“This challenges what we thought we knew about Palaeolithic pigment use”, sais Dr. Izzy Wisher, the lead author of the study.
Until now, scholars believed Palaeolithic artists predominantly used red and black pigments – practically no other colors are present in the art of this period. This was thought to be due to a lack of blue minerals or limited visual appeal. Given the absence of blues in Palaeolithic art, this new discovery suggests that blue pigments may have been used for either body decoration or dyeing fabrics – activities that leave few archaeological traces.
“The presence of azurite shows that Palaeolithic people had a deep knowledge of mineral pigments and could access a much broader color palette than we previously thought – and they may have been selective in the way they used certain colors”, Izzy Wisher says.
The stone bearing the azurite traces was originally thought to be an oil lamp. Now, it appears to have been a mixing surface or palette for preparing blue pigments — hinting at artistic or cosmetic traditions that remain largely invisible today.
The findings urge a rethink of Palaeolithic art and color use, opening new avenues for exploring how early humans expressed identity, status, and beliefs through materials far more varied and vibrant than previously imagined.
The study was conducted in collaboration with Rasmus Andreasen, James Scott and Christof Pearce at the Department of Geoscience, Aarhus University, as well as Thomas Birch who is affiliated with both the Department of Geoscience, AU, and the National Museum of Denmark, alongside colleagues from Germany, Sweden and France.
The full study* is published in Antiquity.
__________________________________
Article Source: Aarhus University news reease.
*The earliest evidence of blue pigment use in Europe, Antiquity, 29-Sep-2025. 10.15184/aqy.2025.10184
Cover Image, Top Left: DieterLumix, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons



