Archives: Articles

This is the example article

Fossils suggest modern humans and Neanderthals alternately occupied a site in France

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE (AAAS)—Scientists have uncovered fossilized modern human remains and tools sandwiched between Neanderthal remains and tools in the stratigraphic record at a site in the Rhône Valley in France, suggesting occupation of the area alternated between Neanderthals and modern humans. The findings provide archaeological evidence that these hominin cousins may have coexisted in the same region of Europe during the same time period and indicate that modern humans did not simply replace Neanderthals there. The study* also pushes back the timeline for the earliest modern European human settlements from about 44,000 years ago (with one possible exception in Greece) to about 54,000 years ago. Fossilized remains of early modern humans in Europe have previously only been identified above the remains of Neanderthals in the stratigraphic record, preventing scientists from demonstrating when and where these hominins may have interacted on the European continent. To help elucidate when modern humans first settled in Europe and whether their arrival may have overlapped with the presence of Neanderthals, Ludovic Slimak and colleagues analyzed the structure of hominin teeth uncovered at Grotte Mandrin, a rock shelter in southern France, to distinguish between Neanderthal and modern human remains. They also analyzed sophisticated stone artifacts found at the site, determining that these were similar to tools commonly found at eastern Mediterranean sites occupied by modern humans. The researchers dated the site’s layers using radiocarbon and luminescence techniques, determining that a layer containing a modern human fossil spans the ages of 56,800 to 51,700 years before the present – significantly earlier than any previously documented modern human remains found in Europe. Altogether, Slimak et al. found evidence of at least 4 phases in which Neanderthals and modern humans alternately occupied the area. The authors found no evidence of cultural exchange between either the successive Neanderthal groups or between modern humans and Neanderthals, suggesting that the populations rapidly alternated between one another without major interactions.

__________________________________

View of the excavation on the Neronian layer dated to 54.000 years old and recording the first Homo sapiens of the European continent. Ludovic Slimak

__________________________________

View of the excavations at the entrance of Grotte Mandrin. Ludovic Slimak

__________________________________

Neronian points. These standardized technologies have no equivalent among the Neanderthal groups before and after the arrival of the first modern humans in Grotte Mandrin. They are technically identical to the point of the Initial Upper Paleolithic made by coeval Homo sapiens from the east mediterranean coast. Laure Metz and Ludovic Slimak

__________________________________

Nanopoint of the Modern Neronian technologies (about 20mm). 1 :1 scale and enlargement. Visual scale is 1 eurocent. Ludovic Slimak

__________________________________

Summary author: Shannon Kelleher

Bronze Age women changed genetic landscape of Orkney, study finds

UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH—Orkney experienced a wave of immigration during the Bronze Age so large that it replaced most of the local population, ancient DNA analysis has revealed.

Experts say that unlike anywhere else, the Bronze Age newcomers to the islands were mostly women.

Although male lineages from the original Neolithic population survived for at least another thousand years, by the Iron Age, which followed the Bronze Age, they were largely replaced and are vanishingly rare today.

Researchers from the Universities of Edinburgh and Huddersfield combined archaeology with the study of ancient DNA from Bronze Age human remains to shed light on this pivotal moment for the islands.  

Around 5200 years ago, during the Neolithic period, when farming first took hold, Orkney was a hugely influential cultural center. Yet, as Europe moved into the Bronze Age around 4500 years ago, the islands’ influence dwindled and it supposedly became more insular.

Despite this, after studying human remains from the Links of Noltland site on the remote northern island of Westray, the research team concluded that Orkney experienced large-scale immigration during the Bronze Age.

The new arrivals were probably the first visitors to Orkney speaking Indo-European languages, and carried genetic ancestry derived in part from livestock farmers living on the steppe lands north of the Black Sea.

This migration of people mirrored what was happening in the rest of Great Britain and Europe in the Early to Middle Bronze Age, experts say.

Across most of Europe, the expansion of livestock farmers on the eve of the Bronze Age was typically led by men.

But in Orkney the researchers found exactly the opposite. The Bronze Age newcomers were mainly women. The survival in Orkney of male lineages from the original Neolithic population for at least another thousand years is not seen anywhere else.

Researchers believe Orkney is so different due to the long-term stability and self-sufficiency of farmsteads on the islands, which the genetic data suggest may have been male dominated by the peak of the Neolithic.

When a Europe-wide recession hit towards the end of the Neolithic, Orkney farmers may have been uniquely placed to weather harsher times and maintain their grip on the population as newcomers arrived.

This implies that Orkney was much less insular than has long been assumed. There was a protracted period of integration of the indigenous males with the newcomers from the south over many generations, experts say.

Jim Wilson, Professor of Human Genetics at the University of Edinburgh’s Usher Institute, said: “It’s absolutely fascinating to discover that the dominant Orcadian Neolithic male genetic lineage persisted at least 1000 years into the Bronze Age, despite replacement of 95 per cent of the rest of the genome by immigrating women. This lineage was then itself replaced and we have yet to find it in today’s population.”

The study, which appears in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), was supported by a Leverhulme Trust Doctoral Scholarship programme, Historic Environment Scotland and the Medical Research Council.

________________________________

Aerial image of Orkney islands. Westray is located in the far north on the image. Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain

________________________________

Article Source: PNAS news release.

Ancient immigration in a remote archipelago

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES—Despite a wave of migration from continental Europe, local male lineages in the remote Orkney Islands persisted well into the Bronze Age, according to a study. The remote Orkney Islands were a cultural center during the expansion of farming in the Neolithic period. However, Orkney’s architectural trends and practices during the Bronze Age did not reflect styles that flourished elsewhere. Martin Richards, Ceiridwen Edwards, and colleagues analyzed ancient genomes to determine the extent of the islands’ seeming insularity. The authors analyzed 29 DNA samples representing the Neolithic period, Bronze Age, and Iron Age, including 22 Bronze Age DNA samples from the Links of Noltland cemetery, located on the most northwesterly island in the archipelago. Similar to most of Britain, the authors report, Orkney underwent a genetic shift in the Bronze Age, with a Y chromosome lineage appearing from central Europe. However, the predominant Y chromosome in Orkney was I2a1b-M423, even as the chromosome disappeared from Bronze Age Europe. In contrast, mitochondrial DNA, which reflects maternal ancestry, was more similar to other areas of Britain.  The results suggest that local male lineages in the remote Orkney Islands persisted well into the Bronze Age, with immigration from continental Europe reflected in the female lineage. According to the authors, the Neolithic lineages may have persisted due to farming households that retained landholdings over time.

____________________________________

The settlement at Links of Noltland extends from the late 4th millennium BC to the mid-1st millennium BC. Over 35 buildings have so far been excavated. This house (Structure 7) was constructed around 2900 BC. Graeme Wilson and Hazel Moore (EASE Archaeology).

____________________________________

Article Source: PNAS news release.

*“Ancient DNA at the edge of the world: Continental immigration and the persistence of Neolithic male lineages in Bronze Age Orkney,” by Katharina Dulias, M. George B. Foody, Pierre Justeau, Ceiridwen J. Edwards, Martin B. Richards, et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 7-Feb-2022. https://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.2108001119

Prehistoric human vertebra discovered in the Jordan Valley tells the story of prehistoric migration from Africa

BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY—A new study, led by researchers from Bar-Ilan University, Ono Academic College, The University of Tulsa, and the Israel Antiquities Authority, presents a 1.5 million-year-old human vertebra discovered in Israel’s Jordan Valley. According to the research published today (Wednesday, February 2) in the journal Scientific Reports, ancient human migration from Africa to Eurasia was not a one-time event but occurred in waves. The first wave reached the Republic of Georgia in the Caucasus approximately 1.8 million years ago. The second is documented in ‘Ubeidiya, in the Jordan Valley, south of the Sea of Galilee, about 1.5 million years ago.

The research was led by Dr. Alon Barash of the Azrieli Faculty of Medicine of Bar-Ilan University, Professor Ella Been of Ono Academic College, Professor Miriam Belmaker of The University of Tulsa, and Dr. Omry Barzilai of the Israel Antiquities Authority.

According to fossil evidence and DNA research, human evolution began in Africa about six million years ago. Approximately two million years ago, ancient humans –– nearly, but not yet in modern form –– began to migrate from Africa and spread throughout Eurasia, a process known as the “Out of Africa.” ‘Ubeidiya, located in the Jordan Valley near Kibbutz Beit Zera, is one of the places where we have archaeological evidence for this dispersal.

The prehistoric site of ‘Ubeidiya is significant for archaeological and evolutionary studies because it is one of the few places that contain preserved remnants of the early human exodus from Africa. The site is the second oldest archaeological site outside Africa and was excavated by several expeditions led by Professor M. Stekelis, Professor O. Bar-Yosef, and Professor E. Tchernov between 1960 and 1999. The finds from the site include a rich and rare collection of extinct animal bones and stone artifacts. Fossil species include sabertoothed tiger, mammoths, and a giant buffalo, alongside animals not found today in Israel, such as baboons, warthogs, hippopotamuses, giraffes, and jaguars. Stone and flint items made and used by ancient humans show resemblance to those discovered at sites in East Africa.

Recently, excavations in ‘Ubeidiya were resumed by Belmaker and Barzilai under a grant that Belmaker received from the U.S. National Science Foundation. The project uses new absolute dating methods to refine the site’s dating and to study the paleoecology and paleoclimate of the region. While looking at the fossils from the site, now housed at the Hebrew University’s National Natural History Collections, Belmaker, a paleoanthropologist from The University of Tulsa’s Department of Anthropology, encountered a human vertebra. Initially unearthed in 1966, the bone was studied by Barash and Professor Ella Been. They identified it as a human lumbar vertebra, the earliest fossil evidence of ancient human remains discovered in Israel, approximately 1.5 million years old.

 According to Barash, human anatomy and evolution researcher at the Azrieli Faculty of Medicine of Bar-Ilan University, there is an ongoing debate in the literature about whether the migration was a one-time event or occurred in several waves. The new find from ‘Ubeidiya sheds light on this question. “Due to the difference in size and shape of the vertebra from ‘Ubeidiya and those found in the Republic of Georgia, we now have unambiguous evidence of the presence of two distinct dispersal waves.”

According to Barzilai, head of the Archaeological Research Department at the Israel Antiquities Authority, “The stone and flint artifacts from ‘Ubeidiya, handaxes made from Basalt, chopping tools, and flakes made from flint, are associated with the Early Acheulean culture. Previously, it was accepted that the stone tools from ‘Ubeidiya and Dmanisi were associated with different cultures – Early Acheulean in ‘Ubeidiya and Oldowan in Dmanisi. After this new study, we conclude that different human species produced the two industries.”

Belmaker explained, “One of the main questions regarding the human dispersal from Africa were the ecological conditions that may have facilitated the dispersal. Previous theories debated whether early humans preferred an African savanna or new, more humid woodland habitat. Our new finding of different human species in Dmanisi and ‘Ubeidiya is consistent with our finding that climates also differed between the two sites. ‘Ubeidiya is more humid and compatible with a Mediterranean climate, while Dmanisi is drier with savannah habitat. This study showing two species, each producing a different stone tool culture, is supported by the fact that each population preferred a different environment.”

“The analysis we conducted shows that the vertebra from ‘Ubeidiya belonged to a young individual 6-12 years old, who was tall for his age. Had this child reached adulthood, he would have reached a height of over 180 cm. This ancient human is similar in size to other large hominins found in East Africa and is different from the short-statured hominins that lived in Georgia,” said Been, paleoanthropologist at the Ono Academic College Faculty of Health Professions and an expert in spinal evolution.

“It seems, then, that in the period known as the Early Pleistocene, we can identify at least two species of early humans outside of Africa. Each wave of migration was that of different kind of humans –– in appearance and form, technique and tradition of manufacturing stone tools, and ecological niche in which they lived,” concluded Barash.

____________________________________

A new study, led by researchers from Bar-Ilan University, Ono Academic College, The University of Tulsa, and the Israel Antiquities Authority, presents a 1.5 million-year-old human vertebra discovered in Israel’s Jordan Valley. According to the research, published in the journal Scientific Reports, ancient human migration from Africa to Eurasia was not a one-time event but occurred in waves. The first wave reached the Republic of Georgia in the Caucasus approximately 1.8 million years ago. The second is documented in ‘Ubeidiya, in the Jordan Valley, south of the Sea of Galilee, about 1.5 million years ago. The research was led by Dr. Alon Barash of the Azrieli Faculty of Medicine of Bar-Ilan University, Professor Ella Been of Ono Academic College, Professor Miriam Belmaker of The University of Tulsa, and Dr. Omry Barzilai of the Israel Antiquities Authority. Photo: The site at ‘Ubeidiya. Dr. Omry Barzilai, Israel Antiquities Authority, Below, Dafna Gazit, Israel Antiquities Authority

____________________________________

____________________________________

Article Source: Bar-Ilan University news release.

*The earliest Pleistocene record of a large-bodied hominin from the Levant supports two out-of-Africa dispersal events, Scientific Reports, 2 Feb. 2022.

____________________________________

Advertisement

Did comet’s fiery destruction lead to downfall of ancient Hopewell?

UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI—The rapid decline of the Hopewell culture about 1,500 years ago might be explained by falling debris from a near-Earth comet that created a devastating explosion over North America, laying waste to forests and Native American villages alike.

Researchers with the University of Cincinnati found evidence of a cosmic airburst at 11 Hopewell archaeological sites in three states stretching across the Ohio River Valley. This was home to the Ohio Hopewell, part of a notable Native American culture found across much of the American East.

The comet’s glancing pass rained debris down into the Earth’s atmosphere, creating a fiery explosion. UC archaeologists used radiocarbon and typological dating to determine the age of the event.

The airburst affected an area bigger than New Jersey, setting fires across 9,200 square miles between the years A.D. 252 and 383. This coincides with a period when 69 near-Earth comets were observed and documented by Chinese astronomers and witnessed by Native Americans as told through their oral histories.

The study was published in the Nature journal Scientific Reports.

UC archaeologists found an unusually high concentration and diversity of meteorites at Hopewell sites compared to other time periods. The meteorite fragments were identified from the telltale concentrations of iridium and platinum they contained. They also found a charcoal layer that suggests the area was exposed to fire and extreme heat.

In his lab, lead author Kenneth Tankersley, a professor of anthropology in UC’s College of Arts and Sciences, held up a container of tiny micrometeorites collected at the sites. A variety of meteorites, including stony meteorites called pallasites, were found at Hopewell sites.

“These micrometeorites have a chemical fingerprint. Cosmic events like asteroids and comet airbursts leave behind high quantities of a rare element known as platinum,” Tankersley said. “The problem is platinum also occurs in volcanic eruptions. So we also look for another rare element found in non-terrestrial events such as meteorite impact craters — iridium. And we found a spike in both, iridium and platinum.”

The Hopewell people collected the meteorites and forged malleable metal from them into flat sheets used in jewelry and musical instruments called pan flutes.

Beyond the physical evidence are cultural clues left behind in the masterworks and oral histories of the Hopewell. A comet-shaped mound was constructed near the epicenter of the airburst at a Hopewell site called the Milford Earthworks.

Various Algonquin and Iroquoian tribes, descendants of the Hopewell, spoke of a calamity that befell the Earth, said Tankersley, who is Native American.

“What’s fascinating is that many different tribes have similar stories of the event,” he said.

“The Miami tell of a horned serpent that flew across the sky and dropped rocks onto the land before plummeting into the river. When you see a comet going through the air, it would look like a large snake,” he said.

“The Shawnee refer to a ‘sky panther’ that had the power to tear down forest. The Ottawa talk of a day when the sun fell from the sky. And when a comet hits the thermosphere, it would have exploded like a nuclear bomb.”

And the Wyandot recount a dark cloud that rolled across the sky and was destroyed by a fiery dart, Tankersley said.

“That’s a lot like the description the Russians gave for Tunguska,” he said of a comet airburst documented over Siberia in 1908 that leveled 830 square miles of forest and shattered windows hundreds of miles away.

“Witnesses reported seeing a fireball, a bluish light nearly as bright as the sun, moving across the sky. A flash and sound similar to artillery fire was said to follow it. A powerful shockwave broke windows hundreds of miles away and knocked people off their feet,” according to a story in EarthSky.

UC biology professor and co-author David Lentz said people who survived the airburst and its fires would have gazed upon a devastated landscape.

“It looks like this event was very injurious to agriculture. People didn’t have good ways to store corn for a long period of time. Losing a crop or two would have caused widespread suffering,” Lentz said.

And if the airburst leveled forests like the one in Russia, native people would have lost nut trees such as walnut and hickory that provided a good winter source of food.

“When your corn crop fails, you can usually rely on a tree crop. But if they’re all destroyed, it would have been incredibly disruptive,” Lentz said.

UC’s Advanced Materials Characterization Center conducted scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectrometry of the sediment samples. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry was employed at the University of Georgia’s Center for Applied Isotope Studies. The U.S. Geological Survey provided stable carbon isotope analysis.

Despite what scientists know, there is still much they do not, Lentz said.

“It’s hard to know exactly what happened. We only have a few points of light in the darkness,” he said. “But we have this area of high heat that would have been catastrophic for people in that area and beyond.”

Now researchers are studying pollen trapped in layers of sediment to see how the comet airburst might have changed the botanical landscape of the Ohio River Valley.

Co-author Steven Meyers, a UC geology alumnus, said their discovery might lead to more interest in how cosmic events affected prehistoric people around the world.

“Science is just a progress report,” Meyers said. “It’s not the end. We’re always somewhere in the middle. As time goes on, more things will be found.”

__________________________________

University of Cincinnati researchers take sediment samples at a Hopewell site at the confluence of the Ohio and Great Miami rivers. From left they are anthropology student Louis Herzner, biology student Stephanie Meyers, anthropology professor Kenneth Tankersley and UC geology alumnus Stephen Meyers. Larry Sandman

__________________________________

A magnet holds tiny micrometeorites collected from sediment samples taken from an ancient Hopewell site. Researchers say this evidence points to a comet airburst that devastated parts of the Ohio River Valley more than 1,500 years ago. Michael Miller

__________________________________

Article Source: UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI news release.

Researchers discover locations of ancient Maya sacred groves of cacao trees

BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY—For as much as modern society worships chocolate, cacao — the plant chocolate comes from — was believed to be even more divine to ancient Mayas. The Maya considered cacao beans to be a gift from the gods and even used them as currency because of their value.

As such, cacao bean production was carefully controlled by the Maya leaders of northern Yucatan, with cacao trees only grown in sacred groves. But no modern researcher has ever been able to pinpoint where these ancient sacred groves were located — until now.

Researchers at Brigham Young University, including professor emeritus Richard Terry and graduate students Bryce Brown and Christopher Balzotti, worked closely with archaeologists from the U.S. and Mexico to identify locations the Maya used to provide the perfect blend of humidity, calm and shade required by cacao trees. While the drier climate of the Yucatan peninsula is inhospitable to cacao growth, the team realized the vast array of sinkholes common to the peninsula have microclimates with just the right conditions.

As detailed in a study newly published in the Journal of Archaeological Science Reports, the team conducted soil analyses on 11 of those sinkholes and found that the soil of nine of them contained evidence of theobromine and caffeine — combined biomarkers unique to cacao. Archaeologists also found evidence of ancient ceremonial rituals — such as staircase ramps for processions, stone carvings, altars and offerings like jade and ceramics (including tiny ceramic cacao pods) — in several sinkholes.

