in Scientific Reports.

___________________________

Dr Andrea Jalandoni studies finger flutings at a cave site in Australia. Dr Andrea Jalandoni

___________________________

Tactile set up with finger flutings. Dr Andrea Jalandoni

___________________________

Article Source: Griffith University news release.

Analysis of 4.4-million-year-old ankle exposes how earliest ancestors moved, evolved

Washington University in St. Louis—For more than a century, scientists have been piecing together the puzzle of human evolution, examining fossil evidence to understand the transition from our earliest ancestors to modern humans.

A new study from Washington University in St. Louis, published October 15 in Communications Biology, presents compelling evidence to support the hypothesis that humans evolved from an African ape-like ancestor. With this discovery, which challenges previous findings, researchers are able to narrow the range of explanations for the origin of human lineage. In doing so, scientists are one step closer to answering one of life’s greatest questions, “where do we come from?”

The research, led by Thomas (Cody) Prang, assistant professor of biological anthropology in Arts & Sciences at WashU, revisits the breakthrough discovery of the 4.4-million-year-old Ardipithecus — nicknamed “Ardi” — which was discovered in 1994.  

Ardi is one of the oldest and most complete skeletons to ever be discovered. Approximately 1 million years older than “Lucy,” another well-known early human ancestor skeleton, Ardi represents an earlier stage of human evolution, according to Prang.

“One of the surprises in this discovery was that Ardi walked upright, yet retained a lot of ape-like characteristics, including a grasping foot,” Prang said.

“Apes, like chimpanzees and gorillas, have a big toe that’s divergent, which allows them to grip tree branches as part of a climbing lifestyle. Yet it also had features that align with our lineage. That makes Ardipithecus a true transitional species.”

Researchers initially proposed that Ardi demonstrated a generalized form of locomotion rather than behavior typical of African apes, leading them to conclude that this very early human ancestor was not similar to apes after all, Prang said. That came as a big surprise to the paleoanthropology community.

“Based on their analysis, they concluded that living African apes — like chimpanzees and gorillas — are like dead ends or cul-de-sacs of evolution, rather than stages of human emergence,” Prang said. “Instead, they thought that Ardi provided evidence for a more generalized ancestor that wasn’t similar to chimps or gorillas.”

Rethinking Ardi

By studying chimpanzees’ and gorillas’ talus — the large bone in the ankle that joins with the tibia of the leg and the calcaneus (heel) of the foot —  researchers can decipher how they move — specifically, how they climb trees vertically. This important bone also offers insight into how early species transitioned to bipedal (two-legged) locomotion.

For this study, Prang and colleagues compared Ardi’s ankle to the ankles of apes, monkeys and early humans. Their analysis showed that Ardi’s ankle is the only one in the primate fossil record that shares similarities with African apes.

According to Prang, these apes are known for their adaptations to vertical climbing and terrestrial plantigrade quadrupedalism — a form of locomotion where an animal moves on four limbs on the ground with the entire soles of its feet, including the heel, touching the surface — hinting that Ardi might have used its feet similarly. In addition to these primitive features, Ardi’s talus also exhibited characteristics suggesting an enhanced push-off mechanism in the foot. This complexity indicates a blend of climbing and walking behaviors in this early hominin species, which is pivotal in understanding the evolution of bipedalism.

“The finding is both controversial and also aligned with what people thought originally,” Prang said.

“Nobody disputes the importance of the discovery (of Ardi), of course, but many people in the field would say the initial interpretation was probably flawed. And so, this paper is a correction of that initial idea that distanced Ardi from chimpanzees and gorillas.”

It’s important to note that this paper does not imply that humans evolved from chimpanzees. However, the research adds more evidence to the hypothesis that the common ancestor humans share with chimpanzees was probably quite similar to the chimpanzees living today, Prang explained.

Contributing to the study are Matthew W. Tocheri at Lakehead University in Thunder Bay, Canada; Biren A. Patel at University of Southern California; Scott A. Williams at New York University; and Caley M. Orr at the University of Colorado Anschutz.

____________________________

Ardipithecus ramidus skull (2016.003.0002), Royal Tyrrell Museum, Drumheller, Alberta, 2025-07-13; cast, age 5 my, collected in Ethiopia. Chris Woodrich, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons

____________________________

Article Source: Washington University in St. Louis news release.

*Ardipithecus ramidus ankle provides evidence for African ape-like vertical climbing in the earliest hominins, Communications Biology, 15-Oct-2025. 10.1038/s42003-025-08711-7 

Ancient lead exposure shaped evolution of human brain

Southern Cross University—A groundbreaking international study* changes the view that exposure to the toxic metal lead is largely a post-industrial phenomenon. The research reveals that our human ancestors were periodically exposed to lead for over two million years, and that the toxic metal may have influenced the evolution of hominid brains, behaviour, and even the development of language.

Moreover, the study – published in Science Advances – adds a piece to the puzzle of how humans outcompeted their cousins, the Neanderthals. Brain organoid models with Neanderthal genetics were more susceptible to the impacts of lead than human brains, suggesting that lead exposure was more harmful to Neanderthals.

Led by researchers from the Geoarchaeology and Archaeometry Research Group (GARG) at Southern Cross University (Australia), the Department of Environmental Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital (New York, USA), and the School of Medicine at the University of California San Diego (UCSD, USA), the research combined novel fossil geochemistry, cutting-edge brain organoid experiments, and pioneer evolutionary genetics to uncover a surprising story about lead’s role in human history.

A toxic thread through human evolution

Until now, scientists believed lead exposure was largely a modern phenomenon, linked to human activities such as mining, smelting, and the use of leaded petrol and paint. By analysing 51 fossil teeth from hominid and great ape species, including Australopithecus africanusParanthropus robustus, early Homo, Neanderthals, and Homo sapiens, the team discovered clear chemical signatures of intermittent lead exposure stretching back almost two million years.

Using high-precision laser-ablation geochemistry at Southern Cross University’s GARG Facility (located in Lismore, NSW) and Mount Sinai’s Exposomics state-of-the-art facilities, the researchers found distinctive ‘lead bands’ in the teeth, formed during childhood as the enamel and dentine grew. These bands reveal repeated episodes of lead uptake from both environmental sources (such as contaminated water, soil, or volcanic activity) and from the body’s own bone stores, released during stress or illness.

“Our data show that lead exposure wasn’t just a product of the Industrial Revolution – it was part of our evolutionary landscape,” said Professor Renaud Joannes-Boyau, Head of the GARG research group at Southern Cross University.

“This means that the brains of our ancestors developed under the influence of a potent toxic metal, which may have shaped their social behaviour and cognitive abilities over millennia.”

From fossils to function: lead and the language gene

The team also turned to the lab to explore how this ancient exposure might have affected brain development. Using human brain organoids, miniature, lab-grown models of the brain, they compared the effects of lead on two versions of a key developmental gene called NOVA1, a gene known to orchestrate gene expression upon lead exposure during neurodevelopment. The modern human version of NOVA1 is different from that found in Neanderthals and other extinct hominids, but until now, scientists did not know why this change evolved.

When organoids carrying the archaic NOVA1 variant were exposed to lead, they showed marked disruptions in the activity of FOXP2 – expressing neurons in the cortex and thalamus – brain regions that are critical for the development of speech and language. This effect was far less pronounced in organoids with the modern NOVA1 variant.

“These results suggest that our NOVA1 variant may have offered protection against the harmful neurological effects of lead,” said Professor Alysson Muotri, Professor of Pediatrics/Cellular & Molecular Medicine and Director of the UC San Diego Sanford Stem Cell Institute Integrated Space Stem Cell Orbital Research Center.

“It’s an extraordinary example of how an environmental pressure, in this case, lead toxicity, could have driven genetic changes that improved survival and our ability to communicate using language, but which now also influence our vulnerability to modern lead exposure.”

Genetics, neurotoxins, and the making of modern humans

Genetic and proteomic analyses in this study revealed that lead exposure in archaic-variant organoids disrupted pathways involved in neurodevelopment, social behaviour, and communication. The altered FOXP2 activity in particular points to a possible link between ancient lead exposure and the evolutionary refinement of language abilities in modern humans.

“This study shows how our environmental exposures shaped our evolution,” said Professor Manish Arora, Professor and Vice Chairman of Environmental Medicine.

“From the perspective of inter-species competition, the observation that toxic exposures can offer an overall survival advantage offers a fresh paradigm for environmental medicine to examine the evolutionary roots of disorders linked to environmental exposures.”

Modern lessons from an ancient problem

While lead exposure today is mostly due to human industry, it remains a serious global health issue, particularly for children. The findings underscore how deeply intertwined environmental toxins and human biology have been and warn that our vulnerability to lead may be an inherited legacy of our past.

“Our work not only rewrites the history of lead exposure,” added Professor Joannes-Boyau, “it also reminds us that the interaction between our genes and the environment has been shaping our species for millions of years, and continues to do so.”

_______________________________

Using human brain organoids (miniature, lab-grown models of the brain), the team compared the effects of lead on two versions of a key developmental gene called NOVA1, a gene known to orchestrate gene expression upon lead exposure during neurodevelopment. The modern human version of NOVA1 is different from that found in Neanderthals and other extinct hominids. University of California San Diego

_______________________________

Laboratory experiments with brain organoids carrying either modern or archaic NOVA1 genes examined the effects of lead on brain development, with a focus on FOXP2, a gene central to speech and language. University of California San Diego

_______________________________

About the research

The study analysed fossil teeth from Africa, Asia, Europe, and Oceania, using advanced geochemical mapping to identify patterns of childhood lead exposure. Laboratory experiments with brain organoids carrying either modern or archaic NOVA1 genes examined the effects of lead on brain development, with a focus on FOXP2, a gene central to speech and language. Genetic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data were integrated to build a comprehensive picture of how lead may have influenced the evolution of hominid social behaviour and cognition.

_______________________________

Article Source: Southern Cross University news release.

*Impact of intermittent lead exposure on hominid brain evolution, 15-Oct-2025,10.1126/sciadv.adr1524 15-Oct-2025

From Ancient Artifacts to Modern Accidents: How Regional Discoveries in New York Reflect Legal Lessons in Preservation and Responsibility

Sujain Thomas is a passionate freelance writer with a deep love for uncovering the past. Fascinated by archaeology, history, and the hidden stories of ancient civilizations, she enjoys bringing timeless knowledge to life through her writing. When she isn’t exploring historical topics, Sujain is often reading, traveling to heritage sites, or researching the cultural roots of modern life. She also contributes to resources like Plomberie 5 Étoiles that highlight expertise in modern plumbing and water systems.

New York State is layered with history: from millennia-old Indigenous sites, colonial-era relics, and buried settlements, to modern urban infrastructure and occasional catastrophes of collapse, contamination or construction accidents. In each case, discoveries—whether intentional archaeological digs or unexpected unearthings through development or accident—raise important legal questions about preservation, liability, property rights, and public safety.

This article examines key regional discoveries across New York and uses them as illustrations of how law grapples with the tension between uncovering the past and addressing immediate responsibilities in the present. Along the way, we draw lessons for developers, municipalities, landowners, legal practitioners, and preservationists on how to manage the duties connected to both ancient artifacts and modern accidents. For additional regional news coverage, see regional news coverage

1. A Glimpse of the Past: Archaeological Discoveries in New York

1.1 The Lamoka Site — A Window into Archaic Life

One of New York’s most celebrated archaeological sites is the Lamoka Lake site (near Tyrone in Schuyler County). Occupied around 4,500 years ago, the site has yielded projectile points (so-called “Lamoka points”), bone tools, hearths, and other material reflecting a Late Archaic hunter-gatherer culture

Because of its importance, part of the site is under preservation, and archaeological work there has spanned multiple institutions over decades. This site highlights how long-term archaeological stewardship operates in New York — how artifacts are recovered, curated, interpreted, and protected for posterity.

1.2 Seneca Village Beneath Central Park

Archaeological work in New York City has also yielded potent reminders of hidden histories. Seneca Village, a predominantly African American community displaced in the 1850s to make way for Central Park, was largely erased from the physical fabric of the city. In the early 2000s, researchers using remote sensing, soil borings, ground-penetrating radar, and test excavations successfully identified traces of cellars, foundations, backyard deposits, and artifacts (including personal items like a child’s shoe sole) beneath the park. 

The Seneca Village excavations have become emblematic of how archaeology in an urban setting uncovers suppressed or marginalized histories—and how such work must be carefully balanced with modern use of land and amenities (e.g., public parks). 

1.3 The Forestville Commonwealth Utopian Community

Another example is the Forestville Commonwealth archaeological district in Greene County, built in 1826–27 as one of several utopian social experiments in New York. Today this site is recognized on the National Register of Historic Places.

Though smaller in scale, the Forestville site demonstrates how even short-lived communities leave material traces and how those traces must be managed under historic preservation frameworks.

2. Legal Frameworks for Preservation in New York

The discoveries above exist inside a broader legal tapestry of federal, state, and local law regulating archaeological resources, historic sites, and the responsibilities of development. Understanding that context is crucial to interpreting how modern accidents or unplanned finds should be handled.

2.1 Federal Protections: ARPA and the National Historic Preservation Act

At the federal level, the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) of 1979 prohibits unauthorized excavation, removal, or damage to archaeological resources on federal lands or Native American lands without permit. Wikipedia ARPA also regulates transport, exchange, or sale of archaeological specimens taken from protected lands.

Likewise, the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966 created the framework for Section 106 review, which requires federal agencies to consider impacts on historic properties in any undertaking that involves federal funds, permits, or licensing. 

These laws set a baseline: significant discoveries made during federally funded projects must be accounted for, and mitigation or preservation plans may be required.

2.2 New York State’s Preservation Laws

New York has its own complementary laws.

  • The New York State Historic Preservation Act (1980), Section 14.09, designates historic preservation as a state policy and requires consultation with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) whenever state agencies plan actions affecting historic or archaeological properties. 
  • The State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) mandates that state, county, and local agencies include historic and archaeological impacts in environmental review.
  • In regulatory detail, 9 NYCRR § 442.2 requires that identification, evaluation, curation, interpretation, and protection activities in archaeological projects be conducted under supervision of a qualified professional archaeologist; site disturbance must be minimized, and mitigation or data recovery only allowed under certain criteria (e.g. unavoidable disturbance). 
  • On state-owned lands, New York Education Law prohibits appropriation, excavation, injury, or destruction of archaeological objects without written permission of the Commissioner of Education. Violations constitute misdemeanors. 
  • Also, New York law allows withholding of information on site locations from the public in order to protect them. 

These overlapping rules give both tools and constraints. Agencies, developers, landowners, and archaeologists must coordinate under this framework to pursue preservation while accommodating lawful development.

2.3 Professional Standards & Archaeological Best Practices

Technical guidelines also matter. The New York Archaeological Council (NYAC) publishes a Standards Handbook outlining accepted methodologies for reconnaissance surveys, site evaluation, mitigation excavations, and curation of collections. 

These professional protocols help ensure that even when disturbance is allowed, investigations are systematic, documented, and scientifically rigorous.

3. When Discovery Meets Development: Legal Tensions and Harmonies

The moment when a construction crew unearths an artifact or sensitive site is a crucible for law in practice. Such “inadvertent discoveries” test the boundaries between preservationist ideals, property rights, and public safety/obligation.

3.1 Duty to Report and Suspend Work

Many statutes, regulations, or permit conditions require that upon discovery of archaeological remains or human remains, work must pause, responsible authorities be notified, and further investigation or mitigation must follow. Indeed, under New York rules, plans for infrastructure development often include a “work stoppage clause” triggered by discovery of possible archaeological remains.   

Failure to do so can expose developers to legal liability, permit revocation, fines, or criminal penalties for unlawful disturbance.

3.2 Mitigation vs Avoidance

When a project encounters a sensitive archaeological site, there are generally two paths: avoidance (rerouting work to leave the site undisturbed) or mitigation/data recovery (carefully excavating and recording before construction proceeds). The law tends to prefer avoidance where feasible. But when disturbance is unavoidable—and justified under the federal or state scheme—mitigation steps are required. 9 NYCRR § 442.2 explicitly contemplates data recovery or mitigation for unavoidable disturbance. 

The balance is delicate. Mitigation may preserve scientific information, but it still destroys site integrity. The legal and regulatory regime must evaluate whether the benefits of disturbance (infrastructure, development) outweigh the heritage loss.

3.3 Liability & Insurance Concerns

From a developer’s perspective, legal risk emerges if improper handling leads to lawsuit (e.g. from concerned descendants, tribes, historical societies), regulatory enforcement actions, or reputational harm. Insurance policies may or may not cover such archaeological liabilities. Some jurisdictions require developers to secure a bond or escrow to account for unforeseen delays or heritage mitigation costs.

3.4 Conflicts with Private Property Rights

Another tension lies between private property rights and public interest in preservation. Landowners may not wish to impede construction, but almost all archaeological and heritage protections override unfettered capability to disturb land when historical resources are implicated. Regulatory frameworks—like SEQRA at the local level—require that land-use decisions weigh archaeological impacts, even on private property, especially when government permits are involved.

4. From Artifacts to Accidents: Parallels in Modern Liability

While much of the legal framing above is about premeditated or semi-planned archaeological work, similar legal dynamics emerge when modern accidents unearth hazards — think sinkholes, collapse of buried infrastructure, contamination, or inadvertent exposure of archaeological remains during unexpected ground failure.

4.1 Accidents Involving Buried Infrastructure

When a utility trench collapse exposes previously unknown wiring, pipelines, or buried tanks, immediate responsibilities kick in: ensuring public safety, containment, investigation, remediation, and dealing with liability to injured parties, property owners, and third parties.

Though not heritage-focused, these same core legal questions emerge:

  • Who bears the duty of care? (Contractor, utility company, local government)
  • Was there negligence in planning, mapping, or safe excavation?
  • Must operations stop pending investigation?
  • What insurance coverage or indemnification applies?

These liability lines mirror the archeological work stoppage duties, but operate in the realm of tort, occupational safety law, and public works regulation.

4.2 Uncovering Human Remains in a Construction Accident

Sometimes a construction accident or collapse may unexpectedly reveal human remains—potentially ancient. In such cases, legal frameworks for artifact preservation, human remains protections, and accident investigations overlap.

Under New York’s Unmarked Burial Site Protection Act (2024), newly enacted in the state, requirements now mandate immediate reporting of burial sites, cessation of disturbance, consultation with descendants or culturally affiliated groups, and sensitive disposition of remains if older than 50 years.

Thus, a modern accident can transition from routine liability to a complex cultural heritage issue—requiring coordination with archaeologists, the state, and sometimes tribes or community groups.

4.3 Environmental Contamination & Hidden Hazards

Imagine a case where development disturbs a historic dump, revealing buried toxins, decaying containers, or lead pipes. Legal responsibility may pull in environmental statutes (e.g. hazardous waste laws), tort liability, public nuisance doctrines, and historic preservation mandates.

Of particular importance: timely notice, containment, remediation measures, and potential obligations to fund archaeological or heritage investigations if historically relevant material is intermingled. The overlapping responsibilities can lead to complicated allocation of risk among developers, environmental consultants, local governments, and contractors.

5. Regional Case Studies & Lessons

To ground the theory, let us consider a few examples (actual or stylized) where regional discoveries or accidents in New York reveal how legal responsibilities play out.

5.1 Case Study: Suburban Road Widening & Indigenous Site Discovery

Suppose a county plans to widen a road in western New York. During grading, contractors uncover lithic flakes and possible post-mold stains indicative of precontact Indigenous habitation. Work stops, the SHPO is notified, and an archaeologist is engaged under a standardized Phase I and possibly Phase II work program. The route is realigned to avoid the most sensitive portion; where unavoidable, mitigation excavation is authorized under permit conditions. The county and contractors assume the cost of the archaeological work and its delays, but the project proceeds in step with legal procedures.

This scenario mirrors many actual instances where roadway projects triggered Section 106 or SEQRA review and cultural resources discovery. The key lesson: incorporate archaeological sensitivity assessments early, budget contingencies, and embed contractual provisions for discovery response.

5.2 Case Study: Urban Redevelopment & Seneca Village

In New York City, urban redevelopment is constant. The Seneca Village excavation under Central Park shows how even in high-stakes urban settings, archaeological discovery must negotiate existing land use (public parks, pedestrian traffic), stakeholder interests (descendant communities, city agencies), and public programming (e.g. museums, exhibits). 

So far, artifacts have been documented and exhibited, and the site has been integrated into interpretive initiatives, but the primary function of the land (i.e. park) continues. This is a classic example of balancing preservation and modern function—requiring legal agreements, public engagement, and institutional partnerships.

5.3 Hypothetical: Sinkhole Reveals 19th-Century Cemetery at Suburban Site

Imagine a development in upstate New York where a sinkhole opens, exposing tombstones and human remains linked to a 19th-century cemetery. The developer is obligated under the emergency response regime to cordon off the site, notify authorities, halt work, and engage forensic archaeologists and legal counsel. Under the new Unmarked Burial Site Protection Act, the discovery must be treated as a culturally significant burial site; remains over 50 years old require involvement of the state archaeologist and descendant notification. Meanwhile, the developer may face tort claims from neighbors or public safety regulators, and permit compliance issues must be sorted out before construction resumes.

This hypothetical encapsulates how a modern accident can suddenly entangle preservation law, human remains law, safety duty, and delay/dispute risk.

6. Comparative Legal Lessons & Best Practices

From the examples and regulatory framework, several broad lessons emerge:

6.1 Advance Planning & Sensitivity Assessment

One of the most effective risk controls is early archaeological sensitivity studies (Phase I) before heavy ground-disturbing activity. These assessments can identify zones of high risk, allowing avoidance or design modifications before work begins. The NYAC standards and New York law strongly endorse such procedures. 

By doing this upfront, developers and agencies reduce surprises, delays, and litigation risk.

6.2 Embed Discovery Clauses & Contingency Budgets in Contracts

Contracts for construction, engineering, or site work should include clauses specifying that if archaeological remains or human remains are discovered, work must stop, appropriate notification must occur, and a defined process (with timelines, responsible parties, and cost-sharing) is triggered. Likewise, budgeting a contingency for unforeseen archaeological or safety responses is wise.

6.3 Engage Qualified Professionals & Follow Standards

When discovery occurs, compliance with professional standards (such as those published by NYAC) and supervision by qualified archaeologists is legally required (e.g. under 9 NYCRR § 442.2). 

Cutting corners may invite regulatory penalties or undermine the scientific integrity of the work.

6.4 Prioritize Avoidance & Minimization Where Feasible

Preservation law generally disfavors wholesale site destruction. Where possible, re-routing, design alteration, or other structural solutions should be used to reduce impact on historically sensitive areas.

6.5 Transparent Stakeholder Engagement & Public Communication

Especially for sites of cultural or community importance (e.g. Indigenous heritage, burial grounds, minority communities), proactive consultation with descendant groups, public communication, and interpretive planning help reduce opposition and build legitimacy.

6.6 Insurance, Indemnities & Liability Allocation

Parties should negotiate insurance coverage, indemnification, and risk-sharing clauses up front, especially in contracts involving subsurface work. Insurers should understand archaeological exposures, and parties should allocate liability for delays or remedial work.

6.7 Emergency Response & Safety Protocols

In accidents (sinkholes, collapse, contamination), safety takes precedence. But prompt coordination with preservation authorities must follow. Where human remains or artifacts emerge, procedural safeguards (work stoppage, notification, forensic or archaeological assessment) should guide the response. The newer Unmarked Burial Site Protection Act in New York underscores this convergence. 

6.8 Judicial & Administrative Precedent Awareness

Lawyers and practitioners must stay attuned to case law or administrative decisions around heritage disputes, tort claims tied to archaeological damage, and permit enforcement actions. While not as high profile as other domains, precedent can shape the risk environment.

7. Toward a Holistic Framework: Integrating Ancient and Modern Risks

The journey from ancient artifacts to modern accidents may seem like two separate worlds, but they converge in the legal domain. When we unearth the past, we must do so responsibly and lawfully; when the present inadvertently reveals hidden risks, we must respond ethically, safely, and within regulatory boundaries.

A holistic framework for managing both kinds of discovery could feature:

  1. Pre-construction planning — archaeological sensitivity studies, risk mapping, stakeholder consultation
  2. Contract architecture — robust discovery clauses, contingency funds, indemnities, insurance
  3. Response protocol — immediate work stoppage, notification to authorities (SHPO, state archaeologist, coroner, descendant groups), engagement of qualified professionals
  4. Mitigation or avoidance decision-making — preference for non-disturbance where possible; when disturbance is needed, scientifically sound data recovery in compliance with law
  5. Oversight and documentation — rigorous record-keeping, reporting to preservation offices, curation of recovered materials
  6. Public transparency and interpretation — sharing findings with communities, museums, or local institutions to build cultural capital
  7. Post-incident liability and remediation — addressing tort claims, regulatory penalties, or cleanup obligations in modern accident contexts

In all phases, the legal obligations and risk exposures are intertwined: failures in archaeological compliance may affect permit standing; accidents revealing heritage may trigger new liability; and safety failures may aggravate regulatory outcomes in heritage contexts.

_______________________________

The historical depths of New York State—its Indigenous heritage, colonial legacies, forgotten settlements, and buried artifacts—are not just academic curiosities. They carry concrete legal weight. At the same time, modern accidents—sinkholes, infrastructure collapse, land subsidence, surprise unearthing of human remains or toxic materials—remind us that the ground is a dynamic interface of past and present.

Regional discoveries across New York, from the Lamoka site to Seneca Village and numerous smaller finds, illustrate how legal regimes structure responsibility: prescribing when and how archaeological work proceeds, how human remains must be handled, how developers and public agencies must budget for surprises, and how safety and liability demands intersect with preservation duties.

The lessons are clear: anticipatory planning, professional standards, smart contracts, stakeholder communication, and responsive protocols are essential. Whether one is building a road or probing historic soil, the same legal currents run beneath.

If you’re facing a situation on the ground in New York—perhaps a development with an unexpected discovery or an accident revealing buried hazards—legal counsel steeped in both property, tort, and preservation law is crucial. For specialized assistance in central New York, particularly around Auburn, you may consult an expert such as an Auburn, NY personal injury attorney

Large-scale prehistoric hunting structures in Europe

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences—Researchers report evidence of large-scale prehistoric hunting structures, likely built before the Bronze Age, in the Adriatic hinterland. Dimitrij Mlekuž Vrhovnik and Tomaž Fabec used airborne laser scanning to identify four prehistoric hunting structures on Europe’s Karst Plateau. The structures—comparable to the “desert kites” of arid Southwest Asia and North Africa—consisted of massive, dry-stone walls designed to guide and corral animal prey. The largest structure extended several kilometers, with converging walls that funneled into a natural cliff edge roughly 10 meters across, where a stone-built enclosure created a square pit that functioned as the final trap. Excavations at the walls recovered charcoal fragments, a flint bladelet, and burnt clay, with radiocarbon dates ranging from the Late Bronze Age to the Roman Period—materials deposited long after the structures had gone out of use. The authors suggest that the traps themselves were constructed previously, in the Neolithic or Mesolithic Period, and that the largest trap would have required more than 5,000 person-hours of coordinated labor. According to the authors, the monumental structures reveal that large-scale communal hunting strategies were present in prehistoric Europe.

_____________________________

LiDAR image of a prehistoric hunting trap on the Karst Plateau, highlighting the structure’s scale and integration into the landscape. Image credit: Dimitrij Mlekuž Vrhovnik.

_____________________________

Article Source: PNAS news release

*Prehistoric hunting megastructures in the Adriatic hinterland, 10/14,2025, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.251190812

Paranthropus and the Greatest Whodunit of All Time

Deborah Barsky is a writing fellow for the Human Bridges, a researcher at the Catalan Institute of Human Paleoecology and Social Evolution, and an associate professor at the Rovira i Virgili University in Tarragona, Spain, with the Open University of Catalonia (UOC). She is the author of Human Prehistory: Exploring the Past to Understand the Future (Cambridge University Press, 2022).

The first fossil hominins were discovered at the beginning of the 20th century in South Africa, just over half a century after the publication of Darwin’s milestone work The Origin of Species (published in 1859) set the foundation for evolutionary theory based on natural selection. Since that time, the human ancestral lineage has constantly been broadened by new fossil discoveries that are progressively adding to the (still very fragmentary) picture of the long and complex family tree from which we have emerged to become the last remaining representative of the hominin line on the planet.

Among this ever-widening range of primate ancestors, the Paranthropus genus is of particular interest. Presently documented from the African continent, at least three distinct species of Paranthropus are known to have existed for a combined period of some 1.5 million years. To put this into perspective, consider that our own genus (Homo) emerged—also in Africa—only some 300,000 years ago.

The Paranthropus were robust bipedal hominins with distinct cranial features that are believed to have supported a vegetarian diet. Their wide and flat skulls display pronounced crests and arches to buttress the heavy facial musculature required for chewing abrasive foods like plants, hard nuts, tubers, and seeds, which likely formed an important part of their dietary staple. Their powerful and protruding jaws were equipped with massive teeth in thick enamel that would have been effective for masticating fibrous plant matter and tubers. A distinctive salient sagittal crest traversing the midline area along the top of the skull maintained the heavy musculature attached to flaring cheekbones.

While the three best-known species of Paranthropus share these cranial features, studies of dental microwear patterns observed on their teeth suggest that there may have been interspecific dietary differences and that their diet may have been more diverse and eco-dependent than previously thought.

The first South African Paranthropus specimen was identified in 1938 by Robert Broom, who provided the genus designation “Paranthropus” to signify “beside Man” and the species’ name “robustus,” in reference to their outstandingly robust features. This species is documented in South African sites from around 1.8 to 1.2 million years ago.

The second species is the East African Paranthropus called P. boisei, which is known from sites in Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, and Malawi, dating between 2.3 and 1.2 million years ago. The holotype specimen is a skull unearthed by Mary Leakey at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, in 1959. It was initially named Zinjanthropus boisei, with the genus name meaning “East African Human,” and the species’ name was coined in honor of Charles Boise, who funded the Leakey family’s excavations. This discovery was, at the time, the most primitive hominin ancestor ever to be discovered in East Africa.

Then there is “The Black Skull,” a magnificent specimen some 2.5 million years old, found by Alan Walker and Richard Leakey in 1985 at West Turkana in Kenya, near the border with Ethiopia. As a student just starting out in archeology, I remember being completely mesmerized by this well-preserved specimen, whose striking dark color was the result of the magnesium absorbed from the soil it was buried in during the fossilization process.

This skull is attributed to the third Paranthropus species, called P. aethiopicus, first described in the late 1960s by French paleoanthropologists (Camille Arambourg and Yves Coppens) after they observed fragmentary remains they found in the Lake Turkana-Omo River region. While the phylogenetic relationship between these three species remains to be clearly elucidated, some believe that this species might have been ancestral to the South and East African Paranthropus.

Female Paranthropus were smaller than males (sexual dimorphism), weighing in at around 35 and 50 kilograms, respectively, for a height of less than a meter and a half. Despite their voluminous skulls, the Paranthropus had relatively small brains, close to the size of a chimpanzee’s and less than a third of the size of that of a modern human’s.

The great longevity of the Paranthropus group not only means that they were a successful genus but that they also coexisted with various other hominin forms that were thriving in South Africa and East Africa between 2.7 and 1.2 million years ago. In fact, they might have rubbed shoulders with at least two species of gracile Australopithecines and, even more surprisingly, multiple representatives of our own genus, including H. erectusH. ergaster, H. rudolfensis, and H. habilis. Their prolonged existence means that they even coincided with the first “out of Africa” hominins, known presently as H. georgicus and perhaps a second, yet unnamed species.

Not only that, these small-brained robust Paranthropus likely made stone tools: a practice that has long been considered the defining attribute of our own genus. This somewhat arrogant bias is underscored by the naming of the first member of the genus HomoH. habilis, meaning “handyman.” While the possibility that Paranthropuses were toolmakers was raised as early as the 1970s, after specimens were found in proximity to primitive stone tools at Olduvai Gorge, and was also advanced by scientists working in South Africa, the prospect has not gained popularity, nor has it been widely disseminated in scholarly venues.

However, combined with the fact that succeeding discoveries now demonstrate that Oldowan technologies actually predate the emergence of Homomore and more evidence of Paranthropus fossils in probable—or indisputable—geostratigraphic relationship with stone and even bone tools is now apparent.

As new technologies transforming archeology continue to accelerate discoveries in the field of human evolution, it is becoming clear that humanity’s course through time has been one of complex interrelated species with varying degrees of competence in inventing technological solutions to address survival-related challenges. Over time, this uniquely human adaptive strategy would revolutionize the hominization process and change the face of the planet.

_______________________________

This article was produced by Human Bridges.

_______________________________

Cover Image, Top Left: The original complete skull (without mandible) of a 1,8 million years old Paranthropus robustus (SK-48 Swartkrans (26°00’S 27°45’E), Gauteng,), discovered in South Africa . Collection of the Transvaal Museum, Northern Flagship Institute, Pretoria South Africa. osé Braga;Didier Descouens, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons

Tracing Faith Through Time: Catholic Pilgrimages and Archaeological Treasures of Poland

Sujain Thomas is a passionate freelance writer with a deep love for uncovering the past. Fascinated by archaeology, history, and the hidden stories of ancient civilizations, she enjoys bringing timeless knowledge to life through her writing. When she isn’t exploring historical topics, Sujain is often reading, traveling to heritage sites, or researching the cultural roots of modern life. She also contributes to resources like Plomberie 5 Étoiles that highlight expertise in modern plumbing and water systems.

Poland stands as one of Europe’s most spiritually rich destinations, where faith and history intertwine seamlessly. Its Catholic heritage runs deep, and its landscapes are dotted with sacred shrines, ancient monasteries, and archaeological treasures that reveal the country’s long relationship with Christianity. From relics buried beneath medieval cathedrals to pilgrimage routes still alive with devotion, Poland offers an experience that’s both sacred and historical.

The Dawn of Christianity in Poland

The roots of Catholicism in Poland trace back to the year 966, when Duke Mieszko I accepted baptism, marking the official Christianization of the Polish state. This event was not just a political move but a cultural transformation that shaped Poland’s identity for centuries to come.

Archaeological discoveries at early Christian sites, such as those from the Piast dynasty period, reveal how Christianity spread across the Polish lands. Excavations have unearthed remnants of wooden churches, stone chapels, and small religious artifacts like crosses, medallions, and reliquaries. These findings illustrate how faith took root at both royal courts and within ordinary communities.

Archaeologists have even uncovered early Christian burials, showing how pagan customs gradually merged with new Christian rituals. Through these excavations, the tangible remnants of early faith emerge — a direct link to the people who first embraced Christianity in this part of Europe.

Poland’s Living Pilgrimage Tradition

Today, Poland remains a beacon for pilgrims from around the world. Each year, hundreds of thousands journey to holy sites, following routes that have been walked for centuries. The country’s pilgrimage culture is not confined to the past — it is a living, breathing part of Polish life.

One of the most renowned pilgrimage destinations is Jasna Góra in Częstochowa, home to the miraculous icon of the Black Madonna. Pilgrims travel on foot for days to reach this sacred sanctuary, praying and singing as they approach the monastery. The experience connects the modern pilgrim to generations before, who walked the same roads seeking hope, forgiveness, and renewal.

Another significant site is Kalwaria Zebrzydowska, a Baroque pilgrimage complex built in the 17th century. With its chapels and winding devotional paths, it mirrors the landscape of Jerusalem and serves as a spiritual retreat for thousands every year. Similarly, Góra Świętej Anny (St. Anne’s Mountain) in Upper Silesia remains an enduring center of faith, where processions, festivals, and devotions have continued since medieval times.

Where Archaeology Meets Pilgrimage

What makes Poland exceptional is the way archaeology and faith coexist. Beneath the cobblestones of monasteries and under cathedral floors lie traces of the earliest Christian structures. Archaeological studies of these sites not only preserve historical heritage but also deepen understanding of religious traditions.

  1. Relics and Religious Artifacts
    Excavations have revealed reliquaries, thuribles, and cross pendants — sacred objects once used in worship. These finds provide insight into how Catholicism was practiced in medieval Poland and how local craftsmanship merged with imported Christian symbols.
  2. Burial Practices and Cultural Transition
    Early Christian cemeteries show the gradual shift from pagan burial customs to distinctly Christian rituals. Grave goods became simpler, with more emphasis on faith symbols such as crosses and rosaries. Archaeologists interpret this transition as evidence of the deepening Christian influence on daily life.
  3. Pilgrim Tokens and Badges
    Pilgrimage-related artifacts like metal badges, medallions, and carved crosses have been unearthed across Poland. These were once carried by medieval pilgrims as tokens of faith and proof of their journeys to holy sites. Each artifact tells a personal story of devotion and endurance.

Key Pilgrimage Sites with Archaeological Significance

  • Ostrów Lednicki – Often referred to as the cradle of Polish Christianity, this island holds ruins of an early royal palace and chapel believed to have witnessed the baptism of Mieszko I. Archaeological finds here — from baptismal basins to fragments of liturgical tools — make it one of the most important religious heritage sites in the country.
  • Jasna Góra, Częstochowa – The spiritual heart of Poland and home of the Black Madonna. Archaeological work around the monastery has uncovered centuries-old foundations, revealing how the sanctuary evolved through wars and rebuilding efforts.
  • Kalwaria Zebrzydowska – A UNESCO-listed pilgrimage park where archaeology meets architecture. The chapels, hill paths, and preserved artifacts from the 17th century help scholars understand the artistic and devotional trends of Baroque Poland.
  • Góra Świętej Anny – A place where faith, history, and geology meet. Archaeological remains from earlier shrines and hermit dwellings surround the active pilgrimage center, connecting the sacred past with the present-day worship experience.

Spiritual Experience and Cultural Identity

Pilgrimage in Poland is more than religious travel — it’s an exploration of identity. The relics, ruins, and sacred artifacts serve as tangible symbols of a faith that has endured through centuries of upheaval. Each site carries stories of resilience — from invasions and partitions to wars and political transformations — yet the devotion remains constant.

For many visitors, walking in the footsteps of ancient pilgrims or standing before relics discovered by archaeologists brings a sense of timeless connection. The spiritual experience becomes richer when one realizes that beneath every chapel floor or monastery wall, layers of history lie quietly preserved.

