Archives: Articles

This is the example article

Ancient teeth provide new insight into the lives of the world’s first farming villagers

Durham University—Archaeologists have revealed new insights into how the world’s first farming villagers formed communities, moved across the land and responded to outsiders. 

Researchers, led by the universities of Durham and Liverpool, analysed the chemical signatures in teeth from 71 people, spanning the entire Neolithic period from 11,600 to 7,500 years ago.  

The teeth were found at five archaeological sites in what is now modern Syria. 

By analysing the strontium and oxygen isotopes in the tooth enamel, the researchers were able to establish if the individuals grew up locally or whether they moved from a different area – reconstructing previously invisible patterns of mobility. 

This tooth analysis, combined with skeletal evidence and funerary practices, revealed that once permanent villages were firmly established, most people stayed local and strengthened ties to particular communities.  

Interestingly, towards the end of the Neolithic it appears that women were more likely than men to move between communities. 

This suggests patrilocal traditions, in which women relocated to form marriages in new communities, whereas men remained in their home villages. 

This movement cycle may have evolved to avoid inbreeding within communities. 

The study also found that local and non-local individuals were often buried together and received the same, sometimes exceptional, funerary treatments. 

The research is published in the journal Nature Scientific Reports. 

Senior author, Dr Eva Fernandez-Dominguez of Durham University’s Department of Archaeology, said: “This research allows us to see, for the very first time in this region, how mobility and social connections shaped the earliest farming societies. 

“We found that villagers largely stayed local, yet they welcomed newcomers who appeared to be fully integrated into social and funerary life.  

“The evidence of women moving between villages also points to complex social dynamics in the world’s first permanent settlements.” 

First author of the study, Dr Jo-Hannah Plug, currently of the University of Oxford, said: “The Late Neolithic period in this region is archaeologically known for the development of new cross-regional networks, innovation, and the movement of material culture, animals, and ideas.  

“Our research, for the first time, shows direct evidence for the movement of people during this period too.  

“Our observation that women in particular were mobile, illustrates their – likely central – role in the processes of innovation and the establishing of cross-regional networks of the Neolithic period. 

“Our results suggest that the reproductive networks of this period extended beyond the direct neighbouring communities, and that marriage partners were sought potentially quite far away.” 

The researchers found that at some sites, individuals who originated elsewhere appeared fully integrated into village life, suggesting early farming communities were inclusive and open to newcomers.  

One striking example came from one of the sites, Tell Halula, where multiple layers of human remains were preserved within house floors.  

Analysis revealed that the individuals buried together in the same house included both locals and non-locals, all treated with the same funerary practices.  

Further evidence across the samples showed that local and non-local people were buried in close proximity in the same cemeteries and spaces, with the same elaborate burial assemblages and with similar post-mortem manipulations such as being buried in a seated position. 

This indicates that mobility did not preclude social inclusion, and that villagers in the Neolithic period were open to assimilating newcomers fully into community life and afforded them the same distinct treatment in death. 

The study demonstrates how scientific techniques, such as isotope analysis, can transform our understanding of human social life from thousands of years ago. 

It also fills a major knowledge gap in the Northern Levant, a key corridor for the spread of agriculture and settled human societies. 

The research was funded by The Leverhulme Trust. 

About Durham University

Durham University is a globally outstanding centre of teaching and research based in historic Durham City in the UK.

We are a collegiate university committed to inspiring our people to do outstanding things at Durham and in the world.

We conduct research that improves lives globally and we are ranked as a world top 100 university with an international reputation in research and education (QS World University Rankings 2026).

We are a member of the Russell Group of leading research-intensive UK universities, The Times and Sunday Times UK University of the Year 2026, and ranked in the top five in all three major UK university rankings (The Times and The Sunday Times Good University Guide, the Guardian University Guide, and the Complete University Guide)

____________________________

Aerial view of the excavations at the Neolithic site of Tell Halula in Syria. Picture credit: Grup de Recerca en Arqueologia del Mediterrani i del Proxim Orient (GRAMPO), Seminari d’Arqueologia Prehistòrica del Pròxim Orient (SAPPO)

____________________________

One of the burials found at the Neolithic site of Tell Halula in Syria. Picture credit: Grup de Recerca en Arqueologia del Mediterrani i del Proxim Orient (GRAMPO), Seminari d’Arqueologia Prehistòrica del Pròxim Orient (SAPPO)

____________________________

Laboratory analysis at Durham University. Picture credit: Dr. Eva Fernandez-Dominguez

____________________________
Article Source: Durham University news release.
*‘Strontium and oxygen isotope analysis reveals changing connections to place and group membership in the world’s earliest village societies’ is published in the journal Nature Scientific ReportsDOI link: s41598-025-18134-3 

A Scholar’s Quest to Find the Ancestral People of the Most Influential Language on Earth

Jan Ritch-Frel is the executive director of the Independent Media Institute.

A deeper reach into human history is now possible, thanks to a growing body of archaeological data collected using advanced technologies and patient scholarly detective work accumulated across recent decades. Research into the reconstruction of lost parent languages of the ones we speak today is included in that process. One of the most studied and reconstructed languages is known as Proto-Indo-European, or PIE for short.

PIE is the parent for most primary languages spoken today in the Americas, western and northeastern Eurasia, and the Indian subcontinent. English, Romance languages, including Spanish and French, German, Slavic, Baltic languages, Russian, Persian, Hindi, Bengali, Gujarati, and Punjabi are all children of PIE. Some PIE speakers and their descendants got deep into the lands of modern China. This spread has intrigued many scholars who are trying to answer questions such as: who were these people, when and where exactly did they emerge, what were they like, and was their spread a random occurrence or was there something about them that allowed PIE-speaking descendants to break “correlations between geography and genetics” to quote Harvard scientist David Reich, whose lab is at the forefront of researching the origins of the Indo-Europeans.

J.P. Mallory is among the most accomplished scholars to investigate the language, culture, and archaeology of the far-flung Indo-Europeans. Across decades, he has published about waves of migration and cultural combination that produced the Irish in far Western Europe, all the way to Northeast Asia, to try and piece together who the Tocharians of the Tarim Basin in China were. Now an emeritus professor at Queen’s University, Mallory has released a new book, The Indo-Europeans Rediscovered: How a Scientific Revolution is Rewriting Their Story, which recounts the history of scholarship about them across the past few centuries and offers new insights into the debates about their origins, using archaeology, linguistic research, and ancient genetics.

The research by Mallory and other scholars into the origins of PIE and their speakers is more than an interesting research project. Misinformation about Indo-Europeans—cultivating the notion of a homeland that produced a dominant culture that spread across the Earth—has been used for political advantage, from Nazi Germany to ethno-nationalist groups in Eurasia and the Americas. Accurate and deeper scholarship that explains the connections to the many descendant cultures and their profound connections should have a powerful clarifying effect that precludes the misuse of this information. It’s powerful information that provides 3.4 billion people, or 42 percent of the world’s population, an authentic shared frame of reference and history across almost 450 languages.

It’s one of many new areas of research into the past that have the potential to become an engine for the betterment of humanity—as it percolates through the centers of influence—and helps us grow accustomed to relying on a wider and global human historical evidence base as reference. This information is valuable context for understanding ourselves, but so is the process of learning it. Society will greatly benefit from minds that are trained to think in deeper timescales than a millennium or two—archaeology and biological sciences are increasingly furnishing useful insights and pattern observations into humanities at a historical depth spanning millions of years.

I reached out to Mallory to learn about his latest research and future directions in finding the lost PIE speakers and thought it would be interesting for readers.

Jan Ritch-Frel: You identify the Pontic Steppe that spans from the northwestern Black Sea coasts across the northern Caucasus into Kazakhstan as the most likely homeland of the Proto-Indo-European speakers. In the decades of research, have you landed on some of the broad cultural and social markers of these people as you looked through the archaeological evidence of that region?

J.P. Mallory: There have been a lot of assumptions made regarding the steppe populations during the Eneolithic-Early Bronze Age, but so far it has been extremely difficult to produce a convincing image of their social structure, hierarchies, etc., from archaeological data.

The problem lies in the nature of the evidence: almost entirely burials, so it is difficult to reconstruct an entire culture from the burials alone. This is compounded by the fact that the burials tend to be poor—the majority lack any grave gifts—and those that do have grave gifts are often limited to a pot, maybe some stone tools or animal remains.

These graves are a lot poorer in objects and information than the Corded Ware culture or many of the Neolithic cultures of Europe. For example, a rough count of the presence of metal objects in a few of the major databases (where we have about 1,000 burials for a given region), reveals that 2 percent or less had a metal object in the grave.

Because of this, we have a range of opinions based on various studies suggesting that the steppe cultures were egalitarian—at one end—to enjoying a tripartite class society resembling that expressed in the Indo-Aryan class system. While we can point to some very rich burials, for example, employing the burial of a wagon and other objects, this is in no way typical of the burials.

One of the greatest research needs is an aggregated database of all Yamna burials (this would probably number well over 12,000 excavated burials) that could be analyzed. Where are the 19th-century German scholars when you need them?

Ritch-Frel: What are some of the most interesting subplots in the pursuit of understanding PIE origins and Indo-Europeans?

Mallory: There are several major aspects of the hunt for the homeland that I find particularly interesting. First, there is the non-linear nature of our progress. By this I mean that unlike many other linguistic problems, we do not find a narrative of discovery and consensus-building progressively unfolding over time, with each conference bringing us closer to a final solution. The only way it can be presented as such is if you concentrate solely on a single strand of argument and ignore the glorious free-for-all that was going on from about 1870 onward.

Some have criticized me for discussing now long-discarded solutions to the homeland problem, presuming that one only needs to dwell on those issues that give us our current answer. What you miss here is that for more than two centuries, the scholarly world has regarded the models of their own time as the definitive solutions, and, at least from the time of Roger Latham around 1860, there have always been multiple camps of diametrically opposed scholars. Often, what constitutes “new evidence” derives from a different discipline than the one that supports an alternative theory and does nothing to address its validity. Moreover, what have often been regarded as long-discarded solutions have had an uncanny ability to be resurrected by later generations.

A related issue is what I have termed the “constituency problem,” i.e., where scholars from various disciplines believe that there are core factors in the solution that cannot be ignored or overturned by evidence from another discipline. Sometimes they are apparent within the same discipline, for example, there are those who argue for a deep genetic or contact relationship between Indo-European and the Uralic family (Finnish, Estonian, Hungarian, etc.). This indicates that the homeland must have been located in or near Eastern Europe, while others emphasize early contacts or relationships between Indo-European and languages of the Near East or south Caucasus, which would locate the homeland south of the Caucasus.

On other occasions, the evidence is disputed across disciplines. For example, the craniometric evidence failed to support any case for relating the Corded Ware culture with the Pontic-Caspian steppe, while ancient DNA firmly supports the derivation of the majority of Corded Ware population from the steppe.

Ritch-Frel: What kinds of industries, specializations, and lifestyles do you think PIE people would have been aware of—boating people, mining, winegrowing, etc., along the Caucasus and the coasts of the Black and Caspian seas.

Mallory: This is guesswork for me but given the fact that metals were mined in the Balkans and transported as far east as the Volga, many would have been aware that such objects came from a distant land, and they would know in which direction that land lay. Obviously, the traders or smiths who transported the copper would be well aware of their source.

As for the coastal areas of the Black Sea and the Caucasus, the fact that the genetic signature indicates that nearly 50 percent of the steppe population had ancestors from that direction, and that there were exchange currents still running between the steppe and the Caucasus, they would know their larger world.

Ritch-Frel: Your book dwells heavily on the sociological factors that might have explained the spread of the PIE and Indo-European speaking populations. Do you think it’s worth considering the density and portability of the livelihoods of PIE speakers and specialized knowledge as a key enabler for their ability to challenge the boundaries of geography and genetics?

Mallory: I would think that the increased mobility of the steppe societies is probably a major key in their expansion, since it exponentially increases the territory that one can interact with and possibly control. The key issue here, as I explain in my book, is that pastoral nomads have had an extremely poor record in Europe in spreading their own language (excepting the Magyars and perhaps we can also count the Turks). So why did Eneolithic pastoralists succeed so well?

One possible reason is that they were the first, so there really was a step change between them and the settled farmers of Europe, while all later pastoralists encountered cultures that already possessed vehicles and horse riding. Who knows?

Ritch-Frel: What parts of the archaeological record and related scholarship would you recommend to curious people who want to know more about the PIE and the Indo-European world and why?

Mallory: Doug Q. Adams and I produced an Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture (1997) and The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World (2006), which introduced readers to most of the topics listed above. For the archaeological cultures, David W. Anthony’s The Horse. The Wheel, and Language (2007) is the go-to book.

_____________________________

This article was produced by Human Bridges, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

Cover Image, Top Left: Kanenori, Pixabay

The Trojan War, Mycenaeans, and an ancient Treasure in Los Angeles

Set artfully within the classic spaces of the famous Getty Villa Museum along California’s Los Angeles coastline rests, for a time, a remarkable treasure that affords a rare view of a time and place over 3,000 years ago in ancient Greece. At once, it tells a story that bridges the legendary myth of the Trojan War, a storied Aegean kingdom, and a mysterious elite warrior buried in a lone shaft tomb in southwestern Greece…. 

 

Troy

It was a perfectly strategic location for the ancients to build a city.

Commanding a point at the south entrance of the Dardanelles (Hellespont), it controlled the land route that extended northward along the western Anatolian coast and over a narrow point of the Dardanelles to the present-day European coast. From an elevated eyeshot looking west from the site across 4 miles of the plain of the Scamander River (Küçükmenderes Çayı), is the Aegean Sea. Today, this place is characterized by a mound, or tell, known as Hisarlik, meaning ‘place of fortresses’ in Turkish. Most archaeologists know it as the site of legendary ancient Troy, made famous in classical and popular literature with Homer’s Iliad as the besieged city of the Trojan War. 

___________________________

These walls of the acropolis belong to Troy VII, which is identified as the site of the Trojan War (c. 1200 BC). CherryX, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons

___________________________

More remains of Troy. Kizildeniz, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons

___________________________

There was at this place, however, more than one ‘Troy’. Succeeding archaeological excavations have revealed evidence of multiple settlements of varying size and complexity, each built on top of the remains of the preceding habitation and forming a layer-cake physical account of cities here beginning just before the Early Bronze Age (c. 3300–2100 BCE) and extending to the 3rd century AD — a remarkably long human occupation of about 3500 years. But Homer’s Troy, according to archaeologists, may arguably be identified with the Late Bronze Age occupation level designated in archaeology-speak as Troy VIIa. In this level, excavations evidenced structures that were set close together within a fortress, with almost every structure featuring one or more massive storage jars sunk into the ground, mouths exposed at the surface. It was a short-lived occupation level, showing measures that suggested preparations for a significant military siege. Analysis of human remains indicated by interpretation that this city was captured, looted, and burned. Imported Mycenaean pottery found in this level helped to date the level to between 1260 and 1240 BCE. In storytelling, this was the time of Homer’s Troy-sieging Achaeans — Agamemnon, Achilles, Odysseus — historically, the Mycenaeans. Among them also was Nestor, king of Pylos….

King Nestor and Pylos

…….we went to Pylos and to Nestor, the shepherd of the people, and he received me in his lofty house and gave me kindly welcome, as a father might his own son who after a long time had newly come from afar: even so kindly he tended me with his glorious sons…….

These words of Telemachus, the son of Odysseus and Penelope as penned by Homer in Book 17 of the Odyssey give us this ancient literary glimpse of Pylos, where the legendary King Nestor made his domicile. But beyond Homer the excavations over the last century have revealed a tangible place — a Pylos that can actually be seen and touched, verifying the historicity of the legendary place.

Evidence for human settlement at Pylos extends as far back as the Neolithic, though it is best known as an important center during Mycenaean times (1600 -1100 BC). Pylos as a state extended over 2,000 square kilometers (770 sq mi) with a population that may have ranged from 50,000 to as many as120,000 people. In 1939, a joint Hellenic-American expedition was formed with the Greek Archaeological Service under Epano Englianos and Carl Blegen with the University of Cincinnati. Excavations began on 4 April 1939, with dramatic results.  Almost immediately, stone walls, fresco fragments, Mycenaean pottery and inscribed tablets were unearthed. Blegen identified monumental structural remains as the great “Palace of Nestor”, and although it is not certain that this was indeed such, Linear B tablets found during the excavations indicated that the site in which the structure is located was anciently called Pylos. In fact, about 1,000 Linear B tablets were unearthed. Translation of the tablets confirmed that they were part of a royal archive, and that the palace functioned as the administrative, political and financial center of the Mycenaean region of Messenia.

______________________

Above and below: the covered area of the excavated remains of Nestor’s Palace. Fæ, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, Wikimedia Commons

______________________

____________________

Wall fresco of lions and griffins that decorated the walls of the “Queen’s Hall” at the Palace of Nestor. As exhibited at the special exhibit, The Kingdom of Pylos: Warrior-Princes of Ancient Greece, at the Getty Villa in Los Angeles.

____________________

Two women walking in procession wearing Minoan-style flounced skirts. Found in a plaster dump northwest of the palace. As exhibited at the special exhibit, The Kingdom of Pylos: Warrior-Princes of Ancient Greece, at the Getty Villa in Los Angeles.

____________________

Tablets inscribed in Linear B, like this one, were found among the excavated material from the remains of the Palace of Nestor. As exhibited at the special exhibit, The Kingdom of Pylos: Warrior-Princes of Ancient Greece, at the Getty Villa in Los Angeles.

____________________

Plan of the excavated remains of the Palace of Nestor. 1-Entrance. 2-Court. 3-Anchamber. 4-Megaron(main hall). 5-Storerooms with olive oil. 6-Storerooms with wine. 7-Archives. 8-Propylon. 9-Bath.
10-Small megaron.