“We looked for theobromine for several years and found cacao in some places we didn’t expect,” said Terry, who recently retired from BYU. “We were also amazed to see the ceremonial artifacts. My students rappelled into one of these sinkholes and said, ‘Wow! There is a structure in here!’ It was a staircase that filled one-third of the sinkhole with stone.”

To extract and analyze the sinkhole soil for cacao biomarkers — specifically theobromine and caffeine — the team developed a new method of soil extraction. This involved drying the soil samples and passing them through a sieve, covering them with hot water, having them centrifuged and passed through extraction disks, and analyzing the extracts by mass spectrometry. To increase the sensitivity of their testing, the research team compared the results of the soil samples to seven control samples with no history of exposure to the biomarkers.

The findings of the BYU study indicate that cacao groves played an important role in ancient rituals and trade routes of the ancient Maya, impacting the entirety of the Mesoamerican economy. A 70-mile Maya “highway” in the area that was the main artery for trade passes near hundreds of sinkholes, so it is likely that the leaders who commissioned the highway development also controlled cacao production. The evidence of cacao cultivation alongside archaeological findings also supports the idea that cacao was important in the ideological move from a maize god to a sun god.

In one sinkhole near Coba, Mexico, a village 45 minutes from modern day Tulum, the research team found the arm and bracelet of a figurine attached to an incense jar and several ceramic modeled cacao pods. They also found remnant cacao trees growing there, making it quite possible that this sinkhole, named “Dzadz Ion,” was the location of a sacred cacao grove during the Late Postclassic period (About A.D. 1000 to 1400).

“Now we have these links between religious structures and the religious crops grown in these sinkholes,” Terry said. “Knowing that the cacao beans were used as currency, it means the sinkholes were a place where the money could be grown and controlled. This new understanding creates a rich historical narrative of a highly charged Maya landscape with economic, political and spiritual value.”

Researchers for the project also came from University of California, Riverside, the University of Miami, State University of New York, Kent State University, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, and the Cultural Heritage and Archaeology in the Maya Area institution.

_______________________________

Researcher Chris Balzotti climbs an ancient staircase discovered in a sinkhole near Coba, Mexico. Richard Terry

_______________________________

Ice-age remains near Sea of Galilee show ancient residents thrived as ice melted

THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM—A new article* published today in PLOS ONE by a Hebrew University of Jerusalem (HU)’s Institute of Archaeology team and colleagues focused on the remains of a previously submerged fisher-hunter-gatherer camp on the shores of the Sea of Galilee from around 23,000 years ago.  Through a close analysis of the abundance, variety and through use of animal remains, the team concluded that these survivors of the latest Ice Age thrived whereas most of their contemporaries, in other parts of the world, were nearly starved, due to the Earth’s extremely cold temperatures.

The Israeli site, known as Ohalo II, was occupied at the end of the last Ice Age (“Last Glacial Maximum”), between 23,500-22,500 years ago.  Ohalo II is known for the excellent preservation of its brush huts and botanical remains. The study, led by HU doctoral student Tikvah Steiner, under the supervision of HU Professor Rivka Rabinovich and University of Haifa archaeologist Prof. Dani Nadel who excavated the site, examined the diet and extensive use of animal parts to determine the welfare and lifestyle of these ancient inhabitants.

During the Last Glacial Maximum, ice sheets covered much of North America, Northern Europe, and Asia, profoundly affected Earth’s climate by causing drought, desertification, and a large drop in sea levels.  Ironically enough, Ohalo II was discovered in 1989, following drought conditions that lowered the water level of the Sea of Galilee by several meters. Excavations were carried out between 1989-1991, and again between 1998-2001.  The site covers 2000 meters and is located near the southern tip of the modern Sea of Galilee, about 9 km south of Tiberias.  The site contains the remains of six oval-shaped brush huts, open-air hearths, the grave of an adult male, as well as various installations and refuse heaps. Abundant organic and inorganic materials provide a wealth of information about the lifestyle of fisher-hunter-gatherers during that period.

From a close analysis of 22,000 animal bones found at the site, including gazelles, deer, hares, and foxes, as well previous documentation regarding the number of charred plant remains, flint tools, cereal grains found there which signify a robust diet and lifestyle, the team concluded that Ohalo II presents a different picture of subsistence than most other early Epipaleolithic sites.

Climatic oscillations during the Last Glacial Maximum had minimal effects on the Upper Jordan Valley, specifically near Ohalo II, enabling those people to utilize a broad ecological niche comprised of varied edible plants, mammals, reptiles, birds, and fish. “Despite their ability to hunt large animals, these inhabitants also hunted a wide range of prey and had tools and time enough to fully exploit animal carcasses down to the marrow,” shared Steiner.  Likewise, “tortoises were seemingly selected for a specific body-size, which may suggest that their shells for use as bowls—and not their meat—were the main target.  Hare and fox were possibly hunted for their pelts,” she added.

The current study focused on reptile, bird and mammal remains found in one of the huts during its three consecutive occupations.  As part of the study, identification and quantification was carried out of the different animal species, bone sizes were measured, and bone surfaces were subjected to spectroscopic examination to identify signs of cutting and wear. In addition, Dr. Rebecca Biton, a post-doctoral student at the Hebrew University and an expert in herpetology, discovered that the turtles were all of a uniform size, which might indicate a conscious selection by the hunters for a specific size of turtle shell.

Steiner and her colleagues believe that the findings from the site do not indicate a decline in the availability of food during this period but rather a rich diversity of food sources.  In this way, Ohalo II is a wonderful example of a true broad-spectrum economy during the latest Ice Age, at the very beginning of the Epipaleolithic period.

______________________________

Ohalo II brush hut. Danie Nadel/Univ of Haifa

______________________________

Cut marks on gazelle bones found at Ohalo II. Tikva Steiner/Hebrew University

______________________________

Article Source: THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM news release.

23,000 years ago, humans in Israel enjoyed a new bounty of food options

PLOS—As climate shifted 23,000 years ago, humans in Israel experienced a new abundance of food, according to a study published January 26, 2022 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Tikvah Steiner of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and colleagues.

The submerged archaeological site of Ohalo II, located on the southern tip of the Sea of Galilee in Israel, preserves extensive evidence of human occupation about 23,000 years ago. This was a time period of global climate fluctuation, and also a time when humans notably diversified their dietary habits. Some researchers have suggested this diet shift was necessary due to decreasing food availability, while others suggest the change was an opportunistic one made possible by increasing food abundance. In this study, Steiner, Nadel and colleagues from a multidisciplinary team from four Israeli and Spanish universities tested these competing hypotheses via analysis of animal remains at Ohalo II.

Early Epipaleolithic sites are marked with red circles, Middle Epipaleolithic with black squares and Late Epipaleolithic with blue triangles. Steiner et al., 2022, PLOS ONE, CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

The authors examined over 20,000 animal remains, including reptiles, birds, and mammals, from well-preserved successive floors of a brush hut at the site. The results show that the people of Ohalo II were successfully hunting prime large game, while at the same time gathering a wide variety of fish, other small animals, and plants.

According to the authors, this evidence does not indicate a drop in food availability, but rather an abundance of multiple prey sources. They suggest that while some animals were gathered for meat, others might have been hunted for pelts (e.g.: foxes, hares) or shells (e.g.: tortoises). From this study, it seems that fluctuating climate conditions did not create food stress, at least in this region, but instead new dietary opportunities. The researchers hope that this work at Ohalo II will serve as a model for similar investigations of human diet changes at other locations and time periods.

The authors add: “The choice of a littoral habitat that could be intensively exploited year-round may be an example of niche selection. The availability of multiple food sources within a rich habitat may have driven exploitation of myriad local resources, rather than targeting mainly energetically-rich large prey.”

_________________________________

Article Source: PLOS news release.

Archaeometry also confirms that the Curia Pompeia in Rome was built in several phases

UNIVERSITY OF CÓRDOBA—The Curia of Pompey was one of the great meeting rooms of profound historical importance during the Roman Republic. Located on the eastern flank of the ancient Portico of Pompey, within its walls the senators of ancient Rome discussed weighty political affairs in private meetings.

What is now a visible site for pedestrians who circulate through the Roman square of Largo Argentina, was actually constructed in several phases, ranging from the time of Pompey himself to the medieval era. This is, at least, what has been corroborated by a study carried out by an Italian/Spanish research team on which the University of Córdoba participated.

This fact had already been ascertained by stratigraphic studies carried out by the Spanish team that worked on the site between 2013 and 2017. Now these conclusions have been ratified from the point of view of archaeometry, a different scientific discipline used in Archeology that applies physical and chemical analysis techniques to archaeological materials.

Specifically, the work analyzed samples of mortar from the monument; that is, the conglomerate that was used to prepare the different construction elements. The results made it possible to establish an indirect dating method confirming that Pompey’s Curia did, in fact, feature several different construction phases.

The first of them, according to the results of the study, was during the time of Pompey himself, around 55 BC. The samples analyzed indicate that the monument also had a second phase of construction, which must have been around 19 BC, under Augustus, the first Roman emperor. Finally, a last stage of construction during the early medieval period has also been documented.

Tell me where you are from and I’ll tell you when

The dating of these stages was established indirectly thanks to knowledge of the origins of the materials with which the monument was built. Analysis of the compositions of the samples analyzed allowed the authors, F. Marra, E. D´Ambrosio, M. Gaeta and A. Monterroso-Checa to ascertain the quarries from which they were extracted. The compositions and dates of removal from the quarries revealed that there were different chronological phases in the use of these construction materials.

All of this is evident because there is a clear distinction between the composition of the samples attributable to the first construction phase and those of the Augustan and medieval ones. For example, while in the initial stage of the monument’s construction a material known as pink pozzolana, extracted from volcanic deposits in the interior of Rome, was exclusively used, in the samples linked to the second phase of construction volcanic glass is found, which is characteristic of a different kind of pink pozzolanathat, due to the expansion of urban planning, was extracted from areas further away from the city’s monumental center.

In this way, the work, published in the University of Oxford’s prestigious journal Archaeometry, confirms, from a different perspective, the different construction phases of the building where Julius Caesar, one of history’s most important politicians and soldiers, died, a fact pertinent not only to Archeology, but also to Roman History.

______________________________

______________________________

Recreation of the Curia in its phase II. A. Monterroso, J.I. Murillo, R. Martín and M.A Utrero

______________________________

Article Source: UNIVERSITY OF CÓRDOBA news release.

The study benefitted from collaboration with the Sovrintendenza Capitolina, the site’s managing body, the University of Cordoba, the National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology of Italy, and Sapienza University in Rome. It was financed by two projects: HAR 2011 25705 and HAR2013 41818P, under the Spanish Science & Innovation Ministry’s National R&D Plan.

_______________________________

*Petrographical and geochemical criteria for a chronology of Roman mortars between the 1st century BC and the 2nd century AD: the Curia of Pompey the Great, Archaeometry, 8-Dec-2021. 10.1111/arcm.12740 

Is Vesuvius taking an extended siesta?

ETH ZURICH—Vesuvius is one of Europe’s most dangerous volcanoes. More than three million people live in its immediate vicinity, and in historical and prehistoric times, there were explosive eruptions that destroyed entire settlements and towns in the area.

So, the pressing question is: When will Vesuvius erupt again and how strong could the eruption be?

To answer this question, a research group at ETH Zurich, in collaboration with researchers from Italy, has taken a close look at the four largest eruptions of Vesuvius over the last 10,000 years so that they can better assess whether a dangerous event might be expected in the foreseeable future.

The four eruptions studied include the Avellino eruption of 3,950 years ago, which is considered a possible “worst case scenario” for future eruptions, and the eruption of AD 79 that buried the Roman cities of Pompeii and Herculaneum. The latter was documented by the Roman writer Pliny the Younger, and so all eruptions of this type are referred to as “Plinian” eruptions. Further, the volcanologists studied eruptions of 472 AD and 8890 y BP. The sub-​Plinian eruption of AD 472 is the smallest of the investigated eruptions but still similar in size compared to the recent Tonga eruption.

Garnets allow precise dating

In their study*, which has just been published in the journal Science Advances, the researchers working with lead author Jörn-​Frederik Wotzlaw and ETH Zurich Professor Olivier Bachmann determined the age of garnet crystals present in the volcanic deposits. This mineral grows from the magma as it is stored in the magma chamber in the upper crust beneath Vesuvius. Knowing the age of these minerals makes it possible to infer how long magma resided in this chamber before the volcano spewed it out.

Garnet is an unusual choice for determining the age of volcanic ejecta. Researchers typically use zircons, which are tiny accessory minerals found in many igneous rocks. Magma from Vesuvius, however, is too alkaline to crystallize zircons, but it is rich in garnet.

To determine the age of the garnets, the researchers used the radioactive elements uranium and thorium. The crystal structure of garnet incorporates both in small but measurable quantities, with a preference for uranium. Using the ratio of the isotopes uranium-​238 to thorium-​230, the researchers can calculate the crystallization age of the minerals.

The garnets for this study all came from material that the ETH team collected on site with the help of colleagues from the Universities of Milan and Bari. For this purpose, they searched for corresponding sites where the volcanic deposits from the four eruptions mentioned above are exposed at the surface and are accessible for sampling.

Intervals become shorter

By using the crystallization ages of garnets, the researchers can now show that the most explosive magma type at Vesuvius (so called “phonolitic” magma) is stored in a reservoir in the upper crust for several thousand years before the influx of more primitive, and hotter, magma from the lower crust triggers an eruption.

For the two prehistoric events, the researchers determined that the phonolitic magma resided in the chamber for about 5,000 years. Before the eruptions in the historical period, it was stored in this reservoir for only about 1,000 years.

For all the eruptions, the residence time of the phonolitic magma in the upper crustal chamber coincides with Vesuvius’ quiescent periods.

“We think it’s likely that a large body of phonolitic magma in the upper crust blocked the upwelling of more primitive, hotter magma from deeper reservoirs,” Bachmann says. “Vesuvius has quite a complicated plumbing system,” he adds with a grin.

Below the volcano are several magma chambers connected by a system of pipes. The top chamber, which is critical for the eruptions, fills with magma from one of the lower chambers in a fairly short time. In this colder environment, the magma cools and crystallizes, leading to chemical changes of the residual melt (a process called “magmatic differentiation”). Experts call the “differentiated” magma of Vesuvius phonolite. At some point (probably at relatively regular intervals), more primitive, or “mafic” magma flows into the upper chamber from greater depths. This recharge leads to a pressure rise within the chamber, which can force the phonolitic magma upwards, potentially all the way to the surface, starting an eruption.

A reservoir of phonolitic magma appears to have almost always existed beneath Vesuvius for the last 10’000 years. However, the question is whether one today that could feed a dangerous eruption like the one of 3,950 years ago or the one of AD 79.

Magma build-​up rather unlikely

Seismic surveys indicate that there is indeed a reservoir at a depth of about six to eight kilometers underneath Vesuvius. However, the composition of the magma it contains – i.e., whether it is phonolitic, or more mafic – cannot be determined using seismic technology. But since Vesuvius has been producing mostly mafic magma since 1631, researchers believe it is unlikely that differentiated phonolite is currently accumulating. “The last major eruption in 1944 is now nearly 80 years ago, which may well be the beginning of a prolonged quiescent period during which differentiated magma can accumulate. Still, a dangerous eruption comparable to the one in AD 79 probably needs the quiescent period to last much longer,” Wotzlaw says.

If predominantly mafic magma is ejected in the coming decades, this could indicate that the magma body detected by seismic surveys is not composed of differentiated magma and that none is currently present beneath Vesuvius. “That’s why we think it’s more likely that a large, explosive eruption of Vesuvius would occur only after a quiescent period lasting for centuries,” Bachmann says. Wotzlaw adds: “However, smaller but still very dangerous eruptions like the one in 1944 or even the one in 1631 can occur after shorter periods of quiescence. Accurate forecasting of size and style of volcanic eruptions is so far not possible. However, the reawakening of the magma reservoirs beneath volcanoes are now recognizable by monitoring.”

Close monitoring

To avoid any nasty surprises, Vesuvius and its activity, together with its big brother to the west, the Phlegraean Fields, are monitored around the clock. For example, Italy’s National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology measures every earthquake around the volcanoes, analyzes gases emitted from fumaroles and observes ground deformation, which are indicators of underground activity. There is also an emergency plan outlining how to evacuate the greater Naples area should surveillance conclude that an eruption is imminent.

___________________________________

Pompeii was destroyed in 79 AD during a massive eruption of Mount Vesuvius. Jörn-​Frederik Wotzlaw / ETH Zürich

___________________________________

Article Source: ETH Zurich news release.

*Wotzlaw J-F, Bastian L, Guillong M, et al. Garnet petrochronology reveals the lifetime and dynamics of phonolitic magma chambers at Somma-​Vesuvius. Science Advances, 12 Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abk2184call_made

___________________________________

Advertisement

Sheep and goat domestication in Neolithic Turkey

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES—A study* finds multiple phases of sheep and goat domestication in a Neolithic settlement in Central Anatolia, Turkey. Southwest Asia is thought to be the site of sheep and goat domestication in the early Holocene epoch, but the methods and precise locations of domestication are unclear. Mary C. Stiner and colleagues analyzed the age and sex structures of goat and sheep remains in the zooarchaeological record of Aşıklı Höyük in Central Anatolia, Turkey. The Aşıklı Höyük Neolithic site spans around 1,000 years of continuous occupation beginning around 8400 BC, corresponding to the beginning of settled life in the region. The authors found that sheep and goat management and domestication proceeded through three phases. In the first phase, residents seasonally captured wild lambs and kids from surrounding highlands and raised them within the settlement prior to slaughter. In the second phase, residents carried out limited breeding within the settlement while continuing to recruit wild infants. The third phase displays evidence of large-scale herding with a reproductively viable captive population and a herding economy that harvested adult animals, in contrast to subsequent Neolithic practices. Transition between phases was gradual, but domestication likely altered labor organization, settlement layout, and waste accumulation in Aşıklı Höyük. According to the authors, the results suggest that sheep and goat domestication at this site was a local rather than an imported development.

________________________________

View of the architectural sequence at Aşıklı Höyük as revealed on the western side of the mound, spanning an interval of 1000 years (8400 to 7350 cal BC) in which sheep and goats became domesticated. Mihriban Özbaşaran.

________________________________

View of the architectural sequence at Aşıklı Höyük as revealed on the western side of the mound, spanning an interval of 1000 years (8400 to 7350 cal BC) in which sheep and goats became domesticated. Mihriban Özbaşaran.

________________________________

Article Source: PNAS news release

*“An endemic pathway to sheep and goat domestication at Aşıklı Höyük (Central Anatolia, Turkey),” by Mary C. Stiner, Natalie D. Munro, Hijlke Buitenhuis, Güneş Duru, and Mihriban Özbaşaran. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

https://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.2110930119

Trackways of Otero

The latest unequivocal evidence of a human presence more than 20,000 years ago in present-day New Mexico may confirm a changing paradigm on the early settling of the Americas . . .

This article is available to Premium members of Popular Archaeology.

Become a member or upgrade to a Premium membership: REGISTER HERE.

The Cataclysm of 1650 BCE

Research shows that a cosmic object from deep space destroyed and incinerated a great ancient city in present-day Jordan . . .

This article is available to Premium members of Popular Archaeology.

Become a member or upgrade to a Premium membership: REGISTER HERE.

King of Kings

I met a traveller from an antique land, who said—“Two vast and trunkless legs of stone stand in the desert.  Near them, on the sand, half sunk a shattered visage lies, whose frown, and wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command, tell that its sculptor well those passions read which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things, the hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed. And on the pedestal, these words appear: My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings; Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair! Nothing beside remains. Round the decay of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare the lone and level sands stretch far away.”

Poet Percy Bysshe Shelley felt inspired to write this poem, Ozymandias, in 1817, following the discovery of a colossal statue of the Egyptian pharaoh Ramesses II (known in Greek as Ozymandias) at Luxor (ancient Thebes). The central theme behind the poem is that all power is temporary and fleeting, no matter how prideful or tyrannical the ruler. Ramesses II is considered today among the ancient world’s most successful rulers. But little was known of him at the time Shelley wrote his poem—a literary piece based mostly on conjecture and awe, an inspiration stemming from the intimidating scale of the king’s colossal statues. The poet likely had Napoleon on his mind, as the poem was written just 2 years after his defeat at Waterloo in 1798.

Defying P.B. Shelley’s musings, Ramses II’s power over our imagination and minds is still strong after over 3,000 years. We have learned a lot about Ramses the Great, aka Ozymandias, since then. We’ve learned he wasn’t a ‘tyrant’ but a leader and unifier of his nation. By his hand, he took the Egyptian empire to its zenith, quashing uprisings, reclaiming lost lands and expanding Egypt’s borders. As a spiritual leader Ramses restored ma’at and reinforced the importance of the gods in a country still recovering from the heretic king Akhenaten’s reign. Ramses brought peace, stability and protection to his people, ruling longer than any other king of Egypt for 67 years from 1279 to 1213 BCE. Contemporary equals are Lord Pakal, ruler of Palenque for 68 years and Queen Elizabeth, currently at 69 and counting. Pepi II of Egypt is still debated – he reigned somewhere between 62 and 94 years.

Ramses II was by all accounts, thus far, a good king, considered one of history’s greatest—a king of kings—the “pharaoh of miracles”. When we marvel at his artifacts and monuments, what can we learn from Ramses the great? What can he teach us about our world today? Many things have changed since and some have stayed the same. What are the implications for contemporary society?

Egyptologist Dr. Kara Cooney draws comparisons in her recent book, “The Good Kings”. She notes how, today, we are still ruled by a powerful minority. She notes that the divinization of leaders that characterized ancient Egyptian culture also has more recent historical and modern parallels. For example: the Sun King Louis XIV, the Pope, and how we have idealized and carved the faces of our first U.S. presidents into the side of a sacred mountain—stolen from Native American Indigenous people—renaming it Mount Rushmore.

What is Ramses II’s relevance to us today, when authoritarianism appears to be on the rise and distrust that democracy can truly solve the most pressing problems of our time at an all-time high? Are we at long last beginning to walk away from patriarchy in search of more equitable systems of governance, or will things stay the same as they have for thousands of years? (Image left, Ramses statue detail at Abu Simbel, Pixabay, Public Domain)

Is our press and media truly independent and free or is it an extension of the state promoting sanctioned propaganda?

A mark of a successful pharaoh was the ability to keep both regions, upper and lower Egypt, united and under their control. How would Ramses deal with the extreme polarized state of our country today and unify our country under one common ideal? 

Increasing global income inequality is still a problem today as it was in ancient times. How did Ramses throttle or appease the priesthood and elites of his time? How would he have handled tax dodging, billionaire space cowboys of today to maintain order?

Plagues and droughts were a challenge for the Egyptians and no less of a challenge for governments of the world today.

Professor and Egyptologist Dr. Kara Cooney posits that Ramses II was a populist leader attempting to prove a point to the elites in the Nile Valley at Thebes that may have viewed him as a foreigner since he was of non-royal blood. His family hailed from the Nile Delta region in the North.

Dr. Zahi Hawass, archaeologist and former Egyptian Minister of State for Antiquities Affairs,  disagrees, presenting a simpler explanation. He maintains it was because of his upbringing. Ramses was prepared by his father Seti I to restore Egypt’s glory.

Let us dig deeper into the life of Ramses II, arguably the most revered Egyptian pharaoh of all time, to gain a greater understanding of the man behind the monumental legacy he left behind:

How He Was Raised

Ramses II started his life with good fortune in the royal court—born during one of Egypt’s golden ages. His father was beloved King Seti I and his grandfather Ramses I. Seti I mentored Ramses II as did his father Ramses I. By all accounts, Seti I and Ramses II had a close and loving relationship and Ramses’ greatness was in large part due to his father’s faith and support of him early on. The two were inextricably linked.

As a young crown prince, Ramses is seen repeatedly at his father’s side in an official capacity and served as his deputy in military campaigns as well as in administrative and religious affairs. Later, as a young king, Ramses served as head of the Egyptian army, leading his campaigns in person.

He was also surrounded by accomplished government officials and high priests as a young man. One of Ramses II’s best friends during childhood was Amenemone, a royal scribe who was son of another high priest of Amun named Parennefer, who also served as Chief of Works in the Ramesseum (Ramses’ funerary temple), after the prince became king. It was during that time that Ramses was instilled with the moral ethos of ma’at – truth, justice, balance and harmony, which proved to be a guiding principle as he worked to bring a new sense of order to Egypt and her people. He was spiritually and morally prepared for the role of leader.

When his father Seti I died, we know that he went to great lengths to honor his father and carry on the values instilled in him to respect his ancestors. In the great funerary temple of Seti I at Abydos, where Ramses II restored and completed his father’s temple, he ordered an inscription called the “Great Dedicatory Inscription”, as well as on a stela from Kubban in Nubia. Both provide evidence of Seti’s love for his son and for his lifetime wish to see him rise to king. The Abydos inscription also intimately details how Seti wept at the sight of seeing his son Ramses II crowned.

Ramses’ mother, Queen Tuya, was a positive influence on him as she was a “woman with a strong personality and no doubt a great deal of patience.” She is very visible in Ramses’ monuments, always shown at his side. We also know that she corresponded with the Hittite royal court during Ramses’ reign, providing evidence she managed state affairs at times, in his absence.

All this reinforcement and guidance in his youth allowed him to later in life become a king worthy enough to be called “the king of miracles”.

How He Ruled 

As a result of Ramses’ success as a military leader and master at diplomacy, the peace he gained allowed the empire to afford his ambitious building projects across the country, as his reign was marked by a long period of prosperity.

Ramses seems to have gone further than any other pharaoh in reinforcing the importance of the gods, making him an effective religious leader. He heavily reinforced the worship of the Apis bull representing the god Ptah throughout Egypt. He moved the capital and his principal residence to Per Ramessu, a faience manufacturing site and palace created by his father Seti I. The city was divided into four quadrants and dedicated to each of four gods; Egyptian gods—Amon and Wadjet coupled with Asiatic gods—Seth and Astarte. Ever the masterful marketer of his brand, this was Ramses’ way of unifying the religions of Syria and Egypt and thereby the citizenry. While Ramses is most famous for his savvy in battle, he also found ways to unite his people as well. Per Ramessu continued to prosper as a city for over ten decades after his death.

Professor and Egyptologist Ola el-Aguizy, head archaeologist excavating Urhiya’s (Iwrkhy’s) impressive tomb near Saqqara, says that Urhiya was a foreigner of Syrian descent and army commander originally serving under his father Seti I. Ramses promoted him to Great Army General and eventually became the trusted right-hand man to the king. This reveals Ramses’ character as a ruler, by rewarding a non-Egyptian and elevating him to a level never seen for a foreigner. We also know that Urhiya’s son Yupa was elevated in status by Ramses to the role of herald of the jubilee, organizing the Sed festivals of Ramses II. Yupa’s son Hatiay was given the title ‘Overseer of Works for All the Monuments of His Majesty’.

Religious scholars have tried for years to tie the villainous pharaoh of the exodus to Ramses II. The evidence, however, does not support this. Zahi Hawass reaffirms that there is absolutely no archaeological evidence, writings or inscriptions found anywhere in Egypt to support these theories, nor is there currently any evidence of Moses having existed in Egypt.

Ramses II successfully protected the people and the Empire from foreign threats. He was, as a result of this and for other reasons, a king so loved by his people that nine of his descendants used Ramses’ name to honor him and ensure the success of their reigns. Unfortunately, Egypt didn’t have a free press and almost all citizens were illiterate. Thus it is virtually impossible to find written firsthand accounts attesting to how the people actually thought of his reign. But, if we were able to ask a farmer of his time if he felt Egypt was safe and protected under the rule of Ramses, one could argue for an emphatic “yes” as the answer. A sense of safety from external threats and economic stability are foundations for happiness in any society.

How He Built

Ramses’ building campaigns covered all of Egypt. No pharaoh in the history of Egypt built as many monuments or raised as many statues as he did, which is an incredible achievement considering Egypt is the world’s longest continuous civilization. After securing Egypt’s borders, he was able to enrich its coffers by establishing more quarries and mines.

In analyzing how he built, one can also gain an understanding of how he loved. He showed his love for his mother and wife at Abu Simbel, where a colossal statue of his mother Tuya features prominently on the façade. Ramses dedicated a chapel to her beside his mortuary temple at the Ramesseum. Additionally, he ordered a 500-year-old statue inside the Ramesseum re-carved to represent his mother, revealing he didn’t usurp statues only to glorify himself. Dying in the 23rd year of his reign, not long after the signing of the Kadesh Peace Treaty, Tuya was buried in a lavish tomb in the Valley of the Queens (QV66).

Ramses married at least four wives and is believed to have married 8 total. Two in his youth—Nefertari and Isetnofret—and two Hittite wives to concrete the peace treaty with the Hittite king. The evidence shows Nefertari was his main wife and by all accounts the love of his life. So much so, that her name cartouche is found inside Ramses’ tomb KV7 in the Valley of the Kings. This shows her importance to the king as it is, so far, the only known example of the inclusion of a queen’s name inside a royal tomb. Her tomb is considered by many to be the most lavish and beautiful tomb of all the pharaohs with its vivid, rich colors showing her being embraced by the gods.

_________________________________

Tomb of Rameses II, the entrance to the fourth corridor which descends further into the tomb towards a vestibule and the burial chamber, a barrier closes the rest of the tomb to visitors. Valley of the Kings, Egypt. Dennis Jarvis, CC BY-SA 2.0, Wikimedia Commons

_________________________________

Map of KV7. Karl Richard Lepsius, Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain

_________________________________

At Abu Simbel, he built two temples, one for him and the gods and the other dedicated to the goddess Hathor and his Queen Nefertari. An inscription inside the temple reads “for whom the sun shines”. Her children are also sculpted next to her in miniature.

A master at public relations, Ramses knew how to best promote his brand. For example, he engineered the temple at Abu Simbel to align with the sunlight through the main doorway, where twice a year the divine rays of the golden sun gradually light up statues of him seated alongside the three major gods of Egypt (Ra-Horakhty, Amon, Ptah) and even designing it to leave Ptah, god of the underworld, in the shadows. It was a theatrical setting for all to imagine him just the way he wanted to be thought of—as a living embodiment of the sun god. Even today, large crowds gather twice a year on February 22nd and October 22nd to watch Ramses the Great become bathed in golden light of the sun god Ra alongside the 3 greatest gods of ancient Egypt. One solar alignment date marks the day he ascended to the throne and the other marks his birthday. Abu Simbel is evidence that Ramses was a pious man that truly loved the gods of Egypt.

_____________________________

Abu Simbel. Pixabay, orsdg, Public Domain

_____________________________

In his self-divination through building, he also included his wife, Queen Nefertari. On the façade of her temple near his, there are colossal representations of her at the same height as her husband, which is unusual. Inside her temple, Ramses II is shown along the sanctuary walls offering incense to himself as a god and to Nefertari—evidence Ramses considered both he and his wife to be divine.

Finally, no other pharaoh celebrated his Queen as much as Ramses II. She accompanied him on important state events and was active in peace negotiations with the Hittites. He portrays her as his equal, a rare occurrence. She was his primary wife and co-regent until her early death, after which he ruled alone for over 40 years.

Ramses also built 4 lesser temples in Nubia. One honored the god of craftsmen, another for Nubian gods, another to Amun, Re-Horakhty and a deified Ramses II. The fourth temple served to worship Ramses II as a god alongside Amun, Re-Horakhty, and Ptah.

His son Khaemwaset continued his father’s honorable legacy. During Ramses’ reign, his son was appointed high priest of the God Ptah, patron god of Memphis and restored old kingdom pyramids, temples and tombs, already ancient in his time. These included the Dynasty I tomb at Abydos, the tomb of the last king of Dynasty 4 – Shepsekaf, the pyramid of Sahure at Abusir, the sun temple of Niuserre at Abu Ghurab, and the Step Pyramid of Djoser. He is documented as the builder of the Serapeum at Saqqara. There are bas-reliefs of him inside the Serapeum, tending the tomb of Ptah’s sacred Apis bulls. Like his father Ramses II before him, he inscribed his name stamp on older buildings that he restored, along with the original owner’s name, titles and his father’s name, as was tradition. Unfortunately, Khaemwaset died before he could become king and is considered today to be the first Egyptologist in history.

Before Ramses II was considered a god incarnate to his people, he was a human like any one of us, except he deeply believed in a social contract that was dictated by religion. This social contract meant that he would rule justly with his heart. His building projects are evidence of this belief.

He showed the love he had for his father Seti I by completing his mortuary temple at Abydos and the construction of a vast forest of decorated columns at the Great Hypostyle Hall at Karnak, also begun by his father.

Ramses built a temple at Abydos near Seti I’s mortuary temple. There is an interesting sunken causeway believed to have been built by Seti I that displays decorated scenes (Book of Gates & Book of What is in the Underworld) along its corridors that runs underground from ancient tombs of the early kings, then descends deeper to the level of the Osirion (temple to Osiris), connecting to its rear. This connecting corridor was originally covered in stone slabs but looted in antiquity and would have been a processional route that would enable worshippers to visit the tombs of early kings, then pass through the Osirion and finally ascend a stairway to enter the mortuary temple of Seti I. Both Ramses II and his father’s temples were situated as close as possible to the Osirion and the tombs of Egypt’s first kings to allow a collective worship of the first kings of Egypt, Osiris and of their own dynasty. Abydos was also considered to be the sacred domain of the god Osiris.

Ramses II showed love for his children by building a tomb for them consisting of an unparalleled 150 rooms in the Valley of the Kings, dug underground into the bedrock.

Many scholars believe Abu Simbel and the other temples Ramses built on the frontier with Nubia served several purposes: reinforce the reverence to the gods, divinize himself as a god, display his might and help secure the source of Egypt’s gold and great wealth. These temples on the hinterlands reinforced Egypt’s domain and strength in the eyes of anyone that would dare challenge her sovereignty.

Zahi Hawass offers up a simpler explanation – the temple was built to honor the king as a god and to concrete his place among Egypt’s pantheon for all eternity.

At his funerary temple at the Ramesseum where he is represented as the god Osiris, a large cache of about 10,000 papyri were discovered revealing it was a Presidential library of sorts, as well as a scribal school.

Images of Ramses were encoded to represent how he viewed himself—an agent of change, an agent to maintain order over chaos, an agent for the gods. Egyptians believed statues were magical avatars embodying the spirit of the person represented. Ramses curated his statues to represent himself for eternity and were purposely carved with his gaze looking downwards, towards his subjects. Standardized images of pharaohs in statuary look upwards towards the heavens or determinedly straight ahead, but Egyptologist Dr. Simon Connor explains that Ramses’ statuary has a unique eyeline that looks downwards. Ramses seems to have wanted to make eye contact and to connect with the people of Egypt to ultimately inspire veneration as a god. Ramses intended for the people he served and loved to intimately connect with living representations of him for all eternity.

_______________________________

View of Ramesseum. Djehouty, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons

_______________________________

The Ramesseum Colossi at Luxor.

_______________________________

Ramses II specifically chose statues of his most prestigious forebears to rebrand and re-embody them. He purposely left evidence on the statues of former rulers, supporting the idea that he was not trying to steal their identities but instead was using the reputation of his most honored ancestors in order to spiritually increase his own power to last the ages. He was branding himself as a newer version of the leaders that came before him, ensuring he would be placed in the highest position among the pantheon of royalty. Current estimates calculate roughly one quarter of his statues were re-carved from previous ruler statues.

No other pharaoh’s imagery is as ubiquitous as his. Ramses II is literally everywhere. Today his obelisk stands center stage in the Place de la Concorde in Paris. Another obelisk stands in front of the Pantheon in Rome, taken from its originally erected site outside the temple of Re in Heliopolis. And another pair from Heliopolis of red granite obelisks are in two different places in Florence. His seated statue is the first thing you see at the entrance to the Metropolitan Museum in New York City and his 36-foot-tall colossal statue will be holding court at the main entrance to the new billion dollar GEM museum in Cairo, greeting visitors from around the world when it opens late 2022.

________________________________

Above and below: A grand statue of Ramses II graces the halls of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. Photo by Eric Vasallo

________________________________

________________________________

Zahi clarifies further that this usurpation of statuary is more a result of tradition than of narcissism. Since the Old Kingdom, it was the sole responsibility of each pharaoh to supervise the burial of his predecessor and to complete their unfinished monuments. In some cases, Ramses actually re-carved statues of the hated Hyksos kings that ruled Egypt during the 17th dynasty who had usurped them from earlier Egyptian kings. It was more of a case of restoration to Egypt than usurpation for vainglorious pursuits. Additionally, Ramses added his name to monuments that were damaged or unfinished. He was either obsessed with being loved by all or saving Egypt…or quite possibly both.

How He Fought

It’s difficult to tease the truth out from what has survived the ravages of time, which are primarily state-sanctioned narratives. Still, to this day Ramses II is revered for his bravery and as an effective military commander that not only secured Egypt’s borders but expanded them. He successfully quashed a Libyan uprising, suppressed Galilee (between Lebanon and Israel) and ended the conflict with the Hittites through a combination of battle and diplomacy.

Ramses II ascended the throne at the very early age of 14 and after only his second year on the throne was challenged by a band of sea pirates called the Sherden that were plundering Egyptian vessels along the Mediterranean coast. Ramses skillfully set a trap for them using a decoy Egyptian boat and it worked just as planned. They were surrounded by Egyptian boats and in one fell swoop, defeated the pirates once and for all.

The Hittites also saw an opportunity to test the young leader at his empire’s northern border. They invaded and took over the important trading town of Kadesh in modern-day Syria. Ramses II led his forces to recapture the fortress. Evidence of his strategic genius and early divination as leader are seen in two different accounts of this pivotal and brutal battle where even the Hittite king’s brother was killed in the battle. Estimates calculate that there were about 6,000 chariots in that battle. Although the temple walls throughout Egypt show Ramses as the victor of that battle, most believe today it was a stalemate. Nonetheless, he had faced death at the Battle of Kadesh but was able to save himself and his army through his own skill and bravery. Even then, he gave credit for his survival not to his own ability but to his beloved god, Amun. Record of the battle is found in the “Bulletin” or “Poem of Pentawer-it” (named after the scribe who copied the hieratic copy in Papyrus Sallier III from tombs in Saqqara). Pentawer-it was also Ramses II’s son and successor. There are similar accounts of this battle that also appear inscribed on the walls of the temples at Karnak, Luxor, Abu Simbel and the Ramesseum. The Bulletin relates “that at sight of the approaching Hittites, the king donned his weapons and armor, leaping into his chariot with his great horses, named Victory in Thebes and Mut is Satisfied, in the yoke. Calling upon Amun for strength, he charged alone into the midst of the enemy, slaying them in their multitudes with no help from anyone.” The Bulletin gives a vivid description of the king, his eyes “savage” and his breath, fiery with rage, burning everything around him. Egyptologist, Dr. Christopher Naunton, shares a second account that reveals, at the most tragic moment, when all seemed lost in battle, his soldiers saw Ramses rise, comparing him to the great God Seth, to whom his father Seti I was consecrated:

“Thereupon the forces of the Foe from Khatti surrounded the followers of his majesty who were by his side. When his majesty caught sight of them, he rose quickly, enraged at them like his father Mont. Taking up weapons and donning his armor he was like Seth in the moment of his power. He mounted ‘Victory-in-Thebes,’ his great horse, and started out quickly alone by himself. His majesty was mighty, his heart stout, one could not stand before him.”

“In his encounter with the Hittites at Kadesh early on in the 5th year of his reign,” says Naunton, “Ramesses found himself alone and surrounded by his enemy but fought his way out to return to the Egyptian troops. He describes himself as being like the god Seth in this – as if evoking the qualities of chaos and violence that the god embodied. What’s interesting is that, whether or not you believe Ramses’ propaganda, it is telling that he wanted to depict himself as being personally involved in the battle. He wanted people to really believe he was the mighty warrior, perhaps more than other pharaohs had.”

At this battle, Ramses named his military units or divisions each with both chariots and infantry after the four gods – Ra, Amun (led by Ramses), Ptah and Seth. Ramses wanted the gods to be with his men, protecting their every step.

Ultimately, the Battle of Kadesh wasn’t a loss for Egypt and as a result, 17 years later, Ramses ended the contentious and costly conflict between the Hittites and Egypt, even going so far as to marry two of the king’s daughters to further seal a time of alliance and peace that lasted almost a century.

The two leaders forged the first treaty in history, forming the basis for future treaties around the world. A replica of that treaty carved in stone was given to the United Nations by the President of Turkey in 1970 after it was discovered in Anatolia. It is displayed today at the headquarters in New York City to remind its member nations of the importance of diplomacy and cooperation between nations.

_____________________________

Kadesh treaty replica at the UN headquarters. Credit – UN photo/R Grunbaum

_____________________________

At the siege of Daipur in Syria. Ramses fought alongside six of his sons. In reliefs at the Ramesseum, Daipur is depicted as a heavily fortified hilltop settlement with inner and outer walls. Inscriptions show chariots and ladders supported by archers and his six sons are shown wearing the youthful side-locks of royalty. References to his sons are also inscribed on the walls at the Ramesseum:

King’s son, of his body, his beloved, Khaemweset.

King’s son, of his body, his beloved, Montu.

King’s son, of his body, his beloved, Meriamon.

King’s son, of his body, his beloved, Amenemuya.

King’s son, of his body, his beloved, Seti.

King’s son, of his body, his beloved, Setepenre.

How He Celebrated

After 30 years on the throne, as was tradition, Ramses hosted a lavish (and very costly) Heb Sed festival. He held 14 festivals thereafter of no less than 10 days each, more festivals than any other pharaoh, celebrating his kingship and renewing his strength among his people. The Heb Sed was an important ritual that additionally satisfied the priest class, representing a reenactment of the unification of Egypt by Menes, founder of the First Dynasty.

Egyptian archaeologist Fathi Yaseen, while digging in Asasif mountain in Luxor, discovered why a tomb of one of Ramses II’s nobles was built so low and accessible instead of high and out of reach, as was usual. He found that it was so his family would be worshipped and visited with offerings during the Beautiful Festival of the Valley held every year. Fathi finally concluded that Ramses was a generous king, sharing the wealth of his empire with others in the kingdom in the festival every year after the first harvest. The annual festival celebrated the three main gods at Karnak Temple and their dead ancestors, where the people of Egypt would ritually bring offerings of food and drink, eating beside their tombs and ensuring their spirits had enough to eat for eternity.

How He Died

His mummy measured about 5 feet 7 inches (above average height). He was most likely red-haired and had vitiligo of the skin. A CT scan and a DNA analysis was performed on his mummy by Zahi Hawass in 2007 and it revealed he had a hardening of the arteries, arthritis and a severe abscess in his teeth. Any of these or all would have contributed to his death at age 90, which was due to natural causes. Despite his health issues, he lived an unusually long life, especially since the average age of Egyptian men at the time was about 34.

_________________________________

Details of mummy of the pharaoh Ramesses II. Cairo Museum. G. Elliot Smith, Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain

_________________________________

Ramses Mummy (Credit: Official catalog for Ramses II exhibit)

_________________________________

Though the remains of Ramses II himself has passed on into history, his legacy still lives on in the minds of millions, and his mark on Egypt still reverberates to this day. 

_________________________________

Article Supplement

The following is an interview with the renowned archaeologist Dr. Zahi Hawass, who is currently curating the Ramses II exhibit at the Houston Museum of Natural Science

Q: Why was Ramses so exceptional? Why did he excel in so many fields?

Zahi:  “Seti I set him up for greatness. He sent him to Heliopolis to learn the Egyptian religion and to supervise the initial construction of his father’s tomb. He wanted his name to be remembered. In my excavation south of the third pyramid of Menkaure at Giza, I recently discovered a large double statue of Ramses II with the Sun God Re. Also, near Abu Sir, we found the remains of another temple for him. We have a statue here in the exhibit from the Middle Kingdom that he took for himself. He didn’t do it for himself, he did it to renew and restore the image of the people before him. Many statues have his name carved beside the previous owner’s name. He was a family man. He had at least 8 wives, but Nefertari was his one and only. He was a very romantic man, a military man, a builder, a religious man because he restored the images of every god. He built one of the most beautiful tombs for Nefertari and another temple next to his at Abu Simbel with her children next to her. Ramses was the only king that built a temple for his queen. The only one. [This] never happened in the history of Egypt at all. At Abu Simbel he inserted himself beside three other gods to receive the light of the sun twice a year. I believe he built Abu Simbel to give offerings to the gods. He worshipped himself as a god. When he lost that battle at Kadesh, I believe he was afraid he would never be a god and therefore he built this temple as a god worshipping himself.”

Q:  Are there any other recent discoveries of Ramses II?

Zahi:  “There is a scene inside Ramses II’s tomb that has been recently cleaned which provides insight on how he ruled. An incredible discovery. The inscription is of hour number five from the Book of the Gates, which refers to the “others”, referring to other countries or peoples. It shows the Sun God Re in his royal boat. In front of him are four Egyptians standing, in front of them four Nubians, four Libyans and four Mesopotamians—all standing and unbound. It is interpreted to be a statement of the Sun God to say that he created all people and that all will be able to go to paradise. A rare and inclusive message.”

“In yet another instance of Ramses II following in his father’s footsteps, this same inscription was also found inside Seti I’s tomb.”

Zahi shared how he supervised a recent excavation underneath the construction of a supermarket in Cairo’s al-Matareya neighborhood, where three important temples were discovered—one for Ramses II, another for Akhenaten, and lastly, Thutmoses III.

Q: What is your favorite artifact at this exhibit?

Zahi: (eyes light up) “Oh, I have to tell you that when I wrote the catalog and two additional books for this exhibit—one souvenir book, one exhibit catalog and one book for children—at first, I was doubtful of this exhibit’s impact. But seeing all these beautiful artifacts all together in the space and the way the exhibit highlights each object so well, I have to tell you that every single object in this exhibit captured my heart. Each object is incredible and will capture the heart of every visitor. They will tell many wonderful stories of ancient Egypt. The collection will teach the people about Ramses as a builder who built temples everywhere from Abu Simbel in the south up to Alexandria in the north. At the same they will look at him as a warrior but also a peacemaker after what I believe was a loss at the battle of Kadesh. He won several other battles against the Hittites but he was ultimately a peacemaker because after that battle, the two countries signed a peace treaty. Ramses also agreed to marry two of the Hittite king’s daughters to finalize the agreement. One wife was very sick. We do not know what sickness she had. It is documented that she needed help because she visited the temples of Sekhmet the goddess of healing at Karnak and Abusir near the pyramids. Some people believe it was the plague. We still aren’t sure. We do know that in Amarna there was a problem with malaria. Through CT scanning we determined that King Tutankhamen died of malaria.”

Certainly, we haven’t heard the last from Ramses the Great. At our meeting in Houston for the grand opening of the Ramses II exhibit and their new Egyptian Hall, Zahi shared an exclusive discovery from an all-Egyptian re-excavation of Ramses II’s tomb (KV7) that he is supervising in the Valley of the Kings. The tomb was heavily damaged from flooding, and they have thus far removed 60,000 square feet of rubble. It is two times the size of his father’s (Seti I) tomb –over 300 feet long. They have cleared and cleaned many scenes of the Book of the Dead and recently discovered an unusual shaft in his tomb. Usually, shafts are carved out of the stone to foil thieves by trapping them or as a flood relieving device. This shaft is very unique because they are usually bare and unfinished. This shaft’s walls are decorated at about 200 feet down. There are scenes of the Birth of the Sun God Re.

Ramses’ tomb has been excavated many times during history, but never fully excavated, so there may yet still be treasures to uncover inside. The newly discovered shaft is the only example of a tomb well-shaft in the Valley of the Kings that is fully decorated with painted scenes.

Zahi hopes that Ramses may have built this shaft to secret away his royal furnishings in the same way that his father’s tomb featured an unfinished vertical shaft extending down into the Earth over 173 meters. He also believes that, in his words, “it might hold a tunnel that connects his tomb with the adjacent KV5 tomb, which was built for his children.”

One can only imagine what will be discovered inside this shaft to tell us more about this iconic figure’s life. After all, the greatest treasure is information.

________________________________

Above and below: Views of excavation work on the KV7 shaft.

________________________________

________________________________

________________________________

Readers can get ‘up close and personal’ to the man that became king, that became a god, at the Houston Museum of Natural Science. The showing lasts until May 2022 before proceeding to San Francisco and a six-year, 10-city world tour.

This major exhibit on Ramses II’s life and the gold of the pharaohs coincides with the reopening of the new Egyptian Hall in the Houston Museum of Natural Science. It is a beautiful and important exhibit curated by Thomas Hardwick and one of the most complete collections of Egyptian artifacts outside of Cairo. The exhibit also features a remarkable golden room full of beautiful scenes from the Book of the Dead, inspired by King Tutankhamun’s golden funerary shrine.

In the state-of-the-art Ramses II exhibit, visitors can walk among real colossal statues and witness a multimedia re-creation of Ramses’ triumph at the Battle of Kadesh, widely considered the largest chariot battle ever fought in the history of the world. There is also a powerful and immersive virtual reality experience by Positron, transporting visitors to Egypt’s golden age with fast-paced highlights of the pharaoh’s greatest moments, the temples of Abu Simbel, and Nefertari’s Tomb. It is narrated by a ghostly apparition of Nefertari, who attempts to rejoin her husband in the afterlife.

The much anticipated, spectacular billion-dollar GEM museum is also slated to open sometime in November of 2022 (TBD), which will be among the largest and most important museums in the world, showcasing thousands of artifacts never before seen by the public. It is designed to architecturally complement and align with the great pyramid of Giza nearby – one of the original seven wonders of the world.

________________________________

The GEM entrance. Khaled Desouki/Getty Images

____________________________________

Egyptians believe words, like symbols, had magic and power, and that if you say a person’s name repeatedly, they will live forever.

Article Supplement cover image above: Dezalb, Pixabay

________________________________

Sources:

Ozymandias by P.B. Shelley – https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/46565/ozymandias

Houston Museum of Natural Science – Ramses II Exhibit until May 2022 https://www.hmns.org

Dr Chris Naunton, Egyptologist www.chrisnaunton.comAncient Egyptian Literature, Volume II: 2 (p. 105). University of California Press. Kindle Edition which is available here: https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00720JSQI/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1634&creative=6738&creativeASIN=B00720JSQI&linkCode=as2&tag=chrisnaunton-21&linkId=5430e9922f21ef33f61b53121e731f84

Zahi Hawass – His latest books on Ramses II written for the Houston Museum of Natural Science – Ramses the Great and the Gold of the Pharaohs (official catalog) Laboratoriorosso, 2021. Books can only be purchased at the museum. Buy tickets for the Ramses II exhibit here – https://www.hmns.org/exhibits/special-exhibitions/ramses-the-great-and-the-gold-of-the-pharaohs

Kara Cooney joins UCLA Fowler Museum to discuss her latest book, on Off the Press: “The Good Kings”  https://fowler.ucla.edu/video/

Kara Cooney discusses Ramses II in this podcast –True Crime: Ancient Egypt Editionhttps://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/afterlives-with-kara-cooney/id1585193255?i=1000539630324

Kara Cooney’s latest book – The Good Kings – get signed copies here – https://www.booksoup.com/book/9781426221965

Ramses Rise to Power: Lost Treasures of Egypt – Episode 3, Season 3

https://m.imdb.com/title/tt15433480/?ref_=tt_ep_pr

Egyptologist Simon Connor – https://independentresearcher.academia.edu/SimonConnor/Papers

Per Ramessu – https://www.britannica.com/place/Per-Ramessu

Video reconstruction of Ramses II capital city – Per Ramessu – https://vimeo.com/194362703

A Layman’s Guide to the Osireion https://www.academia.edu/37568156/The_Osireion_A_Laymans_Guide

Battle of Kadesh – Poem of Pentawerit – https://ancientegyptonline.co.uk/battle-kadesh/

Siege of Daipur inscriptions at the Ramesseum-

Kitchen, Kenneth A (1998-12-17). Ramesside Inscriptions. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 83. ISBN 978-0-631-18435-5

Treaty of Kadesh replica at the United Nations –

https://www.unmultimedia.org/s/photo/detail/111/0111527.html

Heb Sed Festival

https://www.arabworldbooks.com/en/e-zine/the-sed-festival-heb-sed-renewal-of-the-kings-reign

_________________________________

Advertisement

Rediscovering Ancient Arabia

Dr Abdulrahman Alsuhaibani is the Vice President of Culture at the Royal Commission for AlUla, where he works on executing in-depth archeological studies, unique in both geographic size and scale, and assessing the rich and complex past of the AlUla region of Northwest Saudi Arabia. He is also Associate Professor at King Saud University in the Archeology Department.

Editor’s Note: Like a rising phoenix, new evidence of ancient monumental civilizations is emerging from the desert of a modern Arabian kingdom. Below, through his own narrative, the Acting Executive Director of Collections for Saudi Arabia’s Royal Commission for AlUla relates the current efforts by officials and expert teams to discover, re-discover, and revitalize Saudi Arabia’s remarkable ancient heritage, gone unnoticed and uncelebrated to the rest of the world for far too long. In what is today northwest Saudi Arabia, and long before the rise of Islam, ancient monumental kingdoms created an astounding cultural florescence and dominated a landscape through which caravans of the incense trade and other goods enriched a land and its people………  

 

Who was Dhu Ghabbat?

Was the primary deity of the ancient Lihyanites ‘the god of the forest’ as some scholars believe, or was he ‘the absentee’, as others assert?

We simply do not know for certain. We lack sufficient evidence. For too long, the archaeology of Arabia has been under-explored. Only in recent decades has the shortfall been addressed.

Today, Arabian archaeology is like a palace with missing pieces. Now we are finding those pieces, not just by excavating, but by the follow-up work of sorting, classifying and storing, as well. Piece by piece, we will acquire a clearer image of the palace’s structure. Eventually we will reach a point where our hunches become educated guesses and then solidify into working theories and finally accepted facts.

I work at the Royal Commission for AlUla (RCU) as Acting Executive Director of Collections. We are amid an enormous effort to regenerate 22,561 square kilometers of north-west Saudi Arabia. AlUla will become a world-class destination for natural and cultural heritage with flagship projects such as the Kingdoms Institute a center for archaeological and conservation studies and a cultural platform for knowledge, exploration and inspiration.

Already, well over 100 archaeologists are working across AlUla during fieldwork seasons and projects, shedding light on many past eras and revealing the depth and richness of AlUla’s cultural heritage. Our teams are uncovering more than 10,000 artifacts per year. Our storage units are growing rich with wonderful finds – from the minute (a unique leaf-shaped mother-of-pearl pendant found in a burial site dating to between 4300 and 3500 BCE) to the monumental (2.5m-tall statues of broad-shouldered kings excavated at Dadan dated to between the 5th and 3rd centuries BCE).

We are pursuing several projects to ensure the safe preservation of the treasures in our custody. As ambitious as we are to show the world our archaeological discoveries, this is also a time to be meticulous. We are careful with our riches to ensure that they can continue to be researched and enjoyed by future generations.

To begin, we are setting up a CMS (Collections Management System) database compatible with international standards to record and organize our data. We are increasing our storage capacity by building a facility at AlUla to the latest specifications and with capacity for more than 5,000 cases, and within three years we will have a new Collections Storage and Conservation Facility, developed for our art and heritage collections with state-of-the-art labs. We are issuing a Collections Handbook to ensure that all procedures for dealing with artifacts and artworks are controlled. And we are working to improve the quality of preservation and restoration of collections to ensure that they are not damaged in the future, especially during transportation to participate in exhibitions, regionally and globally, and at museums as well.

Working closely with our partners at the French Agency for the Development of AlUla (Afalula), we aspire to the match the excellence identified through internationally recognized institutions such as the British Museum in London, the Louvre in Paris, and the Getty in Los Angeles. As an organization, our aim is to work with the best cultural institutions and businesses, large or small, around the world to place RCU and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia at the forefront of the community.

_________________________________

A Dadanite inscription. Zunkir, (CC BY-SA 4.0), Wikimedia Commons

_________________________________

Dadanite bas relief of a lion. Sanctuaire de Dadan (al-Khuraybah), al-‘Ula. Daté des Ve-Ier siècles av. J.-C. Sur bloc de grès rouge. Présenté à l’Institut du Monde Arabe de Paris pour l’exposition sur Al-‘Ula, prêt du Musée du département d’archéologie de Riyad, université du roi Saud. Zunkir, (CC BY-SA 4.0), Wikimedia Commons

_________________________________

Community involvement is essential. We are encouraging members of the AlUla community who possess artifacts to donate them to our museums. We recognize the invaluable contribution of our local community in developing our collections. Community engagement is an essential part of preservation. Residents will be our eyes and ears on the ground, providing valuable insights and information. But it must be a two-way relationship. Therefore we are training AlUla residents to be partners in our project. The RCU’s Hammayah program in its first phase trained 2,500 young people from AlUla for a variety of careers, archaeology among them.

In this way, they can follow in the footsteps of Dr Abdullah Nasif. A native of AlUla, beginning in the 1970s he was the first scholar to conduct a thorough study of the AlUla qanāts, irrigation systems that harnessed the power of gravity. Dr Nasif served as a professor of archaeology at King Saud University in Riyadh. He paved the way for future generations of Saudi archaeologists, such as me, and was instrumental in establishing the legacy that we are now working to both preserve and extend.

My own work in AlUla dates to 2005, with my first excavation as a student at Dadan.  Over 15 years later I am still making new archaeological discoveries at Dadan. The Dadanites and Lihyanites, two related peoples, fascinate me. It is a privilege to bring their wonders to wider attention.

_______________________________

Dr Abdulrahman Alsuhaibani (middle), who is in charge of collections for the Royal Commission for AlUla, is shown at the Dadan archaeological site in northern Saudi Arabia. It was at Dadan that Dr. Alsuhaibani began his career as an archaeologist and developed his passion for preserving the region’s treasures. Royal Commission for AlUla

_______________________________

The old town of AlUla. Pteropus conspicillatus, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons

_______________________________

The Lion Tomb site at AlUla. juhotski, (CC BY-SA 3.0), Wikimedia Commons

_______________________________

Qasr al Farid, tomb in the archaeological site Mada’in Saleh, AlUla. Richard.hargas, (CC BY-SA 4.0), Wikimedia Commons

_______________________________

Aerial view of AlUla. Sammy Six, (CC BY 2.0), Wikimedia Commons

_______________________________

And as for the question of whether Dhu Ghabbat was ‘the god of the forest’ or ‘the absentee’, I lean toward the latter view. In my opinion, he might well have been a lunar deity like Almakah, the moon god of the Sabaeans. When you think about it, the moon is often an absentee – a mysterious presence high above that gives rhythm to daily life as it waxes and wanes. Perhaps that is how it seemed to the Lihyanites. This is among the many stories we look forward to describing in more detail in years to come as we excavate, preserve and display the riches of AlUla as our gift to the world.

_______________________________

See more about AlUla.

_______________________________

Cover Image, Top Left: Aerial view of Al’ Ula, by Sammy Six, (CC BY 2.0), Wikimedia Commons

Image, Second From Top, Right: This larger-than-life statue, excavated at the archaeological site of Dadan in north-west Saudi Arabia, has been dated to between the 5th and 3rd centuries BCE. It depicts a broad-shouldered man, possibly a king of that era. The statue featured in the exhibition AlUla: Wonder of Arabia in Paris in 2019-20. Royal Commission for AlUla

_______________________________

The Endless Conquest of Yucatán

Freelance writer, researcher and photographer, Georges Fery (georgefery.com) addresses topics from history, culture, and beliefs to daily living of ancient and today’s indigenous societies of Mesoamerica and South America. His articles are published online at travelthruhistory.com, ancient-origins.net and popular-archaeology.com, and in the quarterly magazine Ancient American (ancientamerican.com). In the U.K. his articles are found in mexicolore.co.uk.

The author is a fellow of the Institute of Maya Studies instituteofmayastudies.org, Miami, FL and The Royal Geographical Society, London, U.K. (rgs.org). He is a member in good standing with the Maya Exploration Center, Austin, TX (mayaexploration.org) the Archaeological Institute of America, Boston, MA (archaeological.org), NFAA-Non Fiction Authors Association (nonfictionauthrosassociation.com) and the National Museum of the American Indian, Washington, DC. (americanindian.si.edu).

The subjugation of the Aztecs by the Spanish conquistador or conqueror, Hernan Cortez, took twenty-one years with the support of thousands of Tlaxcala and Otomi Indian allies. The unrelenting conquest of Mexico’s Yucatán peninsula, however, spanned 125 of the 374 years history of a long and adversarial coexistence. In defiance of defeat upon defeat on the battlefield, the native Maya-Yucatec fiercely resisted their foreign foe. The peninsula at that time was heavily populated, with cities of three thousand people and more, five or fewer miles from one another, interspaced with hamlets. Among numerous clashes, the fall of Aké (Ak’e’) stands out, for it was the first decisive armed confrontation between the Spanish and the indigenous people of the Yucatán. Aké, however, was only the beginning of a struggle that would only wane on the doorsteps of the twentieth century.

The First Incursions

The first entrada or incursion, by the Spanish Francisco de Montejo (the Elder), was from the east of the peninsula, between 1527 and 1529. It was followed by a second incursion from the west, headed by his son, also known as Francisco de Montejo (the Younger), from 1529 to 1535. It all started on December 8, 1526, when Spain’s Council of the Indies granted Montejo the Elder the capitulación, or patent, for the conquest of the “Islands of Cozumel and Yucatán” with the title and office of adelantado or governor and captain general. At that time, this unexplored part of Mexico was thought to be two islands. The patent was the legal foundation of the Spanish Crown policies for political, religious, and mercantile aspects of its conquered overseas possessions. Montejo sold his properties and got into debt to obtain the royal patent to finance his expeditions, an investment he expected, like all conquistadores or conquerors, to recover from captured lands. For his first incursion, he selected as his second in command, Alonso Dávila, he knew from past battles in the Indies who was wise in council. In mid-June 1527, with about four hundred men plus the ships’ crews, Montejo stepped on board the armed merchantman San Jerónimo and, accompanied by two caravels, sailed  down the Guadalquivir to the Atlantic, heading to Santo Domingo on the island of Hispaniola.

There he recruited more men and bought twenty-five more horses and a large stock of supplies. Other officers were Pedro de los Rios as lieutenant governor and Gonzalo Nieto, veteran of many battles and standard bearer of the army. Well trained officers and soldiers idle after the Reconquista, the ousting of the Moors from Spain, completed his forces, together with the Franciscan friar Juan Rodriguez de Caraveco, Montejo’s own chaplain, and surgeon Iñigo Lòpez of Seville. Among other officers was Roberto Alemán, a Fleming in charge of the light artillery, and his wife Talina, the only woman on the roster.

Montejo sailed west from Hispaniola leaving the brigantine La Gavarra to follow later with reinforcement and landed with three ships and four hundred men on the island of Cozumel off the eastern coast of the Yucatán in September of 1527. The Maya had already met the Spaniards Francisco Hernández de Córdoba in 1517, Juan de Grijalva in 1518, and Hernán Cortés in 1519. The cacique or chief, Naum Pat, greeted Montejo and his men amiably. The chief informed Montejo about the lay of the land on the continent, and the main chiefdoms he would encounter and with which he may have to contend. Toward the end of that month, Montejo sailed to the mainland and came ashore at or near the small village of Xel Há, which he called Salamanca de Xhelhá in honor of Salamanca, his birthplace, making it his main base on the coast. To quell a mutiny that had been brewing since leaving Santo Domingo, Montejo set fire to two of his ships, while the caravel Nicolasa sailed back to Santo Domingo. Thirty sailors from the burned ships who had participated in the frustrated mutiny elected to return. The Nicolasa captain was instructed to bring back supplies, horses, and men.

The remaining crews of the two burnt ships joined Montejo’s force. He then left a lieutenant in command of the outposts at Salamanca de Xhelhá, with forty men and Talina Alemán, and sent another twenty to set up camp at Polé, a few miles north on the Caribbean coast, to gather foodstuff from neighboring villages. Meanwhile, most of the natives, fearful of the newcomers, fled into the dense forest. On the way, the Spaniards had their first taste of a difficult land and the hostility of its people. The hot and humid climate was hard on the Spaniards, especially during clashes with Indian warriors. They adopted indigenous body protection for close combat, for Spanish armor was too hot and cumbersome. They used long thick tunics quilted with cotton, which they called escuipiles, to protect them to the knees. Footmen, crossbowmen and arquebusiers were likewise protected from head to toe, as were horses with quilted armor. The ferocious Spanish dogs of war were protected by their ferocity.

The notable characteristic of the Maya Early Classic period (250-550AD) was the emergence of independent states across much of the Yucatán peninsula. Sharer and Textler explain that “documentary evidence of the Early Classic era is sporadic in the north. No single major center dominated the political and economic arena of the period, but several important states developed with prominent chiefdoms such as Aké, Acanceh, Izamal and Oxtintok” (2006). The major chiefdoms on the peninsula were those of Cochuah and Ekab, while those yielding the most political power were the Tutul Xiu of Mani and the Nachi Cocom of Sotuta. Both political powerhouses played major roles during the conquest.

The Tutul Xiu promptly allied with the Spanish and kept their friendly disposition throughout the conquest, as a counterpoint no doubt, to their enduring antagonism with the hated Nachi Cocom. Most of the villages in Montejo’s report, such as Xaman Há, Mochis, and Belma, no longer exist. The latter may be identified with the settlement of El Meco, near Puerto Juárez today. From Belma, the little army proceeded to Cónil, in the province of Ekab where they were welcomed and rested for two months. As befits a military leader, Montejo did not let down his defiance of the locals, for he was wary of possible treachery. So, with his captains he organized his army’s stay at Cónil under a twenty-four-hour guard watch.

In the spring of 1528, the army left Cónil for the major town of Choaca or Chauac Há in the neighboring province of Chinkinchel. They traveled through an uninhabited area devoid of water for a week but were soon greeted by a crowd of Choaca people on the outskirts of their town. As Chamberlain explains the Choaca considered themselves “superior to other people  in culture and intelligence, for they were great traders” (1966:51). At first, the contact was respectful but ladened with mistrust, for the caciques or chiefs were warned of the Spaniards arrival. The leaders received the Europeans with gifts of food and shows of friendship. Unlike at Cónil, however, Montejo seems to have let his guard down and did not prepare for possible treachery. After a week, over a few nights, the inhabitants slowly moved their people and supplies out of the city. Montejo and Dávila eventually realized that the unusual silence  around them was ominous and understood what would be coming next.

______________________________

Deadly Aké –  ©georgefery.com

______________________________

At mid-morning of the fifth day of the second week, without warning and in complete silence, the warriors attacked shooting thick flights of arrows, using spear throwers (atlatl) to hurl javelins with fire-hardened spear tips, and hard wood clubs four to five feet in length studded with sharp obsidian flints. The Spanish officers quickly rallied their men and faced the onslaught. The Spaniards, making the most of superior weapons, military discipline, and an irresistible cavalry, together with their dogs of war, succeeded in checking the first onrush  of the Maya. After regrouping the men quartered in other parts of town, Montejo counter attacked. After the hardest kind of fighting, in which both sides showed intrepid determination, the Spaniards broke the Maya’s resistance, and dispersed them. The Europeans won a clean-cut victory in the first pitched battle of the conquest, however, they paid dearly for it, with ten or twelve of their small army killed or wounded. For the Choacas, however, it was a disaster with hundreds of lives lost, among which were ten village chiefs and other principals. After their defeat, the lords of the Chinkinchel province decided against further resistance and, the following day, they sued for peace.

__________________________________

Merciless Encounter – (CC BY-SA 3.0)  ©wikipedia.org Public Domain

__________________________________

After a two-week rest, the Spaniards left Choaca hampered by heat, a difficult terrain, and lack of water. They were unprepared for the absence of rivers or stream in northern Yucatán. They moved toward Aké, ten miles north of today’s town of Tizimin. The Choacas had warned Aké’s paramount chief that the Spaniards were coming to steal their food and their wives. Over a three-day trek, the cavalry, arquebusiers, foot soldiers and war dogs clashed with Aké’ warriors and remnants of Choaca fighters and their allies, who relentlessly fought to slow down the invaders. The Mayas were aware that they did not have the military expertise nor the weapons to overcome the enemy. Their plan of action, according to the Relación de Juan Farfán (1579), was to build a succession of half-moon-shaped palisades, called albarradas in Spanish, tied to tree trunks and bushes on each side of the trail leading to the town, to slow down the enemy. More than the Spanish weapons, however, the Maya were terrified of the horses and, worse still, of the fierce dogs of war.

The Spaniards entered Aké late on the fourth day. The Maya fought furiously all the way inside their city. Alonso Dávila, along with a handful of veteran officers and soldiers, was among the few Spaniards with experience in this type of warfare; he and Montejo led their men by example, at the head of the fight. Horsemen could not be used efficiently due to dense trees, a rocky ground, and bushes, but they did much damage. The merciless fight lasted all day with no relief until late afternoon, when the Maya retired for the night. At daylight the following day, the fight resumed with the same fierceness and rage, but military discipline, their swords and dogs of war again broke the Maya onslaught in mid-afternoon. According to Montejo’s notes recorded by the chronicler Cárdenas y Valencia (1937:15-16):

“…at Aké, the Indians appeared in large numbers banging drums made from the shell of large sea turtles with deer antlers used as drum sticks; they were blowing big conch-shells to rally warriors that, together with screams of rage from hundreds of throats magnified the deafening noise; they all had weapons they use in war such as bows and quivers of arrows, stone throwers, poles with their tips hardened by fire, lances with point of sharp flints, two-handed swords of very strong wood inset with obsidian blades, large conch-shells of the sea; naked except for the shameful parts which were covered with a cloth; daubed with earth of colors, they appeared as most ferocious devils; their nose and ear plugs were adorned with bones and stones of varied colors; but all this did not cause the conquistadors to flinch.”

Even though many Maya warriors were killed and wounded during the fight, many more came in to fill the gaps and kept fighting not allowing the Spaniards any respite. The casualties were important for the Spaniards, with twenty-three men dead or seriously wounded, and three horses killed or maimed, as were dogs. The casualties, however, were horrendous for the Maya, with over 1,200 dead warriors on the battlefield in the northwest part of the large plaza, including local village chiefs. Aké was the turning point of this first entrada or incursion, showing the Mayas the resolve and military prowess of a dangerous foe.

________________________________

It’s not over –  ©georgefery.com

________________________________

The emotional impact of the disaster was devastating to the locals. “This epic battle became by tradition one of the most renowned engagements in the long and bloody conquest of Yucatán” (Chamberlain, 1966). The overwhelming victory of Spanish arms at Aké brought immediate results over a wide territory. Not only did the surviving chastened lords of Aké hastened to pledge their allegiance, but as the Spaniards victory came to be known throughout the region, many headmen sent delegates to Montejo seeking peace and friendship. The battle, however, gave the Spaniards a taste of the implacable antagonism that would simmer long into the future. In that future, the spirit of Aké would be kept alive through ceaseless strife.

Montejo remained at Aké long enough to help his wounded soldiers and reap the rewards of his victory. He then moved on to Zizha, a large town about fourteen miles away, where he and his men were well received. Montejo looked for a broad inland stream to access the hinterland from the sea; there were none. In the process, the Spaniards were coldly received, as the paramount chief and his war leaders clearly showed their dislike of the unwelcome foreigners. By this time, Montejo had achieved about all he could with the men he had. He explored a large part of northeastern Yucatán and won the nominal allegiance of a large area. In line with the requerimientos or requirements under Spanish law, if a chief or his representatives gave fealty to a Spanish leader or his captains, the entire district over which he ruled was considered to have passed under Spanish dominion.

Montejo left Loché in mid-1528 with a depleted force and, after a three-week trek, returned to Salamanca de Xelhá on the Caribbean coast, to regroup and resupply. Cogolludo (1688) records that of the 125 men Montejo led on this first incursion, only about seventy-five returned relatively unscathed. The number of men according to Cogolludo and Fernández de Oviedo (1535), seems to be less than was previously recorded in Spanish archives. On arrival at Salamanca de Xhel Há, Montejo found his settlement in desperate straits. Of the forty or so Spaniards he had left there, only twenty-seven were alive, including Talina, while all of those stationed at Polé had been massacred. The entire original force now numbered less than a hundred able men. Thankfully, the support ship was back from Santo Domingo with men, horses, weapons, and supplies. Within a few weeks, Montejo boarded the Nicolasa and sailed south along the coast while Alonso Dávila followed him overland to join him at the Bay of Chetumal.

This first incursion of the Yucatán was followed by the second in late 1532 under the command of Francisco Montejo “the Younger”, who took up the task from his father to   conquer the interior of the peninsula, moving in from the north. From the beginning, his aim was to seize and establish a major Spanish settlement at Chichén Itzá that he would call Ciudad Real. The site was elected for important communities in its vicinity. At first, the Spaniards were welcomed, but within a few years, the Mayas’ hostility increased as the result of abuses by encomenderos, conquistadors who were granted land and people for their services to the crown, and the forced conversion to the Catholic faith. Growing antagonism between Europeans and natives came to a head with the killing of the Maya paramount chief Naabon Cupul during his failed attempt at killing Montejo the Younger. The latent antagonism turned to rage and reached the breaking point when the Maya laid siege to Ciudad Real. The Spaniards took refuge in the more readily defensible  pre-Columbian ruins nearby, a refuge that quickly became a trap. An attempt to break the encirclement cost the Spaniards dearly, with over 150 men killed or captured and sacrificed. While in the past indigenous clans often warred with each other, their failures in battling the foreign foe led to unlikely alliances and, in some cases, to de facto confederation. Unlike in central Mexico with the Aztecs, the peninsula of Yucatán was ruled by seventeen chiefdoms. Cogolludo’s record is again the reference to understand what happened to the besieged Spaniards at Chichén Itzá in 1532:

The situation was dire and getting worse. They had to move out or die in Ciudad Real.  The Indians, however, had a flaw in their fighting order as found at Aké and other encounters, they did not fight at night, why? Because the twelve Lords of the Night, in Xibalba the “place of fright” or underworld Hun Came (One Death) and Vucub Came (Seven Death) in particular, did not like to be disturbed and would not look kindly on the warriors. The Indians knew they could not defy two powerful foes at the same time. The Spaniards, aware of that precept, had to leave at night but they needed to keep the Indians believing that they still were in the compound at sunrise. So, they had a dog tied up with a rope linked to a bell, with food and water several feet away, out of reach. Through the night, the Indians heard the bell they associated with Christian rituals and the dog barking. In the dead of night, the Spaniards abandoned Ciudad Real and headed for the coast about forty miles away, their only salvation route. Early in the morning the Indians realized the ploy and small groups of warriors ran after the fugitives. Short but violent battles broke the indigenous scouts attempt at stopping the Europeans. Exhausted, Montejo with the remnants of his party, safely reached the port of Dzilam.

By 1535, but for the cities of Mérida and Campeche, the Spanish had been driven out of the Yucatán. In a twist of history, however, food became so scarce that the Yucatec warriors lifted their siege of the remaining towns held by the Spaniards because, it is said, flying ants signaled the corn planting season, so they hastened to their corn fields. Ten years later, the 1542-1545 re-conquest of the east and interior of the peninsula kept the Spanish fighting again to pacify the land, to no avail.

Relentless Conflict

The Great Maya Revolt of 1546-1547 was started by a Cupul priest inspired by ancestral divinities led by the exalted priest Chilam Anbal. He set the date for the Great Uprising on the full moon of the night 8-9 November 1546, corresponding to 5-Cimi (death) and 19-Xul (end), in the Maya calendar. Chamberlain reports that “at the appointed time the Mayas of the eastern provinces rose in sudden and overwhelming fury. The carnage and unspeakable cruelty knew no bounds and killed Spaniards of all ages in large numbers together with over 600 naborias, Maya converts to Christianity. The heads, hands and feet of Spaniards were cut and sent throughout the land to incite others to greater fury and ruthless carnage” (1947). Few cities such as Valladolid were barely able to resist the onslaught, but most were on the brink of collapse when Montejo (the Younger), and his captains from Mérida and Campeche, regained control of the provinces that were emptied of Spaniards and mestizos, albeit through years of conflict interspaced with periods of precarious peace. The burden of occupation was far worse for the Maya, however, since they had to endure untold hardships from their new masters, who were dedicated to bend them to a new faith and way of life. Inter-polity warfare before the arrival of the Europeans was endemic and of a brutal nature, however, the natives found common grounds in the face of a new and deadly foe.

In 1567, another Maya prophet, the Chilam Cuoh, preached the supremacy of the ancient ways and prophesied a war of religion around the Spanish settlement of Bacalar (in today’s Quintana Roo). As armed resistance intensified, the Spaniards requested the provincial in Mérida for help in quelling Cuoh’s rebellion. The Chilam was captured in 1569 and sent under armed guard to bishop Fray Francisco de Toral in Mérida, for exemplary punishment. It would take another nineteen years of brutal and bloody conflicts for the Yucatecs to be somewhat pacified. Hostility and defiance at all times simmered close to the surface. But as Farris summarizes, “the conquest may have taken longer were it not for three separate epidemics that took a heavy toll on the Yucatecs, causing the population to fall by half and weakening traditional social structures” (1984). Nonetheless, Chamberlain further notes that “Maya culture, in common with that of other advanced peoples of New Spain, Colombia and Peru, was too ancient, too deeply grounded and too tenaciously conservative to be easily swept to one side” (1947). In Spanish colonial times, the Yucatán and most of New Spain, was set under a legal caste scheme where peninsulares (those born in Spain), were at the top of the social order. Next were the criollos, born in the colonies but of Spanish lineage. At the next level were the mestizos, or creoles of European and indigenous descent; followed by the descendants of the natives who had collaborated with the Spaniards during the conquest. At the bottom of the social system were the “others”, the indios.

Through history, the Maya showed tenacious resistance to Toltec and Spanish invaders. They overcame the hardships of the smallpox epidemic of 1514. Then there was the uprising of Bacalar 1639-1641, followed by the one of 1668-1671 and the rebellion of Jacinto Canek in 1761. The Maya showed no less tenacity during the Caste War of Yucatán (1847-1901), that bloodied the peninsula for 54 years. Central to this unremitting antagonism was the appropriation of socio-economic and political control by the Spaniards and mestizos of Indian and European descent, and their efforts at spiritual domination through conversion.

_______________________________

The Caste War of Yucatan –  ©georgefery.com

_______________________________

The Spaniards were helped in their quest for domination by successive epidemics of infectious diseases. The vector by which they were transmitted was not understood by European science at the time, for germ theory did not begin to take hold until 1854. Local resistance flared up time and again, until it was somewhat tamed after the brutal fifty-four years Caste War of Yucatán (1847-1901). Countless lives were lost on all sides before the Cruzob movement was crushed by the Mexican General Ignacio Bravo, that ended the Caste War on May 5, 1901. General Bravo, on instructions from the government in Mexico City, implemented reforms that stamped out the root causes of Maya rebellion.

______________________________

We shall not kneel. ©georgefery.com

______________________________

 

The history of wars and insurrections in the Yucatán make plain that the indigenous population at large, after three centuries of conflict and hardship, still regarded Spanish and creoles alike, as foreign domination. As Farris’ underline “The Caste War has received its name precisely because it was not a simple peasant rebellion seeking to redress grievances, one that called merely for “bread and land” for The colonial Maya could not escape the reality, which the caste barrier enforced and preserved, of belonging to a group distinct from the unassimilated overlords(2). At the core of this unremitting antagonism was the appropriation of socio-economic and political control by the Spaniards and their efforts at spiritual domination through conversion.

Forced evangelization was unrealistic for the Spaniards had limited resources. Fifty years after the first entrada, there were still not enough evangelists for such a large and diverse population, speaking hundreds of languages in towns and villages, spread out from the dry deserts and canyons of the north to the tropical jungles of the south. Hope for peaceful coexistence lingered among the Maya, but their hopes did not have the same meaning as those of the foreigners, for it was grounded in their ancient religion, their customs and a spirit that did not die with the fierce defenders of their belief, their identity, and their freedom.

______________________________

Image, Top Right: Statue of a Spanish conquistador. ©krasnyniejasny.com

______________________________

Bibliography/References:

Bernardino de Sahagun, 1905 – Historia General de las Cosas de Nueva España.

Carballo, David, M., 2020 – Collision of Worlds

Chamberlain Robert S., 1966 – The conquest and Colonization of Yucatán,

1517-1550

Diego López de Cogolludo (1610), 2006 – Historia de Yucatán

Fray Diego de Landa, 1959 – Relacion de las Cosas de Yucatán

Reed, Nelson, A., 2001 – The Caste War of Yucatán

The Roman Catacombs: The Labyrinthine City of the Dead

1.  You and Camille wrote a brilliant, wide-ranging book, BELOW ROME: THE STORY OF THE CATACOMBS.  You’ve both been to Italy around 100 times.  Are the Roman catacombs on your top ten list?

Rome has been playing host to the world now for nearly 3,000 years. In antiquity, eager visitors from Syria, Egypt, Persia, Mesopotamia, Greece, Libya, Ilyria, the Jewish diaspora and elsewhere in the Mediterranean basin trekked the plethora of roads leading to Rome to see and marvel at the Eternal City’s fabled sights and sites. Today they come from the Americas, from all over Europe, from Scandinavia, from the Baltics, from Asia and Australia and lesser known points of the globe to behold, wide-eyed, the mighty Colosseum, the Forum, the Pantheon, the Spanish Steps, the piazzas, the fountains, the wonders of the Vatican, and whatever else there is on their top-ten list.

But beneath all this unexampled splendor of Rome there sprawls the dark, dank, eerie, labyrinthine, city of the dead    the catacombs.  These are a story apart, a sui generis, terra sacra, which are not merely on any Roman top-ten list, but which constitute a must-see list solely of their own.

2.  Is a hike on the Via Appia the best way to reach the Catacombs? What will one experience along the way?

The catacombs of the Jews and early Christians of Rome were burial grounds of course and, ipso facto, had to abide by the old Extra Muros law which ordered that all burials and entombments had to take place “outside the walls” of the city.

Thus pagans, Jews, and Christians alike placed their cemeteries or mausolea along the sides of the many highways leading out of Rome, such roads as the Via Cassia, the Via Flaminia, the Via Salaria, the Via Latina, the Via Tiburtina and so on.

Two of the most important Christian subterranean cemeteries    the Catacombs of St. Callistus and the Catacomb of St. Sebastian    together with two of the Jewish grounds, are to be found along the fourth century B.C.Via Appia.

A hike on the Appian Road is a never to be forgotten experience. Whether drenched in the soft golden sun of morning or suffused with the ethereal pink light of evening, the old road that leads south from Rome offers a peaceful alternative to the urban din and commotion endlessly taking place within the towering Aurelian Walls.

While the pulsating Eternal City with its countless charms never fails to cast its spell on all visitors, there comes a point in every Roman sojourn when one aches for a brief interlude of monastic quiet and stillness, for the sweet music of silence.

Camille and I learned long ago to satisfy that intermittent urge for a spell of tranquility by taking a long leisurely walk out along the side of that legendary road    its original paving stones still in place in some stretches    that melancholy yet lovely thoroughfare flanked by pagan tombs with their Latin epitaphs, by fragments of statues and columns, by fields of wildflowers, by graceful umbrella pines and stately cypresses, that scenic highway to Capua and beyond.  Can there be any setting quite so beautiful and romantic as the lines of the Campagna Romana with its gentle inclination of its plains stretching out toward the soft contours of the purple Alban Hills?  The scenery delights the eye, the history intrigues the mind, the antiquity stirs the soul, the stillness evokes reverie.

_________________________________

Appian Way, near Casal Rotondo. Livioandronico2013, (CC BY-SA 4.0), Wikimedia Commons

_________________________________

Twenty-three centuries have walked their way to Rome along these very stones,  The vaunted Roman legions would march through here on the way back from yet another triumph in the East. In June of 1944 American troops trod this storied road on their way to liberate Rome.

3.  What does the word “catacomb” mean?  Can you tell us about the catacombs?

The term “catacomb” derives from the Greek words Kata (down) and kymbas (in the hollows), a very appropriate way of expressing how the Roman Jews and early Christians dug “down” to  “hollow” out the subsoil of the countryside beyond the city walls, to provide extensive burial space for their deceased.

A family crypt (cubiculum).

The Christians of first century Rome buried their dead in public graveyards among the bodies of those few pagans who practiced inhumation, instead of the more common custom of cremation. At some point in the second century, however, the city’s Christians, many of whom were converts from Judaism, adopted the Jewish practice of subterranean tunneling for cemeterial purposes. Among all the monuments of the ancient world, the catacombs of Rome are, along with the southern town of Pompeii, the only ones which have survived the vicissitudes of time.  Pompeii, buried in A.D. 79 by an eruption of the volcano Mount Vesuvius, reveals to us the public and private life of the pagan populace of the Roman Empire. The catacombs tell us a great deal of the life and times and customs of the early Christians. All these sites have retained their fascination and attraction for tourists and pilgrims, for scholars and especially archaeologists.

On many tombs in these underground cemeteries we see carved, etched, or painted some of the Christian primitive prayers and symbols, their love of family and fellow believers, their hope for eternal joy, the doctrines that inspired them. We see evidence of the new, rapidly spreading religion for which they riskedand often willingly sacrificed—their lives.

A typical catacomb gallery or tunnel.

In all, there were some sixty or more burial grounds developed on the outskirts of Rome. These were of varying size and capacity, some containing a few hundred bodies, others thousands, and one with as many as 90,000. Many of the catacombs had several levels to them.

The extent of this colossal network of tunnels by Rome’s early disciples of Christ is enormous and in many ways it rendered possible the existence, survival, and propagation of Christianity.  In the past, some archaeologists thought that if the tunnels—more commonly called gallerieswere to be placed end to end in a straight continuous line, they would stretch longer than the boot-shaped peninsula of Italy itself, that is to say about 750 miles. Modern researchers think that the total length of these galleries is more likely about half that.

4.  The Jews have lived a long time in Rome and were the first to construct catacombs there. You mentioned how Julius Caesar recognized Judaism and that in Augustus’ reign eleven synagogues flourished. You mentioned that in Paul’s letter to the Romans, “Paul greets twenty four Jews, eighteen with Greek names, four with names in Latin, two in Hebrew.”  Is it known how and when the Jews first arrived?

The Jewish community in Rome today is known to be the oldest such community in Europe.  Thanks to the historian Josephus, we know that in 161 B.C. Judah Maccabee, the heroic Jewish warrior-statesman, sent a delegation to the Senate there in the hope of negotiating an alliance with Rome. It is thought that some of the diplomats stayed on and from them a small Jewish population took root on the banks of the Tiber. 

An epitaph, in Greek, from a Jewish catacomb.

The following two decades must have seen another influx of Jewish migrants  – probably from Alexandria    for by 139 B.C. they were causing quite a stir.  Valerius Maximus, one of the least known classical Roman writers, tells of a general expulsion of the Jews in that year. The praetor Hispanus issued a decree banning them from Rome and from all of Italy, charging them with “aggressive proselytizing,” thereby undermining public worship of the pagan dieties.  Apparently the ban by Hispanus was of short duration, for by the turn of the century Jews constituted ten percent of the city’s teeming population.  By now, there were immigrants from the major Jewish centers of Asia Minor, the Land of Israel, Syria, Libya, Egypt and Greece.

In Jewish catacombs of that period, there are gravestones attesting to this diaspora. One mentions a Jew from Catania in Sicily, which was part of the Hellenization of southern Italy, or Magna Graecia. Another inscription honors a Jew from Numidia. A third mentions one from Rhodes.

Conditions improved greatly for Rome’s Jews when Julius Caesar came to power. He granted official recognition to Judaism as a legal religion, a policy followed by his successor, Caesar Augustus. So close did the Jews hold Caesar in their hearts that when he fell to the knives of Brutus and his co-conspirators they mourned his death in their week-long ancient rite of shivah. 

5.  So the Egyptians, Jews, and Christians wanted the body intact? But the Greeks and Romans cremated the body, right?  I recall, for example, that you explained the word “cemetery,” which has Greek roots.

The Greek word coemeterion—“sleeping place”—implies that such land is designated as a burial gravesite and originally applied to the Roman catacombs. The word “catacomb” came into usage in the early Middle Ages as the generic term for all below ground graveyards. Up until then the Christians and the Jews referred to them as cemeteria subterranea.  One does not need much knowledge of Latin to translate that phrase.

As far as the Christians were concerned, trusting in their religion’s promise of a “resurrection,” the deceased were not finished with life but merely “asleep” and waiting peacefully to be transferred to an eternal destination, one filled with joy.

6.  How do you think the Egyptian afterlife (or others if you wish) differed from the Christian afterlife? The worship of Isis loomed large in Rome as Christianity was growing as well.

In Greek mythology the spirits of the dead would cross over the River Styx into the lower world called Hades. There the departed were doomed to an eternity of gloom and horror and dread, with zero prospect of ever escaping. One could only hope that upon dying, he or she would be deemed worthy of admission into an area of the lower world called the Eylisian Fields, a kind of paradise-like final resting place reserved for the heroic and the pure. The Romans’ prospects for an afterlife final resting place, in many ways corresponded to all this.

The ancient Eyptians’ view of death was that an afterlife most assuredly awaited, a rather pleasant one. Like the Christians, they were convinced of immortality and that death was not the cessation of life but rather a temporary phase. Thus the custom of mummification evolved which would preserve the body so that the soul could be soon re-infused into it upon reaching the other world.

Some of the entombment practices could remind one of the early Christian traditions. The bereaved Egyptian family would place, outside the burial chamber, household equipment and daily necessities of food and drink in the new life.

Inscriptions including traditional prayers and invocations were carved on the exterior in order to comfort, encourage, and assist the departed en route to the hereafter. Here again is additional similarity to Christian entombment rites. In place of the Egyptian provisions of food and drink, the Christian bereaved families would hold immediately after the funeral and entombment, on site in the catacombs, a light meal called a refrigerium to commemorate their loved one’s life.  Today’s custom of a repast derives from that tradition.

Soon after the crypt was sealed, an epitaph would be etched into or painted on it and sometimes a brief prayer or even an invoking of the intercession of the martyrs and saints, especially Peter and Paul.

7.  Do you see some common ground between Christianity and religion in ancient Egypt?

If one chose to, he or she could find some common characteristics between early Christianity and the cult of Isis.

Although in the Pauline view of Christianity, God was a male and Isis was a female, both religions worshiped a redeemer, a savior divinity. Isis was a savior goddess. Jesus was the Christian savior.  Another conspicuous similarity between the two faiths is that both offered a one-on-one relationship with a deity, regardless of the background or status of the devotee. In both cults, penitents sought the cleansing of the guilt of their sins.

Both religious were particularly popular with the lower classes. Both offered magnificently solemn rituals that the believers could participate in. There may have been Isiac influence also on Christian iconography. For example, in art, Isis was frequently portrayed in a maternal pose, wearing a crown and holding lovingly in her arms her divine child, Horus.  The Virgin Mary, haloed, is widely presented in catacomb frescoes holding her divine child Jesus.

The Egyptian religions erected imposing temples to their gods. The Egyptian cults were banished by Tiberius but publicly welcomed back to the Roman world by Caligula. And the Temple of Isis in Rome which was destroyed by fire in A.D. 80 was rebuilt by order of Domitian with a luxury and splendor still testified to in our day by two obelisks that once flanked the temple entrance and now serve as centerpieces for Roman piazzas, one in the square fronting the Pantheon, the other just a short distance away in Piazza Minerva.

As for the Christians, architecturally speaking, they had to wait for the liberating Edict of Milan by Constantine to erect such imposing temples as St. Peter’s Basilica in the Vatican, St. Paul’s Outside the Walls, and great Romanesque churches.

Of course, after all this, it must be said that there were many extreme dissimilarities between the two religions, as well. For example, the Isian religion, in most un-Christian fashion, was one of Mystery initiation. In the mid-second century A.D. the African barrister Lucivs Apuleius, himself an initiate of the Mysteries of Isis, wrote The Golden Ass, an entertaining allegorical tale of one man’s conversion from materialistic desire symbolized by his metamorphosis into an ass and accompanying bawdy adventures to the state of pure service of the sublime Goddess. The simple sacrament of Baptism admitted an aspirant into the Christian faith.

8.  Can you tell us about Jesus’ burial in the tomb at Golgotha? And how does this connect to the practice of burial in Roman catacombs?

According to all four canonical gospel accounts, Jesus was placed in a tomb by a councilor of the Sanhedrin named Joseph of Arimathea before the eve of the sabbath. Jewish tradition forbade burial within the walls of a city, so the tomb must have been just outside one of the gates of Jerusalem, likely near to the site of the crucifixion, i.e. the hill called Calvary (from the Latin word calva, “baldhead” or “skull,” and also referred to as the dreaded and ugly Golgotha, from the Aramaic word for “skull”).

When Jesus finally expired after three hours of agony on the cross, Joseph, a devoted disciple of Jesus, a fact he kept secret out of fear of the Jewish authorities, went to the office of Pontius Pilate, the governor of the Roman province of Judaea, and sought permission to remove the body. Permission was granted.

With the help of a certain Nicodemus, the body was taken down and placed in a tomb cut in the cave rock. (All we know about Nicodemus on a personal level is from the Gospel of John (3:1) where he is described as a Pharisee.)  Before placing the body on a limestone shelf or burial bed that was hewn from the wall of the tomb, the two volunteers wrapped it in linen cloth. John tells us that they “wrapped the body with spices in strips of linen”.  In accordance with Jewish burial customs, spices were always applied to ward off odors and to pay homage to the deceased.  Matthew says that after this, Joseph “rolled a huge stone in front of the entrance and went away.”

In their burial procedures down in the catacombs the early Christians emulated the entombment of Jesus in several ways. To receive the body they would carve out a niche (in Latin, loculus) in the wall of a gallery and after applying spices to the body they would clothe it with linen and lay it to rest.The aperture of the loculus would then be closed with brick, terra cotta tiles, or–if a family could afford it–a slab of polished marble.Whatever material was used was sealed air-tight by an outline of mortar, much the same way that putty is used to keep a window pane in place. So completely were the loculi sealed that there was never an offensive odor to contend with in the galleries.Small objects such as coins, bits of colored porcelain, or pieces of glass were at times pushed into the fresh mortar to serve as a means of identification.

______________________________

A high-end example of loculi: Valleys of Jehoshaphat and Hinnom [Jerusalem]. Loculi in Absalom’s pillar. Public Domain, Wikimedia Commons

______________________________

9.  What are some of the high points in the Christian story as to how Christianity spread from Judea?

Some of the early Christians of Rome had been among the soldiers of the cohort, commanded by a certain Cornelius, stationed in Palestine where they had heard the doctrines of the new faith from the lips of the apostles themselves and, excited by what they learned, asked to be baptized. Also, a delegation of Roman Jews had been at the time on a pilgrimage to the Great Temple in Jerusalem around the time of the first Pentecost, when the apostles took to the streets and squares and by-ways to preach the Gospel. Liking what they heard, they too embraced the tenets of Christianity and soon embarked for Rome.

Upon their return to the imperial capital all these recent converts zealously proselytized among friends, neighbors, and kin. We surmise all this from Acts, Chapter 2:

”When the day of Pentecost had come, they were all together in one place…Now there were staying in Jerusalem Jews, devout men from every nation under Heaven…and there were even visitors from Rome, both Jews and proselytes”

Even Jews from Rome! The phrase seems to leap from the page with astonishment.