Faith, History, and Heritage Tourism

Beyond spiritual value, these pilgrimage-archaeology destinations contribute to cultural preservation and tourism. Museums and heritage centers across Poland display excavated artifacts, offering educational insights into the country’s religious evolution. Tourists and scholars alike are drawn to the harmony between sacred devotion and historical discovery.

Local communities benefit too, as heritage tourism promotes preservation, sustains small businesses, and strengthens cultural pride. For those who seek both faith and learning, Poland’s blend of archaeology and pilgrimage offers a profound journey through time.

Planning Your Journey

Travelers can easily blend spiritual exploration with historical curiosity. Begin your route in central or southern Poland, where most major pilgrimage sites are located. Many tours combine walking pilgrimages with guided visits to archaeological museums and monasteries.

For an organized and spiritually fulfilling route that connects Poland’s most revered Catholic destinations, visit Catholic pilgrimage of Poland. It’s an excellent way to experience both the sacred and the historical dimensions of this remarkable country.

________________________________

Poland’s sacred landscape tells a story that transcends time — one of faith, endurance, and discovery. Through its cathedrals, shrines, and archaeological sites, we glimpse not only the devotion of generations past but also the living heart of a nation built upon faith.

For the pilgrim, it is a journey of the soul. For the historian, it is a journey through centuries. And for those who walk between both worlds, Poland’s sacred paths and ancient ruins offer a profound reminder: faith leaves traces, both in hearts and in the earth itself.

From Stone Age to Steel Age: Tracing the Archaeology of Human Innovation

Sujain Thomas is a passionate freelance writer with a deep love for uncovering the past. Fascinated by archaeology, history, and the hidden stories of ancient civilizations, she enjoys bringing timeless knowledge to life through her writing. When she isn’t exploring historical topics, Sujain is often reading, traveling to heritage sites, or researching the cultural roots of modern life. She also contributes to resources like Plomberie 5 Étoiles that highlight expertise in modern plumbing and water systems.

Human history is built on innovation. Long before writing, politics, or empires, our species evolved by making and using tools: first from stone, then from metals, and finally steel. Each stage required new skills, changed societies, and influenced what was possible in architecture, warfare, economy, and culture. In this article, we trace that evolution from the Stone Age through the Bronze and Iron Ages to the Age of Steel, exploring archaeological evidence, technological breakthroughs, and their implications.

1. The Stone Age: Foundations of Human Tool Use

1.1 Lower Paleolithic (~3.3 to ~300,000 years ago)

The earliest known stone tools date back to around 3.3 million years ago in Kenya — long before modern humans existed. These simple tools, known as Oldowan tools, were stones struck to produce sharp edges for cutting and scraping meat or processing vegetation. These early innovations reflected cognitive abilities such as planning, selecting materials, and understanding cause and effect.

1.2 Middle and Upper Paleolithic (~300,000 to ~10,000 years ago)

Around 1.7 million years ago, early humans developed Acheulean hand-axes — symmetrical, bifacial tools that were far more refined and efficient than their predecessors. As time progressed, humans began using bone, antler, and wood, creating complex composite tools. The introduction of hafting (attaching stone blades to wooden handles) marked a leap in efficiency and functionality. During this period, humans also mastered the controlled use of fire, which allowed cooking, warmth, and later, metal smelting.

1.3 Neolithic (New Stone Age, ~10,000 to ~4,500 BCE)

The Neolithic period transformed human life. People shifted from nomadic hunting to settled agriculture, giving rise to permanent villages and early civilizations. Farming required polished stone tools such as axes and sickles, and pottery became essential for storage. This age also saw social specialization — artisans, farmers, and traders emerged, setting the foundation for economic systems. The advances in agriculture and settlement paved the way for the discovery and use of metals.

2. Transition from Stone to Metal: The Metallurgical Turning Point

Stone tools served humanity for millions of years, but the discovery of metal changed everything. Metals introduced strength, flexibility, and durability — qualities stone could never offer. The journey from stone to metal was gradual, involving discovery, experimentation, and innovation.

2.1 The Chalcolithic or Copper-Stone Age

During the Chalcolithic period, humans discovered that copper could be melted and shaped into tools, ornaments, and weapons. Although softer than later metals, copper was easier to mold and recycle. This era represents a bridge between the Stone Age and the true Metal Age. People learned to extract metal from ores using heat — one of the earliest examples of applied chemistry.

2.2 The Bronze Age (~3300 to ~1200 BCE)

The Bronze Age marked one of humanity’s greatest technological leaps. By combining copper with tin, people created bronze — an alloy that was harder and more durable. Bronze tools revolutionized agriculture, architecture, and warfare. Farmers could now plough tougher soils, builders could shape wood and stone more precisely, and warriors wielded stronger weapons and armor.

This era also saw the rise of urban civilizations such as Mesopotamia, Egypt, and the Indus Valley. Trade networks expanded to exchange metals and minerals. The demand for tin and copper fostered long-distance trade routes and introduced early systems of economy and governance.

2.3 The Iron Age (~1200 BCE onward)

The Iron Age began when humans learned to extract and forge iron from ore. Iron was more abundant than copper or tin, making it accessible and transformative. Early blacksmiths learned to heat iron and hammer it into shape, producing stronger and more affordable tools.

However, early iron was not perfect. Without the precise control of carbon, it was often soft and brittle. Over time, metallurgists discovered that heating iron with carbon produced steel — a stronger and more flexible material. This discovery laid the foundation for the next monumental leap in human civilization.

3. The Steel Age: Industrialization, Mass Production, and Modern Applications

The “Steel Age” represents humanity’s entry into the modern industrial world. From architecture to transportation, steel became the backbone of progress. However, it took centuries of experimentation and refinement to master steel production.

3.1 Early Steel and Wootz Innovation

Ancient metallurgists in India developed one of the earliest forms of high-quality steel known as Wootz steel. This crucible steel, renowned for its durability and sharpness, was traded across Asia and the Middle East. Damascus steel — famous for its distinctive patterns and strength — was derived from this early innovation. These discoveries show how ancient craftspeople achieved exceptional quality long before industrial methods existed.

3.2 The Industrial Revolution and the Birth of Mass Steel

The true revolution came with the Industrial Era in the 18th and 19th centuries. Innovations such as the Bessemer process (1856) transformed steelmaking. By blowing air through molten pig iron, impurities could be removed quickly, producing large quantities of affordable steel.

This breakthrough powered the expansion of railroads, bridges, factories, and skyscrapers. Steel became the lifeblood of industrial growth. The ability to produce steel at scale made possible the infrastructure that supports modern society — from city skylines to machinery.

3.3 Modern Steelmaking and Specialization

Today, steelmaking is a blend of science and precision engineering. Processes like electric arc furnaces and basic oxygen furnaces allow fine control over the composition of steel. Different alloys are tailored for specific uses — stainless steel for hygiene, carbon steel for construction, and alloy steels for automotive and aerospace industries.

Sustainability is now a major focus. Recycling and eco-friendly production methods are reducing waste and carbon emissions. In modern construction, Expert steel fabricators play a vital role in designing and crafting structures that meet both strength and sustainability standards.

4. Archaeological Evidence and Key Innovations

Archaeological discoveries provide fascinating insights into this long journey of innovation.

  • Oldowan tools (2.6 million years ago) – The earliest evidence of deliberate toolmaking by early hominins.
  • Acheulean hand-axes (1.7 million years ago) – Advanced shaping and balance, reflecting growing intelligence.
  • Neolithic polished tools (10,000 BCE) – Created for agriculture and woodworking, enabling permanent settlements.
  • Copper smelting (5000 BCE) – Marks the dawn of metallurgy and chemical transformation.
  • Bronze alloying (3300 BCE) – First synthetic metal; triggered the rise of civilizations.
  • Iron smelting (1200 BCE) – Common metal tools, more efficient agriculture, and durable weapons.
  • Wootz steel (300 BCE) – High-quality crucible steel developed in ancient India, setting global standards.
  • Bessemer process (1856 CE) – Mass production of steel; foundation of modern industrial society.

Each step represents a shift in human ability — from manipulating nature to mastering it.

5. The Impact of Material Evolution on Society

The shift from stone to steel did more than change tools; it reshaped how people lived, worked, and thought.

Economic Transformation

Metals required mining, trade, and specialized labor. Regions rich in ores became centers of power. Long-distance trade routes emerged for copper, tin, and iron, linking cultures across continents.

Warfare and Power

The mastery of metalworking determined military dominance. Bronze swords and iron spears transformed warfare, leading to the rise and fall of empires. Steel weaponry later redefined global power dynamics during the Industrial Revolution.

Architecture and Infrastructure

Metal tools allowed precise cutting and shaping of stone and wood. Later, steel made it possible to build bridges, railways, ships, and skyscrapers — feats unthinkable in earlier ages. It changed how humans occupied space and built communities.

Cultural and Artistic Expression  Metal was not just practical; it was symbolic. Jewelry, sculptures, and ceremonial weapons were crafted to represent power, faith, and creativity. Metallurgy became both an art and a science.

Environmental Considerations

Mining and smelting required large amounts of wood for charcoal and, later, coal. These processes contributed to deforestation and pollution. Today’s steel industry strives to balance technological progress with environmental responsibility through recycling and cleaner energy use.

6. Human Evolution and Innovation: The Broader Perspective

The story of human progress is the story of adaptation and curiosity. Every technological leap built on the last, showing the cumulative nature of human knowledge.

  • Cognitive development: Toolmaking reflects problem-solving, foresight, and creativity.
  • Social structure: As tools advanced, labor diversified — from miners and blacksmiths to architects and engineers.
  • Cultural transmission: Knowledge passed through generations and across regions, allowing cumulative progress.
  • Symbolism: Tools became symbols of human dominance over nature and our quest for perfection.

Innovation was not random — it was driven by need, environment, and imagination.

7. What Makes Steel the Pinnacle of Human Engineering

Steel is the culmination of thousands of years of experimentation. Its unique blend of strength, flexibility, and recyclability makes it a cornerstone of modern civilization.

  • Strength and durability: Steel’s ability to withstand pressure and tension surpasses earlier materials.
  • Versatility: It can be rolled, forged, welded, and molded into nearly any shape.
  • Affordability: Mass production reduced costs, making strong materials accessible to all industries.
  • Sustainability: Steel can be endlessly recycled without losing quality.
  • Innovation platform: It forms the base for further advancement in alloys, nanotechnology, and robotics.

From ancient forges to modern factories, steel embodies humanity’s relentless pursuit of excellence.

8. Lessons from the Past and the Future of Steel

Archaeology continues to teach us how ancient techniques can inform sustainable futures. The precision and efficiency of early metallurgists — who relied on natural intuition rather than industrial power — remind us of craftsmanship’s value.

The future of steel lies in green innovation: hydrogen-based furnaces, renewable energy smelting, and advanced recycling systems. Researchers are developing “green steel” technologies to minimize carbon footprints while maintaining quality.

By blending ancient knowledge with modern technology, we can continue the legacy of innovation that began millions of years ago with a chipped stone.

_______________________________

From the first stone flake struck by our ancestors to the skyscrapers rising from steel frames today, the journey of human innovation is extraordinary. Each stage — Stone, Bronze, Iron, and Steel — reflects an evolution in intelligence, creativity, and mastery of nature.

The steel age is not the end but a new beginning. It symbolizes how far humanity has come — from survival to sophistication. As we look ahead, our challenge is to keep innovating responsibly, honoring both our ancient roots and our technological future.

The story of steel is ultimately the story of us: curious, creative, and ever-evolving — forever forging a stronger tomorrow.

__________________________

Image, Top Left: holmespj, pixabay

Underwater Worlds: Archaeology of Flooded Cities and Submerged Ruins

Preeth Vinod Jethwani is a seasoned SEO specialist based in Dhule, India, with a Master’s degree in English Literature. Her academic background in language and communication fuels her strategic approach to digital marketing. With over 5 years of hands-on experience in Guest Posting, Niche Edits, Link Building, and Local SEO, she helps websites grow their organic reach with precision and purpose. When not optimizing content or building backlinks, she shares insights and tips at AskPreeto.com.

Beneath the calm surfaces of lakes, rivers, and oceans lies a hidden world — the remains of ancient civilizations swallowed by water. These submerged ruins, silent for centuries, are time capsules offering rare glimpses into the past. Underwater archaeology, a fascinating branch of the discipline, has unlocked secrets from cities long lost to floods, earthquakes, and rising seas. From the sunken temples of Egypt to the drowned streets of Dwarka in India, underwater worlds tell a story of human resilience, climate change, and the enduring power of water.

___________________________

1. The Birth of Underwater Archaeology

While traditional archaeology relies on excavation in dry land environments, underwater archaeology developed as technology evolved. Its origins can be traced back to the mid-20th century when divers began exploring shipwrecks and coastal ruins. The invention of scuba diving and later advancements in sonar and submersible technology opened a new frontier for historians and scientists alike.

Early explorations, such as those by Jacques Cousteau, revolutionized how we perceive the ocean’s role in preserving history. Unlike land, where oxygen and weather cause materials to deteriorate, underwater environments can sometimes preserve artifacts remarkably well. In certain conditions, lack of oxygen and cold temperatures slow down decay, keeping wooden ships, tools, and even human remains intact for millennia.

2. Why Civilizations Were Lost Beneath the Waves

Many ancient cities now underwater were once thriving coastal or riverine settlements. But the natural forces that sustained them also led to their downfall. There are several reasons why once-inhabited places ended up beneath the waves:

  • Tectonic Activity: Earthquakes and volcanic eruptions can cause land to sink rapidly. The ancient city of Port Royal, Jamaica, for example, was swallowed by the sea in 1692 after a powerful earthquake.
  • Rising Sea Levels: Over thousands of years, melting glaciers and shifts in ocean currents have raised global sea levels. Coastal civilizations that existed during the Ice Age are now submerged hundreds of feet underwater.
  • Flooding and Storm Surges: Repeated flooding events could have forced populations to abandon low-lying areas, leaving them vulnerable to submersion.
  • Human Engineering Failures: Dams, irrigation mismanagement, and deforestation have historically caused catastrophic flooding in some regions.

Each submerged site tells a cautionary tale about the delicate balance between humanity and the natural environment — a balance that continues to challenge us today.

3. Famous Underwater Archaeological Discoveries

Let’s explore some of the world’s most famous submerged cities and what they reveal about human history.

a. Heracleion and Canopus, Egypt

Once bustling port cities near the mouth of the Nile, Heracleion and Canopus vanished beneath the Mediterranean over 1,200 years ago. Rediscovered in 2000 by French marine archaeologist Franck Goddio, these cities revealed a wealth of statues, temples, coins, and pottery — all astonishingly preserved in the seabed’s silt. Heracleion’s discovery transformed our understanding of Egypt’s trade networks and its connection to the ancient Greek world.

b. Pavlopetri, Greece

Off the coast of southern Laconia lies Pavlopetri, considered the oldest known submerged city in the world. Dating back to around 3000 BCE, this Bronze Age settlement features streets, buildings, and even a water management system — all preserved under several meters of water. Pavlopetri provides invaluable insight into early urban planning and social organization in prehistoric Greece.

c. Dwarka, India

Mentioned in Hindu scriptures as the kingdom of Lord Krishna, Dwarka was believed to be a myth until marine archaeologists discovered ruins off the coast of Gujarat. Stone structures, anchors, and pottery dating back thousands of years suggest the existence of a sophisticated port city. The discovery bridges mythology and history, revealing how ancient legends often hold kernels of truth.

d. Atlit-Yam, Israel

Located off the coast of modern-day Haifa, Atlit-Yam is a Neolithic village preserved beneath the Mediterranean. Dating back about 9,000 years, it contains evidence of early agriculture, fishing, and even human burials. The site was likely abandoned after a catastrophic tsunami. It remains one of the best-preserved examples of early coastal living.

e. Port Royal, Jamaica

Known as the “wickedest city on earth” during the 17th century, Port Royal was a thriving center for pirates, merchants, and colonists. In 1692, an earthquake followed by a massive tsunami caused a large part of the city to sink instantly. Archaeologists have since uncovered homes, streets, and everyday objects — a vivid time capsule of colonial Caribbean life.

4. The Role of Technology in Underwater Exploration

Exploring underwater ruins is no simple task. The darkness, pressure, and inaccessibility of many sites demand specialized equipment and expertise. Thankfully, modern technology has made underwater archaeology safer and more precise than ever before.

  • Sonar Mapping: Sonar systems use sound waves to create detailed maps of underwater landscapes, helping researchers locate structures and artifacts without disturbing them.
  • ROVs (Remotely Operated Vehicles): These unmanned machines can reach extreme depths, capturing high-resolution images and collecting samples from areas too dangerous for divers.
  • 3D Photogrammetry: By taking thousands of photos from multiple angles, archaeologists can create digital 3D models of submerged sites for study and preservation.
  • Underwater Drones and AI: Artificial intelligence can now analyze sonar and photographic data to detect patterns and anomalies that might indicate human-made structures.

These tools not only assist in discovery but also minimize human impact, ensuring that fragile underwater heritage sites remain undisturbed.

5. Preservation Challenges: The Battle Against Water Damage

While underwater environments can preserve artifacts, they also pose constant threats. Corrosion, biological growth, and chemical reactions caused by saltwater can slowly destroy priceless relics once exposed. Conservation specialists face immense challenges when recovering and preserving these objects.

When artifacts are brought to the surface, they must undergo careful desalination and stabilization treatments to prevent them from disintegrating. Wood, for instance, can collapse once it dries if not properly treated with polyethylene glycol or other preservatives.

Similarly, modern-day structures also face destruction due to flooding or leaks — something that resonates beyond archaeology. The importance of water damage control and restoration applies not only to ancient relics but also to our homes and cultural landmarks. In fact, professionals like water damage restoration Brooklyn play a vital role in preserving today’s buildings much like archaeologists preserve ancient ones, ensuring that water’s destructive force doesn’t erase modern history.

6. Lessons from the Past: What Submerged Cities Teach Us

Underwater archaeological discoveries aren’t just historical curiosities — they offer profound lessons for the future.

  • Climate Change Awareness: Many submerged sites are stark reminders of how environmental shifts can wipe out entire civilizations. As modern sea levels rise, coastal cities face similar risks today.
  • Cultural Continuity: These discoveries highlight human adaptability. Even after natural disasters, people rebuild, relocate, and evolve.
  • The Value of Preservation: By protecting underwater sites, we maintain a connection to our shared heritage and learn from the triumphs and mistakes of those who came before us.
  • Interdisciplinary Research: Underwater archaeology brings together experts from geology, biology, engineering, and anthropology — showing the power of collaboration in uncovering history.

7. Notable Modern Projects in Underwater Archaeology

Across the globe, several major initiatives are underway to document and preserve submerged heritage:

  • UNESCO’s Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (2001) established international laws to safeguard underwater sites from treasure hunters and looting.
  • The Baltic Sea Project uses cold, low-oxygen waters to explore remarkably preserved shipwrecks, including 17th-century merchant vessels.
  • The Black Sea Maritime Archaeology Project (MAP) has discovered dozens of shipwrecks — some over 2,000 years old — thanks to deep-sea scanning technology.
  • The Mediterranean Archaeology Initiative continues to map lost harbors, trade routes, and submerged temples, revealing how interconnected ancient civilizations truly were.