____________________

More recently, a team of archaeologists, consisting of director archaeologists Jack Davis and Sharon Stocker, along with a group of student volunteers, from the University of Cincinnati, conducted excavations not far from the site of the palace. In preliminary survey work, Stocker noted that “there were noticeable concentrations of rocks on the surface….”*  These were watermelon-sized stones. And there were thousands. They were the remains of collapsed beehive-shaped (tholos) tombs the ancients constructed at this location millennia ago, during the Late Bronze Age. In the spirit and style of archaeology, the team removed them carefully one at a time. The painstaking work eventually revealed two tombs, one of them as deep as nearly 15 feet below the surface. “It was like going back to the Mycenaean Period. They had placed them by hand in the walls of the tombs and we were taking them out by hand,” Stocker said.*

Their work soon began to pay off. “By the end of the first week we knew we had something that was really important,” said Stocker.* And the finds were remarkable. These were clearly princely tombs. Excavations yielded “thousands of small pieces of gold foil, beads, pieces of faience, small bits of bronze and the occasional piece of silver”, according to Stocker, including an agate sealstone emblazoned with two genii (mythological lion-like creatures), a gold ring featuring two bulls flanked by sheaves of barely grain, and a gold pendant showing what could be the Egyptian goddess Hathor. These finds, along with the small fragments of gold foil and other small artifact fragments, clearly suggested wealth and status. Some news releases reported that the gold foil indicated the walls had once been covered in gold leaf. But “there is no evidence that the tomb walls were actually covered with gold leaf,” says Stocker. “[Carl] Blegen [excavator of the Palace of Nestor] speculated as much, based on the quantity of gold leaf that was found in Tholos IV, which was excavated by his team member, Lord William Taylour, in 1953”. In any case, the finds and materials clearly point to tombs that once interred individuals or families of singular wealth and/or status, as well as a capacity to carry out a broad network of trade relationships in the Eastern Mediterranean — evidenced by materials such as amber from the Baltic, amethyst from Egypt, and imported carnelian. The researchers employed extensive use of photogrammetry and digital mapping to record and document in detail the location and orientation of all objects within the tombs. This was important, according to director Davis, as it afforded the ability to “see all levels as we excavated them and relate them one to the other in three dimensions,” essential for analyzing, understanding and interpreting the tombs and the significance and meaning of their contents.*

_________________________

An aerial view of the site shows the Tholos IV tomb, far left, found by UC archaeologist Carl Blegen in 1939 in relation to the two family tombs called Tholos VI and Tholos VII, uncovered by the team of UC archaeologists Jack Davis and Sharon Stocker. Aerial photo/Denitsa Nenova/UC Classics, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

_________________________

UC archaeologists discovered two Bronze Age family tombs.  The round tombs, called Tholos VI and VII, contained artifacts that could shed new light on life in ancient Greece. Aerial photo/Denitsa Nenova/UC Classics, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

_________________________

The floor of Tholos VI, one of two family tombs UC archaeologists discovered, is composed of giant stone slabs likely taken from the ruins of the Palace of Nestor during the Late Bronze Age. Photo/UC Classics, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

_________________________

Carnelian sealstone featuring two mythological creatures called genii with serving vessels and incense over an altar. Photo/Jeff Vanderpool/UC Classics, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

_________________________

A modern putty impression of the carnelian seal stone. Photo/Jeff Vanderpool/UC Classics, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

_________________________

Gold pendant found in the family tombs, featuring the likeness of Hathor, an Egyptian goddess who protected of the dead. Photo/Vanessa Muro/UC Classics, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

_________________________

Tholos tomb IV at the Palace of Nestor site, built ca. 1550-1500 BC. Excavated by Blegen. Peulle, Wikimedia Commons, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International

_________________________

The Tomb of the Griffin Warrior

Arguably one of the most remarkable discoveries at Pylos emerged in 2015, as an archaeological team headed by Davis and Stocker (University of Cincinnati) were excavating what appeared at first to be an otherwise unremarkable stone-lined shaft tomb. This description changed very quickly, however, as they began to encounter relatively intact objects made of bronze. Their efforts eventually led to the skeletal remains of an adult male and nearly 1500 artifacts, some of the artifacts featuring rich iconography, and all associated with a single burial. Dated to about 1500 B.C. based on pottery shards found at the location, the shaft tomb and its contents have turned out to be, according to Stocker, “one of the most magnificent displays of prehistoric wealth discovered in mainland Greece in the past 65 years.”** Stocker would know—after years of experience investigating an area rich with evidence of an ancient presence long before the classical Greeks, she had never personally encountered a single burial quite like this one.

_____________________________

Sharon Stocker stands within the excavated shaft tomb. Courtesy Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

_____________________________

Viewed from above, the excavated Griffin Warrior Tomb, with the one-ton capstone which dominated the scene of the tomb details during the excavation. Courtesy Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

_____________________________

The inventory of finds was astounding. As reported by M.B. Reilly of the University of Cincinnati in the related UC Magazine article, the object tally included the following:

The skeleton of an adult male, age approximately 30 – 35 years who would have stood about five-and-a-half feet tall, placed upon his back when buried;

At his left chest, a sword, three feet in length, featuring an ivory hilt decorated with gold in an embroidery design;

Beneath the sword, a small dagger featuring a similarly designed gold hilt;

More bronze weapons laying at his legs and feet;

Four solid gold seal finger rings;

A 30-inch long necklace of box-shaped gold wires with two gold pendants decorated with ivy leaves;

Numerous well-preserved gold beads;

Two gold cups and six silver cups, one with a gold rim;

Bronze cups, bowls, amphora, jugs, and a basin;

More than 50 seal stones featuring intricate carvings of goddesses, altars, reeds, lions, bulls – some with human bull jumpers flying over their horns. All seal stones were in Minoan style and likely originated in Crete;

Pieces of carved ivory, one featuring a griffin with large wings and another showing a lion attacking a griffin;

Six ornate ivory combs, implying that he may have had long hair;

Over 1,000 beads of carnelian, amethyst, jasper and agate. Archaeologists suggest that some of the beads may have decorated a fabric burial shroud – as suggested by several square inches of associated woven threads;

Thin bands of bronze, likely from long decayed body armor; and

Wild boar’s teeth, likely from a warrior’s helmet.**

____________________________

Above and below: The three-foot sword found next to the skeletal remains. Courtesy Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

____________________________

____________________________

Found within the tomb: A meter-long slashing sword with an ivory handle covered in gold. Courtesy Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

____________________________

A bronze mirror with an ivory handle, found within the tomb. Courtesy Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

____________________________

Ivory comb, one of six, found within the tomb. Courtesy Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

____________________________

One of four solid gold rings found within the tomb. This one features a Cretan bull-jumping scene. Courtesy Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

____________________________

From analysis of the burial, archaeologists could see that many of the burial objects were originally placed above the interred on top of his wooden coffin, which had been initially crushed by a fallen one-ton stone (likely the cap stone of the burial), the wooden coffin having long since decayed and collapsed and leaving the objects resting upon the skeleton. Further analysis of the skull indicated that he had a broad face with close-set eyes and a strong jaw.

__________________________

Graphic representation of the tomb and tomb remains and objects as displayed at the special exhibit, The Kingdom of Pylos: Warrior-Princes of Ancient Greece, the Getty Villa Museum.

__________________________

The skeletal remains within the context of these finds clearly suggested the burial of a high status individual, perhaps even a king, or wanax, as Mycenaean kings or lords were called anciently. The man represented by the remains has been dubbed the “griffin warrior” by Davis and Stocker based on the griffin iconography and weaponry and armor found in the tomb.

More than a year later, conservationists in the lab revealed another stunning find from the tomb. After meticulous cleaning of a limestone-encrusted seal stone, they exposed an intricately detailed etching of a combat scene on a hard stone measuring only 3.6 centimeters, 1.4 inches, in length. In fact, many of the fine details become clear only when revealed through photomicroscopy.   

_____________________________

The agate as seen unaided at the special exhibit, The Kingdom of Pylos: Warrior-Princes of Ancient Greece, the Getty Villa Museum.

_____________________________

Enhanced view of the agate as shown at the special exhibit, The Kingdom of Pylos: Warrior-Princes of Ancient Greece, the Getty Villa Museum. “A horizontal lathe to make fine cuts, along with emory, olive oil and ground stone, were used to make the fine cuts,” said Claire Lyons, Curator of Antiquities for the J.Paul Getty Museum. Based on recent research, says Lyons, “it was not about the artist’s eye” that created this remarkable piece of work, “it was about the artist’s feel” of the material.  

_____________________________

A digitally altered illustration of the seal found in the tomb of the Griffin Warrior. Courtesy Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati, as published in the article, Uncovering the Early Mycenaeans in Popular Archeology Magazine, January 7, 2020.

_____________________________ 

“Some of the details on this are only a half-millimeter big,” said Davis. “They’re incomprehensibly small.”***

The image on the stone portrayed a warrior in the process of defeating two opponents, one already laying dead at his feet, and in the act of plunging a sword into the neck of the shielded second opponent — a scene of Achaean combat that could be likened to any event from the pages of Homer’s Iliad.

_________________________

A Rare Treasure at the Getty Villa Museum

The amazing discoveries and revelations at Pylos notwithstanding, their appreciation has remained primarily via the pages of journals, magazines, and online articles published by the popular press, and through research papers and reports written for academics. Now, however, for the first time, the tomb treasure of the warrior prince, the Pylos kingdom, and the Mycenaeans have journeyed nearly 7,000 miles to the sunny coast of southern California. From June 27, 2025 to January 12, 2026, the Getty Villa Museum showcases the original artifacts in a well-appointed and captivating gallery space, drawing thousands of visitors and enthusiasts to see, in person, many of the most significant objects that have now made the Pylos discoveries among the most iconic finds of Greek archaeology. 

“These are truly unique objects,” says Claire Lyons, who is Curator of Antiquities for the J.Paul Getty Museum, working directly with the Getty Villa Museum, “because, among other things, this is 100 percent archaeologically excavated and documented material.” Along with the incredible ‘combat agate’ and other seal stones exhibited in the special gallery, she points to a reconstructed artifact that, though perhaps less ‘glamorous’ on the stage among these artifacts, deserves equal attention — an early Mycenaean helmet made of boar tusks, a typical part of the military attire of the ancient Mycenaean warrior. “The boar-tusked helmet is totally new,’ she remarks. “It is unpublished material” in the way of display pieces for an exhibit of this kind for this time period.

The exhibit was years in the making. “We’ve had this ongoing relationship with the Ministry of Culture of Greece,” she went on to say. “So when it came time to take the first step in 2021 [to put together the exhibit show in the U.S.] everyone was enthusiastic.”

She emphasized that the show is much more than a display of select artifacts excavated from a certain tomb. “It’s about Messenia, what has been found there.” The ancient region of Messenia was mentioned in the Iliad. Pylos was a prominent center of administration and culture during the Late Bronze Age within Messenia. A number of artifacts exhibited in the gallery space come from other locations and excavations besides Pylos.   

_______________________________

Above and two images below: views of the special exhibit gallery space. Images courtesy J. Paul Getty Trust

_______________________________

_______________________________

_______________________________

The hilt of the Griffin Warrior’s sword is embellished with “gold embroidery”, a labor-intensive Mycenaean technique of inserting tiny L-shaped gold wires into the ivory pommel and grip. After burnishing the gold to create a smooth surface, the artisan incised it with patterns and figures. Here the engraved scenes of animal combat, with lions attacking wild goats native to Crete, mirror the warior culture of Mycenaean palace society. Text and special exhibit display image courtesy J. Paul Getty Trust

_______________________________

The handle of this elaborate dagger is partly preserved at the attachment to the blade, where it was secured by three bronze rivets covered by large gold caps. Tiny L-shaped gold wires were set into the dagger’s handle, as on the hilt of the Griffin Warrior’s sword. The gold surface was then embellished with a net of engraved spirals on both sides. Text and special exhibit display image courtesy J. Paul Getty Trust

_______________________________

This utilitarian axe may have been developed by the Minoans in part for shaping stone building blocks of the sort used at Pylos as early as the 1500s BCE. Several such blocks were found in the stone foundation of the Griffin Warrior’s grave. Text and special exhibit display image courtesy j. Paul Getty Trust

_______________________________

Ivory combs are not uncommon in Late Bronze Age burials, and the Griffin Warrior’s grave held five, probably imported from Crete. This ornate example was stuck to a piece of his bronze armor. Finds of cosmetic implements attest to the widespread emphasis on grooming and beautification in the warrior culture of Greece and other Bronze Age societies. Text and special exhibit display image courtesy of j. Paul Getty Trust

_______________________________

Gold beaded necklace found in the Griffin Warrior’s grave. Elite Mycenaean and Minoam warriors wore jewelry, including armlets and bracelets strung with sealstones. Myriad carnelian, amethyst, amber, and gold beads were found in the Grifin Warror’s burial, deposited by the living to adorn the hero’s body in death. Text and special exhibit display image courtesy J. Paul Getty Trust

_______________________________

Above and below: inlaid daggers found in the grave of a Mycenaean woman, perhaps a princess of Pylos. Text and special exhibit display image courtesy J. Paul Getty Museum

_______________________________

_______________________________

The combat agate, found in the Griffin Warrior grave. © Hellenic Ministry of Culture – HOCRED /
Archaeological Museum, Chora, SN18-0112/ © Palace of Nestor Excavations, Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati / Photo: Jeff Vanderpool

____________________________

Boar’s-Tusk Helmet, Mycenaean, 1520–1440 BCE  Boar’s tusk, set on a modern plaster head © Hellenic Ministry of Culture – HOCRED /Archaeological Museum of Messenia, Kalamata, AMM 11943. Image © J. Paul Getty Trust, photo: Jeff Vanderpool

____________________________

The Getty Villa Museum

Few museums in the world can match the unique splendor of the Getty Villa Museum in Los Angeles. Set near the iconic southern California coastline that boasts such famous surfing beaches as Malibu and Santa Monica, its structure exemplifies the quintessence of a sumptuous ancient Roman villa. The incredible Roman villa remains of Pompeii and Herculaneum in Italy are magnificent to behold in and of themselves, but none can compare in completeness to the reconstruction one sees with the villa in LA, modeled as it were after the famous Villa of the Papyri, the partially excavated remains of which can be seen in a corner of the dramatic multi-story remnants of Herculaneum. 

Jean Paul Getty initially opened the museum in 1974, though it was renovated in 2006. Today it houses one of the world’s best collections of antiquities, especially Greek, Roman and Etruscan, and is recognized as a center of scholarship and conservation.  

Following is a pictorial sampling of the museum’s not-to-be-missed permanent spaces and treasures…. 

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

Courtesy J. Paul Getty Trust

_____________________________

_____________________________

Courtesy J. Paul Getty Trust

_____________________________

Courtesy J. Paul Getty Trust

_____________________________

Courtesy J. Paul Getty Trust

_____________________________

Courtesy J. Paul Getty Trust

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

See more about the Getty Villa and start your visit to this remarkable museum here.

_____________________________

*https://popular-archaeology.com/article/archaeologists-find-bronze-age-tombs-lined-with-gold/

The Raucus Roman Forum

Professor Frank J. Korn has retired from his teaching position on the Classical Studies faculty at Seton Hall University.  He is a Fulbright Scholar at the American Academy in Rome and the author of nine books on various aspects of the Eternal City.  He is listed in Marquis Who’s Who as “a notable classical educator and writer.”  Recipient of the Princeton Prize for Distinguished Teaching, he resides with his wife Camille in Scotch Plains, N.J.  The couple’s three sons –  Frank, Ronald, and John and their families live nearby.  His latest book    Below Rome, the Story of the Catacombs    which he co-authored with his wife, is available on Amazon or from the publisher, St. Johann Press, Haworth, N.J.

The Forum in Rome is the most stately,

most solemn. grand , majestic, and

mournful sight conceivable.”

          …Charles Dickens (1845)

 

Many visitors to the Forum Romanum may formulate misleading mental pictures of what daily life was like there in the glory days of the late Republic and early Empire.  (First century, B.C. and A.D.)  They may conjure up images of only dignified senators, consuls, judges, and other V.I.P.’s in purple-bordered togas coming and going in their conduct of government and justice.  They may envision only splendid colonnaded temples set high upon marble staircases, and other handsome porticoed public buildings like the Basilica of Aemilia or the massive Tabularium (the Hall of Records) as the backdrop.  Such notions fall quite short of the reality of the site, however.

While this Forum was the seat of government, it was also much more:  The business, banking, and religious center, an open-air market, a marketplace of ideas.  It was a popular venue for making deals of every nature.  It was a clamorous hub of activity and enterprise.  It was a hangout for the idle rich and the jobless poor, and every social class in between. 

Surging throngs moved through the Forum from sunrise to mid-evening.  The tumult and the din were beyond the power of words to describe, the medley of sights and sounds impossible to convey.  One had to be there!

In front of one temple or another, smoke rose from sacrificial rites and the chanting of priests perpetually filled the air.  From behind rough wooden tables, along the Via Sacra, whose paving stones remember the footsteps of Caesar, peddlers of fast-food shouted their prices and offerings.  Fishmongers, having set up shop in the porticoes of various edifices, befouled the air with unpleasant and pungent odors.  (Their eventual eviction was one of the earliest steps taken to improve the image of the Forum.)

Crowds of buyers and vendors of all sorts of wares jostled with lobbyists en route to their usual station in front of the Senate chamber.  Street entertainers, beggars, the homeless, noisy little kids being shushed by every passing senator and retired old men looking to kill time, juvenile delinquents up to mischief, artists and con-artists, all mingled with howling cats and growling dogs.  Donkeys pulling carts were, at times, bumper to bumper.

_____________________________

The Roman forum as it appears today. xlizziexx, Pixabay

_____________________________

There were young men    such as Julius Caesar and Marcus Tullius Cicero    studying law by clerking for prominent attorneys, patricians strutting by with their coteries of lackeys, consuls with their secret service agents, (called lictors), robed judges late for court, prosecutors and litigants, and bureaucrats on their way to political patronage jobs.  There were poets of every stripe reciting their verses from makeshift platforms all the livelong day, hecklers, roustabouts, welfare recipients yelling at legislators, “Increase the dole!”  There were armed troops on horseback, helpless to do much of anything toward wresting some order out of all this.

Campaigning politicians in their bleached-white togae candidae in pursuit of votes, would at certain times of the year swell the ranks of Forum habitues.  The better-educated citizens liked to swarm around the news bulletins (Acta Diurna) posted on large wooden boards propped against some column or arch.  Daily life in the Forum was, in short, a loosely choreographed, colorful bedlam.  It was Times Square, Piccadilly Circus, and the Casbah rolled up into one.

There were crowds going one way, crowds going another; crowds stopping and obstructing movement in either direction, with all the participants exceedingly animated and obstreperous, gesticulating wildly.  The lone thoroughfare, the Via Sacra, was just about impassable.

____________________________

The Via Sacra as it appears today. Carla Tavares, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons

____________________________

The morning hours, before the heat set in, saw the greatest concentration of people.  In one speech, Cicero complained about getting shoved and elbowed along by the crunch of humanity trying to shoe-horn their way through the Arch of the Fabii at the eastern entrance.  His Roman pride and dignity were particularly offended at the sight of hordes of foreigners:

“These Spaniards and Gauls walking haughtily through our Forum!”

He surely would have made note of the large numbers of Greeks, Syrians, Numidians, and Illyrians as well.  Cicero would often mumble with disdain about a certain one of his political foes, a powerful crony of the dictator Sulla,

“… hovering about the Forum with his hair fancily combed and shining with unguents!”

The Forum was the scene of occasional riots and bloodshed, the staging ground for some of the capital’s most shameful disorders.  Practically every society, or guild, or private interest group would inevitably organize a “March on the Forum” to air their grievances and demands.  Such events could turn violent, as could some political rallies.

The historian Livy complained one day about a group of women who had  marched on the Forum:

“Indeed it was with some embarrassment that

I came a few minutes ago to the Forum, right

through a throng of women.  If I had not held

in respect the dignity and basic decency of each woman

as an individual (it would mortify them to be seen

receiving a scolding from a consul, say, or a

Senator),  I would have said:  ‘It is not right for

you to concern yourselves about which laws are

passed or repealed here.”

But Seneca in his serene stoicism saw it all through a different lens and marveled at the cosmopolitanism of the place:

“…where flow together from every corner of the globe, those induced by ambition, or by appetite for pleasure.”

 

By late afternoon, the inebriated would stagger in, following hours of guzzling and eating at nearby cauponae (taverns).

There were also some other unsavory characters, wanted back home by the local authorities, who poured in from the provinces to take refuge in the obscurity of the slum district of Rome, just a few minutes’ walk from the Forum.

Various ancient authors speak to us of the sundry types who lingered    or should we say “malingered”    in the precincts of the Forum.  Certain groups acquired the habit of convening in the same area each day, so that in time different spots and corners were named for them.  For example, members of the legal profession in need of clients loitered near the Rostra (the balustraded elaborate speakers’ platform).  A large clague of idlers met near the Sun Dial.   Jewelers and makers of musical instruments set up shop along the Via Sacra.  Other sources inform us that perfume sellers were generally found at the southern end.  Book publishers conducted business in the Argiletum, the wide street that entered the Forum to the side of the Basilica Aemilia.  This section was plagued by pickpockets.  At dusk the petty thieves could be spotted there divvying up the day’s take.  Fortune-tellers were all over the place.