Thus a small but devout community of Christians took root in the Eternal City. At first, the Christians were all regarded by the civil authorities as a harmless sect professing a foreign malignant superstition.

10.  Can you characterize early Christians? You mentioned that even emperor Julian thought it was their kindness and love that helped Christianity spread.

One German historian, F. Uhlhorn claims that “before the coming of Christ the world was devoid of love”.  This statement may be an exaggeration but nevertheless it points out the powerful impact Christianity had on the world and the attraction it held right from the start for people of every walk of life, of every rank and economic status, of both genders, of every national origin. 

What struck the pagans most about the Christians in their midst was how they loved one another. How united they were, the support they extended to one another, how they shared their material goods with one another. The Roman authorities came to realize, too, by the second century that the appeal of Christianity was the conduct of its followers, how they were genuinely concerned for the welfare of not only their fellow believers, but also for complete strangers, for forgiveness, for the poor, the homeless, and the sick, for widows and orphans, for the sad and lonely, for the victims of cruelty and injustice, and especially for the dead. The philosophy of the Christian community seemed to be summed up in two words: Love and Charity.

Pagans, when they observed the customs and behavior of the Christians, were often heard to say, in astonishment: “Look how they love one another!” Christianity brought with it to Rome a new attitude, a new view as to what makes for a meaningful life, and that is: to do good for others. The Apostle James’ words on this subject were often quoted by priests in the early Church:

“My brothers and sisters, what good is it to profess faith without practicing it? Such faith has no power to save one, has it: If a brother or sister has nothing to wear and no food for the day, and you say to them;‘Good bye and good luck! Keep warm and eat well but do not meet their bodily needs, what good is that’. Such faith is thoroughly lifeless.”

James joined religion to action: service to God and to humanity.

Christians considered themselves as members of one family. This was so not only in Rome but throughout the cities, towns, and villages throughout the Empire. The faithful made it a point to get to know one another and call one another by their baptismal names. Every bishop felt obliged to get to know every member of his flock and determine the most needy among it. A fellow Christian passing through was welcome to join in a liturgical assembly.

The Emperor Julian (331-353) attributed the expansion of Christianity to all these kindnesses and especially the Church’s commitment to love and respect for the dead, ensuring a decent burial for all.

Indeed, Christians would go looking for bodies left unburried, especially in cities along the coast where victims of shipwrecks might be found scattered along the sands. The faithful, on such an occasion, would wash the body, dress it in fresh garments, then inter it nearby.

11. During various purges the Romans killed Christians. Roman authorities also made it possible for Christians to go free. There are many examples of saints, popes, and others (such as Apollonius) who chose to die rather than repudiate Christianity.

The historian Tacitus confirms that the first persecution – or purge    of the Christians was by the infamous emperor Nero, widely suspected of the fire of A.D. 64:

“In order to stifle the rumor that he had himself set Rome on fire, Nero falsely charged with the guilt and punished with the most fearful tortures the persons commonly called Christians … In their very deaths they were made the subject of sport, for they were covered with the hides of wild beasts and hounded to death by dogs, or nailed to crosses, or set fire to.”

Over the next two and a half-centuries the persecutions of the Christians waxed and waned with varying degrees of intensity and savagery. Some emperors took a tolerant view of them and their religious practices, while others, like Decius and Diocletian and Valerian, rounded them up for slaughter.

Trajan (98-117) is a good example of the more benign Roman rulers. We know for certain that by his time the Christian religion had been firmly established in most of the provinces of the Roman Empire, even though Nero’s decree banning the practice of the cult, under penalty of death, was still on the books.

In the year 111 Pliny the Younger, serving as the provincial governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor, wrote to his friend and boss, the Emperor Trajan, to express alarm at the vast multitude of Christians in his territory:

“The contagion of the Christian superstition is no longer confined  to the cities. It has even invaded the villages and countryside and has seized upon people of every age, class, rank, and gender. Our temples are almost completely abandoned and the sacred rites honoring our gods utterly neglected.”

Well-bred and highly educated, Pliny was a true gentleman and surely anything but blood thirsty. He was simply concerned about the unrest of the pagan majority that this state of affairs was provoking, and looking for the emperor’s help in coming up with a peaceful and humane solution.

Trajan, a refined and erudite individual himself, wrote back that while he could not abnegate the laws still in effect that forbade the practice of Christianity, he too was most reluctant to crack down on its followers. So he toned down the law to eliminate some of its severity. He stated that anonymous charges against them must be completely disregarded, that if any one of them was caught taking part in Christian rituals he or she must be arrested but given three chances to acquit themselves by venerating the effigies of the pagan divinities and renouncing Christ. In so doing, the accused was to be set free. Above all, the emperor firmly stated, “Christiani non conquirendi sunt!” (There must be no round-ups of Christians!)

Despite the earnest efforts of the two leaders, however, many Christians were arrested and many, if not most, refused to pay homage to the deities of the Roman world and denounce their lord and consequently were put to death. St. Apollonius the Apologist was among those martyred.

So while each Christian arrested faced death, the alternative was so very easy; if he or she would only yield to the invitation and temptation to apostasy extended to them, they would then be released on their own recognizance.

12.  Were the catacombs sacred ground?  Did the Roman authorities respect it?  You mentioned the concept of “violatio sepulchri.”

The Christians looked upon the subterranean burial grounds as truly sacred ground—terra sacra—for a number of reasons; The human body remains sacred always, even in death, they believed. Furthermore, among the great numbers of Christians buried in the catacombsmany of them—in the thousands—were martyrs for the faith who, the belief was, were surely in heaven—that is, they were saints. Their bodies alone hallowed the site. And a great many of the early popes chose to be entombed there.

The Roman authorities respected greatly every burial site be it pagan, Jewish, Christian or other. Even during the most ferocious persecutions on the part of the state, the Christian cemeteries enjoyed the protection of a law called Violatio Sepulchri, which forbade the desecration of any graveyard, tomb, mausoleum, and such.

13.  Was the Cypress a symbol and tree of life in the catacombs?  What other symbols and objects were important. What about graffiti?

In classical antiquity the cypress, particularly among the Etruscans, was a symbol of mourning and in the modern era it remains the principal cemetery tree in both the Muslim world and Europe. In the classical tradition, the cypress was associated with death and the underworld because it failed to regenerate when cut back too severely.

Since it is evergreen, the Christian view it as a symbol of everlasting life. Furthermore, a true Christian, it is said, believes that life begins when he or she dies.

Other symbols in the catacombs include the Fish, for the five letters that make up the Greek word ictus served as the initials for this prayer: Jesus Christ Son of God, Savior.

Also the monogram of Christ composed of two Greek letters  – chi and rho – intertwined.

Two early Christian symbols – Alpha and Omega, and the anchor.

The alpha and omega, the first and last letters of the Greek alphabet signifying Christ as the beginning and end of all things.

The anchor, symbolizing the safe arrival of the soul at the harbor of eternity.

The phoenix, symbol of the Resurrection.

And lastly the dove and the olive branch, a symbol of the soul which flies in the peace of God..

As for graffiti, a custom evolved among the pilgrims to the catacombs in the early Middle Ages to etch in messages on the walls of the galleries to document their visit and perhaps a short prayer or invocation of a martyr’s intercession.

 

 

14.   Aside from burial, what were the other uses of the catacombs?

Contrary to a widespread notion, the Christian cemeteries were not secret hiding places. The civil authorities knew very well of all these sites. The idea that the Christians took refuge or even lived for long periods of time down in the catacombs is entirely without merit. The cold and dampness of these dark tunnels    even in summer    could not be tolerated for any extended time.

One additional use besides burial, though, was for family visits to the graves of their loved ones. Another was for liturgical celebrations. Masses were occasionally offered, especially on the memorial days of the martyrs.

When Pope Paul VI was the young monsignor Giovanni Montini in the 1930’s, he was spiritual advisor and chaplain to the Roman branch of FUCI (the Italian Federation of University Students), a group not looked upon kindly by the Mussolini regime and often set upon by Fascist thugs, sometimes necessitating meetings to be held in one or another catacomb site.

15.  Constantine defeated Maxentius  – and it’s total change. Can you explain the Edict of Milan and the changes that took place afterwards?

According to an interview he years later gave to the Church historian Eusebius, Constantine on the eve of battle in 312 with the forces of the Emperor Maxentius, and encamped on the far side of the Milvian Bridge, saw a shining cross in the sky encircled by the words: “In hoc signo vinces,” (In this sign thou shalt conquer). Not knowing what to make of it, he instructed his soldiers to paint crosses on their shields and helmets and to replace the eagle on the army’s standard with a cross. The following day he crushed Maxentius and his legions and afterwards credited the Christians’ God for his triumph.

Soon Constantine began to pave the way for the beleaguered Christianity to become the official state religion. Just when be became a Christian at heart is open to discussion but he must have supported the idea of a Christian state early in his reign, for in 313 he and Licinius, the emperor of the eastern portion of the Empire, met in the northern city of Milan and thence proclaimed the historic Edict of Milan affording the Christians complete freedom of worship.

This action was followed by more and more privileges and even grants of state property.  To Pope Miltiades he gave the Lateran tract of land in the southwest corner of Rome, just inside the Aurelian Walls. This property had belonged in the first century to the nobleman Plautus Lateranus, who was part of a conspiracy to assassinate Nero. The plot was uncovered, the conspirators arrested, and their estates confiscated. On this location, Constantine urged the Bishop of Rome to erect his personal church, i.e. his cathedral. Completed around 326, the cathedral was named for the Savior. Some centuries later it was renamed for the two St. Johns, the Baptist and the Evangelist, and ever since has been called the Basilica of St. John Laterano.  To this day it remains the cathedral of Rome.

Constantine also commissioned the building of a basilica over the grave of St. Peter in the Vatican meadows, which was also heretofore state property, and another over the grave of St. Paul, outside the walls on the Via Ostiense.

16. Can you mention the life and death of Saint Peter and Paul, Sebastian, Agnes and others that are of great importance? Where were they interred?

In the year 67 the apostle Peter, the first bishop of Rome, was crucified in the Circus, i.e. race course, of Nero across the Tiber. His remains were claimed by his followers and laid to rest in a cemetery adjacent to the stadium in an area called Ager Vaticanus—the Vatican Meadows. That same fateful day, tradition says, Paul was taken by a small execution squad to a spot along the road to the seaport of Ostia and decapitated. Another group of Christians saw to it that he received a proper burial in a nearby necropolis. The final resting place of both leaders of the Christian community were marked and became sites of daily veneration by the faithful. When Constantine came to power in 312 and issued his Edict of Milan the following year, he ordered a great basilica to be built over each grave.

The two apostles’ connection with the catacombs is due to stories that have been passed on down through the centuries. When word of the apostles’ death and burial reached the Eastern churches, a delegation of their members journeyed to Rome on a mission to exhume the saints’ relics and bring them back to the land where the two holy men had begun their evangelical work.

Hearing of the plan, the Roman Christians secretly transferred the bodies to the cemeterium ad catacumbas which would in later times be called the Catacomb of St. Sebastian.

There the precious bones lay for a year and seven months, causing the brethren to refer to the site as the Memoria Apostolorum. After this stretch of time the bodies were taken back to their original places of sepulture which once again became focal points of pilgrimage.

Sebastian was an officer in the Roman army with the prestigious rank, Tribune of the First Praetorian Cohert. With the persecution of Christians under Valerian raging in the mid third century, Sebastian courageously stood up to the tyrant and did everything he could to save Christians and to ease their sufferings. Daily he would smuggle food and clothing to the imprisoned and find places of refuge for those being sought by the authorities. He then became a convert.

When Valerian learned of all this he flew into a rage and had the humanitarian officer executed.  The martyred Sebastian was laid to rest in the subterranean cemetery ad catacumbas, which would soon be renamed for him.

Agnes was a lovely girl just twelve years old when she gave her life for the faith under the murderous regime of Diocletian in 304. Her martyrdom deeply moved the community of believers, and ecclesiastical writers across the centuries since have portrayed her as the symbol of youthful purity and the patron saint of young girls. She lies in eternal repose in the catacomb subsequently named for her, outside the walls along the Via Nomentana.

Cecilia was a pious teen-aged daughter of an affluent Christian family.  A devout Christian from childhood, the much beloved young woman was sentenced to death by the executioner’s axe. Roman law stipulated that if a condemned person were to survive three blows of the axe, he or she was to be set free. Cecilia, severely wounded, nonetheless came through the ordeal alive.  For several days she lingered, blood oozing from the deep neck wound. As she lay dying she would occasionally come out of her coma. In these few lucid moments she would softly sing hymns to Christ. (For this reason she came to be the patron saint of music.)  Upon her passing, Cecilia was placed in a crypt in the Catacombs of St. Callistus.

These are but five saints of a great number who are associated in some way with the catacombs.

17.  Can you tell us about the most famous catacombs, especially the one with the nine popes?

The most renowned of all the subterranean Christian cemeteries, in my view, would be the Catacombs of Saint Callistus for its cappella dei papi, chapel of the popes. In this small chamber down on the first level of graves were buried nine of the early popes: Pontianus, Anterus, Fabianus, Lucius, Stephen, SixtusII, Dionysius, Felix and Eutichianus.

Other prominently known burial grounds are the Catacomb of St. Sebastian on the ancient Appian Way; the Catacomb of St. Domitilla on the Via delle Sette Chiese; the Catacomb of St. Agnes on the Via Nomentana; and the Catacomb of Priscilla out on the old salt road, the Via Salaria.

__________________________________

Catacomb(s) of Callixtus, The Crypt of the Popes. Dnalor 01, (CC BY-SA 3.0), Wikimedia Commons

__________________________________

The loculus of Pontianus in the Chapel of the Popes.

__________________________________

18.  You brought out the personality and spirit of the early popes, such as Damasus who loved poetry and put great effort into safeguarding the catacombs. Can you tell us about some of the early popes?

In the Catholic tradition, St. Peter was the first Bishop of Rome. The word pope came into use some time in the next century. It is the anglicized form of the Greek word papa or father. Early on every bishop throughout the Christian world was addressed by this affectionate term, but it was not long before it was reserved strictly for the Bishop of Rome. It is easy to see that the Greek form gives us our words papal and papacy.

Pope Linus succeeded Peter and began and completed his reign in the same ugly climate that caused the brutal end of his predecessor. He too was martyred.

Cletus succeeded Linus. During his pontificate he divided the city of Rome into twenty-five parishes.

Clement, the third successor of St. Peter and hence the fourth pope, is best known for his letter known as I Clement, the most important first century Christian Document outside the New Testament. It was treated by some in the ancient Church as if it were in fact part of the New Testament canon. Clement, we know too, lived a few blocks down from the newly built Flavian Amphitheater which the world prefers to call “The Colosseum”, and that he allowed his home to be used as a domus ecclesiae, house church. It still exists.

19.  So war, bandits. and disease caused the catacombs to be sealed off. Around when did that happen? Which catacombs remained opened? And which ones had to be rediscovered? Is the situation with the catacombs like Pompeii with more things waiting to be uncovered?

The peacetime of Christians and indeed of all inhabitants of Rome was shattered at the onset of the fifth century. In 408, Alaric and his West Goths laid siege to Rome and in 410 breached the walls and ravaged and plundered the city. This would be the first of many invasions to come.

Sometimes the rampagers even looted, desecrated, and damaged the catacombs across the following centuries.

The year 750 brought the unwelcome Aistulf and his Lombards. After sacking Rome, the invaders fanned out across the campagna seeking accesses to every underground cemetery to gain whatever they thought could be of any value, particularly the remains of martyrs. They carted away countless saintly relics for which there was a busy market across Christian Europe.  It seems that bishops, abbots, and pastors hoping to lend more prestige to their cathedrals, their monasteries, their churches by being able to claim that the moral remains of a martyr were reposing beneath their altars  – were the most eager customers.

These outrages left the catacombs in a state of devastation and now for the most part pilgrimages stopped and the catacombs fell into utter ruin and decay. The one one of these holy sites to remain known and occasionally visited during the long dreary Middle Ages was that of St. Sebastian. And in time this site too, was forsaken and forgotten.

In the autumn of 1578, however, something occurred just outside the ancient brick walls of Rome, along the Via Salaria, that precipitated a wave of excitement that washed over the Eternal City and ultimately paved the way for Christians ever after to examine, close up, their religious roots. It was at that time that workers digging for pozzolana in the fields of the lovely and serene Roman countryside were daily and accidentally coming upon entrances and light shafts  – for long centuries concealed from view    that led down to a subterranean cemetery of the earliest Christians. (This was later determined to be the Catacombs of St. Priscilla.)

Like Pompeii and Herculaneum, the Roman catacombs have troves of treasures waiting to be brought to light.

20.  In times past, it might have been easy to get lost down there in the catacombs, right?  It’s like any huge, dark winding space. I was there some years ago. I recall that you mentioned visits by St. Jerome (as a child), Goethe, Charles Dickens and others.

Some catacombs go as far as five levels deep into the subsoil. When all the burial space of the original corridor was used up, another would be excavated at a right angle to it, and when that was filled still another gallery was dug and then another and another and so on, resulting ultimately in a complex and confusing network of intersecting tunnels    a virtual labyrinth.

When all the available space on that first level was exhausted, the fossores, i.e. grave diggers, would break through the floor and bore a shaft down further into the soil and start a second level of tunnels beneath the original.  In some catacombs there are as many as five levels, reaching in all a depth of seventy feet or more below the surface.  Thus the farther down one goes, the newer the graves will be.

When the Jews and early Christians descended into one of these cemeteries for a funeral or a visit to the final resting place of a dear one, they needed the services of a guide who had an expert familiarity with the maze. It was indeed easy and most perilous to get lost in the jumble of passage ways. Even in our time, visitors to these depths are exhorted to “stay close to your guide”.

In Goethe’s time in Rome, 1788, of course there was still no electric lighting. Visitors had to trudge along the solemn subterranean passages accompanied by a well-versed guide, all holding burning candles to illuminate their way. The German poet and dramatist had this to say about his experience: “My visit to the catacomb, however, was not much of a success. I had hardly taken a step into that airless and foreboding place before I began to feel uncomfortable and insecure, and I immediately returned to the light of day and the fresh air and waited, in that unknown and remote corner of the city, for the return of the others.”

_________________________________

A Procession in the Catacomb of Callistus. Painting by Alberto Pisa. Public Domain, Wikimedia Commons

_________________________________

Charles Dickens’ reaction was similar: “A giant friar with a wild bright eye, was our only guide down into this profound and dreadful place. The narrow ways and openings, hither and thither, coupled with the dead and heavy air, soon blotted out, in all of us, any recollection of the route by which we had come; and I could not help thinking, ‘Good Heaven, if in a sudden fit of madness, he should dash the torches out, or if he should be seized with a spell, what would become of us!’”

My family and I can readily relate to Dickens’ alarm at the awful possibilities. One evening in the summer of 1970, after public visiting hours, a guide at the Catacombs of St. Calisstus, Joseph Mascarenhas, a religious brother in the Salesian order which manages that cemetery and was by now a dear family friend, took us down deep into the third and fourth levels    only the first and second are accessible to the public. I was doing research as a Fulbright Scholar at the American Academy in Rome on the Greek and Latin epitaphs of the catacombs and Brother Joe wished to afford me the rare privilege of copying and translating those on the lower levels. Our only illumination was Brother Joe’s lantern. After our ascent to the surface I learned that my wife Camille and our little sons, Frank, Ronald, and John  – had been having the same thought as Dickens: “If anything happens to Brother Joe what will become of us?!”