8. The Future of Underwater Archaeology

The future of underwater archaeology lies at the intersection of innovation and conservation. With the help of AI, robotics, and satellite imaging, researchers can now detect submerged sites even from space. Virtual reality and 3D modeling allow the public to explore these ancient underwater worlds without disturbing them physically.

As our understanding deepens, underwater archaeology will continue to bridge the gap between past and present. It reminds us that history isn’t just buried underground — it’s hidden beneath the waves, waiting to be rediscovered.

______________________________

The story of submerged cities and underwater ruins is one of both tragedy and wonder. From the grandeur of Heracleion to the serenity of Atlit-Yam, these sites offer a timeless reflection of humanity’s bond with water — as a source of life, trade, and ultimately, destruction.

Each discovery teaches us how fragile and resilient civilizations can be. And just as archaeologists strive to preserve relics of the past, modern experts in water damage NYC

and beyond protect our present-day structures from similar fates. The connection between ancient floods and modern preservation underscores a universal truth — that water, though powerful and unpredictable, has always been both a creator and a keeper of history.

___________________________

Image, Top Left: Sabrinabelle, Pixabay

Ancient teeth provide new insight into the lives of the world’s first farming villagers

Durham University—Archaeologists have revealed new insights into how the world’s first farming villagers formed communities, moved across the land and responded to outsiders. 

Researchers, led by the universities of Durham and Liverpool, analysed the chemical signatures in teeth from 71 people, spanning the entire Neolithic period from 11,600 to 7,500 years ago.  

The teeth were found at five archaeological sites in what is now modern Syria. 

By analysing the strontium and oxygen isotopes in the tooth enamel, the researchers were able to establish if the individuals grew up locally or whether they moved from a different area – reconstructing previously invisible patterns of mobility. 

This tooth analysis, combined with skeletal evidence and funerary practices, revealed that once permanent villages were firmly established, most people stayed local and strengthened ties to particular communities.  

Interestingly, towards the end of the Neolithic it appears that women were more likely than men to move between communities. 

This suggests patrilocal traditions, in which women relocated to form marriages in new communities, whereas men remained in their home villages. 

This movement cycle may have evolved to avoid inbreeding within communities. 

The study also found that local and non-local individuals were often buried together and received the same, sometimes exceptional, funerary treatments. 

The research is published in the journal Nature Scientific Reports. 

Senior author, Dr Eva Fernandez-Dominguez of Durham University’s Department of Archaeology, said: “This research allows us to see, for the very first time in this region, how mobility and social connections shaped the earliest farming societies. 

“We found that villagers largely stayed local, yet they welcomed newcomers who appeared to be fully integrated into social and funerary life.  

“The evidence of women moving between villages also points to complex social dynamics in the world’s first permanent settlements.” 

First author of the study, Dr Jo-Hannah Plug, currently of the University of Oxford, said: “The Late Neolithic period in this region is archaeologically known for the development of new cross-regional networks, innovation, and the movement of material culture, animals, and ideas.  

“Our research, for the first time, shows direct evidence for the movement of people during this period too.  

“Our observation that women in particular were mobile, illustrates their – likely central – role in the processes of innovation and the establishing of cross-regional networks of the Neolithic period. 

“Our results suggest that the reproductive networks of this period extended beyond the direct neighbouring communities, and that marriage partners were sought potentially quite far away.” 

The researchers found that at some sites, individuals who originated elsewhere appeared fully integrated into village life, suggesting early farming communities were inclusive and open to newcomers.  

One striking example came from one of the sites, Tell Halula, where multiple layers of human remains were preserved within house floors.  

Analysis revealed that the individuals buried together in the same house included both locals and non-locals, all treated with the same funerary practices.  

Further evidence across the samples showed that local and non-local people were buried in close proximity in the same cemeteries and spaces, with the same elaborate burial assemblages and with similar post-mortem manipulations such as being buried in a seated position. 

This indicates that mobility did not preclude social inclusion, and that villagers in the Neolithic period were open to assimilating newcomers fully into community life and afforded them the same distinct treatment in death. 

The study demonstrates how scientific techniques, such as isotope analysis, can transform our understanding of human social life from thousands of years ago. 

It also fills a major knowledge gap in the Northern Levant, a key corridor for the spread of agriculture and settled human societies. 

The research was funded by The Leverhulme Trust. 

About Durham University

Durham University is a globally outstanding centre of teaching and research based in historic Durham City in the UK.

We are a collegiate university committed to inspiring our people to do outstanding things at Durham and in the world.

We conduct research that improves lives globally and we are ranked as a world top 100 university with an international reputation in research and education (QS World University Rankings 2026).

We are a member of the Russell Group of leading research-intensive UK universities, The Times and Sunday Times UK University of the Year 2026, and ranked in the top five in all three major UK university rankings (The Times and The Sunday Times Good University Guide, the Guardian University Guide, and the Complete University Guide)

____________________________

Aerial view of the excavations at the Neolithic site of Tell Halula in Syria. Picture credit: Grup de Recerca en Arqueologia del Mediterrani i del Proxim Orient (GRAMPO), Seminari d’Arqueologia Prehistòrica del Pròxim Orient (SAPPO)

____________________________

One of the burials found at the Neolithic site of Tell Halula in Syria. Picture credit: Grup de Recerca en Arqueologia del Mediterrani i del Proxim Orient (GRAMPO), Seminari d’Arqueologia Prehistòrica del Pròxim Orient (SAPPO)

____________________________

Laboratory analysis at Durham University. Picture credit: Dr. Eva Fernandez-Dominguez

____________________________
Article Source: Durham University news release.
*‘Strontium and oxygen isotope analysis reveals changing connections to place and group membership in the world’s earliest village societies’ is published in the journal Nature Scientific ReportsDOI link: s41598-025-18134-3 

A Scholar’s Quest to Find the Ancestral People of the Most Influential Language on Earth

Jan Ritch-Frel is the executive director of the Independent Media Institute.

A deeper reach into human history is now possible, thanks to a growing body of archaeological data collected using advanced technologies and patient scholarly detective work accumulated across recent decades. Research into the reconstruction of lost parent languages of the ones we speak today is included in that process. One of the most studied and reconstructed languages is known as Proto-Indo-European, or PIE for short.

PIE is the parent for most primary languages spoken today in the Americas, western and northeastern Eurasia, and the Indian subcontinent. English, Romance languages, including Spanish and French, German, Slavic, Baltic languages, Russian, Persian, Hindi, Bengali, Gujarati, and Punjabi are all children of PIE. Some PIE speakers and their descendants got deep into the lands of modern China. This spread has intrigued many scholars who are trying to answer questions such as: who were these people, when and where exactly did they emerge, what were they like, and was their spread a random occurrence or was there something about them that allowed PIE-speaking descendants to break “correlations between geography and genetics” to quote Harvard scientist David Reich, whose lab is at the forefront of researching the origins of the Indo-Europeans.

J.P. Mallory is among the most accomplished scholars to investigate the language, culture, and archaeology of the far-flung Indo-Europeans. Across decades, he has published about waves of migration and cultural combination that produced the Irish in far Western Europe, all the way to Northeast Asia, to try and piece together who the Tocharians of the Tarim Basin in China were. Now an emeritus professor at Queen’s University, Mallory has released a new book, The Indo-Europeans Rediscovered: How a Scientific Revolution is Rewriting Their Story, which recounts the history of scholarship about them across the past few centuries and offers new insights into the debates about their origins, using archaeology, linguistic research, and ancient genetics.

The research by Mallory and other scholars into the origins of PIE and their speakers is more than an interesting research project. Misinformation about Indo-Europeans—cultivating the notion of a homeland that produced a dominant culture that spread across the Earth—has been used for political advantage, from Nazi Germany to ethno-nationalist groups in Eurasia and the Americas. Accurate and deeper scholarship that explains the connections to the many descendant cultures and their profound connections should have a powerful clarifying effect that precludes the misuse of this information. It’s powerful information that provides 3.4 billion people, or 42 percent of the world’s population, an authentic shared frame of reference and history across almost 450 languages.

It’s one of many new areas of research into the past that have the potential to become an engine for the betterment of humanity—as it percolates through the centers of influence—and helps us grow accustomed to relying on a wider and global human historical evidence base as reference. This information is valuable context for understanding ourselves, but so is the process of learning it. Society will greatly benefit from minds that are trained to think in deeper timescales than a millennium or two—archaeology and biological sciences are increasingly furnishing useful insights and pattern observations into humanities at a historical depth spanning millions of years.

I reached out to Mallory to learn about his latest research and future directions in finding the lost PIE speakers and thought it would be interesting for readers.

Jan Ritch-Frel: You identify the Pontic Steppe that spans from the northwestern Black Sea coasts across the northern Caucasus into Kazakhstan as the most likely homeland of the Proto-Indo-European speakers. In the decades of research, have you landed on some of the broad cultural and social markers of these people as you looked through the archaeological evidence of that region?

J.P. Mallory: There have been a lot of assumptions made regarding the steppe populations during the Eneolithic-Early Bronze Age, but so far it has been extremely difficult to produce a convincing image of their social structure, hierarchies, etc., from archaeological data.

The problem lies in the nature of the evidence: almost entirely burials, so it is difficult to reconstruct an entire culture from the burials alone. This is compounded by the fact that the burials tend to be poor—the majority lack any grave gifts—and those that do have grave gifts are often limited to a pot, maybe some stone tools or animal remains.

These graves are a lot poorer in objects and information than the Corded Ware culture or many of the Neolithic cultures of Europe. For example, a rough count of the presence of metal objects in a few of the major databases (where we have about 1,000 burials for a given region), reveals that 2 percent or less had a metal object in the grave.

Because of this, we have a range of opinions based on various studies suggesting that the steppe cultures were egalitarian—at one end—to enjoying a tripartite class society resembling that expressed in the Indo-Aryan class system. While we can point to some very rich burials, for example, employing the burial of a wagon and other objects, this is in no way typical of the burials.

One of the greatest research needs is an aggregated database of all Yamna burials (this would probably number well over 12,000 excavated burials) that could be analyzed. Where are the 19th-century German scholars when you need them?

Ritch-Frel: What are some of the most interesting subplots in the pursuit of understanding PIE origins and Indo-Europeans?

Mallory: There are several major aspects of the hunt for the homeland that I find particularly interesting. First, there is the non-linear nature of our progress. By this I mean that unlike many other linguistic problems, we do not find a narrative of discovery and consensus-building progressively unfolding over time, with each conference bringing us closer to a final solution. The only way it can be presented as such is if you concentrate solely on a single strand of argument and ignore the glorious free-for-all that was going on from about 1870 onward.

Some have criticized me for discussing now long-discarded solutions to the homeland problem, presuming that one only needs to dwell on those issues that give us our current answer. What you miss here is that for more than two centuries, the scholarly world has regarded the models of their own time as the definitive solutions, and, at least from the time of Roger Latham around 1860, there have always been multiple camps of diametrically opposed scholars. Often, what constitutes “new evidence” derives from a different discipline than the one that supports an alternative theory and does nothing to address its validity. Moreover, what have often been regarded as long-discarded solutions have had an uncanny ability to be resurrected by later generations.

A related issue is what I have termed the “constituency problem,” i.e., where scholars from various disciplines believe that there are core factors in the solution that cannot be ignored or overturned by evidence from another discipline. Sometimes they are apparent within the same discipline, for example, there are those who argue for a deep genetic or contact relationship between Indo-European and the Uralic family (Finnish, Estonian, Hungarian, etc.). This indicates that the homeland must have been located in or near Eastern Europe, while others emphasize early contacts or relationships between Indo-European and languages of the Near East or south Caucasus, which would locate the homeland south of the Caucasus.

On other occasions, the evidence is disputed across disciplines. For example, the craniometric evidence failed to support any case for relating the Corded Ware culture with the Pontic-Caspian steppe, while ancient DNA firmly supports the derivation of the majority of Corded Ware population from the steppe.

Ritch-Frel: What kinds of industries, specializations, and lifestyles do you think PIE people would have been aware of—boating people, mining, winegrowing, etc., along the Caucasus and the coasts of the Black and Caspian seas.

Mallory: This is guesswork for me but given the fact that metals were mined in the Balkans and transported as far east as the Volga, many would have been aware that such objects came from a distant land, and they would know in which direction that land lay. Obviously, the traders or smiths who transported the copper would be well aware of their source.

As for the coastal areas of the Black Sea and the Caucasus, the fact that the genetic signature indicates that nearly 50 percent of the steppe population had ancestors from that direction, and that there were exchange currents still running between the steppe and the Caucasus, they would know their larger world.

Ritch-Frel: Your book dwells heavily on the sociological factors that might have explained the spread of the PIE and Indo-European speaking populations. Do you think it’s worth considering the density and portability of the livelihoods of PIE speakers and specialized knowledge as a key enabler for their ability to challenge the boundaries of geography and genetics?

Mallory: I would think that the increased mobility of the steppe societies is probably a major key in their expansion, since it exponentially increases the territory that one can interact with and possibly control. The key issue here, as I explain in my book, is that pastoral nomads have had an extremely poor record in Europe in spreading their own language (excepting the Magyars and perhaps we can also count the Turks). So why did Eneolithic pastoralists succeed so well?

One possible reason is that they were the first, so there really was a step change between them and the settled farmers of Europe, while all later pastoralists encountered cultures that already possessed vehicles and horse riding. Who knows?

Ritch-Frel: What parts of the archaeological record and related scholarship would you recommend to curious people who want to know more about the PIE and the Indo-European world and why?

Mallory: Doug Q. Adams and I produced an Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture (1997) and The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World (2006), which introduced readers to most of the topics listed above. For the archaeological cultures, David W. Anthony’s The Horse. The Wheel, and Language (2007) is the go-to book.

_____________________________

This article was produced by Human Bridges, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

Cover Image, Top Left: Kanenori, Pixabay

The Trojan War, Mycenaeans, and an ancient Treasure in Los Angeles

Set artfully within the classic spaces of the famous Getty Villa Museum along California’s Los Angeles coastline rests, for a time, a remarkable treasure that affords a rare view of a time and place over 3,000 years ago in ancient Greece. At once, it tells a story that bridges the legendary myth of the Trojan War, a storied Aegean kingdom, and a mysterious elite warrior buried in a lone shaft tomb in southwestern Greece…. 

 

Troy

It was a perfectly strategic location for the ancients to build a city.

Commanding a point at the south entrance of the Dardanelles (Hellespont), it controlled the land route that extended northward along the western Anatolian coast and over a narrow point of the Dardanelles to the present-day European coast. From an elevated eyeshot looking west from the site across 4 miles of the plain of the Scamander River (Küçükmenderes Çayı), is the Aegean Sea. Today, this place is characterized by a mound, or tell, known as Hisarlik, meaning ‘place of fortresses’ in Turkish. Most archaeologists know it as the site of legendary ancient Troy, made famous in classical and popular literature with Homer’s Iliad as the besieged city of the Trojan War. 

___________________________

These walls of the acropolis belong to Troy VII, which is identified as the site of the Trojan War (c. 1200 BC). CherryX, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons

___________________________

More remains of Troy. Kizildeniz, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons

___________________________

There was at this place, however, more than one ‘Troy’. Succeeding archaeological excavations have revealed evidence of multiple settlements of varying size and complexity, each built on top of the remains of the preceding habitation and forming a layer-cake physical account of cities here beginning just before the Early Bronze Age (c. 3300–2100 BCE) and extending to the 3rd century AD — a remarkably long human occupation of about 3500 years. But Homer’s Troy, according to archaeologists, may arguably be identified with the Late Bronze Age occupation level designated in archaeology-speak as Troy VIIa. In this level, excavations evidenced structures that were set close together within a fortress, with almost every structure featuring one or more massive storage jars sunk into the ground, mouths exposed at the surface. It was a short-lived occupation level, showing measures that suggested preparations for a significant military siege. Analysis of human remains indicated by interpretation that this city was captured, looted, and burned. Imported Mycenaean pottery found in this level helped to date the level to between 1260 and 1240 BCE. In storytelling, this was the time of Homer’s Troy-sieging Achaeans — Agamemnon, Achilles, Odysseus — historically, the Mycenaeans. Among them also was Nestor, king of Pylos….

King Nestor and Pylos

…….we went to Pylos and to Nestor, the shepherd of the people, and he received me in his lofty house and gave me kindly welcome, as a father might his own son who after a long time had newly come from afar: even so kindly he tended me with his glorious sons…….

These words of Telemachus, the son of Odysseus and Penelope as penned by Homer in Book 17 of the Odyssey give us this ancient literary glimpse of Pylos, where the legendary King Nestor made his domicile. But beyond Homer the excavations over the last century have revealed a tangible place — a Pylos that can actually be seen and touched, verifying the historicity of the legendary place.

Evidence for human settlement at Pylos extends as far back as the Neolithic, though it is best known as an important center during Mycenaean times (1600 -1100 BC). Pylos as a state extended over 2,000 square kilometers (770 sq mi) with a population that may have ranged from 50,000 to as many as120,000 people. In 1939, a joint Hellenic-American expedition was formed with the Greek Archaeological Service under Epano Englianos and Carl Blegen with the University of Cincinnati. Excavations began on 4 April 1939, with dramatic results.  Almost immediately, stone walls, fresco fragments, Mycenaean pottery and inscribed tablets were unearthed. Blegen identified monumental structural remains as the great “Palace of Nestor”, and although it is not certain that this was indeed such, Linear B tablets found during the excavations indicated that the site in which the structure is located was anciently called Pylos. In fact, about 1,000 Linear B tablets were unearthed. Translation of the tablets confirmed that they were part of a royal archive, and that the palace functioned as the administrative, political and financial center of the Mycenaean region of Messenia.

______________________

Above and below: the covered area of the excavated remains of Nestor’s Palace. Fæ, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, Wikimedia Commons

______________________

____________________

Wall fresco of lions and griffins that decorated the walls of the “Queen’s Hall” at the Palace of Nestor. As exhibited at the special exhibit, The Kingdom of Pylos: Warrior-Princes of Ancient Greece, at the Getty Villa in Los Angeles.

____________________

Two women walking in procession wearing Minoan-style flounced skirts. Found in a plaster dump northwest of the palace. As exhibited at the special exhibit, The Kingdom of Pylos: Warrior-Princes of Ancient Greece, at the Getty Villa in Los Angeles.

____________________

Tablets inscribed in Linear B, like this one, were found among the excavated material from the remains of the Palace of Nestor. As exhibited at the special exhibit, The Kingdom of Pylos: Warrior-Princes of Ancient Greece, at the Getty Villa in Los Angeles.

____________________

Plan of the excavated remains of the Palace of Nestor. 1-Entrance. 2-Court. 3-Anchamber. 4-Megaron(main hall). 5-Storerooms with olive oil. 6-Storerooms with wine. 7-Archives. 8-Propylon. 9-Bath.
10-Small megaron.