______________________________

3-D reconstruction of the Basilica Aemilia as it would have appeared in its day. L.VII.C, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons

______________________________

The Basilica Aemilia as it appears today. Jordiferrer, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons

______________________________

At any rate, it was through such unbridled mayhem that senators, magistrates, and other officials had to pick their way to the Curia (Senate building), or to the Basilica (courthouse), or to the Tabularium (Hall of Records), often to a soundtrack of sibilant hisses and jeers from the cynical populace, many of whom were on the dole.

It wasn’t until daylight began to lose itself in the west, that the crowds would disperse and go quickly home, for the streets of Rome were no place to be after dark, what with muggers, rapists, and other malefactors on the prowl.

Juvenal, in one of his satires, has something to say about it:

“Consider the dangers of a Roman night. Chipped ceramic dishes, tossed from a rooftop, that might shatter on your head.  Danger in every window you pass under.  You can only hope that the resident may be content to pour down the contents of a slop-pail.  A rickety horse-drawn wagon whose axle breaks, spilling its load of marble on the pavement, gangs of bullies with malice in mind, a dead body to step over.  Such is the privilege of the poor bloke who, having been assaulted, prays to get home with a few teeth left in his mouth.  You would be foolish to go out to dinner if you haven’t yet made out your will.”

As far back as the second century before Christ, Plautus the playwright, in one of his dramas, offered a virtual guide on where to find whom:  “Monstrabo quo quemque hominem facile inveniatis loco.  (I’ll show you where you can track-down men of every type.)

“Qui mendacem et goriosum apud Cloacinae Veneris sacrum.”  (Who would like a liar or a pedantic, check out the shrine of Venus Cloacina.)

“Qui periurum convenire volt hominem ito in Comitium.”  (If you hope to meet up with a perjurer, go over to the Comitium.)

In medio propter canalem, ibi ostentores meri.”  (Around the middle section, near the pond, are those who put on airs, showoffs.)

Sub veteribus ibi sunt qui dant quique accipiunt faenore.”  (Down by the old shops are the loansharks.)

Pone aedem Castoris, ibi sunt subito quibus credas male.  (Behind the Temple of Castor are the swindlers. Do not trust them.)

Confidentes garrulique et malevoli supra lacum, qui alteri de nihilo audacter dicunt contumeliam.  (Beyond the pond are those cocky and garrulous wiseguys who gratuitously harass others with insults.)

Ditis damnos maritos sub basilica quaerito ibidem erunt scorta exoleta.  (You will find the rich, derelict husbands at the base of the basilica, where there will be waiting mature ‘escorts.’)

A century later, the satirist Gaius Luciliuis, whom Horace credits as the originator of that genre of literature, echoes Plautus’  sentiments with this:

Nunc vero a mani ad noctem, festo atque profesto, totus item pariterque die populusque iactare indu foro se omnes, decedere nusquam; uni se atque eidem studio omnes dedere et artiverba dare ut caute possint, pugnare dolose, blanditia certare, bonum silulare virum se, insidias facere ut si hostes sint omnibus omnes.”   (Now truly from morning to  night, holiday or not, the commoners and the elite descend on the Forum with no plans for ever leaving.  They pull the same stunts on one another, and fight like cats and dogs then make nice in an effort to seem reputable, while at the same time they continue to plot against their own kind like irreconcilable foes.)

 

Such were the day-to-day activities in the great Forum Romanum, with some exceptions.  On days of special events, such as the inauguration of the newly elected consuls, or a sacrosanct ritual of the Vestal Virgins, or a triumphal parade honoring victorious legions with their spoils of combat and their pitiful prisoners-of-war in tow, or any other highly ceremonial celebration, perhaps, for example, an official state visit by the diplomatic corps representing all the provinces and allies—for such occasions, the authorities would see to it that a sanitized version of the Forum was presented.  On the days leading up to such hoopla, a company of elite Roman troops would make a clean sweep of it, rousting and ousting all the unwanted dramatis personae.  This would be followed by a squad of street cleaners ridding this hallowed ground of all the accumulated debris.  The following day the usual suspects would flock back to the Forum and renew the madcap circus ambience, amid the architectural splendor of the place.

That splendor of the majestic rectangle (540 yards by 270) would be heartlessly ravaged by the invading barbarians of the early Middle Ages, who reduced the old marketplace into today’s ruin-strewn graveyard.  Sic transit gloria mundi—thus passes the glory of the world.

The Breath of the Underworld: The Last Rite in Hierapolis

Bülent Ortakcı is a freelance and ghostwriter based in Turkey. As an independent writer with a deep passion for history and archaeology, he focuses on creating compelling articles rooted in thorough research and inspired by the rich heritage of Anatolia and surrounding regions.

His writings often explore lesser-known archaeological sites, the legacy of ancient civilizations, comparative religious beliefs, and folklore involving supernatural or paranormal phenomena.

Hierapolis, 2nd century A.D. The sky was painted in a hue of blood-orange as the sun descended. The white travertines of Pamukkale glowed crimson, as if soaked in ancient blood. In the heart of Hierapolis, behind the Temple of Apollo, a sacred courtyard stood silent. Only the priests of Cybele —the Galli, dressed in red robes with silver clasps— bowed before the gate of the underworld.

Ariston, high priest of the temple and guardian of the Ploutonion, was a man past fifty, but his eyes gleamed with the fire of youth. His voice rumbled like the breath of the earth itself. Like his father before him, he had inherited the duty of guarding this gate — the door between the world of the living and the realm of the dead.

But tonight was different. Even visitors from Rome had come for the ritual. According to ancient lore, once every seventy-nine years, when the stars aligned, the gate would open for the blink of an eye, and the voice of the god Pluto could be heard. That night, the sky promised such an event.

The Deadly Breath and Rising Legends

Every creature that approached the arched gate of the Ploutonion collapsed within minutes. Even today, this deadly gas was demonstrated using small animals. But tonight, something else was planned. 

Ariston opened the lid of a small marble coffin. Inside lay a carefully preserved body — Eurynome, the ancient sorceress of the city and once the woman Ariston had loved. Myths surrounded her. Some claimed she had spoken to the god of the underworld three days before her death and vowed to return. Some called her mad, others a prophetess. But Ariston had never forgotten her words.

He placed the coffin near the cave’s mouth, where the gas subtly rose. The priests chanted, and the stars slowly shifted into alignment.

The Gate Opens

Just before midnight, the ground trembled. A deep, low hum echoed from the Ploutonion. The gas at the entrance momentarily dispersed. The gate —or as Ariston believed, the veil between life and death— had indeed parted.

A whisper: “Eurynome…” It was a woman’s voice. Familiar.

Ariston fell to his knees, tears in his eyes. A silhouette appeared at the gate —draped in white, glowing eyes, empty yet full of light. The body in the coffin stirred. The priests stepped back in awe. No one had ever seen such a thing.

From Eurynome’s chest, a wisp of smoke rose and drifted into the Ploutonion. Her soul was being offered to the god.

The Price of Forbidden Knowledge

But every open gate demands a price. The tremors intensified. Columns cracked. The hum from the depths became a roar. Was it Pluto’s wrath? Or had the balance between life and death been disturbed?

Ariston heard the god’s voice, deep and terrible: “Close the gate.”

He understood. The gate was not merely a passage for the dead —it was a temptation for knowledge, power, and corruption. Humanity was not ready.

He shouted: “Seal the gate! Set the stones, begin the prayers!”

The priests obeyed. Ancient texts described the three seals to close the Ploutonion: Fire, Blood, and Breath.

A goat was sacrificed, its blood poured onto the threshold. Ariston cut his own hands and reached into the rising mist. Lastly, three priests extended their arms and offered sacred breath with solemn hymns.

Silence fell. The roar ceased. The mist withdrew. Eurynome’s body, now serene, was returned to the coffin —a smile on her face.

A Thousand Years of Silence

The gate never opened again. Ariston never left the temple. He never spoke of what he had seen. On his tombstone, he had one sentence engraved:

“To open a gate is not to speak with gods; it is to silence oneself.”

Centuries passed. Wars, earthquakes, and empires came and went. Until one day in 2013, archaeologists descended beneath the ancient stones and found an inscription near the gate of Ploutonion:

“The passage sealed by Ariston. He who opens it will speak through the price.”

_______________________________

(Pluto’s Gate), a sacred cave believed to be an entrance to the underworld and the oldest local sanctuary, Hierapolis. It was described by Strabo (629-30) as an orifice in a ridge of the hillside, in front of which was a fenced enclosure filled with thick mist immediately fatal to any who entered except the eunuchs of Kybele. The Plutoneion was mentioned and described later by numerous ancient writers, in particular Dio Cassius (68.27), who observed that an auditorium had been erected around it, and Damascius ap. Photius (Bibl. 344f), who recorded a visit by a certain doctor Asclepiodotus about A.D. 500; he mentioned the hot stream inside the cavern and located it under the Temple of Apollo. There is, in fact, immediately below the sidewall of the temple in a shelf of the hillside, a roofed chamber 3 m square, at the back of which is a deep cleft in the rock filled with a fast-flowing stream of hot water heavily charged with a sharp-smelling gas. In front is a paved court, from which the gas emerges in several places through cracks in the floor. The mist mentioned by Strabo is not observable now. The gas was kept out of the temple itself by allowing it to escape through gaps left between the blocks of the sidewalls. Carole Raddato, CC BY-SA 2.0, Wikimedia Commons

_______________________________

Cover Photo, Above Left: Credit Carole Raddato, CC BY-SA 2.0, Wikimedia Commons

Pioneering Archaeology in the Middle Mekong Basin: An Interview with Dr. Joyce White, University of Pennsylvania

Dr. Joyce White has been specializing in Southeast Asian prehistory since 1974, especially in Thailand and Laos. She has done pioneering work at the UNESCO World Heritage site of Ban Chiang in Thailand. She is the Director of the Ban Chiang Project at the University of Pennsylvania Museum, where she is Consulting Scholar. In 2001, Dr. Joyce White started an archaeological program in Laos. The Middle Mekong Archaeological Project (MMAP) explores and researches the prehistory of northern Laos. MMAP has an international team of researchers in diverse fields, including scholars from Laos.She has a long list of publications on Asian archaeology. Dr. Joyce White is the Executive Director of the Institute for Southeast Asian Archaeology.

Her first great impression of archaeology unfolded when she was fifteen and saw a church and graveyard being excavated in England. Images of Asia in a professor’s class at UPENN helped her set course. She has an MA & Ph.D. in Anthropology from the University of Pennsylvania. Dr. White’s research has been funded by the National Science Foundation, The National Geographic Society, the Henry Luce Foundation, etc. One of her latest articles, cowritten with Elizabeth G. Hamilton, is “The Metal Age of Thailand and Ricardo’s Law of Comparative Advantage” in Archaeological Research in Asia 27.

______________________________

Ban Chiang, Thailand. Welcome to Ban Chiang World Heritage. Mattes, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons

______________________________

Ban Chiang Prehistory. SF12, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons

_______________________________

RM (Richard Marranca): You did pioneering work in Ban Chiang and other places in Thailand. What brought you there – what luck and pluck? When did you first work there, and was this continuous over many years?

JW (Joyce White): I was a first-year grad student in Anthropology at the University of Pennsylvania in 1974. After hearing slide presentations by Chet Gorman at the University of Pennsylvania Museum, I wanted to specialize in Southeast Asian archaeology, and specifically Thailand. Chet was not very encouraging at first, but eventually he became supportive.

 

RM: What are some of the things you did early on in Ban Chiang?

JW: As a grad student, I supervised the lab analysis of the materials from Ban Chiang and other Metal Age and Stone Age sites. The cultural remains were shipped to Penn Museum for study. When it came time to design a PhD Project, I wanted to study plants and foods, using modern Ban Chiang societies to get some ideas on the past in that region. This kind of study is called ethnoarchaeology.

_____________________________

Ban Chiang excavations. Steve from Bangkok, Thailand, CC BY-SA 2.0, Wikimedia Commons

_____________________________

RM: Did you work with Chet Gorman and Pisit Chareonwongsa? Can you tell us about them, as well as any others you worked with?

JW: Chet Gorman was my supervisor until he died in 1981. Pisit Charoenwongsa came to the Penn Museum to also work with the Ban Chiang materials for a couple of years. Chet was a ‘character’ and Pisit was more serious. Fascinating collaborators and peers of Chet frequently came through, really adding to my education on what being a Southeast Asian archaeologist was all about.

 

RM: Is Ban Chiang a mixed burial/habitation site? Can you tell us about it?  

JW: At Ban Chiang, both burials and remains from everyday life were excavated. As I worked with the site’s evidence after Chet’s death, I eventually came to the conclusion that the dead were in fact buried within the settlement in spaces used during daily life. This kind of practice is called “residential burial.” In the world there are some societies still practicing some form of residential burial, and there is an ethos of the living wanting to maintain a strong connection with deceased relatives.

_____________________________

Rice farmers in Thailand. Jtorquy, CC 1.0 Universal, Wikimedia Commons

_____________________________

Rice Farmers in Thailand.jpg Wikimedia commons

RM: You mentioned that people had millet and rice and other foods. Were the people involved in both agriculture and hunting/gathering? Were they animistic/polytheistic? What kind of houses did they live it? What were their ailments and how long did they live?

JW: Pre-state agrarian societies in Thailand practiced both some plant cultivation and animal husbandry, but also engaged in hunting and gathering. This diverse resource base and diet resulted in the people being unusually healthy for an early agrarian society. Average life expectancy was around 35-40 years. Evidence for trauma, such as broken bones, suggested they came from accidents of daily life, not warfare. Their houses must have been made of organic materials like bamboo, as only holes for posts remain.

 

RM: Can you tell us about curating a traveling exhibition on Ban Chiang, “Discovery of a Lost Bronze Age,” sponsored by the Smithsonian, 1981?

JW: Before Chet died in 1981, he had gotten the Smithsonian’s Traveling Exhibition Service interested in doing an exhibit on Ban Chiang. After Chet died, I was asked to be guest curator for the exhibit as my years working in the lab before I lived in Ban Chiang gave me in-depth knowledge about the site and the materials excavated.

 

RM: Was the technology (bronze making, pots and such) centered in major places like Ban Chiang, or did it spread out from there? I recall you used the word “decentralized.” You mentioned something about “Ricardo’s Law” having to do with decentralization?

JW: Technologies of pot-making and bronze making were not centralized. The existing evidence indicates these were decentralized crafting activities. This meant relevant skill sets widely distributed in prehistoric sites throughout Thailand. Expectations among archaeologists in the mid-20th century were that metallurgy in particular was likely to be a restricted specialized activity. However, in the latter part of the 20th century, more evidence for other kinds of economic strategies have been recognized.

Ricardo’s Law of Comparative Advantage is one of the concepts that help to illuminate decentralized economic systems from a bottom up rather than a top-down perspectives.

_____________________________

Ceramic Pot, Ban Chiang Museum. Kiwiodysee, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons

_____________________________

RM: I recall you said that the people were peaceful, that researchers didn’t find any or many skeletons with serious war injuries? Did towns and cities have defensive walls?

JW: The monograph suite (4 volumes) laid out comprehensive evidence for prehistoric exploitation of metals in Thailand. One theme concerns the methodology of study. Some studies of ancient metallurgy take what I call an “art history” approach, focusing only on intact attractive objects, and usually such objects are recovered from graves. But that approach misses the massive evidence from fragmentary remains that metalwork was localized and used in quotidian ways.

Looking at “whole assemblages” (all metals and related objects recovered from a site) reveals a much more accurate picture of the place of metals in societies as—in some cases valued objects—but not so much prestige goods restricted to the rich. As noted above, skeletal trauma is predominantly from everyday activities, and there is no evidence for defensive walls until late in the iron period.

____________________________

Ban Chiang ceramic ware. Ziegler175, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimeda Commons

____________________________

RM: Can you tell us about the Ban Chiang Ethnobotanical Project? One person was Dr. Cristina Castillo from the University of London, I recall. What did she work on?

JW: For our Year of Botany program in 2024, we studied 3 collections with botanical dimensions connected to Ban Chiang. I brought in experts for each part of the program. Dr. Cristina Castillo from University of London trained and supervised two Thai student interns in the process called “flotation”, where excavated sediments are processed in a way to extract plant microfossils. The ethnobotanical collection I did in 1978-1981 in Ban Chiang village was the focus of four Thai botanists, who curated the collection so it could be accessioned to the Philadelphia Herbarium. A fifth Thai I brought to work with the ethnographic collection I did in Ban Chiang in 1981.

 

RM: So, the PENN museum asked you to head to Laos. You discovered something amazing – 10,000 years of habitation along the Mekong near Luang Prabang city. Can you discuss some of the high points? It’s also a land of rivers and tributaries and crossroads – how does that support people and culture?

JW: The archaeology of Laos is still in its infancy. There are very few projects, and it was shut off from modern archaeology for most of the 20th century. But my initial 2.5 day visit to Luang Prabang in 2001 showed to me that specifically that part of the Mekong River had human occupation for at least 10,000 years. There was the Stone Age site Tham Hua Pu with classic Hoabinhian stone tools; there were sherds from many different periods eroding into the Mekong, including earthenware, stoneware, and porcelains. And there were many polished stone adzes.

I am so far the only American who has successfully established a long-term archaeological research Program in Laos.

Luang Prabang, eventually beginning in AD 1351, became the capital of the Lao Kingdom of Lanxang. Archaeologists are still in the early stages of compiling a narrative with high points. However, I am working with the idea that the numerous tributaries entering the Mekong near Luang Prabang from the left bank is a key geographical factor making that area of enduring significance for humans living there in the past. Even decentralized societies like to trade and communicate. So, the evidence we are finding in things like ceramics do support a crossroads scenario for this location.

________________________________

Lua Prabang. Shelly Zohar, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons

________________________________

Luang Prabang market. calflier001, CC BY-SA 2.0, Wikimedia Commons

________________________________

RM: You explored a huge number of sites? How did you get around and find them? Where did you do test excavations? It sounds like an especially amazing site was called Tham An Mah – was that the culmination and what was that like?

JW: At this point in time, we do “reconnaissance surveys”. We work closely with local inhabitants to find sites and any evidence for pre-modern use of the terrain. We get around with local transportation, both vehicles and, if needed, small boats, and a lot of walking. From the 100 localities identified, we chose 4 so far for test excavations at cave sites, each site on a different tributary, with access to both upland and lowland landscapes. Tham An Mah was a wonderful site with intact burials. We hope to do 1 more test excavation on the Ou tributary.

________________________________

Luang Prabang Museum. Rebeccamack, CC BY 2.0, Wikimedia Commons

________________________________

RM: I loved Luang Prabang and its museum. Didn’t you do work at the museum?

JW: The government has assigned us space several times in outbuildings for the Luang Prabang National Museum. We do love to work in those spaces, which are essentially un-renovated but sturdy late colonial structures but perfect for our needs.

 

RM: It was fascinating that you mentioned scientists that joined your team to study remains, to get DNA samples from villagers, to study climate, etc.? Can you tell us a few things about the scientists?

JW: Stephen Oppenheimer, who is affiliated with both Oxford and the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, took DNA samples from several villages in Luang Prabang Province. A team led by Dr. Kathleen Johnson, who is at the University of California Irvine, is studying climate change evidence from speleothems (stalagmites). Her team includes Australians, Italians, Chinese and more. We have a very multi-national approach to our work.