21.  Can you tell us about those archeologists of the catacombs. Antonio Bosio and Giovanni Battista De Rossi?

An enormous debt of gratitude for the reemergence of the catacomb sites after their long hiatus in the Middle Ages is due to a young man with a keen intellect and an unquenchable curiosity, Antonio Bosio (1575-1629). Born on the island of Malta, he was early on sent to Rome to live with an uncle who happened to be that island nation’s ambassador to the Holy See. Scholarly by nature, he pursued studies in literature, philosophy, and law at the University of Rome.

His heart and thoughts, however, were elsewhere. He could not get his mind off the wonders of his Christian heritage waiting to be explored deep beneath the earth. At age 18 he gave up his studies to devote himself full-time to systematically probing the galleries of the newly rediscovered cemetery of St. Priscilla and to poring over tomes of early Christian literature and the Acts of the Martyrs in an effort to learn the locations of other catacombs on the outskirts of Rome in every direction.

He would set out for places indicated in these sources and scour the land for hidden entrance shafts. He kept voluminous notes on his findings, made sketches of the galleries, loculi and cubicula (small chambers), translated Latin and Greek epitaphs into Italian. His magnum opus, Roma Sotteranea, was published in 1632, three years after his passing. Bosio came to be called, “The Columbus of the Catacombs”.

Some two centuries later another genius comes along who was destined to be a second Bosio.  Giovanni Battista De Rossi, a twenty three-year-old Roman recently graduated from the university with a major in archaeology, had a particular interest in the subterranean cemeteries of the early Christians.

On a sultry summer afternoon of 1844, he and his kid brother Michele, aged ten, walking through a vineyard that lay between the Via Appia and the Via Ardeatina just outside the city walls, came upon a pile of fragments of polished marble neatly engraved with Latin words.  Giovanni asks the landowner for permission to gather the chunks and take them home.  Thinking the objects worthless, the owner readily concedes.

Back home, after weeks of jigsawing the pieces and their engraved words together, De Rossi excitedly concludes that they are from epitaphs of the catacomb name for St. Callistus, an early pope, the whereabouts of which had still been unknown since the Middle Ages but about which Giovanni had heard and read in his student days.

He devoted the rest of his life to bringing to light and restoring order to what is today considered the major and largest catacomb of them all, St. Callistus.

22.  Do you have any favorite movies that depict Roman catacombs or any Roman ruins?  Do you have a favorite quote from Christianity?

I am not aware of any Hollywood production that covers, in even the slightest way, the Roman catacombs. There may exist some television documentaries on them. Perhaps Channel EWTN, a Catholic outlet would be worth checking.

For a quote on Christianity, I have always favored one by Benjamin Franklin. While the word itself is not mentioned, the allusion is crystal clear:

“As to Jesus of Nazareth, I think the system of morals and his religion as he left them to us, is the best the world ever saw, or is likely to ever see.”

Ah Rome.  Eternal Rome.  How Camille and I never cease to wonder at the wonder of it all.

_______________________________

Note: The fascinating and informative book,  Below Rome: The Story of the Catacombs, by Frank and Camille Korn is available at Amazon.

_______________________________

About the interviewer

As a child, Richard Marranca was given books on history, myth and religion that ignited his interests. When he was seven, he went with his mom, grandmother and aunt to Italy and Switzerland – a trip that lasted a lifetime. During his doctoral studies at New York University, he spent a semester in Greece with a side project in Egypt. Around the midpoint of his career, he also was awarded a Fulbright to teach at LMU Munich (and for two years was president of NJ Fulbright chapter), as well as six NEH summer seminars, including Andean Worlds in Peru/Bolivia; Concord MA; and High Plains Indians of Nebraska.

For Richard, teaching and writing go together; he teaches a variety of humanities and English courses. His most recent publications include stories in Coneflower Café, The Raven’s Perch and Months to Years Magazine; interviews in Popular Archaeology and Minerva; and poetry in the Paterson Literary Review. His manuscript, Speaking of the Dead, has been accepted for publication by Blydyn Square Books in NJ.

The latest project: His wife Renah, daughter Hera and Richard create videos, the latest being Childe Hera’s World on YouTube; so far it’s mostly travel videos, but this year the highlight was Coronavirus, A Child’s View.

His story, Affirmative Action, published in Coneflower Review, was recently nominated for a Pushcart Prize.

Richard wishes to thank his wife Renah and Bridget Briant for their help with this interview.

_______________________________

Advertisement

Rare Roman wooden figure uncovered by HS2 archaeologists in Buckinghamshire

An early Roman rare wooden carved figure has been discovered during work on the HS2 project. In July 2021, archaeologists from Infra Archaeology, working for HS2’s contractor Fusion JV, removed the well-preserved figure from a water-logged Roman ditch in a field in Twyford, Buckinghamshire.

As they were investigating at Three Bridge Mill, the team came across what they initially thought was a degraded piece of wood. As they continued to excavate it a humanlike, or anthropomorphic, figure was revealed. The figure, cut from a single piece of wood, stands at 67cm tall and is 18cm wide.

Initial assessment dates the wooden figure to the early Roman period, given the style of the carving and the tunic-like clothing. Shards of pottery dating from 43-70 AD were also discovered in the same ditch. Whilst archaeologists cannot be certain about what the carved figure was used for, there have been examples of wooden carved images being offered as gifts to the gods. It is possible that rather than being casually discarded in the ditch it was more deliberately placed there.

Given its predicted age and being carved from wood, what is most surprising is the incredible preservation of the artifact. The lack of oxygen in the water-logged clay fill of the ditch has helped prevent the wood from rotting, thus preserving it for centuries.

Speaking about the incredible discovery, Iain Williamson, Archaeologist for Fusion JV said:

“The amazing discovery of this wooden figure was totally unexpected, and the team did a great job of recovering it intact. The preservation of details carved into the wood such as the hair and tunic really start to bring the individual depicted to life. Not only is the survival of a wooden figure like this extremely rare for the Roman period in Britain, but it also raises new questions about this site: who does the wooden figure represent, what was it used for and why was it significant to the people living in this part of Buckinghamshire during the 1st century AD?” 

Whilst the figure is in good condition given its age, the arms below the elbows and feet have degraded. A surprising amount of detail remains visible in the carving with the figure’s hat or hairstyle clearly noticeable. The head is slightly rotated to the left, the tunic at the front seems to be gathered at the waist going down to above knee level, and the legs and shape of the calf muscles are well defined.  

The figure is currently being preserved by York Archaeology’s conservation team at their specialist laboratory where it will undergo examination and conservation. A small fragment from the figure, found broken off in the ditch, is being sent for radiocarbon dating to provide an accurate date for the wood, and stable isotope analysis is being undertaken, which may indicate where the wood originally came from.

Helen Wass, Head of Heritage at HS2 Ltd, said:

“Our unprecedented archaeology programme on Phase One of the HS2 project between London and Birmingham has provided us with a great wealth of new information about our past. In Buckinghamshire, our careful work has enabled us to build a much greater understanding of how the landscape was used by our ancestors, especially during the Roman period, and is brought to life further through incredible artefacts like this figure. We are committed to sharing our findings with communities and the public, to deepen our understanding of Britain’s history.”

The occurrence of carved, wooden figures in British prehistory and the Romano-British period is extremely rare.  In 2019 a wooden limb, thought to be a Roman votive offering, was found at the bottom of a well in Northampton. Examples of full Roman carved figures have been recovered in Dijon and Chamalières in France. A wooden carving, the ‘Dagenham Idol’, was recovered from the north bank of the Thames is 1922 and has been dated back to the Neolithic period and an early Iron Age carved figure was recovered from the banks of the River Teign, Kingsteignton in 1866.

Jim Williams, Senior Science Advisor for Historic England, said:

“This is a truly remarkable find which brings us face to face with our past. The quality of the carving is exquisite and the figure is all the more exciting because organic objects from this period rarely survive. This discovery helps us to imagine what other wooden, plant or animal-based art and sculpture may have been created at this time. Further analysis has the potential to reveal more detail, perhaps even providing clues about where it was made.”

This incredible rare find features in the new BBC Digging for Britain series, hosted by Professor Alice Roberts. The episode featuring the Roman wooden figure will air on BBC Two on Thursday 13th January at 8pm.

_______________________________

Carved wooden figure recovered by HS2 archaeologists in Buckinghamshire. Courtesy HS2 Ltd

_______________________________

Roman Carved Wooden Figure uncovered by HS2 archaeologists in Buckinghamshire undergoing conservation. Courtesy HS2 Ltd

_______________________________

Article Source: HS2 Ltd news release

_______________________________

Advertisement

Earliest human remains in eastern Africa dated to more than 230,000 years ago

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE—The age of the oldest fossils in eastern Africa widely recognized as representing our species, Homo sapiens, has long been uncertain. Now, dating of a massive volcanic eruption in Ethiopia reveals they are much older than previously thought.

The remains – known as Omo I – were found in Ethiopia in the late 1960s, and scientists have been attempting to date them precisely ever since, by using the chemical fingerprints of volcanic ash layers found above and below the sediments in which the fossils were found.

An international team of scientists, led by the University of Cambridge, has reassessed the age of the Omo I remains – and Homo sapiens as a species. Earlier attempts to date the fossils suggested they were less than 200,000 years old, but the new research shows they must be older than a colossal volcanic eruption that took place 230,000 years ago. The results* are reported in the journal Nature.

The Omo I remains were found in the Omo Kibish Formation in southwestern Ethiopia, within the East African Rift valley. The region is an area of high volcanic activity, and a rich source of early human remains and artifacts such as stone tools. By dating the layers of volcanic ash above and below where archaeological and fossil materials are found, scientists identified Omo I as the earliest evidence of our species, Homo sapiens.

“Using these methods, the generally accepted age of the Omo fossils is under 200,000 years, but there’s been a lot of uncertainty around this date,” said Dr Céline Vidal from Cambridge’s Department of Geography, the paper’s lead author. “The fossils were found in a sequence, below a thick layer of volcanic ash that nobody had managed to date with radiometric techniques because the ash is too fine-grained.”

As part of a four-year project led by Professor Clive Oppenheimer, Vidal and her colleagues have been attempting to date all the major volcanic eruptions in the Ethiopian Rift around the time of the emergence of Homo sapiens, a period known as the late Middle Pleistocene.

The researchers collected pumice rock samples from the volcanic deposits and ground them down to sub-millimeter size. “Each eruption has its own fingerprint – its own evolutionary story below the surface, which is determined by the pathway the magma followed,” said Vidal. “Once you’ve crushed the rock, you free the minerals within, and then you can date them, and identify the chemical signature of the volcanic glass that holds the minerals together.”

The researchers carried out new geochemical analysis to link the fingerprint of the thick volcanic ash layer from the Kamoya Hominin Site (KHS ash) with an eruption of the Shala volcano, more than 400 kilometers away. The team then dated pumice samples from the volcano to 230,000 years ago. Since the Omo I fossils were found deeper than this particular ash layer, they must be more than 230,000 years old.

“First I found there was a geochemical match, but we didn’t have the age of the Shala eruption,” said Vidal. “I immediately sent the samples of the Shala volcano to our colleagues in Glasgow so they could measure the age of the rocks. When I received the results and found out that the oldest Homo sapiens from the region were older than previously assumed, I was really excited.”

“The Omo Kibish Formation is an extensive sedimentary deposit which has been barely accessed and investigated in the past,” said co-author and co-leader of the field investigation Professor Asfawossen Asrat from Addis Ababa University in Ethiopia, who is currently at BIUST in Botswana. “Our closer look into the stratigraphy of the Omo Kibish Formation, particularly the ash layers, allowed us to push the age of the oldest Homo sapiens in the region to at least 230,000 years.”

“Unlike other Middle Pleistocene fossils which are thought to belong to the early stages of the Homo sapiens lineage, Omo I possesses unequivocal modern human characteristics, such as a tall and globular cranial vault and a chin,” said co-author Dr Aurélien Mounier from the Musée de l’Homme in Paris. “The new date estimate, de facto, makes it the oldest unchallenged Homo sapiens in Africa.”

The researchers say that while this study shows a new minimum age for Homo sapiens in eastern Africa, it’s possible that new finds and new studies may extend the age of our species even further back in time.

“We can only date humanity based on the fossils that we have, so it’s impossible to say that this is the definitive age of our species,” said Vidal. “The study of human evolution is always in motion: boundaries and timelines change as our understanding improves. But these fossils show just how resilient humans are: that we survived, thrived and migrated in an area that was so prone to natural disasters.”

“It’s probably no coincidence that our earliest ancestors lived in such a geologically active rift valley – it collected rainfall in lakes, providing fresh water and attracted animals, and served as a natural migration corridor stretching thousands of kilometers,” said Oppenheimer. “The volcanoes provided fantastic materials to make stone tools and from time to time we had to develop our cognitive skills when large eruptions transformed the landscape.”

“Our forensic approach provides a new minimum age for Homo sapiens in eastern Africa, but the challenge still remains to provide a cap, a maximum age, for their emergence, which is widely believed to have taken place in this region,” said co-author Professor Christine Lane, head of the Cambridge Tephra Laboratory where much of the work was carried out. “It’s possible that new finds and new studies may extend the age of our species even further back in time.”

“There are many other ash layers we are trying to correlate with eruptions of the Ethiopian Rift and ash deposits from other sedimentary formations,” said Vidal. “In time, we hope to better constrain the age of other fossils in the region.”

The research was supported in part by the Leverhulme Trust, the Cambridge-Africa ALBORADA Research Fund and the Natural Environment Research Council. Céline Vidal is a Fellow of Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge.

_____________________________

The Omo Kibish Formation in southwestern Ethiopia, within the East African Rift valley. The region is an area of high volcanic activity, and a rich source of early human remains and artifacts such as stone tools. Céline Vidal

_____________________________

Researchers at the Omo Kibish Formation in southwestern Ethiopia, within the East African Rift valley. The region is an area of high volcanic activity, and a rich source of early human remains and artifacts such as stone tools. Céline Vidal

_____________________________

Article Source: UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE news release

_____________________________
Advertisement

HS2 archaeologists uncover vast Roman trading settlement in Northamptonshire

Archaeologists working for HS2 Ltd have uncovered one of the most significant archaeological sites on the project to date near a small village in South Northamptonshire. Over the past twelve months, a team of around 80 archaeologists from MOLA Headland Infrastructure have been excavating an Iron Age village which developed into a wealthy Roman trading town.

The presence of such a significant archaeological site in the area has been known since the 18th century, and initial survey and analysis by HS2 gave some indication of what could be discovered there. However, the scale and quality of the discoveries on site have surpassed expectations.

The original use of the site, known as Blackgrounds after the black soil found there, began in the Iron Age when it was a village formed of over 30 roundhouses, which have been uncovered alongside an Iron Age road. Evidence from the dig shows that the settlement expanded over time becoming more prosperous during the Roman period, with new stone buildings and new roads emerging.

Considering the close proximity of the Iron Age remains, the archaeological team believe it is likely that local inhabitants continued to live at the site into the Roman period and adapted to a new way of life. This ‘Romanization’ included taking on Roman customs, products and building techniques.

Running through the site is a 10m wide Roman road which is exceptional in its size. It indicates that the settlement would have been very busy with carts simultaneously coming and going to load and unload goods. The wealth of the settlement is likely to have been based on trade, both from the nearby River Cherwell and via the Roman road. Over 300 Roman coins, discovered as if lost or discarded, have been recovered, an indication that a significant volume of commerce was passing through this area.

The layout of the site suggests the settlement was split into different areas, with foundations uncovered of buildings used for domestic purposes, as well as more industrial practices. At its peak during the Roman age, Blackgrounds would have been a bustling and busy area, shown through the evidence of workshops, kilns, and several beautifully preserved wells, uncovered by HS2 archaeologists. In one area of the site, the earth has been preserved with a fiery red color, indicating that the area would have been used for activities involving burning, such as bread making, foundries for metal work, or a pottery kiln.  

Speaking about the incredible site, James West, MOLA Site Manager said:

“This is certainly one of the most impressive sites MOLA Headland Infrastructure has discovered whilst working on the HS2 scheme. A particular highlight for me has been understanding the emerging story of Blackgrounds, which we now know spans multiple time periods. Uncovering such a well-preserved and large Roman road, as well as so many high quality finds has been extraordinary and tells us so much about the people who lived here. The site really does have the potential to transform our understanding of the Roman landscape in the region and beyond.”

Alongside coinage, the wealth of the settlement’s inhabitants can be seen in the finds uncovered during the dig, which include glass vessels, highly decorative pottery, jewelry and even evidence of make-up. Traces of the mineral galena, lead sulphide, was found on the site – a substance that was crushed and mixed with oil as make up.

A particularly interesting discovery in the dig has been half a set of shackles, similar to those recently found at an excavation in Rutland. Unlike those uncovered in Rutland, the shackles found at Blackgrounds are not associated with a burial but may suggest the presence of either criminal activity or slave labor.

The removed artifacts are being cleaned and analyzed by specialists from MOLA Headland Infrastructure and the details of the buildings and layout of the settlement are being carefully mapped. Blackgrounds is one of over 100 archaeological sites that HS2 has examined since 2018 between London and Birmingham, which combined provide a detailed insight into the rich history of Britain.

Mike Court, Lead Archaeologist for HS2 Ltd, said:

“As we near the end of our archaeological field work between London and Birmingham, we have made some unprecedented discoveries, which we will continue to share with communities near our works. The opportunity to carefully examine a site such as Blackgrounds, and map out a long history of the site, brought to life through artifacts, building remains and roads, has enabled us to provide a more in depth understanding of what life was like in rural South Northamptonshire in the Iron and Roman Age.”

The history of the site, from the Iron Age to the Roman era, features in the new BBC Digging for Britain series, hosted by Professor Alice Roberts. The episode featuring the Blackgrounds dig will air on BBC Two on Tuesday 11th January at 8pm.

_______________________________

James West, Site Manager MOLA, by one of four wells uncovered during the archaeological excavation of a wealthy Roman trading settlement, known as Blackgrounds, in South Northamptonshire. Courtesy HS2 Ltd.

_______________________________

Image of a roman wall, uncovered during the archaeological excavation of a wealthy Roman trading settlement, known as Blackgrounds, in South Northamptonshire. Courtesy HS2 Ltd

_______________________________

Ariel view of archaeological excavation of a wealthy Roman trading settlement, known as Blackgrounds, in South Northamptonshire. Courtesy HS2 Ltd

_______________________________

Walls of a domestic building uncovered during the archaeological excavation of a wealthy Roman trading settlement, known as Blackgrounds, in South Northamptonshire. Courtesy HS2 Ltd

_______________________________

Archaeologist holding a Roman pot uncovered during the archaeological excavation of a wealthy Roman trading settlement, known as Blackgrounds, in South Northamptonshire. Courtesy HS2 Ltd

_______________________________

Decorative Roman pottery uncovered during the archaeology excavation at Blackgrounds, Chipping Warden, Northamptonshire-14. Courtesy HS2 Ltd

_______________________________

Roman cremation urns uncovered during the archaeology excavation at Blackgrounds, Chipping Warden, Northamptonshire-11. Courtesy HS2 Ltd

_______________________________

Article Source: HS2 Ltd news release.

_______________________________

Advertisement