____________________

More recently, a team of archaeologists, consisting of director archaeologists Jack Davis and Sharon Stocker, along with a group of student volunteers, from the University of Cincinnati, conducted excavations not far from the site of the palace. In preliminary survey work, Stocker noted that “there were noticeable concentrations of rocks on the surface….”*  These were watermelon-sized stones. And there were thousands. They were the remains of collapsed beehive-shaped (tholos) tombs the ancients constructed at this location millennia ago, during the Late Bronze Age. In the spirit and style of archaeology, the team removed them carefully one at a time. The painstaking work eventually revealed two tombs, one of them as deep as nearly 15 feet below the surface. “It was like going back to the Mycenaean Period. They had placed them by hand in the walls of the tombs and we were taking them out by hand,” Stocker said.*

Their work soon began to pay off. “By the end of the first week we knew we had something that was really important,” said Stocker.* And the finds were remarkable. These were clearly princely tombs. Excavations yielded “thousands of small pieces of gold foil, beads, pieces of faience, small bits of bronze and the occasional piece of silver”, according to Stocker, including an agate sealstone emblazoned with two genii (mythological lion-like creatures), a gold ring featuring two bulls flanked by sheaves of barely grain, and a gold pendant showing what could be the Egyptian goddess Hathor. These finds, along with the small fragments of gold foil and other small artifact fragments, clearly suggested wealth and status. Some news releases reported that the gold foil indicated the walls had once been covered in gold leaf. But “there is no evidence that the tomb walls were actually covered with gold leaf,” says Stocker. “[Carl] Blegen [excavator of the Palace of Nestor] speculated as much, based on the quantity of gold leaf that was found in Tholos IV, which was excavated by his team member, Lord William Taylour, in 1953”. In any case, the finds and materials clearly point to tombs that once interred individuals or families of singular wealth and/or status, as well as a capacity to carry out a broad network of trade relationships in the Eastern Mediterranean — evidenced by materials such as amber from the Baltic, amethyst from Egypt, and imported carnelian. The researchers employed extensive use of photogrammetry and digital mapping to record and document in detail the location and orientation of all objects within the tombs. This was important, according to director Davis, as it afforded the ability to “see all levels as we excavated them and relate them one to the other in three dimensions,” essential for analyzing, understanding and interpreting the tombs and the significance and meaning of their contents.*

_________________________

An aerial view of the site shows the Tholos IV tomb, far left, found by UC archaeologist Carl Blegen in 1939 in relation to the two family tombs called Tholos VI and Tholos VII, uncovered by the team of UC archaeologists Jack Davis and Sharon Stocker. Aerial photo/Denitsa Nenova/UC Classics, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

_________________________

UC archaeologists discovered two Bronze Age family tombs.  The round tombs, called Tholos VI and VII, contained artifacts that could shed new light on life in ancient Greece. Aerial photo/Denitsa Nenova/UC Classics, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

_________________________

The floor of Tholos VI, one of two family tombs UC archaeologists discovered, is composed of giant stone slabs likely taken from the ruins of the Palace of Nestor during the Late Bronze Age. Photo/UC Classics, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

_________________________

Carnelian sealstone featuring two mythological creatures called genii with serving vessels and incense over an altar. Photo/Jeff Vanderpool/UC Classics, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

_________________________

A modern putty impression of the carnelian seal stone. Photo/Jeff Vanderpool/UC Classics, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

_________________________

Gold pendant found in the family tombs, featuring the likeness of Hathor, an Egyptian goddess who protected of the dead. Photo/Vanessa Muro/UC Classics, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

_________________________

Tholos tomb IV at the Palace of Nestor site, built ca. 1550-1500 BC. Excavated by Blegen. Peulle, Wikimedia Commons, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International

_________________________

The Tomb of the Griffin Warrior

Arguably one of the most remarkable discoveries at Pylos emerged in 2015, as an archaeological team headed by Davis and Stocker (University of Cincinnati) were excavating what appeared at first to be an otherwise unremarkable stone-lined shaft tomb. This description changed very quickly, however, as they began to encounter relatively intact objects made of bronze. Their efforts eventually led to the skeletal remains of an adult male and nearly 1500 artifacts, some of the artifacts featuring rich iconography, and all associated with a single burial. Dated to about 1500 B.C. based on pottery shards found at the location, the shaft tomb and its contents have turned out to be, according to Stocker, “one of the most magnificent displays of prehistoric wealth discovered in mainland Greece in the past 65 years.”** Stocker would know—after years of experience investigating an area rich with evidence of an ancient presence long before the classical Greeks, she had never personally encountered a single burial quite like this one.

_____________________________

Sharon Stocker stands within the excavated shaft tomb. Courtesy Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

_____________________________

Viewed from above, the excavated Griffin Warrior Tomb, with the one-ton capstone which dominated the scene of the tomb details during the excavation. Courtesy Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

_____________________________

The inventory of finds was astounding. As reported by M.B. Reilly of the University of Cincinnati in the related UC Magazine article, the object tally included the following:

The skeleton of an adult male, age approximately 30 – 35 years who would have stood about five-and-a-half feet tall, placed upon his back when buried;

At his left chest, a sword, three feet in length, featuring an ivory hilt decorated with gold in an embroidery design;

Beneath the sword, a small dagger featuring a similarly designed gold hilt;

More bronze weapons laying at his legs and feet;

Four solid gold seal finger rings;

A 30-inch long necklace of box-shaped gold wires with two gold pendants decorated with ivy leaves;

Numerous well-preserved gold beads;

Two gold cups and six silver cups, one with a gold rim;

Bronze cups, bowls, amphora, jugs, and a basin;

More than 50 seal stones featuring intricate carvings of goddesses, altars, reeds, lions, bulls – some with human bull jumpers flying over their horns. All seal stones were in Minoan style and likely originated in Crete;

Pieces of carved ivory, one featuring a griffin with large wings and another showing a lion attacking a griffin;

Six ornate ivory combs, implying that he may have had long hair;

Over 1,000 beads of carnelian, amethyst, jasper and agate. Archaeologists suggest that some of the beads may have decorated a fabric burial shroud – as suggested by several square inches of associated woven threads;

Thin bands of bronze, likely from long decayed body armor; and

Wild boar’s teeth, likely from a warrior’s helmet.**

____________________________

Above and below: The three-foot sword found next to the skeletal remains. Courtesy Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

____________________________

____________________________

Found within the tomb: A meter-long slashing sword with an ivory handle covered in gold. Courtesy Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

____________________________

A bronze mirror with an ivory handle, found within the tomb. Courtesy Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

____________________________

Ivory comb, one of six, found within the tomb. Courtesy Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

____________________________

One of four solid gold rings found within the tomb. This one features a Cretan bull-jumping scene. Courtesy Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

____________________________

From analysis of the burial, archaeologists could see that many of the burial objects were originally placed above the interred on top of his wooden coffin, which had been initially crushed by a fallen one-ton stone (likely the cap stone of the burial), the wooden coffin having long since decayed and collapsed and leaving the objects resting upon the skeleton. Further analysis of the skull indicated that he had a broad face with close-set eyes and a strong jaw.

__________________________

Graphic representation of the tomb and tomb remains and objects as displayed at the special exhibit, The Kingdom of Pylos: Warrior-Princes of Ancient Greece, the Getty Villa Museum.

__________________________

The skeletal remains within the context of these finds clearly suggested the burial of a high status individual, perhaps even a king, or wanax, as Mycenaean kings or lords were called anciently. The man represented by the remains has been dubbed the “griffin warrior” by Davis and Stocker based on the griffin iconography and weaponry and armor found in the tomb.

More than a year later, conservationists in the lab revealed another stunning find from the tomb. After meticulous cleaning of a limestone-encrusted seal stone, they exposed an intricately detailed etching of a combat scene on a hard stone measuring only 3.6 centimeters, 1.4 inches, in length. In fact, many of the fine details become clear only when revealed through photomicroscopy.   

_____________________________

The agate as seen unaided at the special exhibit, The Kingdom of Pylos: Warrior-Princes of Ancient Greece, the Getty Villa Museum.

_____________________________

Enhanced view of the agate as shown at the special exhibit, The Kingdom of Pylos: Warrior-Princes of Ancient Greece, the Getty Villa Museum. “A horizontal lathe to make fine cuts, along with emory, olive oil and ground stone, were used to make the fine cuts,” said Claire Lyons, Curator of Antiquities for the J.Paul Getty Museum. Based on recent research, says Lyons, “it was not about the artist’s eye” that created this remarkable piece of work, “it was about the artist’s feel” of the material.  

_____________________________

A digitally altered illustration of the seal found in the tomb of the Griffin Warrior. Courtesy Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

_____________________________ 

“Some of the details on this are only a half-millimeter big,” said Davis. “They’re incomprehensibly small.”***

The image on the stone portrayed a warrior in the process of defeating two opponents, one already laying dead at his feet, and in the act of plunging a sword into the neck of the shielded second opponent — a scene of Achaean combat that could be likened to any event from the pages of Homer’s Iliad.

_________________________

A Rare Treasure at the Getty Villa Museum

The amazing discoveries and revelations at Pylos notwithstanding, their appreciation has remained primarily via the pages of journals, magazines, and online articles published by the popular press, and through research papers and reports written for academics. Now, however, for the first time, the tomb treasure of the warrior prince, the Pylos kingdom, and the Mycenaeans have journeyed nearly 7,000 miles to the sunny coast of southern California. From June 27, 2025 to January 12, 2026, the Getty Villa Museum showcases the original artifacts in a well-appointed and captivating gallery space, drawing thousands of visitors and enthusiasts to see, in person, many of the most significant objects that have now made the Pylos discoveries among the most iconic finds of Greek archaeology. 

“These are truly unique objects,” says Claire Lyons, who is Curator of Antiquities for the J.Paul Getty Museum, working directly with the Getty Villa Museum, “because, among other things, this is 100 percent archaeologically excavated and documented material.” Along with the incredible ‘combat agate’ and other seal stones exhibited in the special gallery, she points to a reconstructed artifact that, though perhaps less ‘glamorous’ on the stage among these artifacts, deserves equal attention — an early Mycenaean helmet made of boar tusks, a typical part of the military attire of the ancient Mycenaean warrior. “The boar-tusked helmet is totally new,’ she remarks. “It is unpublished material” in the way of display pieces for an exhibit of this kind for this time period.

The exhibit was years in the making. “We’ve had this ongoing relationship with the Ministry of Culture of Greece,” she went on to say. “So when it came time to take the first step in 2021 [to put together the exhibit show in the U.S.] everyone was enthusiastic.”

She emphasized that the show is much more than a display of select artifacts excavated from a certain tomb. “It’s about Messenia, what has been found there.” The ancient region of Messenia was mentioned in the Iliad. Pylos was a prominent center of administration and culture during the Late Bronze Age within Messenia. A number of artifacts exhibited in the gallery space come from other locations and excavations besides Pylos.   

_______________________________

Above and two images below: views of the special exhibit gallery space. Images courtesy J. Paul Getty Trust

_______________________________

_______________________________

_______________________________

The hilt of the Griffin Warrior’s sword is embellished with “gold embroidery”, a labor-intensive Mycenaean technique of inserting tiny L-shaped gold wires into the ivory pommel and grip. After burnishing the gold to create a smooth surface, the artisan incised it with patterns and figures. Here the engraved scenes of animal combat, with lions attacking wild goats native to Crete, mirror the warior culture of Mycenaean palace society. Text and special exhibit display image courtesy J. Paul Getty Trust

_______________________________

The handle of this elaborate dagger is partly preserved at the attachment to the blade, where it was secured by three bronze rivets covered by large gold caps. Tiny L-shaped gold wires were set into the dagger’s handle, as on the hilt of the Griffin Warrior’s sword. The gold surface was then embellished with a net of engraved spirals on both sides. Text and special exhibit display image courtesy J. Paul Getty Trust

_______________________________

This utilitarian axe may have been developed by the Minoans in part for shaping stone building blocks of the sort used at Pylos as early as the 1500s BCE. Several such blocks were found in the stone foundation of the Griffin Warrior’s grave. Text and special exhibit display image courtesy j. Paul Getty Trust

_______________________________

Ivory combs are not uncommon in Late Bronze Age burials, and the Griffin Warrior’s grave held five, probably imported from Crete. This ornate example was stuck to a piece of his bronze armor. Finds of cosmetic implements attest to the widespread emphasis on grooming and beautification in the warrior culture of Greece and other Bronze Age societies. Text and special exhibit display image courtesy of j. Paul Getty Trust

_______________________________

Gold beaded necklace found in the Griffin Warrior’s grave. Elite Mycenaean and Minoam warriors wore jewelry, including armlets and bracelets strung with sealstones. Myriad carnelian, amethyst, amber, and gold beads were found in the Grifin Warror’s burial, deposited by the living to adorn the hero’s body in death. Text and special exhibit display image courtesy J. Paul Getty Trust

_______________________________

Above and below: inlaid daggers found in the grave of a Mycenaean woman, perhaps a princess of Pylos. Text and special exhibit display image courtesy J. Paul Getty Museum

_______________________________

_______________________________

The combat agate, found in the Griffin Warrior grave. © Hellenic Ministry of Culture – HOCRED /
Archaeological Museum, Chora, SN18-0112/ © Palace of Nestor Excavations, Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati / Photo: Jeff Vanderpool

____________________________

Boar’s-Tusk Helmet, Mycenaean, 1520–1440 BCE  Boar’s tusk, set on a modern plaster head © Hellenic Ministry of Culture – HOCRED /Archaeological Museum of Messenia, Kalamata, AMM 11943. Image © J. Paul Getty Trust, photo: Jeff Vanderpool

____________________________

The Getty Villa Museum

Few museums in the world can match the unique splendor of the Getty Villa Museum in Los Angeles. Set near the iconic southern California coastline that boasts such famous surfing beaches as Malibu and Santa Monica, its structure exemplifies the quintessence of a sumptuous ancient Roman villa. The incredible Roman villa remains of Pompeii and Herculaneum in Italy are magnificent to behold in and of themselves, but none can compare in completeness to the reconstruction one sees with the villa in LA, modeled as it were after the famous Villa of the Papyri, the partially excavated remains of which can be seen in a corner of the dramatic multi-story remnants of Herculaneum. 

Jean Paul Getty initially opened the museum in 1974, though it was renovated in 2006. Today it houses one of the world’s best collections of antiquities, especially Greek, Roman and Etruscan, and is recognized as a center of scholarship and conservation.  

Following is a pictorial sampling of the museum’s not-to-be-missed permanent spaces and treasures…. 

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

Courtesy J. Paul Getty Trust

_____________________________

_____________________________

Courtesy J. Paul Getty Trust

_____________________________

Courtesy J. Paul Getty Trust

_____________________________

Courtesy J. Paul Getty Trust

_____________________________

Courtesy J. Paul Getty Trust

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

See more about the Getty Villa and start your visit to this remarkable museum here.

_____________________________

*https://popular-archaeology.com/article/archaeologists-find-bronze-age-tombs-lined-with-gold/

The Raucus Roman Forum

Professor Frank J. Korn has retired from his teaching position on the Classical Studies faculty at Seton Hall University.  He is a Fulbright Scholar at the American Academy in Rome and the author of nine books on various aspects of the Eternal City.  He is listed in Marquis Who’s Who as “a notable classical educator and writer.”  Recipient of the Princeton Prize for Distinguished Teaching, he resides with his wife Camille in Scotch Plains, N.J.  The couple’s three sons –  Frank, Ronald, and John and their families live nearby.  His latest book    Below Rome, the Story of the Catacombs    which he co-authored with his wife, is available on Amazon or from the publisher, St. Johann Press, Haworth, N.J.

The Forum in Rome is the most stately,

most solemn. grand , majestic, and

mournful sight conceivable.”

          …Charles Dickens (1845)

 

Many visitors to the Forum Romanum may formulate misleading mental pictures of what daily life was like there in the glory days of the late Republic and early Empire.  (First century, B.C. and A.D.)  They may conjure up images of only dignified senators, consuls, judges, and other V.I.P.’s in purple-bordered togas coming and going in their conduct of government and justice.  They may envision only splendid colonnaded temples set high upon marble staircases, and other handsome porticoed public buildings like the Basilica of Aemilia or the massive Tabularium (the Hall of Records) as the backdrop.  Such notions fall quite short of the reality of the site, however.

While this Forum was the seat of government, it was also much more:  The business, banking, and religious center, an open-air market, a marketplace of ideas.  It was a popular venue for making deals of every nature.  It was a clamorous hub of activity and enterprise.  It was a hangout for the idle rich and the jobless poor, and every social class in between. 

Surging throngs moved through the Forum from sunrise to mid-evening.  The tumult and the din were beyond the power of words to describe, the medley of sights and sounds impossible to convey.  One had to be there!

In front of one temple or another, smoke rose from sacrificial rites and the chanting of priests perpetually filled the air.  From behind rough wooden tables, along the Via Sacra, whose paving stones remember the footsteps of Caesar, peddlers of fast-food shouted their prices and offerings.  Fishmongers, having set up shop in the porticoes of various edifices, befouled the air with unpleasant and pungent odors.  (Their eventual eviction was one of the earliest steps taken to improve the image of the Forum.)

Crowds of buyers and vendors of all sorts of wares jostled with lobbyists en route to their usual station in front of the Senate chamber.  Street entertainers, beggars, the homeless, noisy little kids being shushed by every passing senator and retired old men looking to kill time, juvenile delinquents up to mischief, artists and con-artists, all mingled with howling cats and growling dogs.  Donkeys pulling carts were, at times, bumper to bumper.

_____________________________

The Roman forum as it appears today. xlizziexx, Pixabay

_____________________________

There were young men    such as Julius Caesar and Marcus Tullius Cicero    studying law by clerking for prominent attorneys, patricians strutting by with their coteries of lackeys, consuls with their secret service agents, (called lictors), robed judges late for court, prosecutors and litigants, and bureaucrats on their way to political patronage jobs.  There were poets of every stripe reciting their verses from makeshift platforms all the livelong day, hecklers, roustabouts, welfare recipients yelling at legislators, “Increase the dole!”  There were armed troops on horseback, helpless to do much of anything toward wresting some order out of all this.

Campaigning politicians in their bleached-white togae candidae in pursuit of votes, would at certain times of the year swell the ranks of Forum habitues.  The better-educated citizens liked to swarm around the news bulletins (Acta Diurna) posted on large wooden boards propped against some column or arch.  Daily life in the Forum was, in short, a loosely choreographed, colorful bedlam.  It was Times Square, Piccadilly Circus, and the Casbah rolled up into one.

There were crowds going one way, crowds going another; crowds stopping and obstructing movement in either direction, with all the participants exceedingly animated and obstreperous, gesticulating wildly.  The lone thoroughfare, the Via Sacra, was just about impassable.

____________________________

The Via Sacra as it appears today. Carla Tavares, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons

____________________________

The morning hours, before the heat set in, saw the greatest concentration of people.  In one speech, Cicero complained about getting shoved and elbowed along by the crunch of humanity trying to shoe-horn their way through the Arch of the Fabii at the eastern entrance.  His Roman pride and dignity were particularly offended at the sight of hordes of foreigners:

“These Spaniards and Gauls walking haughtily through our Forum!”

He surely would have made note of the large numbers of Greeks, Syrians, Numidians, and Illyrians as well.  Cicero would often mumble with disdain about a certain one of his political foes, a powerful crony of the dictator Sulla,

“… hovering about the Forum with his hair fancily combed and shining with unguents!”

The Forum was the scene of occasional riots and bloodshed, the staging ground for some of the capital’s most shameful disorders.  Practically every society, or guild, or private interest group would inevitably organize a “March on the Forum” to air their grievances and demands.  Such events could turn violent, as could some political rallies.