____________________________

You can learn more about the Ban Chiang Project at this website, and the Middle Mekong Archaeological Project here.

The Fall of Cusco

Freelance writer, researcher and photographer, Georges Fery (georgefery.com) addresses topics from history, culture, and beliefs to daily living of ancient and today’s indigenous societies of Mesoamerica and South America. His articles are published online at travelthruhistory.com, ancient-origins.net and popular-archaeology.com, and in the quarterly magazine Ancient American (ancientamerican.com). In the U.K. his articles are found in mexicolore.co.uk.

The author is a fellow of the Institute of Maya Studies instituteofmayastudies.org, Miami, FL and The Royal Geographical Society, London, U.K. (rgs.org). He is a member in good standing with the Maya Exploration Center, Austin, TX (mayaexploration.org) the Archaeological Institute of America, Boston, MA (archaeological.org), NFAA-Non Fiction Authors Association (nonfictionauthrosassociation.com) and the National Museum of the American Indian, Washington, DC. (americanindian.si.edu).

In “The Conquest of Peru,” we left Pizarro departing Tangarará, which he founded on the Pacific coast in mid-September of 1532. From the coast with his riders and foot soldiers, he traveled up the mountains, where reports of war and carnage became reality. The Spaniards were not aware of the severity of the ongoing “war of succession” between the two sons of Inca Huayna Capac for the crown of the “Land of Four Parts” or Tahuantinsuyo in the Quechua language. It was Topa Inca (1471-1493), the son of the great Sapa Inca Pachacuti (1438-1471), who expanded the empire’s borders north to Ecuador and south to Chile. His son, Huayna Capac, on his deathbed, made the fatal mistake of splitting the kingdom between his two sons (de la Vega, 1539-1616), for his first son, Ninan Cuyochi, who died of smallpox.  Huascar Capac and his deceased brother were born to a Coya or princess of the imperial court at Cusco. His half-brother Atahualpa (1502-1533), born to a Cara princess of the court at Quito, was shunned by the nobility at Cusco for not being of royal blood. Spanish chroniclers of the late sixteenth century depict Atahualpa as brave, ambitious, and popular with soldiers. The father deeply loved his second son and persuaded his legitimate son, Huayna Capac, the future Great (Sapa) Inca in Cusco, to have Atahualpa reign in the northern reaches of the empire at Quito, over a thousand miles away. This situation led to persistent conflicts between the half-brothers and, as de la Vega underlined, they were soon entangled in a deadly civil war that lasted from 1529 to 1532. Antagonisms intensified while ethnic groups sided with one faction or the other, ravaging cities and towns, wreaking havoc on economies, and decimating the population.

________________________________

Lima-Cusco Region

________________________________

Atahualpa and his army of quiteños “people of Quito” defeated Huayna Capac cuzqueños “those of Cusco.” However, it is at Quipaipán in the most significant military battle of Inca history (1532), that the war took a decisive turn for Inca Atahualpa. After the battle, the Inca headed south and stopped at Cajamarca (Kaxamarka in Quechua), while his superior officers (apukispays) chased Huascar’s army south; they defeated and captured him near Cusco. Had it not been for Pizarro’s arrival at that time, the entire Inca empire would have fallen to Atahualpa at Quipaipán.

As the Spaniards moved up the Andes Mountain range, they encountered devastation and remnants of scorched villages. The local people believed that the Spaniards would come to help Inca Huascar against his half-brother Atahualpa, who was now encamped with his army in the Pultumarca valley near Cajamarca. In July 1532, with 62 riders and 106 infantrymen, Pizarro reached the ruined village of Caxas, nine thousand feet up in the mountains on the paved road to Cajamarca. The going was hard in the Cordillera Vilcabamba because the biting cold, ice, and snow of the Salcantay range had replaced the mild climate and sea breeze of the coast. Many troopers suffered from the cold and became sick, as did the horses. Meanwhile, Atahualpa reached the outskirts of Cajamarca, where, informed by his scouts, he waited for the Spaniards.

On Friday, 15 November 1532, the Spaniards arrived on the hills over Cajamarca. The city below looked finely built and paved with smooth stones; it was deserted. Half a mile beyond, in the Pultumarca valley, was Atahualpa’s camp and its thousands of warriors. Pizarro ordered his army to go down to the deserted town before dusk, for they could quickly be overpowered in the open. There, they set up camps in large houses with covered stockades attached for horses. Once settled, Pizarro planned to invite the Inca the following day and capture him. For this purpose, in the morning, he sent Hernando de Soto with Felipillo as translator, and Hernan Pizarro with Yacané, who, with Felipillo, were the young men captured off the coast of Tumbes. Thirty-armed riders protected the envoys.

They made their way through the Inca’s camp and were impressed by thousands of fires and warriors. Courtiers and high-ranking war chiefs welcomed the envoys. Atahualpa made them wait several hours outside his lodgings and appeared when the rowdy visitors’ impatience could no longer be contained. The Inca faced the Spaniards with ire and contempt. This thirty-five-year-old lord with long black hair and gold ornaments dangling from his ears and neck, together with the mascapaycha‘s red imperial headband, magnified his eminent position. He sat on his usnu, an elevated golden throne with officials (kurakas) at his sides. Heated exchanges about the presence of armed white bearded men in his kingdom, soldiers of an unknown king, were baffling to him, as was this equally unknown world they claimed to come from.

The Spaniards displayed their skills riding horses and shooting arquebuses. Pedro de Alvarado, an expert rider, brought his horse at full gallop, heading straight to the seated Atahualpa. He came to an abrupt stop only a few feet from the deadpan Inca. A lesson of remarkable horsemanship, while Atahualpa displayed a lesson of lordly stoicism. To seal the meeting, chicha, the traditional fermented drink made of corn and seasoned with a variety of wild plants, was poured into three large gold cups. The Spaniards held the cups but did not drink, so the Inca, noticing their distrust, sipped from each cup to show his guests they had nothing to fear. Atahualpa accepted Pizarro’s invitation to visit Cajamarca the following day. 

______________________________

Atahualpa, the last Incan Emperor. @sciencephotolibrary.com

______________________________

At noon, after a night of anxiety, the Spaniards were still waiting for Atahualpa. Pizarro hid his forces, including cavalry under Hernando de Soto, Sebastian de Belalcazar, and Hernando Pizarro, along with their saddled horses, in sheds that opened onto the plaza. Juan Pizarro was in command of the infantry and would closely follow the riders’ thrust. Captain Pedro de Candia and the artillery were on the Rumitiana hill behind the town for support. Pizarro, on horseback together with twenty-five-foot soldiers, hid in a structure in the middle of the plaza. Fear was palpable, given the overwhelming odds; several foot soldiers wetted their pants. The plan called for a forceful exit on the plaza, aiming for Atahualpa, who would be carried on his golden litter, then to surround and capture him. A simple plan of victory or death, for there was no other way for a handful of Spaniards in this war of conquest. The Inca likewise had plans, which were to make sure none of the bearded men escaped and survived. Atahualpa’s command officer, Rumiñahui, with battle-hardened warriors, was sent to close any escape route on the back of the town to capture all Spaniards for public execution.

By mid-afternoon, lookouts saw the Inca leave his camp with a large retinue of unarmed warriors, for the Inca bet on numbers to capture the bearded men alive. He was eager to show the Andean supreme deity Viracocha and the people of the empire that no god or man could ever stand or defeat him. He arrived at the plaza on his golden litter held by courtesans, protected by bodyguards and a compact group of unarmed warriors to display his apparent peaceful intent. Calling for the Spaniards, he sent unarmed scouts to find out where they were. They reported that the bearded ones were hiding in nearby sheds around the plaza. The Inca was about to order a more forceful investigation when Dominican Friar Vicente de Valverde, chaplain of the army, pushed his way through the throng to the Inca’s litter with Martinillo, also from the 1526 encounter off Tumbes as translator, screaming God’s name to the heretics while brandishing the Holy Bible.

Atahualpa asked what the yelling was all about, but could not understand, and, enraged by Martinillo’s stuttering, threw both friar and Bible to the ground. This outraged Pizarro, who burst out of the shed with infantry onto the plaza, while Pedro de Candia’s artillery boomed, arquebuses were discharged on the crowd, and a red waving flag summoned the cavalry, which came out stamping grounds, bugles blaring, lances, axes, and saber blades glinting in a no quarter charge. The panicked Incas were no match for the unknown weapons, the ferocious war dogs, and the brutal and pitiless men. Fear seized the unarmed men who tried to escape the plaza, piled up against its walls, forming human pyramids where many were slaughtered. Fear was everywhere, for fear, at that moment, was the Spaniards’ most powerful ally, without which they would have been defeated. The Inca was thrown from his golden litter and seized by Francisco Pizarro. That evening, taken to the town’s Amaru Huasi or Snake House by torchlight, the Spaniards saw a man torn by defeat but still radiating majesty, looking fiercely and imperiously at his captors.

_______________________________

Cajamarca’s Battle. @JuanLepiani, 1922-1927 in wikipedia.org

_______________________________

The following day, November 16, Hernando de Soto on Pizarro’s orders, rode down into the valley in Atahualpa’s camp, where he recovered eighty thousand pesos of gold and seven thousand marcos of silver (Xeres 1983; 1534-fol.XIII). He also came back with over a hundred women and thousands of quiteño prisoners. The many cuzqueños they encountered, were forcefully enlisted in Atahualpa’s army as carriers. Few of them were retained as support personnel while others were ordered to go home.

After days of negotiations, according to Spanish military ransom tradition, Pizarro demanded Atahualpa, as conditional freedom, to fill three rooms to a man’s height, one with gold and two with silver. Upon agreement, over weeks, gold and silver plates, cups, figurines and panels reached Cajamarca in long caravans of llamas carrying loads which, according to estimates, totaled over twenty tons. Why was the astute reason for Atahualpa to pay Pizarro for his restricted autonomy? It was classic Andean barter; the Inca traded gold and silver, of which he had plenty, for a limited self-determination which was better than no freedom. With the capture of Atahualpa, the Spaniards were, if not yet in control of the empire, major players in its future.

A few weeks later Atahualpa’s brother and rival, Huascar, was found drowning in the Andamarca river. Questioned by Pizarro, Atahualpa pleaded his innocence. With no convincing proof of the Inca’s guilt, Pizarro spared his life. The cuzqueños, however, were enraged for they could not understand Pizarro’s leniency; they knew that Atahualpa was Huascar’s murderer. Spanish officers likewise did not believe Atahualpa’s claim of innocence, for they were tipped about his contacts with the quiteño general Quisquis then master of Cuzco, who was last seen near Jaujá, planning to mobilize forces to surround Cajamarca. Even though the gold and silver rooms were not fully stacked up as promised, Pizarro was satisfied but, for security reasons, did not release Atahualpa. Many officers were convinced of Atahualpa’s duplicity and of his hand in Huascar and his family’s execution. However, as a hostage Atahualpa was worth protecting; dead, he had no value. The Spaniards conviction of Atahualpa’s guilt rested largely on their interpreter Felipillo who, at times, translated for his own benefit or that of others. Each party, for its own purpose, wanted Atahualpa executed. Diego de Almagro, who arrived with a reinforcement of two hundred men, was worried that, on one hand, he was not certain of the Inca’s guilt, but on the other that the gold and silver share would mostly go to Pizarro’s men, who already had “saved some” for themselves. Spanish officials were concerned that the fifth of gold and silver, the quinto real owed to the Crown under the 1528 Agreement could be lost or delayed. Friar Vincente de Valverde, as a Dominican with an inquisitorial mentality, demanded the Inca be burned at the stake for his refusal of baptism.

The unstable situation led Pizarro to remain firm in not sentencing Atahualpa to death; he was in fact the only one left on the Inca’s defense. In mid-July, however, after tedious legal proceedings, Atahualpa was indicted for treason, the murder of his brother Huascar, killing family princes and princesses of his father clan (panaca), but also, for having children with his sisters and keeping matrimonial relationships with them and last, for being a heretic who refused the true God. On 26 July 1533, Atahualpa Inca, with his hands tied, was led to Cajamarca’s Plaza in a procession including Friar Vicente de Valverde, the mayor Juan de Porras, Captain Juan de Salcedo, and military officers.  The Inca walked with the serenity of a warrior’s utter indifference to his fate. In the middle of the plaza, a tree trunk was driven into the ground with a pile of wood at its base. Atahualpa understood that he would be burned at the stake and asked the priest Valverde, Why? Valverde answered that fire was for idolaters consigned to hell, while strangulation or garrote was for believers of the true cross, sent to heaven. Atahualpa elected garrote to prevent his soul from being dispersed to the four winds, never to live again. He was immediately baptized under the name of Juan, while Pizarro promptly changed the terms of his execution from burning to strangling. The Incas’ wives cried, begging to follow their lord into the afterlife; many of them did.

With Cajamarca and its province now under Spanish control, Pizarro knew that, for absolute socio-political and economic power, the Spaniards needed to occupy Cusco, the seat of government of the Inca empire. The current leader, Túpac Manco Capac Inca (1514-1544), was born in Tiahuanaco, on the shores of Lake Titicaca. He was one of the sons of Huayna Capac and his second wife, the Coya (princess), Shihui Chimpu Rontocay. Throughout his childhood with his siblings, they were repeatedly told that Atahualpa had slaughtered their family. Now in his late twenties, Manco Capac was already a seasoned military officer stationed in the town of Charcas in the Paititi mountains, leading thousands of warriors during the fratricide war.

Of note is that Manco Capac Inca was initially suspicious of Pizarro’s motives and of his long-term plans. But the recent capture of the quiteño leader Calcuchimac, a Quisquis general hanged by the Spaniards, eased his doubts. Pizarro took advantage of Manco Capac’s lifelong bitterness and made it known that the Inca should be the legitimate heir to the empire.

_____________________________

Manco Capac Inca Yupanqui.  @mayaincaztec.com

_____________________________

Driven by his lifelong rage for the murder of his family, Manco Capac committed to pooling Spanish and Inca forces to take back Cusco from Quiquis, which they did. On 14 November 1533, Pizarro and his army reached the hills overlooking the city and the fortress of Sacsayhuaman, two miles north of Cusco, which Quisquis’ troops had deserted. Cusco is 11,200 feet high in the Andes mountains; its name, Qusquis, in Quechua is Qusqu’wanka or “rock of the owl” in Aymara. The city was divided into two social groups or moieties: hurin (upper), associated with the priesthood and hanan (lower), related with the military. Furthermore, the city was partitioned to mirror the four provinces of the empire: the Tahuantisuyo : Chinchaysuyo (north), Antisuyo (east), Kuntisuyu (west), and Qullsuyu (south), with Cusco at their intersection. Hernando de Soto and Juan Pizarro with the cavalry entered Cusco from the north without opposition. They were followed by Francisco Pizarro, Manco Capac Inca, and his officers, while, to avoid surprises, Diego de Almagro followed with the rear guard. The Spaniards were awestruck by the city’s magnificence, its wide and well-paved streets, and the megalithic, tightly fitting stone walls of buildings. They rode to the main plaza and were received by old priests who believed the bearded men were sent by the creator deity Viracocha, the Sun, with their lord Manco Capac.

_______________________________

Cusco, Plaza de Armas.  @St.Amant-wikimedia.org

_______________________________

Spanish captains secured the main palatial buildings around the central plaza. Pizarro elected Inca Huayna Cápac’s Casana palace for himself. Almagro chose the one next to it while Gonzalo selected Túpac Inca’s palace. They were mesmerized by the city’s abundance of gold and silver seen on and inside major buildings and palaces. Before order could be restored, soldiers ran screaming through the paved streets of polished stones and into palaces and mansions. They came out with armfuls of valuable fine dresses, rich feathers, gold and silver plates, and precious stones. They broke into a storage area containing coca leaves, chili, corn, stacked dried goods, quinoa, weapons, and more. They ran up the wide stairs of the massive Qorikancha, or “great enclosure,” the Temple of the Sun (Inti). Its inside walls were covered with thick gold panels, while in the temple of the Moon goddess (Mama Ocllo), daughter of Viracocha and Mama Qucha, the walls were covered with silver. Halfway up the wide stairs of the Qorikancha, the High Priest (villac umu), his arms spread out, tried to stop the rush of these strange, bearded men who, for an instant, mouth agape, looked up before running up the steps laughing. They reached the Hatunkancha housing of the acllahuasi, the solar virgins dedicated to the Sun, who had been sent safely away a few weeks before to save them from sacrilege.

From Cusco, the first of many shipments of precious metals was carried to Cajamarca for processing. Sixteenth-century records account for hundreds of loads of gold and silver, equivalent to tens of tons (Xerez 1636: fol. XXI). After cutting and melting into bars, the precious metals were transferred to Lima overland for shipment to Panama and then onward to Spain. At the same time, wages of officers and soldiers were paid, together with those for services. Manco Capac Inca’s agreement with Pizarro was grounded in his persistent hate of the quiteños for in his mind, they and not the Spaniards, were the real invaders. After all, didn’t Pizarro agree to return the Inca dominion as his realm? Hernando de Soto, in command of the army, supported by thousands of native troops, was ordered to chase and capture the fleeing quiteños. He crossed the Apurimac river to confront Quisquis’ coalition at Cupi in Collabamba, where a fierce battle forced the defeated group to retreat north.  On their retreat the quiteños left a trail of vengeance and a horrifying killing spree through Quechua and Huanca towns and villages, killing men of all ages and kidnapping hundreds of women. The Spaniards, however, would turn the tide, for by mid-May 1534, they defeated again Quisquis forces in Maraycalla, but once more, he escaped the battlefield. However, he was murdered a year later in the village of Tiacambe near Quito by his lieutenant Huambracuna. Quisquis general Rumiñahui, escaped to Quito after Atahualpa’s capture and named himself Inca. Over months in 1533, he fiercely battled Sebastián de Belalcázar’s army in the empire’s northern reaches. He was taken prisoner and tortured to reveal where he hid the gold and silver of the Treasure of the Llanganates he took from the cities he burned, but he never talked and was hanged on the 26 of July 1533.

Manco Capac Inca returned to Cusco from the Maraycalla battle, wearing the mascapaycha imperial red headband with tassels, followed by Juan Pizarro, Fernando’s brother. A few months later, the Inca had misgivings about the Spaniards’ motives. They were neither friends nor partners as he thought they were, but the real invaders. His lifelong hate for Quisquis and the quiteños he realized blinded him.

_____________________________

Apukispay Quisquis. @numiscorner.com

_____________________________

The conquistadors backed the coronation of Manco Capac to secure their control over the empire. Pizarro’s backing stemmed from the Spaniard’s goal to continue and perpetuate Inca internal discord. Manco Capac, however, decided that he would not be the puppet of the bearded men who frequently disrespected and humiliated him, especially the ambitious and abusive Pizarro brothers Juan and Gonzalo, unlike their father’s paternalistic relationship. Manco Capac discretely shared his growing dislike of the Spaniards’ heavy hand with principals of towns in the Tahuantinsuyo. His supporters agreed to his plans to rebuild the empire of his forebears.

At length, he resolved to escape, which he did on a dark night with his bodyguards. As agreed with kinsmen he headed for the nearby town of Mohina. Upon learning about the escape, Juan Pizarro became enraged and asked his brother Gonzalo, captain of the cavalry, for a squad of riders to capture the Inca, which they did two days later. Manco Capac was forcefully returned to Cusco in chains, placed in a cell and, for weeks, was subjected to abuses from his captors. The punishment included demeaning his first wife, the Colla Curi Ocllo, her sisters, and other noble women. The pressure to deliver more gold and silver knew no bounds. It was driven by greed, as well as to answer the persistent demands from Emperor Carlos V in Madrid to finance his ongoing wars against the French and the Turks.