The historian Livy complained one day about a group of women who had  marched on the Forum:

“Indeed it was with some embarrassment that

I came a few minutes ago to the Forum, right

through a throng of women.  If I had not held

in respect the dignity and basic decency of each woman

as an individual (it would mortify them to be seen

receiving a scolding from a consul, say, or a

Senator),  I would have said:  ‘It is not right for

you to concern yourselves about which laws are

passed or repealed here.”

But Seneca in his serene stoicism saw it all through a different lens and marveled at the cosmopolitanism of the place:

“…where flow together from every corner of the globe, those induced by ambition, or by appetite for pleasure.”

 

By late afternoon, the inebriated would stagger in, following hours of guzzling and eating at nearby cauponae (taverns).

There were also some other unsavory characters, wanted back home by the local authorities, who poured in from the provinces to take refuge in the obscurity of the slum district of Rome, just a few minutes’ walk from the Forum.

Various ancient authors speak to us of the sundry types who lingered    or should we say “malingered”    in the precincts of the Forum.  Certain groups acquired the habit of convening in the same area each day, so that in time different spots and corners were named for them.  For example, members of the legal profession in need of clients loitered near the Rostra (the balustraded elaborate speakers’ platform).  A large clague of idlers met near the Sun Dial.   Jewelers and makers of musical instruments set up shop along the Via Sacra.  Other sources inform us that perfume sellers were generally found at the southern end.  Book publishers conducted business in the Argiletum, the wide street that entered the Forum to the side of the Basilica Aemilia.  This section was plagued by pickpockets.  At dusk the petty thieves could be spotted there divvying up the day’s take.  Fortune-tellers were all over the place.

______________________________

3-D reconstruction of the Basilica Aemilia as it would have appeared in its day. L.VII.C, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons

______________________________

The Basilica Aemilia as it appears today. Jordiferrer, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons

______________________________

At any rate, it was through such unbridled mayhem that senators, magistrates, and other officials had to pick their way to the Curia (Senate building), or to the Basilica (courthouse), or to the Tabularium (Hall of Records), often to a soundtrack of sibilant hisses and jeers from the cynical populace, many of whom were on the dole.

It wasn’t until daylight began to lose itself in the west, that the crowds would disperse and go quickly home, for the streets of Rome were no place to be after dark, what with muggers, rapists, and other malefactors on the prowl.

Juvenal, in one of his satires, has something to say about it:

“Consider the dangers of a Roman night. Chipped ceramic dishes, tossed from a rooftop, that might shatter on your head.  Danger in every window you pass under.  You can only hope that the resident may be content to pour down the contents of a slop-pail.  A rickety horse-drawn wagon whose axle breaks, spilling its load of marble on the pavement, gangs of bullies with malice in mind, a dead body to step over.  Such is the privilege of the poor bloke who, having been assaulted, prays to get home with a few teeth left in his mouth.  You would be foolish to go out to dinner if you haven’t yet made out your will.”

As far back as the second century before Christ, Plautus the playwright, in one of his dramas, offered a virtual guide on where to find whom:  “Monstrabo quo quemque hominem facile inveniatis loco.  (I’ll show you where you can track-down men of every type.)

“Qui mendacem et goriosum apud Cloacinae Veneris sacrum.”  (Who would like a liar or a pedantic, check out the shrine of Venus Cloacina.)

“Qui periurum convenire volt hominem ito in Comitium.”  (If you hope to meet up with a perjurer, go over to the Comitium.)

In medio propter canalem, ibi ostentores meri.”  (Around the middle section, near the pond, are those who put on airs, showoffs.)

Sub veteribus ibi sunt qui dant quique accipiunt faenore.”  (Down by the old shops are the loansharks.)

Pone aedem Castoris, ibi sunt subito quibus credas male.  (Behind the Temple of Castor are the swindlers. Do not trust them.)

Confidentes garrulique et malevoli supra lacum, qui alteri de nihilo audacter dicunt contumeliam.  (Beyond the pond are those cocky and garrulous wiseguys who gratuitously harass others with insults.)

Ditis damnos maritos sub basilica quaerito ibidem erunt scorta exoleta.  (You will find the rich, derelict husbands at the base of the basilica, where there will be waiting mature ‘escorts.’)

A century later, the satirist Gaius Luciliuis, whom Horace credits as the originator of that genre of literature, echoes Plautus’  sentiments with this:

Nunc vero a mani ad noctem, festo atque profesto, totus item pariterque die populusque iactare indu foro se omnes, decedere nusquam; uni se atque eidem studio omnes dedere et artiverba dare ut caute possint, pugnare dolose, blanditia certare, bonum silulare virum se, insidias facere ut si hostes sint omnibus omnes.”   (Now truly from morning to  night, holiday or not, the commoners and the elite descend on the Forum with no plans for ever leaving.  They pull the same stunts on one another, and fight like cats and dogs then make nice in an effort to seem reputable, while at the same time they continue to plot against their own kind like irreconcilable foes.)

 

Such were the day-to-day activities in the great Forum Romanum, with some exceptions.  On days of special events, such as the inauguration of the newly elected consuls, or a sacrosanct ritual of the Vestal Virgins, or a triumphal parade honoring victorious legions with their spoils of combat and their pitiful prisoners-of-war in tow, or any other highly ceremonial celebration, perhaps, for example, an official state visit by the diplomatic corps representing all the provinces and allies—for such occasions, the authorities would see to it that a sanitized version of the Forum was presented.  On the days leading up to such hoopla, a company of elite Roman troops would make a clean sweep of it, rousting and ousting all the unwanted dramatis personae.  This would be followed by a squad of street cleaners ridding this hallowed ground of all the accumulated debris.  The following day the usual suspects would flock back to the Forum and renew the madcap circus ambience, amid the architectural splendor of the place.

That splendor of the majestic rectangle (540 yards by 270) would be heartlessly ravaged by the invading barbarians of the early Middle Ages, who reduced the old marketplace into today’s ruin-strewn graveyard.  Sic transit gloria mundi—thus passes the glory of the world.

The Breath of the Underworld: The Last Rite in Hierapolis

Bülent Ortakcı is a freelance and ghostwriter based in Turkey. As an independent writer with a deep passion for history and archaeology, he focuses on creating compelling articles rooted in thorough research and inspired by the rich heritage of Anatolia and surrounding regions.

His writings often explore lesser-known archaeological sites, the legacy of ancient civilizations, comparative religious beliefs, and folklore involving supernatural or paranormal phenomena.

Hierapolis, 2nd century A.D. The sky was painted in a hue of blood-orange as the sun descended. The white travertines of Pamukkale glowed crimson, as if soaked in ancient blood. In the heart of Hierapolis, behind the Temple of Apollo, a sacred courtyard stood silent. Only the priests of Cybele —the Galli, dressed in red robes with silver clasps— bowed before the gate of the underworld.

Ariston, high priest of the temple and guardian of the Ploutonion, was a man past fifty, but his eyes gleamed with the fire of youth. His voice rumbled like the breath of the earth itself. Like his father before him, he had inherited the duty of guarding this gate — the door between the world of the living and the realm of the dead.

But tonight was different. Even visitors from Rome had come for the ritual. According to ancient lore, once every seventy-nine years, when the stars aligned, the gate would open for the blink of an eye, and the voice of the god Pluto could be heard. That night, the sky promised such an event.

The Deadly Breath and Rising Legends

Every creature that approached the arched gate of the Ploutonion collapsed within minutes. Even today, this deadly gas was demonstrated using small animals. But tonight, something else was planned. 

Ariston opened the lid of a small marble coffin. Inside lay a carefully preserved body — Eurynome, the ancient sorceress of the city and once the woman Ariston had loved. Myths surrounded her. Some claimed she had spoken to the god of the underworld three days before her death and vowed to return. Some called her mad, others a prophetess. But Ariston had never forgotten her words.

He placed the coffin near the cave’s mouth, where the gas subtly rose. The priests chanted, and the stars slowly shifted into alignment.

The Gate Opens

Just before midnight, the ground trembled. A deep, low hum echoed from the Ploutonion. The gas at the entrance momentarily dispersed. The gate —or as Ariston believed, the veil between life and death— had indeed parted.

A whisper: “Eurynome…” It was a woman’s voice. Familiar.

Ariston fell to his knees, tears in his eyes. A silhouette appeared at the gate —draped in white, glowing eyes, empty yet full of light. The body in the coffin stirred. The priests stepped back in awe. No one had ever seen such a thing.

From Eurynome’s chest, a wisp of smoke rose and drifted into the Ploutonion. Her soul was being offered to the god.

The Price of Forbidden Knowledge

But every open gate demands a price. The tremors intensified. Columns cracked. The hum from the depths became a roar. Was it Pluto’s wrath? Or had the balance between life and death been disturbed?

Ariston heard the god’s voice, deep and terrible: “Close the gate.”

He understood. The gate was not merely a passage for the dead —it was a temptation for knowledge, power, and corruption. Humanity was not ready.

He shouted: “Seal the gate! Set the stones, begin the prayers!”

The priests obeyed. Ancient texts described the three seals to close the Ploutonion: Fire, Blood, and Breath.

A goat was sacrificed, its blood poured onto the threshold. Ariston cut his own hands and reached into the rising mist. Lastly, three priests extended their arms and offered sacred breath with solemn hymns.

Silence fell. The roar ceased. The mist withdrew. Eurynome’s body, now serene, was returned to the coffin —a smile on her face.

A Thousand Years of Silence

The gate never opened again. Ariston never left the temple. He never spoke of what he had seen. On his tombstone, he had one sentence engraved:

“To open a gate is not to speak with gods; it is to silence oneself.”

Centuries passed. Wars, earthquakes, and empires came and went. Until one day in 2013, archaeologists descended beneath the ancient stones and found an inscription near the gate of Ploutonion:

“The passage sealed by Ariston. He who opens it will speak through the price.”

_______________________________

(Pluto’s Gate), a sacred cave believed to be an entrance to the underworld and the oldest local sanctuary, Hierapolis. It was described by Strabo (629-30) as an orifice in a ridge of the hillside, in front of which was a fenced enclosure filled with thick mist immediately fatal to any who entered except the eunuchs of Kybele. The Plutoneion was mentioned and described later by numerous ancient writers, in particular Dio Cassius (68.27), who observed that an auditorium had been erected around it, and Damascius ap. Photius (Bibl. 344f), who recorded a visit by a certain doctor Asclepiodotus about A.D. 500; he mentioned the hot stream inside the cavern and located it under the Temple of Apollo. There is, in fact, immediately below the sidewall of the temple in a shelf of the hillside, a roofed chamber 3 m square, at the back of which is a deep cleft in the rock filled with a fast-flowing stream of hot water heavily charged with a sharp-smelling gas. In front is a paved court, from which the gas emerges in several places through cracks in the floor. The mist mentioned by Strabo is not observable now. The gas was kept out of the temple itself by allowing it to escape through gaps left between the blocks of the sidewalls. Carole Raddato, CC BY-SA 2.0, Wikimedia Commons

_______________________________

Cover Photo, Above Left: Credit Carole Raddato, CC BY-SA 2.0, Wikimedia Commons

Pioneering Archaeology in the Middle Mekong Basin: An Interview with Dr. Joyce White, University of Pennsylvania

Dr. Joyce White has been specializing in Southeast Asian prehistory since 1974, especially in Thailand and Laos. She has done pioneering work at the UNESCO World Heritage site of Ban Chiang in Thailand. She is the Director of the Ban Chiang Project at the University of Pennsylvania Museum, where she is Consulting Scholar. In 2001, Dr. Joyce White started an archaeological program in Laos. The Middle Mekong Archaeological Project (MMAP) explores and researches the prehistory of northern Laos. MMAP has an international team of researchers in diverse fields, including scholars from Laos.She has a long list of publications on Asian archaeology. Dr. Joyce White is the Executive Director of the Institute for Southeast Asian Archaeology.

Her first great impression of archaeology unfolded when she was fifteen and saw a church and graveyard being excavated in England. Images of Asia in a professor’s class at UPENN helped her set course. She has an MA & Ph.D. in Anthropology from the University of Pennsylvania. Dr. White’s research has been funded by the National Science Foundation, The National Geographic Society, the Henry Luce Foundation, etc. One of her latest articles, cowritten with Elizabeth G. Hamilton, is “The Metal Age of Thailand and Ricardo’s Law of Comparative Advantage” in Archaeological Research in Asia 27.

______________________________

Ban Chiang, Thailand. Welcome to Ban Chiang World Heritage. Mattes, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons

______________________________

Ban Chiang Prehistory. SF12, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons

_______________________________

RM (Richard Marranca): You did pioneering work in Ban Chiang and other places in Thailand. What brought you there – what luck and pluck? When did you first work there, and was this continuous over many years?

JW (Joyce White): I was a first-year grad student in Anthropology at the University of Pennsylvania in 1974. After hearing slide presentations by Chet Gorman at the University of Pennsylvania Museum, I wanted to specialize in Southeast Asian archaeology, and specifically Thailand. Chet was not very encouraging at first, but eventually he became supportive.

 

RM: What are some of the things you did early on in Ban Chiang?

JW: As a grad student, I supervised the lab analysis of the materials from Ban Chiang and other Metal Age and Stone Age sites. The cultural remains were shipped to Penn Museum for study. When it came time to design a PhD Project, I wanted to study plants and foods, using modern Ban Chiang societies to get some ideas on the past in that region. This kind of study is called ethnoarchaeology.

_____________________________

Ban Chiang excavations. Steve from Bangkok, Thailand, CC BY-SA 2.0, Wikimedia Commons

_____________________________

RM: Did you work with Chet Gorman and Pisit Chareonwongsa? Can you tell us about them, as well as any others you worked with?

JW: Chet Gorman was my supervisor until he died in 1981. Pisit Charoenwongsa came to the Penn Museum to also work with the Ban Chiang materials for a couple of years. Chet was a ‘character’ and Pisit was more serious. Fascinating collaborators and peers of Chet frequently came through, really adding to my education on what being a Southeast Asian archaeologist was all about.

 

RM: Is Ban Chiang a mixed burial/habitation site? Can you tell us about it?  

JW: At Ban Chiang, both burials and remains from everyday life were excavated. As I worked with the site’s evidence after Chet’s death, I eventually came to the conclusion that the dead were in fact buried within the settlement in spaces used during daily life. This kind of practice is called “residential burial.” In the world there are some societies still practicing some form of residential burial, and there is an ethos of the living wanting to maintain a strong connection with deceased relatives.

_____________________________

Rice farmers in Thailand. Jtorquy, CC 1.0 Universal, Wikimedia Commons

_____________________________

Rice Farmers in Thailand.jpg Wikimedia commons

RM: You mentioned that people had millet and rice and other foods. Were the people involved in both agriculture and hunting/gathering? Were they animistic/polytheistic? What kind of houses did they live it? What were their ailments and how long did they live?

JW: Pre-state agrarian societies in Thailand practiced both some plant cultivation and animal husbandry, but also engaged in hunting and gathering. This diverse resource base and diet resulted in the people being unusually healthy for an early agrarian society. Average life expectancy was around 35-40 years. Evidence for trauma, such as broken bones, suggested they came from accidents of daily life, not warfare. Their houses must have been made of organic materials like bamboo, as only holes for posts remain.

 

RM: Can you tell us about curating a traveling exhibition on Ban Chiang, “Discovery of a Lost Bronze Age,” sponsored by the Smithsonian, 1981?

JW: Before Chet died in 1981, he had gotten the Smithsonian’s Traveling Exhibition Service interested in doing an exhibit on Ban Chiang. After Chet died, I was asked to be guest curator for the exhibit as my years working in the lab before I lived in Ban Chiang gave me in-depth knowledge about the site and the materials excavated.

 

RM: Was the technology (bronze making, pots and such) centered in major places like Ban Chiang, or did it spread out from there? I recall you used the word “decentralized.” You mentioned something about “Ricardo’s Law” having to do with decentralization?

JW: Technologies of pot-making and bronze making were not centralized. The existing evidence indicates these were decentralized crafting activities. This meant relevant skill sets widely distributed in prehistoric sites throughout Thailand. Expectations among archaeologists in the mid-20th century were that metallurgy in particular was likely to be a restricted specialized activity. However, in the latter part of the 20th century, more evidence for other kinds of economic strategies have been recognized.

Ricardo’s Law of Comparative Advantage is one of the concepts that help to illuminate decentralized economic systems from a bottom up rather than a top-down perspectives.

_____________________________

Ceramic Pot, Ban Chiang Museum. Kiwiodysee, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons

_____________________________

RM: I recall you said that the people were peaceful, that researchers didn’t find any or many skeletons with serious war injuries? Did towns and cities have defensive walls?

JW: The monograph suite (4 volumes) laid out comprehensive evidence for prehistoric exploitation of metals in Thailand. One theme concerns the methodology of study. Some studies of ancient metallurgy take what I call an “art history” approach, focusing only on intact attractive objects, and usually such objects are recovered from graves. But that approach misses the massive evidence from fragmentary remains that metalwork was localized and used in quotidian ways.

Looking at “whole assemblages” (all metals and related objects recovered from a site) reveals a much more accurate picture of the place of metals in societies as—in some cases valued objects—but not so much prestige goods restricted to the rich. As noted above, skeletal trauma is predominantly from everyday activities, and there is no evidence for defensive walls until late in the iron period.

____________________________

Ban Chiang ceramic ware. Ziegler175, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimeda Commons

____________________________

RM: Can you tell us about the Ban Chiang Ethnobotanical Project? One person was Dr. Cristina Castillo from the University of London, I recall. What did she work on?

JW: For our Year of Botany program in 2024, we studied 3 collections with botanical dimensions connected to Ban Chiang. I brought in experts for each part of the program. Dr. Cristina Castillo from University of London trained and supervised two Thai student interns in the process called “flotation”, where excavated sediments are processed in a way to extract plant microfossils. The ethnobotanical collection I did in 1978-1981 in Ban Chiang village was the focus of four Thai botanists, who curated the collection so it could be accessioned to the Philadelphia Herbarium. A fifth Thai I brought to work with the ethnographic collection I did in Ban Chiang in 1981.

 

RM: So, the PENN museum asked you to head to Laos. You discovered something amazing – 10,000 years of habitation along the Mekong near Luang Prabang city. Can you discuss some of the high points? It’s also a land of rivers and tributaries and crossroads – how does that support people and culture?

JW: The archaeology of Laos is still in its infancy. There are very few projects, and it was shut off from modern archaeology for most of the 20th century. But my initial 2.5 day visit to Luang Prabang in 2001 showed to me that specifically that part of the Mekong River had human occupation for at least 10,000 years. There was the Stone Age site Tham Hua Pu with classic Hoabinhian stone tools; there were sherds from many different periods eroding into the Mekong, including earthenware, stoneware, and porcelains. And there were many polished stone adzes.

I am so far the only American who has successfully established a long-term archaeological research Program in Laos.

Luang Prabang, eventually beginning in AD 1351, became the capital of the Lao Kingdom of Lanxang. Archaeologists are still in the early stages of compiling a narrative with high points. However, I am working with the idea that the numerous tributaries entering the Mekong near Luang Prabang from the left bank is a key geographical factor making that area of enduring significance for humans living there in the past. Even decentralized societies like to trade and communicate. So, the evidence we are finding in things like ceramics do support a crossroads scenario for this location.

________________________________

Lua Prabang. Shelly Zohar, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons

________________________________

Luang Prabang market. calflier001, CC BY-SA 2.0, Wikimedia Commons

________________________________

RM: You explored a huge number of sites? How did you get around and find them? Where did you do test excavations? It sounds like an especially amazing site was called Tham An Mah – was that the culmination and what was that like?

JW: At this point in time, we do “reconnaissance surveys”. We work closely with local inhabitants to find sites and any evidence for pre-modern use of the terrain. We get around with local transportation, both vehicles and, if needed, small boats, and a lot of walking. From the 100 localities identified, we chose 4 so far for test excavations at cave sites, each site on a different tributary, with access to both upland and lowland landscapes. Tham An Mah was a wonderful site with intact burials. We hope to do 1 more test excavation on the Ou tributary.

________________________________

Luang Prabang Museum. Rebeccamack, CC BY 2.0, Wikimedia Commons

________________________________

RM: I loved Luang Prabang and its museum. Didn’t you do work at the museum?

JW: The government has assigned us space several times in outbuildings for the Luang Prabang National Museum. We do love to work in those spaces, which are essentially un-renovated but sturdy late colonial structures but perfect for our needs.

 

RM: It was fascinating that you mentioned scientists that joined your team to study remains, to get DNA samples from villagers, to study climate, etc.? Can you tell us a few things about the scientists?

JW: Stephen Oppenheimer, who is affiliated with both Oxford and the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, took DNA samples from several villages in Luang Prabang Province. A team led by Dr. Kathleen Johnson, who is at the University of California Irvine, is studying climate change evidence from speleothems (stalagmites). Her team includes Australians, Italians, Chinese and more. We have a very multi-national approach to our work.

____________________________

You can learn more about the Ban Chiang Project at this website, and the Middle Mekong Archaeological Project here.

The Fall of Cusco

Freelance writer, researcher and photographer, Georges Fery (georgefery.com) addresses topics from history, culture, and beliefs to daily living of ancient and today’s indigenous societies of Mesoamerica and South America. His articles are published online at travelthruhistory.com, ancient-origins.net and popular-archaeology.com, and in the quarterly magazine Ancient American (ancientamerican.com). In the U.K. his articles are found in mexicolore.co.uk.

The author is a fellow of the Institute of Maya Studies instituteofmayastudies.org, Miami, FL and The Royal Geographical Society, London, U.K. (rgs.org). He is a member in good standing with the Maya Exploration Center, Austin, TX (mayaexploration.org) the Archaeological Institute of America, Boston, MA (archaeological.org), NFAA-Non Fiction Authors Association (nonfictionauthrosassociation.com) and the National Museum of the American Indian, Washington, DC. (americanindian.si.edu).

In “The Conquest of Peru,” we left Pizarro departing Tangarará, which he founded on the Pacific coast in mid-September of 1532. From the coast with his riders and foot soldiers, he traveled up the mountains, where reports of war and carnage became reality. The Spaniards were not aware of the severity of the ongoing “war of succession” between the two sons of Inca Huayna Capac for the crown of the “Land of Four Parts” or Tahuantinsuyo in the Quechua language. It was Topa Inca (1471-1493), the son of the great Sapa Inca Pachacuti (1438-1471), who expanded the empire’s borders north to Ecuador and south to Chile. His son, Huayna Capac, on his deathbed, made the fatal mistake of splitting the kingdom between his two sons (de la Vega, 1539-1616), for his first son, Ninan Cuyochi, who died of smallpox.  Huascar Capac and his deceased brother were born to a Coya or princess of the imperial court at Cusco. His half-brother Atahualpa (1502-1533), born to a Cara princess of the court at Quito, was shunned by the nobility at Cusco for not being of royal blood. Spanish chroniclers of the late sixteenth century depict Atahualpa as brave, ambitious, and popular with soldiers. The father deeply loved his second son and persuaded his legitimate son, Huayna Capac, the future Great (Sapa) Inca in Cusco, to have Atahualpa reign in the northern reaches of the empire at Quito, over a thousand miles away. This situation led to persistent conflicts between the half-brothers and, as de la Vega underlined, they were soon entangled in a deadly civil war that lasted from 1529 to 1532. Antagonisms intensified while ethnic groups sided with one faction or the other, ravaging cities and towns, wreaking havoc on economies, and decimating the population.

________________________________

Lima-Cusco Region

________________________________

Atahualpa and his army of quiteños “people of Quito” defeated Huayna Capac cuzqueños “those of Cusco.” However, it is at Quipaipán in the most significant military battle of Inca history (1532), that the war took a decisive turn for Inca Atahualpa. After the battle, the Inca headed south and stopped at Cajamarca (Kaxamarka in Quechua), while his superior officers (apukispays) chased Huascar’s army south; they defeated and captured him near Cusco. Had it not been for Pizarro’s arrival at that time, the entire Inca empire would have fallen to Atahualpa at Quipaipán.

As the Spaniards moved up the Andes Mountain range, they encountered devastation and remnants of scorched villages. The local people believed that the Spaniards would come to help Inca Huascar against his half-brother Atahualpa, who was now encamped with his army in the Pultumarca valley near Cajamarca. In July 1532, with 62 riders and 106 infantrymen, Pizarro reached the ruined village of Caxas, nine thousand feet up in the mountains on the paved road to Cajamarca. The going was hard in the Cordillera Vilcabamba because the biting cold, ice, and snow of the Salcantay range had replaced the mild climate and sea breeze of the coast. Many troopers suffered from the cold and became sick, as did the horses. Meanwhile, Atahualpa reached the outskirts of Cajamarca, where, informed by his scouts, he waited for the Spaniards.

On Friday, 15 November 1532, the Spaniards arrived on the hills over Cajamarca. The city below looked finely built and paved with smooth stones; it was deserted. Half a mile beyond, in the Pultumarca valley, was Atahualpa’s camp and its thousands of warriors. Pizarro ordered his army to go down to the deserted town before dusk, for they could quickly be overpowered in the open. There, they set up camps in large houses with covered stockades attached for horses. Once settled, Pizarro planned to invite the Inca the following day and capture him. For this purpose, in the morning, he sent Hernando de Soto with Felipillo as translator, and Hernan Pizarro with Yacané, who, with Felipillo, were the young men captured off the coast of Tumbes. Thirty-armed riders protected the envoys.

They made their way through the Inca’s camp and were impressed by thousands of fires and warriors. Courtiers and high-ranking war chiefs welcomed the envoys. Atahualpa made them wait several hours outside his lodgings and appeared when the rowdy visitors’ impatience could no longer be contained. The Inca faced the Spaniards with ire and contempt. This thirty-five-year-old lord with long black hair and gold ornaments dangling from his ears and neck, together with the mascapaycha‘s red imperial headband, magnified his eminent position. He sat on his usnu, an elevated golden throne with officials (kurakas) at his sides. Heated exchanges about the presence of armed white bearded men in his kingdom, soldiers of an unknown king, were baffling to him, as was this equally unknown world they claimed to come from.

The Spaniards displayed their skills riding horses and shooting arquebuses. Pedro de Alvarado, an expert rider, brought his horse at full gallop, heading straight to the seated Atahualpa. He came to an abrupt stop only a few feet from the deadpan Inca. A lesson of remarkable horsemanship, while Atahualpa displayed a lesson of lordly stoicism. To seal the meeting, chicha, the traditional fermented drink made of corn and seasoned with a variety of wild plants, was poured into three large gold cups. The Spaniards held the cups but did not drink, so the Inca, noticing their distrust, sipped from each cup to show his guests they had nothing to fear. Atahualpa accepted Pizarro’s invitation to visit Cajamarca the following day. 

______________________________

Atahualpa, the last Incan Emperor. @sciencephotolibrary.com

______________________________

At noon, after a night of anxiety, the Spaniards were still waiting for Atahualpa. Pizarro hid his forces, including cavalry under Hernando de Soto, Sebastian de Belalcazar, and Hernando Pizarro, along with their saddled horses, in sheds that opened onto the plaza. Juan Pizarro was in command of the infantry and would closely follow the riders’ thrust. Captain Pedro de Candia and the artillery were on the Rumitiana hill behind the town for support. Pizarro, on horseback together with twenty-five-foot soldiers, hid in a structure in the middle of the plaza. Fear was palpable, given the overwhelming odds; several foot soldiers wetted their pants. The plan called for a forceful exit on the plaza, aiming for Atahualpa, who would be carried on his golden litter, then to surround and capture him. A simple plan of victory or death, for there was no other way for a handful of Spaniards in this war of conquest. The Inca likewise had plans, which were to make sure none of the bearded men escaped and survived. Atahualpa’s command officer, Rumiñahui, with battle-hardened warriors, was sent to close any escape route on the back of the town to capture all Spaniards for public execution.

By mid-afternoon, lookouts saw the Inca leave his camp with a large retinue of unarmed warriors, for the Inca bet on numbers to capture the bearded men alive. He was eager to show the Andean supreme deity Viracocha and the people of the empire that no god or man could ever stand or defeat him. He arrived at the plaza on his golden litter held by courtesans, protected by bodyguards and a compact group of unarmed warriors to display his apparent peaceful intent. Calling for the Spaniards, he sent unarmed scouts to find out where they were. They reported that the bearded ones were hiding in nearby sheds around the plaza. The Inca was about to order a more forceful investigation when Dominican Friar Vicente de Valverde, chaplain of the army, pushed his way through the throng to the Inca’s litter with Martinillo, also from the 1526 encounter off Tumbes as translator, screaming God’s name to the heretics while brandishing the Holy Bible.

Atahualpa asked what the yelling was all about, but could not understand, and, enraged by Martinillo’s stuttering, threw both friar and Bible to the ground. This outraged Pizarro, who burst out of the shed with infantry onto the plaza, while Pedro de Candia’s artillery boomed, arquebuses were discharged on the crowd, and a red waving flag summoned the cavalry, which came out stamping grounds, bugles blaring, lances, axes, and saber blades glinting in a no quarter charge. The panicked Incas were no match for the unknown weapons, the ferocious war dogs, and the brutal and pitiless men. Fear seized the unarmed men who tried to escape the plaza, piled up against its walls, forming human pyramids where many were slaughtered. Fear was everywhere, for fear, at that moment, was the Spaniards’ most powerful ally, without which they would have been defeated. The Inca was thrown from his golden litter and seized by Francisco Pizarro. That evening, taken to the town’s Amaru Huasi or Snake House by torchlight, the Spaniards saw a man torn by defeat but still radiating majesty, looking fiercely and imperiously at his captors.

_______________________________

Cajamarca’s Battle. @JuanLepiani, 1922-1927 in wikipedia.org

_______________________________

The following day, November 16, Hernando de Soto on Pizarro’s orders, rode down into the valley in Atahualpa’s camp, where he recovered eighty thousand pesos of gold and seven thousand marcos of silver (Xeres 1983; 1534-fol.XIII). He also came back with over a hundred women and thousands of quiteño prisoners. The many cuzqueños they encountered, were forcefully enlisted in Atahualpa’s army as carriers. Few of them were retained as support personnel while others were ordered to go home.

After days of negotiations, according to Spanish military ransom tradition, Pizarro demanded Atahualpa, as conditional freedom, to fill three rooms to a man’s height, one with gold and two with silver. Upon agreement, over weeks, gold and silver plates, cups, figurines and panels reached Cajamarca in long caravans of llamas carrying loads which, according to estimates, totaled over twenty tons. Why was the astute reason for Atahualpa to pay Pizarro for his restricted autonomy? It was classic Andean barter; the Inca traded gold and silver, of which he had plenty, for a limited self-determination which was better than no freedom. With the capture of Atahualpa, the Spaniards were, if not yet in control of the empire, major players in its future.

A few weeks later Atahualpa’s brother and rival, Huascar, was found drowning in the Andamarca river. Questioned by Pizarro, Atahualpa pleaded his innocence. With no convincing proof of the Inca’s guilt, Pizarro spared his life. The cuzqueños, however, were enraged for they could not understand Pizarro’s leniency; they knew that Atahualpa was Huascar’s murderer. Spanish officers likewise did not believe Atahualpa’s claim of innocence, for they were tipped about his contacts with the quiteño general Quisquis then master of Cuzco, who was last seen near Jaujá, planning to mobilize forces to surround Cajamarca. Even though the gold and silver rooms were not fully stacked up as promised, Pizarro was satisfied but, for security reasons, did not release Atahualpa. Many officers were convinced of Atahualpa’s duplicity and of his hand in Huascar and his family’s execution. However, as a hostage Atahualpa was worth protecting; dead, he had no value. The Spaniards conviction of Atahualpa’s guilt rested largely on their interpreter Felipillo who, at times, translated for his own benefit or that of others. Each party, for its own purpose, wanted Atahualpa executed. Diego de Almagro, who arrived with a reinforcement of two hundred men, was worried that, on one hand, he was not certain of the Inca’s guilt, but on the other that the gold and silver share would mostly go to Pizarro’s men, who already had “saved some” for themselves. Spanish officials were concerned that the fifth of gold and silver, the quinto real owed to the Crown under the 1528 Agreement could be lost or delayed. Friar Vincente de Valverde, as a Dominican with an inquisitorial mentality, demanded the Inca be burned at the stake for his refusal of baptism.

The unstable situation led Pizarro to remain firm in not sentencing Atahualpa to death; he was in fact the only one left on the Inca’s defense. In mid-July, however, after tedious legal proceedings, Atahualpa was indicted for treason, the murder of his brother Huascar, killing family princes and princesses of his father clan (panaca), but also, for having children with his sisters and keeping matrimonial relationships with them and last, for being a heretic who refused the true God. On 26 July 1533, Atahualpa Inca, with his hands tied, was led to Cajamarca’s Plaza in a procession including Friar Vicente de Valverde, the mayor Juan de Porras, Captain Juan de Salcedo, and military officers.  The Inca walked with the serenity of a warrior’s utter indifference to his fate. In the middle of the plaza, a tree trunk was driven into the ground with a pile of wood at its base. Atahualpa understood that he would be burned at the stake and asked the priest Valverde, Why? Valverde answered that fire was for idolaters consigned to hell, while strangulation or garrote was for believers of the true cross, sent to heaven. Atahualpa elected garrote to prevent his soul from being dispersed to the four winds, never to live again. He was immediately baptized under the name of Juan, while Pizarro promptly changed the terms of his execution from burning to strangling. The Incas’ wives cried, begging to follow their lord into the afterlife; many of them did.

With Cajamarca and its province now under Spanish control, Pizarro knew that, for absolute socio-political and economic power, the Spaniards needed to occupy Cusco, the seat of government of the Inca empire. The current leader, Túpac Manco Capac Inca (1514-1544), was born in Tiahuanaco, on the shores of Lake Titicaca. He was one of the sons of Huayna Capac and his second wife, the Coya (princess), Shihui Chimpu Rontocay. Throughout his childhood with his siblings, they were repeatedly told that Atahualpa had slaughtered their family. Now in his late twenties, Manco Capac was already a seasoned military officer stationed in the town of Charcas in the Paititi mountains, leading thousands of warriors during the fratricide war.

Of note is that Manco Capac Inca was initially suspicious of Pizarro’s motives and of his long-term plans. But the recent capture of the quiteño leader Calcuchimac, a Quisquis general hanged by the Spaniards, eased his doubts. Pizarro took advantage of Manco Capac’s lifelong bitterness and made it known that the Inca should be the legitimate heir to the empire.

_____________________________

Manco Capac Inca Yupanqui.  @mayaincaztec.com

_____________________________

Driven by his lifelong rage for the murder of his family, Manco Capac committed to pooling Spanish and Inca forces to take back Cusco from Quiquis, which they did. On 14 November 1533, Pizarro and his army reached the hills overlooking the city and the fortress of Sacsayhuaman, two miles north of Cusco, which Quisquis’ troops had deserted. Cusco is 11,200 feet high in the Andes mountains; its name, Qusquis, in Quechua is Qusqu’wanka or “rock of the owl” in Aymara. The city was divided into two social groups or moieties: hurin (upper), associated with the priesthood and hanan (lower), related with the military. Furthermore, the city was partitioned to mirror the four provinces of the empire: the Tahuantisuyo : Chinchaysuyo (north), Antisuyo (east), Kuntisuyu (west), and Qullsuyu (south), with Cusco at their intersection. Hernando de Soto and Juan Pizarro with the cavalry entered Cusco from the north without opposition. They were followed by Francisco Pizarro, Manco Capac Inca, and his officers, while, to avoid surprises, Diego de Almagro followed with the rear guard. The Spaniards were awestruck by the city’s magnificence, its wide and well-paved streets, and the megalithic, tightly fitting stone walls of buildings. They rode to the main plaza and were received by old priests who believed the bearded men were sent by the creator deity Viracocha, the Sun, with their lord Manco Capac.

_______________________________

Cusco, Plaza de Armas.  @St.Amant-wikimedia.org

_______________________________

Spanish captains secured the main palatial buildings around the central plaza. Pizarro elected Inca Huayna Cápac’s Casana palace for himself. Almagro chose the one next to it while Gonzalo selected Túpac Inca’s palace. They were mesmerized by the city’s abundance of gold and silver seen on and inside major buildings and palaces. Before order could be restored, soldiers ran screaming through the paved streets of polished stones and into palaces and mansions. They came out with armfuls of valuable fine dresses, rich feathers, gold and silver plates, and precious stones. They broke into a storage area containing coca leaves, chili, corn, stacked dried goods, quinoa, weapons, and more. They ran up the wide stairs of the massive Qorikancha, or “great enclosure,” the Temple of the Sun (Inti). Its inside walls were covered with thick gold panels, while in the temple of the Moon goddess (Mama Ocllo), daughter of Viracocha and Mama Qucha, the walls were covered with silver. Halfway up the wide stairs of the Qorikancha, the High Priest (villac umu), his arms spread out, tried to stop the rush of these strange, bearded men who, for an instant, mouth agape, looked up before running up the steps laughing. They reached the Hatunkancha housing of the acllahuasi, the solar virgins dedicated to the Sun, who had been sent safely away a few weeks before to save them from sacrilege.

From Cusco, the first of many shipments of precious metals was carried to Cajamarca for processing. Sixteenth-century records account for hundreds of loads of gold and silver, equivalent to tens of tons (Xerez 1636: fol. XXI). After cutting and melting into bars, the precious metals were transferred to Lima overland for shipment to Panama and then onward to Spain. At the same time, wages of officers and soldiers were paid, together with those for services. Manco Capac Inca’s agreement with Pizarro was grounded in his persistent hate of the quiteños for in his mind, they and not the Spaniards, were the real invaders. After all, didn’t Pizarro agree to return the Inca dominion as his realm? Hernando de Soto, in command of the army, supported by thousands of native troops, was ordered to chase and capture the fleeing quiteños. He crossed the Apurimac river to confront Quisquis’ coalition at Cupi in Collabamba, where a fierce battle forced the defeated group to retreat north.  On their retreat the quiteños left a trail of vengeance and a horrifying killing spree through Quechua and Huanca towns and villages, killing men of all ages and kidnapping hundreds of women. The Spaniards, however, would turn the tide, for by mid-May 1534, they defeated again Quisquis forces in Maraycalla, but once more, he escaped the battlefield. However, he was murdered a year later in the village of Tiacambe near Quito by his lieutenant Huambracuna. Quisquis general Rumiñahui, escaped to Quito after Atahualpa’s capture and named himself Inca. Over months in 1533, he fiercely battled Sebastián de Belalcázar’s army in the empire’s northern reaches. He was taken prisoner and tortured to reveal where he hid the gold and silver of the Treasure of the Llanganates he took from the cities he burned, but he never talked and was hanged on the 26 of July 1533.