Manco Capac’s hope was rekindled when the high Solar Priest (villac umu), arrived from exile in Chile where he escaped Alonso de Alvarado’s army. He raised the ire of miners along Lake Titicaca by calling, “all rise and leave no Spaniard alive.” The Solar Priest sent a message to Manco Capac, who was then planning his second escape. The chance came thanks to Hernando Pizarro’s insatiable demands for gold when Manco Capac told him that he knew where Huascar Capac’s hidden treasure was near Cusco. At that time, Manco Capac had been released from strict captivity a few months before and had regained his jailer’s confidence. As evidence, he showed Hernando a large gold statue, which was smuggled into his residence by Inca warriors as proof of Huascar’s treasure. Hernando was convinced and planned to let Manco Capac lead the way, but, to avoid warning the treasure’s guards, he and his riders would follow a couple of leagues behind. That was his mistake. A few leagues from Cusco, Manco Capac met a large group of Inca soldiers who swiftly led him to his army of tens of thousands of warriors encamped fifty miles away. Scouts informed the Pizarro brothers of the Inca gathering forces. Over the course of a few weeks, the brothers fanned out of the city to assess the seriousness of the situation. Meeting one evening, they raised the number of lookouts and guards on the city’s access roads. On May 29, 1536, Hernando and his brothers knew that the Incas’ call to arms to rid their kingdom’s capital of the Spaniards was real because that day, Cusco was surrounded.

Sixteenth-century Spanish chroniclers point to an Inca army numbering over two hundred thousand warriors headed by high-ranking officers (apuquispays), with the Solar Priest in overall command. In addition to combat troops, there were about eighty thousand support personnel and carriers. The Inca forces were to attack the city through the roads of the four suyos, Cusco’s cardinal quarters’ access routes, each headed by experienced fighters and officers. They aimed to weaken the Spaniards by dividing their forces on four fronts. The Incas’ troops under the command of officers Coyllas, Osca, Curi, Atao and Taipe would attack on the North road (Chinchaysuyo) while the South (Qullasuyo) with the bulk of the troops, was under the command of Llicli; the West (Kuntisuyo) squadrons were headed by Saradaman, Humán Quicana, and Curi Huallpa; while those of the East  (Antisuyo) were manned by archers, slingers, and blowgun shooters, under Rampa Yupanqui and Anta Allaca. The Solar Priest’s first order was to breach the water pools and canals around the city to swamp the land and turn it into an immense mud field, which would slow down the Spaniards’ deadly horse charges.

On the conquistadors’ side, there were no more than five hundred Spaniards, all of whom were experienced in military tactics and weaponry. They were fearsome battle-hardened fighters, with years of experience, from Europe to Mexico’s killing fields. In the city, they were supported by about thirty thousand native allies from several ethnic groups hostile to the Incas—chief among them were the Chachapoyas. The three Pizarro brothers knew that the key to survival rested on the cavalry, for the natives were frightened of the trampling horses and their riders, armed with lances and swords. The foot soldiers wore metal helmets, upper body armor and were deadly in close combat with swords and axes; musketeers were of limited use.

The Inca armies’ advantage was in numbers. They were able during battle to roll tired or wounded troops with fresh ones from the rear every three to four hours, allowing for unceasing assaults. Yells from tens of thousands of throats; hundreds of drums beating; blowing of trumpet-like conch-shells (pututu) calling on ancestors for help, never ceased, leaving no respite. Waves of incendiary arrows and slingshots with stones, red heat from fire, wrapped in cotton, burned the roofs of houses made of wood, covering the city with a thick, suffocating smoke. Day after day, it was a merciless fight. 

_____________________________

No Mercy. @F.Castro.P – georgefery.com

_____________________________

Hernando Pizarro organized Cusco’s defense around three teams with riders, each headed by his brother Gonzalo, Gabriel de Rojas, and Hernán Ponce de Leon. In contrast, he, his brother Juan, and their lieutenants would, at the sound of a bugle, move from quarter-to- quarter to support fighters where and when needed. They quickly learned that the cavalry had to be the heart of the defense strategy. Early mornings, the infantry’s task, headed by Pedro del Barco, Diego Méndez, and Francisco de Villacastín, supported by allied warriors, destroyed barricades erected across the streets during the night to clear the way for the cavalry.

The riders were not very successful, given the narrowness of most streets, which, at best, limited the frontal assault to two riders at a time. The deep wall of enemy warriors blocking the street could not be breached, even though many were slain. Both riders and horses were wounded in these forays; many could not fight another day. Indian allies fought boldly and impetuously, while the Spaniards battled with a determination driven by fear. Spanish captains said that they should hold the Qorikancha or “great enclosure” for its massive walls and tunnel (the chincana found in 1594; rediscovered recently), extending below the city to Sacsayhuaman. The enclosure would have been impregnable, allowing time for support to arrive from the coast. Others advised Hernando to abandon Cusco and head for Lima. Alas, it was too late, all roads and trails were now tightly held by the enemy.

The worst came when the Spaniards realized that the massive fortress of Sacsayhuaman (fortress of the royal falcon), two miles on Cusco’s northern outskirts, was held by the enemy. The Killke people had built it around 900, before the arrival of the Incas, when Pachacuti Inca (1438-1471) fortified it in the mid-fifteenth century. The Spaniards had no alternative but to retake the fortress for its proximity to the city, before more enemy forces settled there. With their indigenous allies the Spaniards battled fiercely all day with cavalry charges and foot soldiers.

________________________________

Sacsayhuaman’s Triple Walls. @ticketmachupicchu.com

________________________________

They cleared the fortress late on 6 May 1536, and returned to Cusco, leaving a large contingent of indigenous fighters to hold it. A week later, however, Sacsayhuaman was overrun again. Most worrisome for Inca warriors were the deadly riders with their lances and swords in open terrain. So, they made traps for the horses by digging round holes a couple of feet or so wide and about three or more feet deep in dirt roads in which the leg of a horse at full gallop would plunge into and break. The rider was then easy prey because he had to fight his way on foot or be captured and decapitated.

Twice, the Spaniards overran and lost Sacsayhuaman. On the third attempt, they succeeded in keeping the fortress at the end of a tough day under the leadership of Hernando Pizarro. In command of the fortress was the Solar Priest with more fighters; the frontal assault was as intense as it was brutal. A few days later, fifty horsemen led by Juan Pizarro and auxiliaries rode from Cusco, breaking through lines of warriors, running northwest toward Chinchaysuyo. The riders feigned a retreat toward Lima, which drew more Inca warriors out of the fortress. The Spaniards then swiftly turned around and attacked from the south, securing the first battlement of the perimeter walls. It is at that time that Juan Pizarro, having lost his helmet, was struck in the head by stones from sling shots, and died a few days later from his injuries. The following night, using wood ladders made on site, Spaniards and their allies scaled and fought their way up the two successive upper walls, overrunning the bastions in a savage fury.

In the morning, however, the fortress’s Muyumarca tower was still in the enemy’s hands. The Solar Priest (villac umu) planned his way out from the tower to seek reinforcement. Tuti Cusi Hualpa, the fortress commander, would hold the tower but ultimately could not resist the Spaniards’ onslaught. The following day, the Muyumarca tower was overrun, and the battle was lost. Tuti Cusi Hualpa had sworn to Manco Capac that he would hold the fortress at all costs; he failed and could not surrender. In full regalia, weapons in hand, he threw himself from the battlements to the rocks below. The Solar Priest had escaped on the riverside and joined Manco Capac in Calca with plans for a second siege of Cusco. When, a few weeks later, Inca scouts returned, they found the fortress firmly in Spanish hands. The siege had lasted for a long, brutal year of fighting.  Grain, however, was now in short supply; the Inca army could not be fed. The last harvests were exhausted, and grain storages were empty. Hunger loomed in towns and villages near and far; it was time to plant before famine would overcome everyone. Tens of thousands of allied warriors left for home, so Manco Capac Inca lifted Cusco’s siege and withdrew to Ollantaytambo and then to Vilcabamba where he established the Neo-Inca State (1537-1572).

The cost in lives of the “war of the brothers” followed by the battle of Cusco was dreadful and wrecked Inca and other Peruvian cultures. During the battle of Cusco, Lima, Ciudad de los Reyes, its original name, was very close to falling to the Inca allies’ relentless attacks. The battles were no less brutal and savage than those at Cusco, with Francisco Pizarro at the forefront. The city was saved by those pitiless soldiers from Spain and their indigenous allies who, for weeks, battled and freed Lima on the 14 of September 1536. But where did all the gold go? The upcoming article “Portobello, Peru’s Gold Gateway” will answer this question.

______________________________

Onward to Portobello.  @P.Briege the Elder-wikipedia.org 

________________________________

References – Further Reading:

José Antonio del Busto Duthurburu, 1973 – La Conquista del Perú and Perú Preincaico, 1977                        

Garcilaso de la Vega (1539-1543) by Alain Gheerbrant, 1961The Incas and, La Florida del Inca, 1986

Salomon and G.L. Urioste, 1991    The Huarochiri Manuscript

Pedro Cieza de Leon (1540-1550) – El Señorio de los Incas 1984, and La Crónica del Perú, 1985

John V. Murra, 1978 – La Organización Económica del Estado Inca

Francisco de Xerez, 2011Verdadera Relación de la Conquista del Perú.

Father Bernabé Cobo (1582-1657), by Roland Hamilton, 1979History of the Inca Empire

Pedro Sarmiento de Gamboa (1532-1608?), 1907 – History of the Incas

Lilian Estelle Fisher, 1966 – The Last Inca Revolt 1780-1783

The Multi-Million-Year Path to Becoming Human—Are We Actually There Yet?

Jan Ritch-Frel is the executive director of the Independent Media Institute and publisher of the Observatory, where he edits the Human Bridges initiative.

Deborah Barsky is a writing fellow for the Human Bridges, a researcher at the Catalan Institute of Human Paleoecology and Social Evolution, and an associate professor at the Rovira i Virgili University in Tarragona, Spain, with the Open University of Catalonia (UOC). She is the author of Human Prehistory: Exploring the Past to Understand the Future (Cambridge University Press, 2022).

Our chapter in the human evolutionary story is one of a globally connected population that has ballooned thanks to a suite of recent technologies. We frequently congratulate ourselves on these achievements, unique to the animal kingdom. But what if the celebrations are a little premature? Should we take into consideration that more phases of development will come in mind, behavior, and even appearance? Can we identify where we are in the process and what the pathways of change look like?

These are the kinds of questions that can keep professor Eudald Carbonell up at night. Carbonell is one of the most prominent archaeologists and thinkers on human evolution on the international stage today. He is best known as the co-director of the UNESCO World Heritage Site, Sierra de Atapuerca archaeological complex in Burgos, Spain, home to one of the longest records of human evolution known to science. A professor at the Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Carbonell also established the Catalan Institute of Human Paleoecology and Social Evolution in Tarragona, Spain, where he continues to mentor students and researchers.

One of Carbonell’s great legacies is a conceptual framework for thinking about the human evolutionary process that he calls “hominization and humanization.”

In an important summary paper of his concept that we have translated with his approval, Carbonell explains hominization as:

“… a biological process in which a series of morphological and ethological changes in the primate order generate a structure with enormous evolutionary potential. This process involves, in addition to the genetic material that carries the information, the continuous change in ecological conditions to which these primates must adapt in order to survive. … In the long process toward humanization, humans have undergone a series of acquisitions—or improvements on previous acquisitions—that have made our current uniqueness possible.”

Carbonell wants us to understand that the hominization and humanization processes are two sides of the same coin. And that the humanization process has its own trajectory, which includes an active choice in our fate.

“Humanization must be seen as an evolutionary state of being that our species has not yet attained, but toward which we—as a species—can aspire:

“Humanization, as a systemic structural acquisition, represents a cosmic awakening, a singularity composed of multiform acquisitions that have allowed us, over time, to break with the inertia of the past and overcome natural selection to delve into what is currently unknown. It is essential to begin by understanding the initial concept, which provides us with the foundation of knowledge that makes the process of humanization possible and, therefore, places us right at the beginning of the entire human adventure.”

Initially, straitjacketed by biological limits, our ancestors eventually invented the technologies that would come to rewrite the rules. We are completely reliant on culture and symbolic communication for this stage of extraordinary economic development and population growth.

Carbonell’s thinking and published research have influenced scholars, including us, to consider whether the next phases of human development are only possible if we can take guidance from what this revolutionary deep-time archaeology is teaching us. We met with Carbonell to discuss these ideas and reflect on the wisdom he has attained over the decades.

___________________________

Jan Ritch-Frel and Deborah Barsky: Your concept of hominization to humanization is a powerful framework for understanding human origins and our own framework. Can you briefly describe the meaning of this process?

Eudald Carbonell: This concept describes a hybridization process between biological and cultural traits. Hominization refers to all the biological developments characterizing the human evolutionary process. For example, when early hominins adopted an erect stature and fully bipedal locomotion, this was an important shift that liberated the hands from locomotory tasks and led to crucial modifications of the brain.

Humanization refers to all of the social and cultural developments that are associated with the different stages of human biological evolution. The concept of humanization is distinct from hominization, but their relationship should not be seen as one of coevolution but rather one of integral evolution. I don’t like the concept of coevolution. Instead, I propose the idea of evolutionary integration, wherein one incidence triggers another, engaging a process of reproduction through retro-alimentation. So, when I speak about hominization and humanization, I am referring to a process of hybridization of both biological and cultural traits.

Ritch-Frel and Barsky: New data emanating from archaeogenomics indicate a braided human evolution pathway: What do hominization and humanization tell us about the culmination of this process and our own experiences of being and becoming?

Carbonell: The evolutionary process of hominization and humanization is very complex. Previously, it was conceived of as a linear phenomenon—occurring sequentially—but it is not. In fact, it is plural and very multifaceted, like a bush with many branches. For example, advances in genetic studies (paleogenomics) now demonstrate that we are a hybrid of the many species with which we coexisted in Paleolithic Eurasia at different times, like the Neandertals and the Denisovans. We have also learned that anatomically modern humans emerged from yet another hybrid species much earlier than previously thought. In reality, the story of our genus Homo is very complex. I agree with my good friend, the famous paleoanthropologist Tim White, who said that Homo erectus and Homo sapiens are actually the same, in the sense that they represent a single evolutionary branch composed of a long succession of distinct individuals.

Modern humans are the result of multiple hybridization events. Only some 40,000 years ago—when the last known hybridization took place—the genomes recorded from some fossils of modern human individuals, who lived in Eurasia, have revealed relatively high percentages of Neandertal and Denisovan inputs. That means that H. sapiens emerged as a result of genetic drift; presently, our species has predominated as an outcome of this supersystem, but we are hybrids. We are not what we thought we were.

Ritch-Frel and Barsky: A lifetime like yours spent studying prehistory must allow you to develop original perspectives: Is the life of an archaeologist really the fantastic journey that most people think it is?

Carbonell: When you work, you always encounter deceptions. But the truth is, I have been obsessed with human evolution for many decades. Now that I am [72 years old], I feel I am ready to work on the future because I think that our species should know where it is headed. But my experience has also taught me that in order to think about where we are going, we need to investigate the past.

To me, the past and the future are the same and can be considered as having a linear quality, but only if we know the whole sequence. So, to speak with more authority about the future, we need to know the past. Without this knowledge, we cannot adequately develop our minds, our consciousness, our human intelligence.

In my opinion, we should define how we want to shape our future; what we want as a species. Do we want to be 4 billion people in the world? Do we want to be more cooperative? Do we want to be more united? Or do we want to disconnect? Once we know what we want to be, then we can look to the past to see what we need to do to get there. Do we want to be more eco-social? Do we want to show more respect to the natural and historic patterns we come from? Or do we want to break it all down—and even destroy ourselves? That is the first thing that we need to decide. If we don’t want to destroy ourselves, then we must find better ways to cooperate.

Ritch-Frel and Barsky: Archaeologists develop a special perspective because they spend more time than most people thinking about human evolution. Do you think this kind of training could be useful for other professions?

Carbonell: Yes, exactly. In fact, I have proposed to integrate a new class into the educational system, from as early as primary school and then also in secondary and university levels, which I have named: Human Social Autecology. Even if this class is taught for only one hour a week, from a young age, when one enters the educational system, let’s say from four or five years old, it could provide our youth with a new vision of the world. The class should be designed to provide a synthesis and should include a wide range of topics, like zoology, biology, sociology, and other subjects.

Acquiring and truly integrating such a wide body of knowledge would be beneficial to humanity on the whole because it would help individuals to learn to think critically and more fittingly assume a more acceptable basic behavioral code based on Human Social Autecology.

Ritch-Frel and Barsky: Do you think the new waves of information coming out of human origins research can address questions that challenge modern humanity?

Carbonell: I think we are an imbecile species. And for that reason, we sometimes believe and act on imbecile ideas that have no scientific proof. Learning about human evolution serves to understand ourselves. Human beings are profoundly evolutionary and evolved.

I sincerely believe that all of these notions, like creationism, in its various forms, or fake news—all of these nonsensical ideas are linked to our failure as a species. They teach us nothing and cannot be demonstrated. For example, the idea that the world is flat; everyone knows that it is round because it has been demonstrated scientifically. Everybody also knows that we originated from primates, that we are primates. Although with a significant difference, we are cultural primates. We are intelligent thinking beings.

__________________________

This article was produced by Human Bridges.

Cover Image, Top Left: Pexels, Pixabay

Lost Cities Beneath Our Feet: What Urban Archaeology Reveals About Modern Life

Sujain Thomas is a passionate freelance writer with a deep love for uncovering the past. Fascinated by archaeology, history, and the hidden stories of ancient civilizations, she enjoys bringing timeless knowledge to life through her writing. When she isn’t exploring historical topics, Sujain is often reading, traveling to heritage sites, or researching the cultural roots of modern life. She also contributes to resources like Plomberie 5 Étoiles that highlight expertise in modern plumbing and water systems.

Walking the streets of New York City, it is easy to feel overwhelmed by the towering skyscrapers, flashing billboards, and the constant rush of people. But beneath the paved roads and towering buildings lies another city—one that predates the steel and glass of the modern skyline. Urban archaeology, the study of buried remains in cities, gives us an extraordinary opportunity to peek into the lives of past generations. New York City, in particular, has proven to be a treasure trove of artifacts, ruins, and hidden histories, showing us how the past continues to shape the present.

In this article, we’ll explore the fascinating discipline of urban archaeology, focusing on New York City as both a living museum and an evolving experiment in human settlement. From colonial cellars unearthed beneath financial districts to Native American settlements along the Hudson, NYC offers countless stories about resilience, migration, adaptation, and everyday life. And as we’ll see, the city’s deep past also has much to say about how we design, build, and even renovate our urban spaces today.

What Is Urban Archaeology?

Urban archaeology is a branch of archaeology that studies the material remains buried under modern cities. Unlike traditional digs in open fields or rural landscapes, urban archaeologists must navigate construction sites, basements, subway tunnels, and even old landfill layers. The field is challenging but incredibly rewarding: every artifact recovered helps reconstruct stories of how people lived in bustling cityscapes centuries ago.

In places like New York City, where continual construction reshapes the urban landscape, opportunities abound. Each new skyscraper foundation or subway extension often cuts through centuries of history, revealing hidden neighborhoods, forgotten industries, and long-lost cultural practices.

____________________________

Myotus, CC BY 4.0, Wikimedia Commons

____________________________

Layers of History Beneath New York

Native American Foundations

Long before Dutch settlers arrived in the early 1600s, the area now known as Manhattan was home to the Lenape people. Archaeological discoveries along the Hudson and East Rivers have revealed evidence of settlements, shell middens (piles of discarded shells from meals), stone tools, and fire pits. These finds illustrate the Lenape’s close relationship with the waterways and forests, relying on them for fishing, hunting, and trade.

With the Dutch establishment of New Amsterdam in 1624, layers of colonial history began to accumulate. Excavations have uncovered tavern foundations, wells, clay pipes, and ceramic dishes. In Lower Manhattan, archaeologists have found remnants of early Dutch farmhouses, marketplaces, and shipping infrastructure that fueled the colony’s growth.

The British period also left behind fascinating remains. Artifacts from this era include wine bottles, weapon fragments, coins, and even children’s toys, reflecting a growing city shaped by trade, war, and migration.

The Forgotten African Burial Ground

One of the most remarkable discoveries in NYC urban archaeology occurred in 1991, when construction workers uncovered human remains near Foley Square in Lower Manhattan. Archaeologists soon realized this was part of the African Burial Ground, a resting place for thousands of free and enslaved Africans in the 17th and 18th centuries.

The site revealed not only skeletal remains but also coffin decorations, beads, and burial items, providing a glimpse into African cultural traditions maintained under oppression. Today, the African Burial Ground National Monument stands as a powerful reminder of a hidden community erased from mainstream narratives but vital to the city’s history.

_____________________________

Drawing recreation of African Burial Gound in Manhatan. Public Domain, Wikimedia Commons

_____________________________

Industrial and Immigrant Neighborhoods

By the 19th century, New York City had become a hub for immigrants from Ireland, Germany, Italy, and beyond. Archaeological work in neighborhoods like the Lower East Side has uncovered ceramics, medicine bottles, children’s shoes, and even food scraps preserved in privies (outdoor toilets).

These artifacts paint vivid pictures of everyday immigrant life—meager diets, crowded living conditions, and resilience in the face of poverty. Similarly, industrial archaeology has revealed the remains of breweries, tanneries, and textile workshops that fueled NYC’s economy.

Infrastructure and Modernization

The creation of New York’s iconic infrastructure—the subways, bridges, and skyscrapers—has often required digging through older layers of the city. During subway expansions, for example, workers have stumbled upon old wooden water pipes, colonial foundations, and even fossilized oyster shells once discarded by the Lenape.

Each discovery highlights the constant layering process: old streets and buildings buried beneath new ones, with traces of different eras stacked like chapters in a book.

What Urban Archaeology Teaches Us About Modern Life

Urban archaeology isn’t just about studying the past—it’s about understanding the roots of our modern world. The discoveries beneath New York City hold important lessons for how we live today.

1. Cities Are Built on Diversity

Archaeological finds remind us that New York has always been a city of immigrants. From Lenape tools to Irish pottery fragments, the city’s archaeological record demonstrates a long history of cultural exchange, adaptation, and resilience.

2. Inequality Is Not New

The African Burial Ground and immigrant tenement excavations reveal the harsh realities of social inequality. Urban archaeology forces us to confront how marginalized groups contributed to the city’s growth while enduring exploitation and hardship.

3. Everyday Life Matters

While grand monuments and famous buildings often dominate history books, archaeology shows that small items—buttons, plates, shoes, and toys—are equally important. They reveal how ordinary people lived, loved, and struggled.

4. Environmental Lessons

The remains of food, building materials, and waste disposal systems highlight how past societies interacted with their environments. Studying these can inform today’s debates about sustainability and urban planning.

5. The Importance of Preservation

Urban development often threatens archaeological resources. However, careful excavation, documentation, and preservation ensure that we don’t lose touch with the lessons of the past. Even modern construction industries, like home renovation companies, can play a role by collaborating with archaeologists when projects uncover historical layers.

Urban Archaeology in Action: New York Case Studies

The South Street Seaport

Excavations at the Seaport revealed the remains of wharves, warehouses, and taverns, offering insights into New York’s maritime economy. Items like clay pipes, pottery, and tools tell stories of sailors, merchants, and dockworkers.

Five Points Neighborhood

The infamous Five Points district, once known for poverty and crime, has been excavated to reveal artifacts that tell a different story. Archaeologists found evidence of vibrant cultural traditions, including Irish ceramics, African-American musical instruments, and Chinese porcelain, illustrating resilience in hardship.

The World Trade Center Site

After 9/11, excavation for reconstruction at Ground Zero revealed an 18th-century ship buried beneath the site. Likely used as landfill, the ship’s discovery stunned archaeologists and added another layer to the city’s already rich historical record.

How the Past Shapes the Future of Cities

Urban archaeology reminds us that cities are living organisms. They grow, adapt, and change, but they always carry their histories within them. New York’s buried layers show us that urban life has always involved complexity—diverse populations, environmental challenges, innovation, and resilience.

For modern architects, planners, and homeowners, this perspective is crucial. Understanding how people adapted their homes and communities in the past can inspire how we design sustainable and inclusive cities for the future.

_________________________

The next time you walk through New York City, imagine the countless layers of history beneath your feet: Lenape fire pits, Dutch cellars, African burial grounds, immigrant kitchens, and even ships buried under skyscrapers. Each tells a story of adaptation, survival, and creativity in the face of change.

Urban archaeology bridges the gap between past and present, reminding us that modern life rests on the foundations of countless forgotten lives. Just as archaeologists carefully piece together fragments of pottery to reconstruct ancient stories, we can use these insights to guide the way we build and renovate our cities today.

For those shaping New York’s future—from urban planners to builders—respecting and learning from its buried past ensures a richer, more meaningful city. To explore modern approaches to preserving and enhancing NYC’s architectural legacy, visit NYC Renovation.

 

Cover Image, Top Left: Pixabay  https://pixabay.com/users/soultrain-7283580/

 

Extinct South American megafauna were a staple in the diet of Pleistocene humans

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)—Extinct megafauna that once roamed southern South America were staples in the diet of early human hunters, according to a new chronological analysis* of faunal remains. “Our results undermine one of the most widely cited objections to the hypothesis that humans are the principal cause of megafaunal extinctions and put human foragers again at the heart of the debate,” Luciano Prates and colleagues write. The late Pleistocene extinction devastated the planet’s existing megafauna, wiping out majestic giants ranging from mammoths to giant sloths and saber-toothed tigers. Scientists generally agree that climate change at the end of the last glacial period was a chief driver of ecological stress and extinctions worldwide. However, the role of humans in this extinction is debated, especially in North America. Some researchers posit that humans played a negligible role in the decline of megafauna, while others argue that predation by early hunter-gatherers was the chief driver of extinctions. In contrast, most archaeologists suspected that humans played a less prominent role in the extinction of megafauna in South America, in part due to a lack of sites containing faunal and human remains. However, Prates et al. now show that megafauna in South America were leading prey items for early hunters and foragers in the late Pleistocene, ranging from 13,000 to 11,600 years ago. The team identified and examined 20 archaeological assemblages of faunal remains in the Southern Cone of South America, comprising modern-day Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile. By comparing bone remains of megafauna with small- and medium-sized animals, the scientists calculated that extinct megafauna dominated 15 of the 20 assemblages. These extinct taxa included two species of giant sloths, giant armadillos, and horses, which the authors determined likely ranked at the top of choice prey items because they offered higher returns than smaller species. Prates et al. conclude that extinct megafauna were thus the main targets of hunters in the Pampas, Patagonia, and central Chile, noting that the human diet only broadened to include smaller extant species such as guanaco once megafauna had largely disappeared 11,600 years ago.

_______________________________

Megafaunal species were preferred prey for humans in Southern South America. Luciano Prates et al. Megafaunal reconstructions in the figure were provided and authorized by Megafauna 3D Project (https://www.megafauna3d.org)

_______________________________

Location of sites with preextinction faunal assemblages. Top: Summed
probabilities of radiocarbon dates on megafauna showing the limit (11,600 cal
years B.P.) for a substantial coexistence with humans. Bottom: Map of Southern
South America with location of sites with preextinction faunal assemblages studied
in this work: Monte Verde II (1), Tagua Tagua 1 to 3 (2 to 4), Campo Laborde (5),
Cerro La China 1 (6), Santa Julia (7), Paso Otero 5 (8), Infieles-1
(9), El Trébol (10),
Cueva Fell (11), Cueva Lago Sofía 1 (12), Piedra Museo 1 (13), Cueva Tunel (14), Casa
del Minero 1 (15), Cueva del Medio (16), Cueva Tixi (17), Tres Arroyos (18), Cerro Tres
Tetas (19), and Pay Paso 1 (20). Summed Probability Distribution (SPD) curve and
species diversity map were plotted using data provided by Prates and Perez (5).
Credit
Prates et al., Sci. Adv. 11, eadx2615

_______________________________

Frequency of animal occurrence by site in preextinction bone assemblages,
grouped by class and body size of prey. Columns show the occurrence
of physical (light gray) or behavioral (dark gray) association with humans. Prates et al., Sci. Adv. 11, eadx2615

_______________________________

Article Source: AAAS news release.

Stories in Stone: What NYC Sidewalks Reveal About the Past

Preeth Vinod Jethwani is a seasoned SEO specialist based in Dhule, India, with a Master’s degree in English Literature. Her academic background in language and communication fuels her strategic approach to digital marketing. With over 5 years of hands-on experience in Guest Posting, Niche Edits, Link Building, and Local SEO, she helps websites grow their organic reach with precision and purpose. When not optimizing content or building backlinks, she shares insights and tips at AskPreeto.com.

Walking the streets of New York City, one might not immediately think that the sidewalks themselves tell stories. We step daily over slabs of concrete, pavement, and granite, rarely pausing to consider what lies beneath—or what the layers beneath might reveal about the city’s deep history. But in fact, the sidewalks of NYC are portals into a palimpsest of human activity: Indigenous occupation, colonial settlement, commerce, urban renewal, and daily life across centuries.

This article explores how New York’s sidewalks are more than mere pathways—they are archaeological stages on which stories lie just beneath our feet.

The Concept of Urban Sidewalk Archaeology

Archaeology in cities is often thought of in relation to major digs—museums, historic sites, construction trenches. But urban archaeology also unfolds in subtle ways: through sidewalk cuts, utility trenches, street repairs, and building foundation work. Each time the soil beneath the street is disturbed, there is a chance to glimpse vestiges of earlier eras.

Because sidewalks often align with older street alignments, and because sidewalks get repaired, replaced, or cut for access, they serve as accessible “windows” into subsurface deposits. When archaeological teams or municipal workers open up a sidewalk, they may encounter:

  • Soil horizons preserved beneath fill or pavement
  • Artifacts discarded or lost over time
  • Foundation stones, cellar remnants, wells, cisterns
  • Historic features (old curbstones, cast-iron elements, paving blocks)
  • Traces of early utility lines (gas, water, early telegraph)
  • Organic traces (pollen, seeds, charcoal) in buried layers

Because sidewalks are continuous and traverse wide swaths of the city, cumulative finds create a mosaic of the past cityscape.

Historic Layers Under the Sidewalk: Selected Case Studies

1. Lower Manhattan’s Stadt Huys Block

Excavations near the old Dutch city hall revealed intact 17th- and 18th-century layers, wells, and colonial foundations. These were found beneath streets and adjacent sidewalks, proving that preserved sequences often remain hidden just under modern surfaces.

2. Remnants at Pearl Street

In the Financial District, a section of sidewalk allows people to view preserved 17th-century building foundations beneath protective glass. This demonstrates how sidewalks can also serve as exhibit spaces.

3. Wharf Remains at Burling Slip

Near John Street, redevelopment exposed portions of forgotten wharf structures, once waterfront but now hidden under pavement and pedestrian routes.

4. Small Everyday Artifacts

Countless ceramics, coins, bottles, and tools have been recovered during sidewalk replacements and street trenching. Each artifact is a piece of the city’s story, revealing how ordinary New Yorkers lived, consumed, and disposed of goods.

5. Sidewalk Clocks

Manhattan’s historic cast-iron sidewalk clocks are not buried, but they are part of sidewalk heritage, representing architectural and industrial craftsmanship that has become part of the city’s streetscape.

___________________________

___________________________

What the Sidewalk Record Reveals

When studied collectively, sidewalk discoveries tell us:

  • How street grids and ground levels have shifted over centuries
  • What daily consumption looked like in different neighborhoods
  • The history of utilities and infrastructure beneath the pavement
  • Where older features like wells, cisterns, and cellars were located
  • How Indigenous traces sometimes survive below colonial and modern fill

These themes show that every sidewalk is a thin crust over layers of change.

Challenges of Sidewalk Archaeology

Urban sidewalk archaeology faces constraints:

  • Excavations are usually small, temporary, and limited by safety rules
  • Permits and coordination with city agencies are required
  • Developers often must balance preservation with construction needs
  • Public interpretation requires creative solutions like plaques, glass panels, or augmented reality
  • Documentation must be precise so that even small finds are not lost to history

Despite these challenges, sidewalks remain a vital access point to the city’s hidden past.

Sidewalks and Modern Repair

Maintaining sidewalks is itself part of the city’s living archaeology. Property owners are responsible for adjacent sidewalks, and if they fail to repair violations, the city may step in. Contractors today cut, replace, and repave sidewalks constantly, creating chances for discoveries. That’s why professional crews, like sidewalk repair contractors and check NYC sidewalk repair cost, play a key role in balancing compliance, safety, and heritage awareness.

Each repair is both a civic duty and an opportunity to rediscover what lies beneath the concrete.

Reading the Pavement: An Archaeologist’s Approach

Archaeologists “read” sidewalks through:

  • Historic map analysis
  • Test cores and probes
  • Monitoring of sidewalk and utility trenching
  • Recording soil layers and artifacts
  • Cataloging and integrating finds into citywide databases

Through these methods, they weave together a narrative of urban life hidden below modern pavement.

What Sidewalk Stories Teach Us

The study of NYC sidewalks reveals:

  • A continuity of urban habitation from colonial times to today
  • Layered modernization—from cobblestones to fiber optics
  • Patterns of wealth and poverty visible in artifact distribution
  • The impact of urban renewal and erasure in some neighborhoods
  • How sidewalks can connect pedestrians to history beneath their feet

Ultimately, sidewalks embody both continuity and transformation.

__________________________

__________________________

The sidewalks of New York City are more than just functional paths; they are thin veils over centuries of history. Beneath them lie forgotten streets, discarded artifacts, buried wells, and layers of human life that tell the city’s story. Every sidewalk repair, every excavation, is a chance to rediscover these hidden narratives.

As New Yorkers walk the pavements of today, they tread directly over the memories of yesterday. Recognizing sidewalks as living archaeological spaces allows us to connect with the city in a deeper way—bridging daily life with centuries of heritage.

For those looking to maintain safe and compliant sidewalks while respecting this layered past, expert guidance is essential. Learn more at NYC Sidewalk Violations.

12,000-year-old monumental camel rock art acted as ancient ‘road signs’ to desert water sources

Griffith University—New findings highlight the pioneering role of human groups who lived in the interior of northern Arabia shortly after the hyper-arid conditions of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), guided by the return of seasonal water sources – and leaving behind a monumental legacy in rock art.

The Hidden History Beneath Florida’s Beaches: Archaeology in Action

Preeth Vinod Jethwani is a seasoned SEO specialist based in Dhule, India, with a Master’s degree in English Literature. Her academic background in language and communication fuels her strategic approach to digital marketing. With over 5 years of hands-on experience in Guest Posting, Niche Edits, Link Building, and Local SEO, she helps websites grow their organic reach with precision and purpose. When not optimizing content or building backlinks, she shares insights and tips at AskPreeto.com.

When one visits Florida’s beaches—strolling along the sugar-white sands or snorkelling in its azure shallows—the impression is of vibrant life: shells, surf, palms, sunshine. Few pause to consider that beneath those sands and shallow waters lies an extraordinary archive of human history, thousands of years old. As sea levels, storms, and coastal dynamics have shifted landscapes over millennia, entire settlements, burial grounds, and ritual sites once on dry land have been lost beneath the waves. Archaeologists today are working to uncover—carefully, respectfully—what remains of those sunken worlds.

Florida is especially fertile ground for this work. Between its long coastline, hundreds of springs and rivers, and its geologically dynamic history, Florida has become a key frontier in submerged landscape archaeology and underwater cultural heritage. The stories hidden beneath its beaches and bays complicate conventional narratives of Florida’s human history, challenge us to think about climate change, and force us to reckon with how modern development interacts with ancient heritage.

Geological and Sea-Level Backdrop: Why So Much Is Submerged

To appreciate why Florida hides so much beneath its beaches and nearshore zones, one must understand how sea levels and landscapes have shifted over time.

Paleolandscapes and Submerged Shorelines

During the last glacial maximum (~21,000 years ago), global sea levels were more than 120 meters lower than today. Much of the continental shelf now submerged was then dry land—extending Florida’s shoreline far offshore. Over the subsequent millennia, melting ice, changing climate, and thermal expansion progressively raised sea levels, flooding coastal terraces, river valleys, springs, and habitation zones. Some archaeological sites that were once inland gradually became submerged as the ocean advanced.

These submerged landscapes—buried under sediments and sometimes preserved in low-oxygen conditions—offer a chance to detect human activity well outside the bounds of what we can see on land today. For example, the so-called PaleoAucilla and PaleoEconfina channels (in Florida’s Big Bend region) have been major foci for underwater archaeological surveys aimed at revealing how people used waterways that are now underwater.

Because sea level rise has not been monotonic or uniform, coastal zones have experienced pulses of transgression and regression, sedimentation, erosion, and reworking. Some ancient features were deeply buried; others were scoured or fragmented by storms and currents. The result: a palimpsest of buried cultural remains, many fragile and hidden.

Wet-Site Preservation and Peat Encasement

Some submerged sites enjoy exceptional preservation when they are sealed in peat or organic sediments that retard decay. In freshwater or brackish conditions, wood, plant remains, and human remains can survive far longer than in aerobic soils. One dramatic example is the Manasota Key Offshore site, which lies under ~21 feet (≈ 6–7 meters) of water and yet preserves wooden burial stakes and human remains dating to more than 7,200 years ago.

Because peat layers slow microbial activity, organic materials such as wood, fiber, shells, and sometimes even textiles or plant remains may survive far better than expected. In Florida, with its many springs, sinkholes, and peat-rich wetlands, archaeologists often call these “wet sites” — akin to famous upland waterlogged preservation sites like Europe’s bogs or Alpine lake dwellings, but underwater.

Thus, while much of Florida’s buried archaeological record has been lost to erosion, there remain many sites where enough has survived that archaeologists can reconstruct past lifeways, environments, and ties between ancient people and the evolving coastline.

Notable Underwater and Coastal Archaeological Sites in Florida

In Florida, archaeology under and near beaches spans prehistoric, colonial, and more recent historic periods. Below are some of the most compelling case studies that illustrate the diversity, challenges, and insights of working beneath the waves.

Manasota Key Offshore: An Underwater Burial Pond

One of the most striking discoveries in Florida’s underwater archaeology is the Manasota Key Offshore site, near Venice. First reported in 2016 by a fossil diver, the site turned out to be a prehistoric burial pond—originally a fresh or spring-fed pond—that later became submerged by rising sea levels.