Manco Capac Inca returned to Cusco from the Maraycalla battle, wearing the mascapaycha imperial red headband with tassels, followed by Juan Pizarro, Fernando’s brother. A few months later, the Inca had misgivings about the Spaniards’ motives. They were neither friends nor partners as he thought they were, but the real invaders. His lifelong hate for Quisquis and the quiteños he realized blinded him.

_____________________________

Apukispay Quisquis. @numiscorner.com

_____________________________

The conquistadors backed the coronation of Manco Capac to secure their control over the empire. Pizarro’s backing stemmed from the Spaniard’s goal to continue and perpetuate Inca internal discord. Manco Capac, however, decided that he would not be the puppet of the bearded men who frequently disrespected and humiliated him, especially the ambitious and abusive Pizarro brothers Juan and Gonzalo, unlike their father’s paternalistic relationship. Manco Capac discretely shared his growing dislike of the Spaniards’ heavy hand with principals of towns in the Tahuantinsuyo. His supporters agreed to his plans to rebuild the empire of his forebears.

At length, he resolved to escape, which he did on a dark night with his bodyguards. As agreed with kinsmen he headed for the nearby town of Mohina. Upon learning about the escape, Juan Pizarro became enraged and asked his brother Gonzalo, captain of the cavalry, for a squad of riders to capture the Inca, which they did two days later. Manco Capac was forcefully returned to Cusco in chains, placed in a cell and, for weeks, was subjected to abuses from his captors. The punishment included demeaning his first wife, the Colla Curi Ocllo, her sisters, and other noble women. The pressure to deliver more gold and silver knew no bounds. It was driven by greed, as well as to answer the persistent demands from Emperor Carlos V in Madrid to finance his ongoing wars against the French and the Turks.

Manco Capac’s hope was rekindled when the high Solar Priest (villac umu), arrived from exile in Chile where he escaped Alonso de Alvarado’s army. He raised the ire of miners along Lake Titicaca by calling, “all rise and leave no Spaniard alive.” The Solar Priest sent a message to Manco Capac, who was then planning his second escape. The chance came thanks to Hernando Pizarro’s insatiable demands for gold when Manco Capac told him that he knew where Huascar Capac’s hidden treasure was near Cusco. At that time, Manco Capac had been released from strict captivity a few months before and had regained his jailer’s confidence. As evidence, he showed Hernando a large gold statue, which was smuggled into his residence by Inca warriors as proof of Huascar’s treasure. Hernando was convinced and planned to let Manco Capac lead the way, but, to avoid warning the treasure’s guards, he and his riders would follow a couple of leagues behind. That was his mistake. A few leagues from Cusco, Manco Capac met a large group of Inca soldiers who swiftly led him to his army of tens of thousands of warriors encamped fifty miles away. Scouts informed the Pizarro brothers of the Inca gathering forces. Over the course of a few weeks, the brothers fanned out of the city to assess the seriousness of the situation. Meeting one evening, they raised the number of lookouts and guards on the city’s access roads. On May 29, 1536, Hernando and his brothers knew that the Incas’ call to arms to rid their kingdom’s capital of the Spaniards was real because that day, Cusco was surrounded.

Sixteenth-century Spanish chroniclers point to an Inca army numbering over two hundred thousand warriors headed by high-ranking officers (apuquispays), with the Solar Priest in overall command. In addition to combat troops, there were about eighty thousand support personnel and carriers. The Inca forces were to attack the city through the roads of the four suyos, Cusco’s cardinal quarters’ access routes, each headed by experienced fighters and officers. They aimed to weaken the Spaniards by dividing their forces on four fronts. The Incas’ troops under the command of officers Coyllas, Osca, Curi, Atao and Taipe would attack on the North road (Chinchaysuyo) while the South (Qullasuyo) with the bulk of the troops, was under the command of Llicli; the West (Kuntisuyo) squadrons were headed by Saradaman, Humán Quicana, and Curi Huallpa; while those of the East  (Antisuyo) were manned by archers, slingers, and blowgun shooters, under Rampa Yupanqui and Anta Allaca. The Solar Priest’s first order was to breach the water pools and canals around the city to swamp the land and turn it into an immense mud field, which would slow down the Spaniards’ deadly horse charges.

On the conquistadors’ side, there were no more than five hundred Spaniards, all of whom were experienced in military tactics and weaponry. They were fearsome battle-hardened fighters, with years of experience, from Europe to Mexico’s killing fields. In the city, they were supported by about thirty thousand native allies from several ethnic groups hostile to the Incas—chief among them were the Chachapoyas. The three Pizarro brothers knew that the key to survival rested on the cavalry, for the natives were frightened of the trampling horses and their riders, armed with lances and swords. The foot soldiers wore metal helmets, upper body armor and were deadly in close combat with swords and axes; musketeers were of limited use.

The Inca armies’ advantage was in numbers. They were able during battle to roll tired or wounded troops with fresh ones from the rear every three to four hours, allowing for unceasing assaults. Yells from tens of thousands of throats; hundreds of drums beating; blowing of trumpet-like conch-shells (pututu) calling on ancestors for help, never ceased, leaving no respite. Waves of incendiary arrows and slingshots with stones, red heat from fire, wrapped in cotton, burned the roofs of houses made of wood, covering the city with a thick, suffocating smoke. Day after day, it was a merciless fight. 

_____________________________

No Mercy. @F.Castro.P – georgefery.com

_____________________________

Hernando Pizarro organized Cusco’s defense around three teams with riders, each headed by his brother Gonzalo, Gabriel de Rojas, and Hernán Ponce de Leon. In contrast, he, his brother Juan, and their lieutenants would, at the sound of a bugle, move from quarter-to- quarter to support fighters where and when needed. They quickly learned that the cavalry had to be the heart of the defense strategy. Early mornings, the infantry’s task, headed by Pedro del Barco, Diego Méndez, and Francisco de Villacastín, supported by allied warriors, destroyed barricades erected across the streets during the night to clear the way for the cavalry.

The riders were not very successful, given the narrowness of most streets, which, at best, limited the frontal assault to two riders at a time. The deep wall of enemy warriors blocking the street could not be breached, even though many were slain. Both riders and horses were wounded in these forays; many could not fight another day. Indian allies fought boldly and impetuously, while the Spaniards battled with a determination driven by fear. Spanish captains said that they should hold the Qorikancha or “great enclosure” for its massive walls and tunnel (the chincana found in 1594; rediscovered recently), extending below the city to Sacsayhuaman. The enclosure would have been impregnable, allowing time for support to arrive from the coast. Others advised Hernando to abandon Cusco and head for Lima. Alas, it was too late, all roads and trails were now tightly held by the enemy.

The worst came when the Spaniards realized that the massive fortress of Sacsayhuaman (fortress of the royal falcon), two miles on Cusco’s northern outskirts, was held by the enemy. The Killke people had built it around 900, before the arrival of the Incas, when Pachacuti Inca (1438-1471) fortified it in the mid-fifteenth century. The Spaniards had no alternative but to retake the fortress for its proximity to the city, before more enemy forces settled there. With their indigenous allies the Spaniards battled fiercely all day with cavalry charges and foot soldiers.

________________________________

Sacsayhuaman’s Triple Walls. @ticketmachupicchu.com

________________________________

They cleared the fortress late on 6 May 1536, and returned to Cusco, leaving a large contingent of indigenous fighters to hold it. A week later, however, Sacsayhuaman was overrun again. Most worrisome for Inca warriors were the deadly riders with their lances and swords in open terrain. So, they made traps for the horses by digging round holes a couple of feet or so wide and about three or more feet deep in dirt roads in which the leg of a horse at full gallop would plunge into and break. The rider was then easy prey because he had to fight his way on foot or be captured and decapitated.

Twice, the Spaniards overran and lost Sacsayhuaman. On the third attempt, they succeeded in keeping the fortress at the end of a tough day under the leadership of Hernando Pizarro. In command of the fortress was the Solar Priest with more fighters; the frontal assault was as intense as it was brutal. A few days later, fifty horsemen led by Juan Pizarro and auxiliaries rode from Cusco, breaking through lines of warriors, running northwest toward Chinchaysuyo. The riders feigned a retreat toward Lima, which drew more Inca warriors out of the fortress. The Spaniards then swiftly turned around and attacked from the south, securing the first battlement of the perimeter walls. It is at that time that Juan Pizarro, having lost his helmet, was struck in the head by stones from sling shots, and died a few days later from his injuries. The following night, using wood ladders made on site, Spaniards and their allies scaled and fought their way up the two successive upper walls, overrunning the bastions in a savage fury.

In the morning, however, the fortress’s Muyumarca tower was still in the enemy’s hands. The Solar Priest (villac umu) planned his way out from the tower to seek reinforcement. Tuti Cusi Hualpa, the fortress commander, would hold the tower but ultimately could not resist the Spaniards’ onslaught. The following day, the Muyumarca tower was overrun, and the battle was lost. Tuti Cusi Hualpa had sworn to Manco Capac that he would hold the fortress at all costs; he failed and could not surrender. In full regalia, weapons in hand, he threw himself from the battlements to the rocks below. The Solar Priest had escaped on the riverside and joined Manco Capac in Calca with plans for a second siege of Cusco. When, a few weeks later, Inca scouts returned, they found the fortress firmly in Spanish hands. The siege had lasted for a long, brutal year of fighting.  Grain, however, was now in short supply; the Inca army could not be fed. The last harvests were exhausted, and grain storages were empty. Hunger loomed in towns and villages near and far; it was time to plant before famine would overcome everyone. Tens of thousands of allied warriors left for home, so Manco Capac Inca lifted Cusco’s siege and withdrew to Ollantaytambo and then to Vilcabamba where he established the Neo-Inca State (1537-1572).

The cost in lives of the “war of the brothers” followed by the battle of Cusco was dreadful and wrecked Inca and other Peruvian cultures. During the battle of Cusco, Lima, Ciudad de los Reyes, its original name, was very close to falling to the Inca allies’ relentless attacks. The battles were no less brutal and savage than those at Cusco, with Francisco Pizarro at the forefront. The city was saved by those pitiless soldiers from Spain and their indigenous allies who, for weeks, battled and freed Lima on the 14 of September 1536. But where did all the gold go? The upcoming article “Portobello, Peru’s Gold Gateway” will answer this question.

______________________________

Onward to Portobello.  @P.Briege the Elder-wikipedia.org 

________________________________

References – Further Reading:

José Antonio del Busto Duthurburu, 1973 – La Conquista del Perú and Perú Preincaico, 1977                        

Garcilaso de la Vega (1539-1543) by Alain Gheerbrant, 1961The Incas and, La Florida del Inca, 1986

Salomon and G.L. Urioste, 1991    The Huarochiri Manuscript

Pedro Cieza de Leon (1540-1550) – El Señorio de los Incas 1984, and La Crónica del Perú, 1985

John V. Murra, 1978 – La Organización Económica del Estado Inca

Francisco de Xerez, 2011Verdadera Relación de la Conquista del Perú.

Father Bernabé Cobo (1582-1657), by Roland Hamilton, 1979History of the Inca Empire

Pedro Sarmiento de Gamboa (1532-1608?), 1907 – History of the Incas

Lilian Estelle Fisher, 1966 – The Last Inca Revolt 1780-1783

The Multi-Million-Year Path to Becoming Human—Are We Actually There Yet?

Jan Ritch-Frel is the executive director of the Independent Media Institute and publisher of the Observatory, where he edits the Human Bridges initiative.

Deborah Barsky is a writing fellow for the Human Bridges, a researcher at the Catalan Institute of Human Paleoecology and Social Evolution, and an associate professor at the Rovira i Virgili University in Tarragona, Spain, with the Open University of Catalonia (UOC). She is the author of Human Prehistory: Exploring the Past to Understand the Future (Cambridge University Press, 2022).

Our chapter in the human evolutionary story is one of a globally connected population that has ballooned thanks to a suite of recent technologies. We frequently congratulate ourselves on these achievements, unique to the animal kingdom. But what if the celebrations are a little premature? Should we take into consideration that more phases of development will come in mind, behavior, and even appearance? Can we identify where we are in the process and what the pathways of change look like?

These are the kinds of questions that can keep professor Eudald Carbonell up at night. Carbonell is one of the most prominent archaeologists and thinkers on human evolution on the international stage today. He is best known as the co-director of the UNESCO World Heritage Site, Sierra de Atapuerca archaeological complex in Burgos, Spain, home to one of the longest records of human evolution known to science. A professor at the Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Carbonell also established the Catalan Institute of Human Paleoecology and Social Evolution in Tarragona, Spain, where he continues to mentor students and researchers.

One of Carbonell’s great legacies is a conceptual framework for thinking about the human evolutionary process that he calls “hominization and humanization.”

In an important summary paper of his concept that we have translated with his approval, Carbonell explains hominization as:

“… a biological process in which a series of morphological and ethological changes in the primate order generate a structure with enormous evolutionary potential. This process involves, in addition to the genetic material that carries the information, the continuous change in ecological conditions to which these primates must adapt in order to survive. … In the long process toward humanization, humans have undergone a series of acquisitions—or improvements on previous acquisitions—that have made our current uniqueness possible.”

Carbonell wants us to understand that the hominization and humanization processes are two sides of the same coin. And that the humanization process has its own trajectory, which includes an active choice in our fate.

“Humanization must be seen as an evolutionary state of being that our species has not yet attained, but toward which we—as a species—can aspire:

“Humanization, as a systemic structural acquisition, represents a cosmic awakening, a singularity composed of multiform acquisitions that have allowed us, over time, to break with the inertia of the past and overcome natural selection to delve into what is currently unknown. It is essential to begin by understanding the initial concept, which provides us with the foundation of knowledge that makes the process of humanization possible and, therefore, places us right at the beginning of the entire human adventure.”

Initially, straitjacketed by biological limits, our ancestors eventually invented the technologies that would come to rewrite the rules. We are completely reliant on culture and symbolic communication for this stage of extraordinary economic development and population growth.

Carbonell’s thinking and published research have influenced scholars, including us, to consider whether the next phases of human development are only possible if we can take guidance from what this revolutionary deep-time archaeology is teaching us. We met with Carbonell to discuss these ideas and reflect on the wisdom he has attained over the decades.

___________________________

Jan Ritch-Frel and Deborah Barsky: Your concept of hominization to humanization is a powerful framework for understanding human origins and our own framework. Can you briefly describe the meaning of this process?

Eudald Carbonell: This concept describes a hybridization process between biological and cultural traits. Hominization refers to all the biological developments characterizing the human evolutionary process. For example, when early hominins adopted an erect stature and fully bipedal locomotion, this was an important shift that liberated the hands from locomotory tasks and led to crucial modifications of the brain.

Humanization refers to all of the social and cultural developments that are associated with the different stages of human biological evolution. The concept of humanization is distinct from hominization, but their relationship should not be seen as one of coevolution but rather one of integral evolution. I don’t like the concept of coevolution. Instead, I propose the idea of evolutionary integration, wherein one incidence triggers another, engaging a process of reproduction through retro-alimentation. So, when I speak about hominization and humanization, I am referring to a process of hybridization of both biological and cultural traits.

Ritch-Frel and Barsky: New data emanating from archaeogenomics indicate a braided human evolution pathway: What do hominization and humanization tell us about the culmination of this process and our own experiences of being and becoming?

Carbonell: The evolutionary process of hominization and humanization is very complex. Previously, it was conceived of as a linear phenomenon—occurring sequentially—but it is not. In fact, it is plural and very multifaceted, like a bush with many branches. For example, advances in genetic studies (paleogenomics) now demonstrate that we are a hybrid of the many species with which we coexisted in Paleolithic Eurasia at different times, like the Neandertals and the Denisovans. We have also learned that anatomically modern humans emerged from yet another hybrid species much earlier than previously thought. In reality, the story of our genus Homo is very complex. I agree with my good friend, the famous paleoanthropologist Tim White, who said that Homo erectus and Homo sapiens are actually the same, in the sense that they represent a single evolutionary branch composed of a long succession of distinct individuals.

Modern humans are the result of multiple hybridization events. Only some 40,000 years ago—when the last known hybridization took place—the genomes recorded from some fossils of modern human individuals, who lived in Eurasia, have revealed relatively high percentages of Neandertal and Denisovan inputs. That means that H. sapiens emerged as a result of genetic drift; presently, our species has predominated as an outcome of this supersystem, but we are hybrids. We are not what we thought we were.

Ritch-Frel and Barsky: A lifetime like yours spent studying prehistory must allow you to develop original perspectives: Is the life of an archaeologist really the fantastic journey that most people think it is?

Carbonell: When you work, you always encounter deceptions. But the truth is, I have been obsessed with human evolution for many decades. Now that I am [72 years old], I feel I am ready to work on the future because I think that our species should know where it is headed. But my experience has also taught me that in order to think about where we are going, we need to investigate the past.

To me, the past and the future are the same and can be considered as having a linear quality, but only if we know the whole sequence. So, to speak with more authority about the future, we need to know the past. Without this knowledge, we cannot adequately develop our minds, our consciousness, our human intelligence.

In my opinion, we should define how we want to shape our future; what we want as a species. Do we want to be 4 billion people in the world? Do we want to be more cooperative? Do we want to be more united? Or do we want to disconnect? Once we know what we want to be, then we can look to the past to see what we need to do to get there. Do we want to be more eco-social? Do we want to show more respect to the natural and historic patterns we come from? Or do we want to break it all down—and even destroy ourselves? That is the first thing that we need to decide. If we don’t want to destroy ourselves, then we must find better ways to cooperate.

Ritch-Frel and Barsky: Archaeologists develop a special perspective because they spend more time than most people thinking about human evolution. Do you think this kind of training could be useful for other professions?

Carbonell: Yes, exactly. In fact, I have proposed to integrate a new class into the educational system, from as early as primary school and then also in secondary and university levels, which I have named: Human Social Autecology. Even if this class is taught for only one hour a week, from a young age, when one enters the educational system, let’s say from four or five years old, it could provide our youth with a new vision of the world. The class should be designed to provide a synthesis and should include a wide range of topics, like zoology, biology, sociology, and other subjects.

Acquiring and truly integrating such a wide body of knowledge would be beneficial to humanity on the whole because it would help individuals to learn to think critically and more fittingly assume a more acceptable basic behavioral code based on Human Social Autecology.

Ritch-Frel and Barsky: Do you think the new waves of information coming out of human origins research can address questions that challenge modern humanity?

Carbonell: I think we are an imbecile species. And for that reason, we sometimes believe and act on imbecile ideas that have no scientific proof. Learning about human evolution serves to understand ourselves. Human beings are profoundly evolutionary and evolved.

I sincerely believe that all of these notions, like creationism, in its various forms, or fake news—all of these nonsensical ideas are linked to our failure as a species. They teach us nothing and cannot be demonstrated. For example, the idea that the world is flat; everyone knows that it is round because it has been demonstrated scientifically. Everybody also knows that we originated from primates, that we are primates. Although with a significant difference, we are cultural primates. We are intelligent thinking beings.

__________________________

This article was produced by Human Bridges.

Cover Image, Top Left: Pexels, Pixabay