Archaeologists documented multiple human remains and burial stakes carved from wood. Radiocarbon dating placed some stakes at more than 7,200 years old. The peat bottom, relatively undisturbed, preserved fragile organic materials, offering a rare window into early burial practices and environmental context. Because the site had shifted from terrestrial to submerged conditions, it is the first known underwater prehistoric burial site in the Americas.

What makes this site especially powerful is that it allows archaeologists to reconstruct both the cultural behavior (burial methods, use of stake structures) and the paleoenvironment (hydrology, vegetation, topographic context) as it was before inundation.

Shipwreck Preserves: Museums in the Sea

Florida’s underwater archaeological heritage is not limited to prehistoric sites. The state has developed a system of Underwater Archaeological Preserves known as Museums in the Sea. These are historic shipwrecks that have been interpreted and opened to divers and snorkelers as in situ “museum” sites, combining archaeology, preservation, and public education.

Some of the highlights include:

  • San Pedro: Part of the 1733 Spanish treasure fleet, located near the Florida Keys. The ship lies in about 18 ft of water, and visitors can dive or snorkel over it.
  • USS Narcissus: Sank off Egmont Key in 1866; part of the preserve system.
  • Vamar: A steamship built in 1919 that sank during World War II conditions. It became Florida’s 9th preserve in 2004.
  • SS Tarpon (1887): Another historic shipwreck preserved as an underwater archaeological site.

These preserves serve dual roles: as protected heritage sites and as public portals into underwater archaeology. Underwater plaques, guided brochures, laminated maps, and interpretive signage help visitors understand what they are seeing.

Southeastern and Gulf Sites: Expanding the Frontier

In Northwest Florida, the University of West Florida’s Maritime Archaeology Program has explored shipwrecks near Pensacola and along barrier island systems. Their work includes the Emanuel Point shipwreck (from the 1559 Spanish colonial expedition) and other colonial-era wrecks.

Meanwhile, ongoing research detects ancient shell mounds as far as 20 miles into the Gulf of Mexico, well offshore of modern coastlines. These shell middens—heaps of discarded shellfish remains and associated artifacts—document coastal adaptation and resource use that were once on dry land and later inundated.

One team led by archaeologist Jessi Halligan (FSU) has found a stone knife beneath 13 ft of sediment in the Aucilla River, pushing earlier human occupation in Florida back to ~14,500 years ago—well earlier than many conventional models of continental colonization.

These findings indicate that Florida’s submerged coastal shelves may preserve evidence of the earliest human presence in the region, contingent on sediment cover, preservation conditions, and archaeological detection.

Methods and Challenges in Coastal and Underwater Archaeology

Exploring the hidden history beneath beaches and into offshore zones requires specialized methods, logistical coordination, and sensitivity to environmental and legal constraints. Below are the principal techniques, obstacles, and best practices.

Remote Sensing and Geophysical Survey

Because most submerged sites lack obvious surface features, archaeologists often begin with remote sensing:

  • Side-scan sonar: Useful for mapping the seafloor and detecting anomalies (wreck debris, buried structures, shell mounds) based on acoustic reflections.
  • Sub-bottom profiling: Penetrates sediments to identify buried shapes or stratigraphy.
  • Magnetometry: Detects ferrous metal anomalies (shipwrecks, cannons, iron artifacts).
  • Multibeam bathymetry: Provides high-resolution topographic models of underwater terrain.
  • Ground-penetrating radar (GPR): In shallow coastal zones and on beach/nearshore sands, GPR may detect buried features.
  • LIDAR and aerial photogrammetry: In extremely shallow water or exposed tidal zones, aerial or drone surveys may reveal subtle depressions or buried shell middens.

These tools help archaeologists prioritize where to dive, trench, or core, and allow for minimal disturbance. Because underwater archaeology is inherently destructive (once you dig, the context is altered), remote sensing helps minimize unnecessary excavation.

Diving, Coring, and Excavation

Once a promising target is identified:

  • Coring: Sediment cores—taken with piston or vibracore devices—sample vertical stratigraphy of buried sequences. They can reveal artifact-bearing layers, organic material, and changes in sediment or environment.
  • Test trenches / trenches: Archaeologists may cut trenches with hand tools or water dredges to expose specific features like hearths, floor surfaces, or burial pits.
  • Underwater excavation: In the case of shipwrecks or submerged structures, divers use airlifts, dredges, photographic documentation, and careful stratigraphic removal to retrieve artifacts and record context.
  • Water sieving and flotation: Recovered sediments are screened underwater, and organic materials are floated or processed with water-based techniques to capture small artifacts, remains, or ecofacts.

Because visibility underwater may be limited, archaeologists rely heavily on photographic recording, photogrammetry, and robust field notes.

_____________________________

_____________________________

Preservation, Conservation, and Stabilization

Artifacts recovered from underwater environments require careful conservation because the transition to dry, oxygenated conditions can accelerate deterioration. Practices include:

  • Keeping artifacts wet (immersed) until conservation labs can treat them.
  • Desalination baths to remove salt that may corrode metals.
  • Consolidants and stabilizing treatments (e.g., polyethylene glycol, epoxies) to support fragile wood or organic remains.
  • Controlled drying and freeze-drying for delicate items.

Moreover, some heritage is better preserved in situ (left in place) than recovered. Archaeologists may choose to backfill, consolidate, or bury a site again, after mapping and documentation, to preserve it for future generations.

Legal Framework, Conservation, and Public Interpretation

The success of underwater archaeology in Florida depends not just on scientific methods but on effective legal protections, public involvement, and interpretive outreach.

Legal Protection of Underwater Heritage

Florida’s Division of Historical Resources has a dedicated Underwater Archaeology branch, protecting archaeological resources ranging from prehistoric sites to shipwrecks. Under Florida law, removal of artifacts or disturbance to archaeological or burial sites without authorization is illegal. For example:

  • Section 267.13, Florida Statutes, prohibits removal of artifacts from archaeological sites without a permit.
  • Section 872.05 prohibits desecration or disturbance of human burial sites. 

Likewise, many shipwreck preserves are protected by state and federal laws. Some sites are listed in the U.S. National Register of Historic Places, and federal protections like the Abandoned Shipwreck Act or the Sunken Military Craft Act may apply when U.S. or foreign governments own submerged vessels. For instance, the recently confirmed identification of HMS Tyger (an 18th-century British warship) in the Dry Tortugas extends sovereign protection under U.S. law.

These legal protections help regulate salvage, permit issuance, and ensure that fledgling projects comply with heritage best practices.

____________________________

____________________________

Underwater Preserves as Living Museums

The Underwater Archaeological Preserves (Museums in the Sea) represent a powerful model of balancing conservation and public access. Rather than recover every artifact, many shipwrecks are left in place and interpreted through underwater plaques, guided dive brochures, and public education campaigns.

These preserves serve multiple goals:

  • Heritage protection: By controlling access and signage, they deter looting and unregulated artifact removal.
  • Education and outreach: Snorkelers and divers can engage directly with cultural heritage in situ.
  • Tourism synergy: These preserves help promote Florida’s underwater cultural tourism.
  • Research and monitoring: Archaeologists can revisit protected sites to study decay, ecological interactions, and longitudinal change.

That said, management is not trivial: interpretive materials need updating, visitation must be monitored, and environmental damage (e.g., anchors, diver contact) must be mitigated.

___________________________

___________________________

What the Hidden Archaeology Tells Us: Insights into Past Societies and Coastal Dynamics

Unearthing submerged archaeological sites is not just an intellectual curiosity. These discoveries reshape narratives about human adaptation, settlement, mobility, and interaction with changing environments.

Early Coastal Economies and Settlement

Many prehistoric Floridians would have gravitated toward coastlines, estuaries, springs, and rivers for freshwater, aquatic resources, and access to transportation routes. As sea levels rose, these same landscapes were submerged. Underwater sites allow us to trace how people shifted to ever-narrowing habitable zones, adapted diets (toward marine resources), and reorganized settlement patterns.

For example, ancient shell mounds preserved offshore show how shellfish harvesting, fish traps, and perhaps seasonal camps extended into what is now open sea.

The discovery of a stone knife 13 ft beneath the surface of sediment in the Aucilla River suggests a human presence in Florida as early as ~14,500 years ago—pushing back arrival dates and complicating migration models based on ice-age corridor theory.

___________________________

___________________________

Mortuary Behavior and Belief Systems

Burial sites like Manasota Key Offshore illuminate early mortuary practices, use of wooden stakes, burial clustering, and the role of water features in cultural beliefs. Because many inland (dry land) mortuary sites degrade or remain undetected, submerged burial contexts may add critical data about variation in mortuary behavior across time and space.

Coastal Resilience, Adaptation, and Retreat

The submerged archaeological record documents how societies responded to environmental change—especially sea level rise, storms, salinity shifts, and erosion. In Florida, such stresses are not ancient analogs but present reality. Archaeologists have observed:

  • Cycles of abandonment and relocation of coastal settlements.
  • Reorganization of subsistence toward more marine-oriented diets or deeper-water fisheries.
  • Engineering or structural responses (shell barriers, mounded middens, raised habitation zones).

These patterns inform our understanding of how human communities adapt (or fail to adapt) to changing coastlines. The past provides analogs for modern sea-level challenges.

Environment and Paleoecology Reconstruction

Because submerged sites often preserve organic remains—shells, botanical remains, peat, pollen—they offer paleoenvironmental data. Researchers can reconstruct vegetation, salinity gradients, hydrology, and climatic fluctuations in tandem with human activity.

At Manasota Key Offshore, the peat-enclosed burials allow archaeologists to reconstruct the freshwater pond in which the burials occurred, even though today the site lies 21 ft underwater. 

Thus underwater archaeology joins paleoclimatology, ecology, and archaeology in multidisciplinary work that helps us understand how coastal environments evolved and how people responded.

Anchorage for Local Relevance: Naples, Florida and Coastal Development

Before concluding, a nod to the intersection of archaeology and coastal development: Florida’s coastal cities, including those like Naples, must balance growth, infrastructure, and heritage conservation. In rapidly developing zones, construction (shoreline erosion control, beachfront housing, seawalls) may disturb buried archaeological deposits, shell middens, or paleolandscape strata.

Developers and builders—Naples home builders, for instance—should engage proactively with archaeologists, require pre-construction surveys (especially in sensitive zones), and incorporate preservation or documentation into their planning. When heritage is seen as a stakeholder, development and conservation can coexist rather than clash.

Conclusion

The hidden history beneath Florida’s beaches is not just a metaphor—it is a literal truth. Submerged settlements, underwater burials, shell middens, and historic shipwrecks lie waiting beneath the sands and waves. Archaeologists working in coastal and underwater settings face formidable technical, legal, and environmental obstacles. Yet their discoveries rewrite narratives of ancient life, migration, adaptation, and resilience.

Florida’s underwater heritage also offers a cautionary mirror to the present: as sea level rises again, as storms batter coasts, and as development presses ever closer to the shore, the lessons of past communities’ responses to change become urgently relevant. The integration of archaeology, conservation, public outreach, and responsible development is essential.

For Naples and other coastal communities, the imperative is clear: build with foresight, integrate heritage planning into development, and treat buried history as a valued resource rather than an inconvenient footnote. When development is aligned with heritage—informed by archaeology rather than oblivious to it—our coastal landscapes gain depth, meaning, and continuity.

As you consider coastal investments, shoreline planning, or home construction, remember the silent pages of the past beneath your feet. Protect them, learn from them, and build with respect. For more on how development and heritage-conscious design can go hand in hand, you may wish to explore Goyaldevelopment.com, a resource committed to combining growth and heritage stewardship.

 

Archaeologists Discover Proof of Ancient Theatre on Russia’s Taman Peninsula

An archaeological expedition at the ancient Greek polis of Phanagoria on the Taman Peninsula in the South of Russia has uncovered what appears to be the first physical evidence of a classical theatre at the site. The team, supported by Oleg Deripaska’s Volnoe Delo Foundation, found a fragment of a theatrical mask depicting a satyr — the jovial companion of Dionysus and one of the most recognizable figures in ancient Greek comedy.

The mask fragment, dating to the 2nd century BC, preserves the right side of the satyr’s face: a large ear, prominent cheekbones, a pierced pupil, and a thick beard. Its vivid colors — blue contouring around the eye and a red beard and mustache — suggest that it belongs to the New Comedy genre. A perforation behind the ear once held the strap that secured the mask to the actor’s head. Measuring about 30 cm in length, with wide openings for the eyes and mouth, the piece was clearly a functional theatre prop.

In ancient Greece, actors wore masks to switch roles and convey emotions. Facial features and colors allowed audiences to recognize a character’s personality at a glance. For example, red hair and a bushy beard signified a fiery, irascible temper. The satyr is unmistakable on this terracotta fragment, with its exaggerated features, tousled hair, and horseshoe-shaped mustache — consistent with depictions of Dionysus’ goat-footed companions, who celebrated his exploits and accompanied him in processions.

The discovery was made in Phanagoria’s central district. Archaeologists suggest the mask may later have been reused in theatrical mysteries or sacrificial offerings. Earlier excavations at the site uncovered smaller ritual masks, no more than 10 cm high — including two satyrs and one comic actor. These miniature masks were fixed to wooden poles and placed in sanctuaries as votive offerings for healing or the granting of wishes.

Classical sources also attest to theaters in the northern Black Sea region. In the 4th century BC, the writer Polyaenus described the stratagem of commander Memnon, who sent the singer Aristonicus to perform in Bosporan theaters. As crowds gathered to hear the celebrated  musician, Memnon gauged the enemy’s population and military strength. “There isn’t the slightest doubt that Phanagoria had a theater. We believe it was located on a hill overlooking the sea and modern Kerch — the ancient Panticapaeum, capital of the Bosporan Kingdom,” said Vladimir Kuznetsov, head of the Phanagoria expedition.

Masks also held deep ritual meaning in the cult of Dionysus, the god of wine and religious ecstasy. During Dionysian mysteries, initiates symbolically shed their own identities and took on new ones — a transformation embodied by the mask. The cult flourished in Phanagoria under Mithridates VI Eupator, who regarded Dionysus as his patron and even adopted the epithet “Dionysus.” Under his reign, images of the god and his companions appeared everywhere: on coins, amphora stamps, statuettes, and black-glazed ceramics.

________________________________

Fragment of a theatrical mask depicting a satyr. Courtesy Volnoe Delo Foundation

________________________________

Smaller ritual masks. Courtesy Volnoe Delo Foundation

________________________________

Coins with the image of Dionysus. Courtesy Volnoe Delo Foundation

________________________________

Figurines of a girl and a child with bunches of grapes — symbols of Dionysus. Courtesy Volnoe Delo Foundation

________________________________

Article Source: Volnoe Delo Foundation news release

Europe’s oldest blue pigment found in Germany

Aarhus University—At the Final Palaeolithic site of Mühlheim-Dietesheim, Germany, archaeologists from Aarhus University found traces of a blue residue on a stone artifact dating back around 13,000 years. Using a suite of cutting-edge scientific analyses, they confirmed the traces were from the vivid blue mineral pigment azuritepreviously unseen in Europe’s Palaeolithic art. 

“This challenges what we thought we knew about Palaeolithic pigment use”, sais Dr. Izzy Wisher, the lead author of the study. 

Until now, scholars believed Palaeolithic artists predominantly used red and black pigments – practically no other colors are present in the art of this period. This was thought to be due to a lack of blue minerals or limited visual appeal. Given the absence of blues in Palaeolithic art, this new discovery suggests that blue pigments may have been used for either body decoration or dyeing fabrics – activities that leave few archaeological traces.

 “The presence of azurite shows that Palaeolithic people had a deep knowledge of mineral pigments and could access a much broader color palette than we previously thought – and they may have been selective in the way they used certain colors”, Izzy Wisher says. 

The stone bearing the azurite traces was originally thought to be an oil lamp. Now, it appears to have been a mixing surface or palette for preparing blue pigments — hinting at artistic or cosmetic traditions that remain largely invisible today.

The findings urge a rethink of Palaeolithic art and color use, opening new avenues for exploring how early humans expressed identity, status, and beliefs through materials far more varied and vibrant than previously imagined.

The study was conducted in collaboration with Rasmus Andreasen, James Scott and Christof Pearce at the Department of Geoscience, Aarhus University, as well as Thomas Birch who is affiliated with both the Department of Geoscience, AU, and the National Museum of Denmark, alongside colleagues from Germany, Sweden and France. 

The full study* is published in Antiquity.

__________________________________

Article Source: Aarhus University news reease.

Ancient fishing nets resurrected from pottery using X-ray CT: a world-first achievement by Kumamoto University researchers

Kumamoto University—In a groundbreaking archaeological achievement, researchers from Kumamoto University have successfully reconstructed the structure of prehistoric fishing nets from the Jomon period (ca. 14,000–900 BCE) by analyzing impressions preserved in ancient pottery using advanced X-ray computed tomography (CT). This marks the first time in the world that nets from over 6,000 years ago have been digitally and physically resurrected in such detail.

Led by Professor Emeritus Hiroki Obata from Faculty of Humanities And Social Sciences, Kumamoto University, the team examined pottery unearthed from sites in Hokkaido and Kyushu—regions in northern and southern Japan respectively—where ancient net impressions remained hidden inside and on the surfaces of ceramic fragments. By using high-resolution X-ray CT imaging alongside silicone cast replication techniques, the researchers visualized and reconstructed the nets’ intricate structures, including thread twists, knot types, and mesh sizes.

The study revealed a rich diversity in net-making techniques between regions. In northern Japan’s Hokkaido region, large-mesh nets with tightly tied “reef knots” were found embedded in the clay coils of so-called Shizunai-Nakano style pottery. These nets, believed to have been used for ocean fishing, were then repurposed as structural core materials in pottery making—a practice suggesting the early reuse and recycling of tools.

In contrast, pottery from the southern Kyushu region, dating to the Final Jomon and early Yayoi periods (ca. 3,200–2,800 years ago), contained fine-mesh nets tied with simpler overhand knots or using “knotted wrapping” methods. These nets likely served as molds or release agents during pottery production and may have originally been used as bags.

Remarkably, the study also estimated the labor involved in net production, suggesting that crafting a single fishing net could take more than 85 hours—highlighting the value of these tools and the cultural importance of their reuse. “This reuse of materials reflects an early form of sustainability, akin to today’s SDGs,” said Prof. Obata.

The findings challenge previous assumptions that all net impressions represented fishing gear and demonstrate that not all preserved impressions can be interpreted as functional nets. Instead, the nets appear to have had multiple lives—first as tools for fishing or carrying, and later as integral elements in the creation of pottery.

This world-first study, published in the Journal of Archaeological Science, not only reconstructs ancient technology but also opens new doors for identifying and preserving other vanished organic materials in archaeological contexts.

___________________________

X-ray computed tomography (CT) was used to examine and digitally reconstruct net impressions preserved in pottery from the Hidaka region of Hokkaido, Japan, dating to the Early Jomon period (referred to as ‘Shizunai-Nakano style pottery’). This study revealed that fishing nets were (re)used in various ways during pottery production. Differences in thread twist direction, knotting methods, and mesh size provide insights into the nets’ functions and the cultural practices of the time—shedding light on the importance of net-making in prehistoric Japan.
Figure reproduced from Obata & Lee, 2025, Journal of Archaeological Science, under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hiroki Obata, Kumamoto University

___________________________

Article Source: Kumamoto University news release.

*Nets hidden in pottery: Resurrected fishing nets in the Jomon period, Japan, Journal of Archaeological Science, 1-Jul-2025. 10.1016/j.jas.2025.106231 

Why did Neanderthals go to the beach?

University of Seville—An international study, published in the journal Scientific Reports by Nature Publishing Group, has revealed a new Neanderthal site in the south of the Iberian Peninsula, on the Algarve coast of Portugal. More specifically, it describes the first traces of Neanderthal hominids in Portugal, representing a significant advance in our understanding of the human presence on the Atlantic coast of the Iberian Peninsula during the period known as the Pleistocene.

The work is led by Carlos Neto de Carvalho, geologist and palaeontologist at IDL-University of Lisbon and scientific coordinator of the Naturtejo UNESCO Global Geopark, with the participation of Fernando Muñiz Guinea, professor in the Department of Crystallography, Mineralogy and Agricultural Chemistry at the University of Seville. The study has also benefited from contributions from other universities and research centers in Portugal, Spain, Gibraltar, Italy, Denmark and China. It is an “interdisciplinary study on the ecological and behavioral analysis of the fossilized footprint record in southern Portugal,” say Neto de Carvalho and Fernando Muñiz.

A unique window into everyday behavior

The first Neanderthal footprints in Portugal were discovered in two different locations in the Algarve: Praia do Monte Clérigo, in rocks dating back some 78,000 years, and Praia do Telheiro, dating back 82,000 years. At Monte Clérigo, 5 tracks and 26 footprints have been identified, left by adults and children just over a year old on a steep slope of what was once a coastal dune. At Praia do Telheiro, an isolated footprint attributed to a teenager or adult female has been discovered, associated with other fossilised footprints of birds typical of coastal and rocky environments.

The study of Neanderthal footprints offers several unique and complementary advantages over other types of archaeological remains, such as bones or tools. These footprints, preserved in sediments or sedimentary rocks, constitute a direct record of the behavior at a specific moment in time of the Neanderthals who produced them. The footprints show the physical presence of a Neanderthal in a specific place, unlike artifacts, which may have been transported or abandoned. 

“Footprints record a specific moment, almost instantaneously, allowing us to reconstruct what was happening; for example, a group walk, a chase, a flight, or presence in a particular landscape. The footprints show how Neanderthals used space, how they explored coastal environments, forests, dunes or riverbanks, something that is difficult to infer solely from artifacts,” argue Neto de Carvalho and Muñiz. 

Through the number, size and arrangement of the footprints, it is possible to infer the minimum number of individuals present, their age range (children, adolescents, adults) or the possible division of tasks (e.g. a hunting party). Children and babies, who rarely leave archaeological traces, can be identified by their footprints (which are smaller), revealing more about the social structure: “footprints offer a unique and dynamic window into everyday behavior: a snapshot of life tens of thousands of years ago,” explain the authors.

The footprints studied by the research team indicate locomotion strategies adapted to the terrain, suggesting route planning, proximity to the camp, possible hunting behavior and coexistence with other species. For example, one of the tracks shows the interaction between human footprints and those of a deer produced simultaneously, reinforcing the hypothesis of pursuit or ambush practices in a dune context.

A diet rich in deer, horses and hares

The research also uses ecological network analysis based on mathematical network theory to relate data from other known coastal archaeological sites in the Iberian Peninsula, confirming that the Neanderthal diet in these regions consisted mainly of deer, horses and hares, complemented by marine and coastal resources, indicating a diversified dietary strategy.

These new findings demonstrate that Neanderthals were more versatile and ecologically and cognitively adapted to coastal environments than previously believed, offering exceptional insight into their behavior, mobility and social organization.

___________________________

Article Source: University of Seville news release.

*Neanderthal coasteering and the first Portuguese hominin tracksites, Scientific Reports, 3-Jul-2025. 10.1038/s41598-025-06089-4 

Cover Image, Top Left: Face of a Neanderthal, Frank_Rietsch, Pixabay

Discovery expands understanding of Neolithic agricultural practices, diets in East Asia

Washington University in St. Louis—A discovery by researchers at Washington University in St. Louis and Shandong University — together with an international team of scientists working in China, Japan and South Korea — sheds new light on the historical use and domestication of the adzuki bean across East Asia.

Researchers recovered charred adzuki bean remains from the Xiaogao site in Shandong, China that were dated to 9,000 to 8,000 years ago, during the beginning of the Neolithic age when humans first began to cultivate plants and domesticate animals for food. The findings* — published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sept. 22 — push the record of this significant legume back by at least 4,000 years in the Yellow River region.

The adzuki bean (Vigna angularis) is a staple crop widely cultivated in East Asia that is prized for both its nutritional value and nitrogen-fixing properties, meaning it also enriches the soil. It holds cultural significance and is featured prominently in various cuisines, even today.

According to the researchers, the new evidence suggests that adzuki beans formed part of an early Neolithic multi-cropping system alongside millet, rice and soybeans, in a well-established agricultural tradition in the Lower Yellow River region.

The discovery was a part of a larger analysis of charred adzuki bean remains from 41 archaeological sites across East Asia, including the Yellow River, Japan, Korea and Southern China environment. By combining newly available and previously published data, researchers also discovered significant regional differences in the size and utilization of the bean, providing a comprehensive look at the chronology and evolution of this important legume.

“At the global level, there has been considerable recent momentum in recognizing plant domestication as a protracted and widely dispersed process — one without singular geographical centers,” said Xinyi Liu, a professor and associate chair of anthropology in Arts & Sciences at WashU. “Our results align with this perspective by illustrating parallel developments in the Yellow River, Japan and South Korea during the Neolithic.

“The divergent trajectories of adzuki bean size in the Neolithic Yellow River and Jomon-period Japan are particularly revealing, as they demonstrate that culinary and dietary practices played a role in the domestication process as significant as the environmental factors.”

____________________________

Excavation at Xiaogao.  (Image: Lang Jianfeng)

____________________________

Modern adzuki bean and charred adzuki remain unearthed from Xiaogao. (Image: Cai Haohong)

____________________________

Article Source: Washington University St. Louis news release.

The oldest shell jewelry workshop in Western Europe

Between 55,000 and 42,000 years ago, Europe underwent a profound transformation, with the last Neanderthals being gradually replaced by groups of Homo sapiens arriving during their most recent migration out of Africa. The Châtelperronian, a prehistoric culture attested in France and northern Spain during this period, occupies a central place in research. Recognised as one of the earliest industries of the Upper Palaeolithic in Eurasia, the identity of its artisans – Neanderthals or Homo sapiens – remains a matter of debate.

During new excavations at La Roche-à-Pierrot, conducted by scientists working at the De la Préhistoire à l’actuel: culture, environnement et anthropologie laboratory (CNRS/Ministère de la culture/Université de Bordeaux), the research team uncovered pierced shells and numerous pigments attributable to the Châtelperronian period. The absence of wear marks on some of the perforations and the presence of unpierced shells indicated that this was a genuine workshop for the manufacture of jewellery. Analyses revealed that these shells came from the Atlantic coast, at that time located about 100 kilometres away, while the pigments came from an area more than 40 kilometres away, providing evidence of long-distance trade networks or significant human mobility. Other remains found at the site include typical Neanderthal tools and the remains of hunted animals (bison, horses), highlighting the diversity and complexity of human occupation at that time.

These exceptional discoveries mark the first documented instance of an early Upper Palaeolithic industry and associated shell beads in Western Europe. The jewellery and pigments identified bear witness to the explosion of symbolic expression during this period – marked by practices of ornamentation, social differentiation and identity affirmation – most generally associated with Homo sapiens. They also shed new light on the cultural variability of the time, suggesting that the Châtelperronian people were influenced by, or even belonged to, an early wave of Homo sapiens who arrived in the region at least 42,000 years ago.

Occupied by various human groups for nearly 30,000 years, Saint-Césaire remains a unique laboratory for understanding the dynamics of prehistoric settlements and the interactions between Neanderthals and Homo sapiens. Since 1976, excavations at this site have continued to yield valuable information, not least due to the revision of old collections and new methods of analysis and excavation implemented since 2013.

_________________________

Eleven laboratories participated in this study under the supervision of the CNRS:

  • De la Préhistoire à l’actuel : culture, environnement et anthropologie (CNRS/ministère de la Culture/Université de Bordeaux)  
  • Archéologie et Histoire ancienne : Méditerranée – Europe (CNRS/ministère de la Culture/Université de Strasbourg)
  • Environnement dynamique et territoires de la montagne (CNRS/Université Savoie Mont Blanc)
  • Travaux et recherches archéologiques sur les cultures, les espaces et les sociétés (CNRS/ministère de la Culture/Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès)
  • Histoire naturelle des Humanités préhistoriques (CNRS/MNHN/Université Perpignan Via Domitia)
  • Centre de recherche et d’enseignement des géosciences de l’environnement (AMU/CNRS/INRAE/IRD)
  • Institut méditerranéen de biodiversité et d’écologie marine et continentale (AMU/Avignon Université/CNRS/IRD)
  • Laboratoire méditerranéen de préhistoire Europe-Afrique (AMU/CNRS/ministère de la Culture)
  • Géosciences Rennes (CNRS/Université de Rennes)
  • Archéosciences-Bordeaux : matériaux, temps, images et sociétés (CNRS/Université Bordeaux Montaigne)
  • Identité et différenciation de l’espace, de l’environnement et des sociétés (CNRS/Université Caen Normandie / Université Le Havre Normandie/ Université Rouen Normandie)

The Musée national de Préhistoire contributes to this initiative through the participation of Brad Gravina affiliated to the ministère de la Culture, curator responsible for the Early and Middle Paleolithic collections.

_________________________

Top left: Microtomographic post-processing and virtual reconstruction of a Littorina obtusata shell from La Roche-à-Pierrot (Saint-Césaire, France), broken in situ during post-depositional events.
Centre left: Perforated Littorina obtusata shells associated with Châtelperronian stone tools.
Bottom left: Red and yellow pigments from the same area.
Right: Microscopic views of the modifications observed on Littorina obtusata: perforations made by pressure (a-e, g, h), pigment staining (f, h).
© S. Rigaud & L. Dayet

_________________________

Map of Europe illustrating the categories of raw materials used for personal ornaments from pre-Aurignacian Upper Palaeolithic archaeological contexts. Note the regional peculiarity of La Roche-à-Pierrot, Saint-Césaire, where shells were used to make jewellery.
© Archéosphère

_________________________

Left: Thanatocoenosis on Men-Du beach (Brittany, France).
Centre: Reference collection of Littorina obtusata collected from the thanatocoenosis on 8th October 2016.
Right: Colour variability of L. obtusata. © S. Rigaud

_________________________

Article Source: CNRS news release

__________________________

Notes :

1 – Only excavations carried out in South Eastern Europe and around the Mediterranean had previously yielded this type of shell jewellery.

Bibliography:

Châtelperronian cultural diversity at its western limits: Shell beads and pigments from La Roche-à-Pierrot, Saint-Césaire.
Bachellerie F., Gravina B., Rigaud S., Dayet L., Thomas M., Lebreton L., Morin E., Lesage C., Falguères C., Bard E., Bahain J.-J., Baillet M., Beauval C., Bordes J.-G., Culioli G., Devièse T., Flas D., Garbé L., Guérin G., Lacrampe-Cuyaubère F., Lahaye C., Mallol C., Marot J., Maureille B., Michel A., Muth X., Regniers O., Tartar E., Teyssandier N., Thibeault A., Todisco D., Tombret O., Rougier H. & Crevecoeur I.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, w/c 22nd September 2025.

When Did Societal Elites Emerge?

John P. Ruehl is an Australian-American journalist living in Washington, D.C., and a world affairs correspondent for the Independent Media Institute. He is a contributor to several foreign affairs publications, and his book, Budget Superpower: How Russia Challenges the West With an Economy Smaller Than Texas’, was published in December 2022.

Despite the diversity of government and social structures, every country today faces social and political tensions tied to concentrated and unaccountable power in the hands of national elites. The modern sociological concept of elites emerged in the early 20th century, introduced by Vilfredo Pareto, who argued that every society produces a minority that steers decision-making. Other sociologists further refined the idea of elite theory, noting its regularity in organizations, corporations, and institutions.

Robert Michels’s “iron law of oligarchy” argued that even mass socialist organizations in the 20th century inevitably became elitist as power centralized. This can also be seen in modern populist movements, where leaders attack established elites while consolidating and masking their own elite status.

The word ‘elite’ comes from the French élite, meaning “the chosen,” which in turn comes from the Latin eligere, meaning “to choose.” It has a number of different connotations, but each implies a group of people considered superior to others in a particular society. While the modern sociological concept of elites has evolved over the last century, how far back does the presence of an entrenched elite go, and what are the conditions that generate them?

Archaeologist Mehmet Özdoğan has argued that the historical record of elites dates back to some of the earliest farming communities in the Upper Euphrates and Upper Tigris basins between 10,500 and 7300 BC. The Neolithic era would therefore mark not only the dawn of agriculture but also the rise of elites in human society. Understanding how these elite communities formed and sustained themselves provides context for the economic and cultural systems governing us today.

Creating Inequality

Early 20th-century archaeologist Vere Gordon Childe identified plant cultivation and animal domestication as key drivers of the Neolithic Revolution, which resulted in nomadic groups settling in villages. Mobile hunter-gatherers carried few possessions, but permanent settlement allowed accumulation. Agriculture produced storable surpluses that could be lent, redistributed, and used to consolidate power and increase dependence, while ox-drawn plows and other technologies further increased output, freeing some people from subsistence work and creating a labor class and an upper class to manage them.

But throughout the 20th century, growing evidence suggested that people often settled first and only later developed agriculture, with the transition occurring slowly and unevenly over thousands of years.

Similarly, elites did not form overnight. Comparatively egalitarian, sedentary communities such as Çatalhöyük, not far from the Upper Euphrates and Tigris, thrived between 7400 BC and 5600 BC without entrenched hierarchies. “In this city, which was founded by our ancestors 9,000 years ago, the houses were built back-to-back, with no streets in between. … It is generally believed that this unique layout at Çatalhöyük reflects the ideal of equality between people in the Neolithic period. There is no design that indicates a hierarchy in the structures,” points out the Turkish Museums website.

Earlier hints of inequality had meanwhile appeared among the Natufians in the southern Levant, with their elaborate burials, and in Göbekli Tepe with its monumental sites and division of labor, but without concrete evidence of long-term elite entrenchment.

According to Mehmet Özdoğan, systemic elitism began to take root in the Upper Euphrates and Tigris region around 10,500 BC onward. Archaeological evidence from the period has revealed larger houses for certain families, as well as more elaborate burials, access to prestige goods, and the use of resources like lime to make terrazzo floors. Elements resembling land ownership and segregated housing were similarly documented.

According to a chapter written by Özdoğan in the book Human Societies Facing Climate Change, Pre-Pottery Neolithic sites in the Upper Euphrates-Upper Tigris region reveal “vast amounts of objects that are too elaborate to be of an unpretentious community, presenting great variety, high levels of craftsmanship and the artistic touch of exceptional refinement. … it seems more than evident that there must have been an elite competitiveness leading to careful selection not only of skilled craftsmen but also those of artistic talents.”

Through these status objects, elite preferences began to shape cultural norms and tastes, a pattern that later sociologists would find among other upper-status groups. By promoting collective beliefs in the importance of certain styles, skills, or objects, elites reinforced their exclusive position and defined what society considered valuable.

Beyond material wealth, inequality in early societies appears reinforced by religion and ritual. Even among nomadic or sedentary egalitarian groups, shared ceremonial practices existed, but were generally not monopolized by a ruling class. In the Upper Euphrates and Tigris regions, however, Özdoğan notes, “there is growing evidence for dominant governance by spiritual leaders.” By controlling ritual and ideology, these elites positioned themselves as intermediaries with the spiritual world, granting them authority over ceremonies, sacred spaces, and symbols. Feasts, harvest celebrations, and burial rites became tools to legitimize power through divine sanction.

Creating spiritual and cultural hierarchies legitimized elite status, with modern sociological theory expanding on this. Max Weber distinguished class based on resources, power based on rule, and status based on recognition, noting that status could not be seized and was based on others’ recognition, helping solidify elite positions even in egalitarian societies. Sociologist Pierre Bourdieu also notes how celebrated tastes, skills, and knowledge reinforce elite authority.

Where Social Elites Came From

In the Upper Euphrates and Tigris regions, the earliest elites were not kings or bureaucrats, but those who controlled resources, cultural tastes, and rituals. Wealth and goods gave them leverage, but legitimacy also came from cultural hierarchies. In these early societies, culturally sanctioned preferences and religious rituals anchored elite power through social legitimacy, complementing their material wealth.

Some communities resisted early hierarchies by splitting off to form new settlements free of old hierarchies, but over time, new elite structures were created and spread elsewhere. Anthropologist Cathy Costin points to craft specialization in Iraq at Bestansur between 7600 BC and 7100 BC, likely serving elites. A painted fragment found in Teleilat Ghassul in modern-day Jordan, dated roughly 4500 BC, shows two pairs of feet on footstools, one elaborately sandaled, while other figures appear to be standing. “The fragmentary scene is of considerable significance… archaeologically, as it provides evidence of social ranking,” according to the journal Arts, and may have portrayed “worshippers paying homage to a divine couple or a priest and priestess in a cultic ritual.” Similar finds in En Gedi, Nahal Mishmar, and Ghassul indicate priesthoods or ritual specialists consolidating authority.

Elaborate burials and ornaments in Thailand, dating back to 3600 BC, meanwhile, show comparable social hierarchies. Simultaneously in Europe, increased weapon production suggests elites were consolidating power and protecting accumulated wealth as their governance systems spread across the continent.

As resources depleted and groups expanded, conflict and conquest spread elite systems further, often bringing a new underclass with them. This template became the foundation for the first civilization in Sumer, emerging around 4000 to 3500 BC, where, importantly, theocracy provided structure to society and supported elite dominance.

Gaetano Mosca later called these legitimizing narratives “political formulas,” such as the “Great Chain of Being” in medieval Europe, which solidified royal power. In aristocratic societies, hierarchy was assumed, but in democratic ones, elites constantly reaffirm it through education, culture, or science. By the 19th and 20th centuries, tools like IQ tests reinforced perceived hierarchies of intelligence, entrenching academic elites and social classes in the U.S.

Today, elites still rely on organization and affirmation to maintain power, often facing less coordinated opposition from non-elites. This organization can produce innovation for the public good, particularly when elite groups compete with one another rather than simply extracting rents from society. History also shows that popular pressure—from Roman plebeian walkouts to modern mass strikes—can force elites to concede influence even if their structures endure. Circulation of elites, or awareness that rulers can be replaced, has also long served as a check on domination.

Interestingly, the same lands that first saw elite systems also hosted early republic-like institutions. In Sumer and nearby city-states, assemblies of elders or citizens shared authority with rulers, who were also kept in check by civic bodies. Egyptian records from the mid-14th century describe Phoenician cities sending delegates to represent citizens instead of monarchs, and calls for alliances and requests for aid by the “men of Arwad” and “elders of Irqata.”

Resistance to elite domination, therefore, has ancient roots, with republican and collective governance emerging alongside hierarchical rule. When reform or turnover fails, dictators or populist movements, which can quickly become elitist themselves, pose new challenges for non-elites. Combined with modern corporate elitism, understanding how political and social elites maintain and legitimize their power is an important lesson in finding ways to encourage elites to act in the broader public interest, rather than merely entrenching their own position.

________________________________

This article was produced by Human Bridges.

________________________________

Cover Image, Top Left: MythologyArt, Pixabay